1. bookVolume 9 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
21 Jun 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Observations from the Analysis of Searching Peak of Tension Test (SPOT) Charts

Published Online: 05 May 2015
Page range: 25 - 52
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
21 Jun 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

(1) Abrams S. (1989), Th e complete polygraph handbook, Lexington, Lexington Books. Search in Google Scholar

(2) Ansley N. (1992), Th e History and Accuracy of Guilty Knowledge and Peak of Tension Tests, Polygraph, Vol. 21, No. 3. Search in Google Scholar

(3) Ansley N. (1998), Question formulation, Polygraph, Vol. 27, No. 3. Search in Google Scholar

(4) Backster C. (1969), Standardized polygraph examination notepack, San Diego, Backster Associates. Search in Google Scholar

(5) Dufek M., Widacki J., Valkowa V. (1975), Eksperymentalne badania przydatności poligrafu do przeszukania pomieszczeń, Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii, Vol. 25, No. 2. Search in Google Scholar

(6) Federal Psychophysiological Detection of Deception Examiner Handbook (2011), Polygraph, Vol. 40, No 1. Special Edition. Search in Google Scholar

(7) Harrelson L. (1964), Th e Polygraph. Interrogation, Chicago. Search in Google Scholar

(8) Hikita Y., Suzuki A. (1965), Construction and Interviewing of Probing Peak of Tension Tests for Some Other Crime Suspected and Their Results. Research Materials, No. 35. Polygraph Reports, National Research Institute of Police Science. Search in Google Scholar

(9) Hikita Y. (1969), Results of Probing Peak of Tension Tests Used in Other Crimes and Its Relation to the Suspected Conditions, Research Materials, No. 53, Polygraph Reports, National Research Institute of Police Science. Search in Google Scholar

(10) Jaworski R. (2001), Application of Situational Sequencing Test in the Case of Police Officers Suspected of Murder and POT Tests as ‘Knowledge of the Perpetrator Test’, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 51, No. 2. Search in Google Scholar

(11) Jaworski R. (2003), Th e Significance of Situational Sequencing Tests in Establishing the Participation of Two Persons in a Murder Case and Hiding the Corpse, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 53, No. 2. Search in Google Scholar

(12) Jaworski R. (2006), Further Investigation Supports the Accuracy of Polygraph Examinations, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 56, No. 5.Search in Google Scholar

(13) Jaworski R. (2008), Multi-subject polygraph examination, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego [Wrocław University Press], Wrocław.Search in Google Scholar

(14) Jaworski R. (2008), Th e validity of Polygraph Examination of an Innocent Person and a Perpetrator Administered Several Years after a Murder, European Polygraph, Vol. 1, No. 3. Search in Google Scholar

(15) Jaworski R. (2011), Personalization and Calibration of the Control Question in the Control Question Test, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 61, No. 5. Search in Google Scholar

(16) Johnston A. (1958), Th e magic lie detector, Saturday Evening Post, April 1944; quoted from: Academy Lectures on Lie-Detection, Vol. 2, Springfield [about Leonard Keeler]. Search in Google Scholar

(17) Lykken D. (1981), A tremor in the blood, Perseus Books, New York. Search in Google Scholar

(18) Matte J.A. (1996), Forensic Psychophysiology. Using the Polygraph. Scientific Truth Verification - Lie Detection. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, New York. Search in Google Scholar

(19) Nakayama M. (2002), Practical Use of the Concealed Information Test for Criminal Investigation in Japan [in:] M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press, London. Search in Google Scholar

(20) National Research Council (2003), Th e Polygraph and Lie Detection, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC, Th e National Academies Press. Search in Google Scholar

(21) Ohkawa H. (1963), Comparison of Physiological Response of ‘Yes’, ‘No’, and ‘Mute’ Conditions In Peak of Tension Test. Reports of the National Institute of Police Science, Japan, No. 1-4. Search in Google Scholar

(22) Ohmishi K., Matsuno K., Arasuna M., Suzuki A. (1976), Th e objective Analysis of Physiological Indices in the Field Detection of Deception, Reports of the National Institute of Police Science, Vol. 29, No. 3. Search in Google Scholar

(23) Reid J., Inbau F.E. (1977), Truth and Deception: Th e Polygraph (‘Lie Detector’) Technique, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins. Search in Google Scholar

(24) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2008), Th e Event Knowledge Test (EKT) in Polygraph Examination (in case murder), European Polygraph, Vol. 2, No. 2 (4). Search in Google Scholar

(25) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2008), The Event Knowledge Test (EKT) In Polygraph Examination, European Polygraph, Vol. 2, No. 3-4 (5-6). Search in Google Scholar

(26) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2011), A Little About Memory Traces, European Polygraph, Vol. 5, No. 1 (15). Search in Google Scholar

(27) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A., Knyazev V. (2012), Tests with Numbers, European Polygraph, Vol. 6, No. 1 (19). Search in Google Scholar

(28) Widacki J. (1981), Wprowadzenie do problematyki badań poligraficznych, Warszawa. Search in Google Scholar

(29) Wilkerson O.M. (1978), Th e Peak of Tension Tests Utilized in the Ashmore Kidnapping, Polygraph, Vol. 7, No. 1. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo