1. bookVolume 61 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-8608
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Microsatellite based genetic variation among the buffalo breed populations in Pakistan

Published Online: 27 Dec 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 61 (2017) - Issue 4 (December 2017)
Page range: 535 - 542
Received: 11 Jul 2017
Accepted: 13 Nov 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-8608
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Introduction: Eight microsatellite loci were used to define genetic diversity among five native water buffalo breeds in Pakistan.

Material and Methods: Blood samples (10 mL) from 25 buffaloes of each of the Nili, Ravi, Nili-Ravi, Kundhi, and Azi-Kheli breeds were collected aseptically from the jugular vein into 50 ml Falcon tubes containing 200 μl of 0.5 M EDTA. The phenol-chloroform method was used to extract DNA and the regions were amplified for microsatellite analysis. The eight microsatellite markers ETH10, INRA005, ILSTS029, ILSTS033, ILSTS049, ILSTS052, ETH225, and CSSM66 were analysed.

Results: The effective number of alleles across all loci was as usual lower than the observed values with a mean value of 2.52 alleles per locus. The overall allele frequency varied from 0.0041 for alleles B, I, and J over respective loci ILSTS052, INRA005, and ILSTS029 to 0.80 for allele H over locus ILSTS029. The average observed and expected heterozygosity values across all polymorphic loci in all studied buffalo breeds were 0.43 and 0.53, respectively. The overall value for polymorphic information content of considered microsatellite markers was 0.53, suggesting their appropriateness for genetic diversity analysis in buffalo. The mean Fis value was 0.13 and all loci except ILSTS049 were found significantly deviated from HWE, most likely due to non-random breeding. The five buffalo populations were genetically less diverse as indicated by a small mean Fst value (0.07). The average gene flow (Nm) indicative for population migration was calculated as 3.31. Nei’s original measures of genetic distance (Ds) revealed ancient divergence of the Nili and Azi-Kheli breeds (Ds = 0.1747) and recent divergence of the Nili and Ravi breeds (Ds = 0.0374).

Conclusion: These estimates of genetic diversity were seen to coincide with phenotypic differentiation among the studied buffalo breeds. The present study reports the first microsatellite marker-based genetic diversity analysis in Pakistani buffalo breeds, and might facilitate similar studies in other livestock breeds of Pakistan.

Keywords

1. Abbas G.: Phylogenetic relationship among buffalo breeds of Pakistan using RAPD analysis. MSc Thesis. Depart. Anim. Breed. Genet., Univ. Agri. Faisalabad, Pakistan 2007.Search in Google Scholar

2. Arora R., Lakhchaura P.R.B., Tantia M.S., Vijh R.K.: Genetic diversity analysis of two buffalo populations of northern India using microsatellite markers. J Anim Breed Genet 2004, 121, 111–118.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2004.00451.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Babar M.E., Imran M., Nawaz M., Benkel B.F., Farid H., Jabeen R., Abdullah M., Javed M., Javed M.: Genetic identification of three Pakistani buffalo breeds through a homozygosity pattern in the PRKAG3 gene. Pak J Zool 2008, 40, 409–415.Search in Google Scholar

4. Barker J.S.F., Moore S.S., Hetzel D.J.S., Evans D., Tan S.G., Byrne K.: Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): microsatellite variation and a comparison with protein-coding loci. Anim Genet 1997, 28, 103–115.10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00085.x9172308Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M., Davis R.W.: Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 1980, 32, 314–331.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bruford M.W., Bradley D.G., Luikart G.: DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nature Rev Genet 2003, 4, 900–910.10.1038/nrg120314634637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Cañón J., García D., García-Atance M.A., Obexer-Ruff G., Lenstra J.A., Ajmone-Marsan P., Dunner S.: Geographical partitioning of goat diversity in Europe and the Middle East. Anim Genet 2006, 37 327–334.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01461.x16879341Search in Google Scholar

8. Consortium E.C.G.D.: Marker-assisted conservation of European cattle breeds: an evaluation. Anim Genet 2006, 37, 475–481.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01511.x16978177Search in Google Scholar

9. Crawford A.M., Cuthbertson R.P.: Mutations in sheep microsatellites. Genome Res 1996, 6, 876–879.10.1101/gr.6.9.8768889555Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Elbeltagy A.R., Galal S., Abdelsalam A.Z., El-Keraby F.E., Blasi M., Mohamed M.M.: Biodiversity in Mediterranean buffalo using two microsatellite multiplexes. Livest Sci 2008, 114, 341–346.10.1016/j.livsci.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar

11. FAO: Animal production and health guidelines. Molecular genetic characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

12. GOP: GEconomic Survey, 2006–2007. Economic Affairs Division, Government of Pakistan, Isalamabad 2007.Search in Google Scholar

13. GOP: Economic Survey, 2007–2008. Economic Affairs Division, Government of Pakistan, Isalamabad 2008.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hillel J., Groenen M.A.M., Tixier-Boichard M., Korol A.B., David L., Kirzhner V.M., Burke T., Barre-Dirie A., Crooijmans R.P.M.A., Elo K., Feldman M.W., Freidlin P.J., Mäki-Tanila A, Oortwijn M., Thomson P., Vignal A., Wimmers K., Weigend S.: Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol 2003, 35, 533–357.10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533269798012939204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Kathiravan P., Mishra B.P., Kataria R.S., Sadana D.K.: Evaluation of genetic architecture and mutation drift equilibrium of Marathwada buffalo population in Central India. Livest Sci 2008, 5, 13–17.Search in Google Scholar

16. Khan M.S., Ahmad N., Khan M.A.: Genetic resources and diversity in dairy buffaloes of Pakistan. Pak Vet J 2007, 27, 201–207.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kimura M., Crow J.F.: The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 1964, 49, 725–738.10.1093/genetics/49.4.725121060914156929Search in Google Scholar

18. Kumar S., Gupta J., Kumar N., Dikshit K., Navani N., Jain P., Nagarajan M.: Genetic variation and relationships among eight Indian riverine buffalo breeds. Mol Ecol 2006, 15, 593–600.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02837.x16499687Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Levene H.: On a matching problem in genetics. Ann Math Stat 1949, 20, 91–94.10.1214/aoms/1177730093Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Lindgren G., Backström N., Swinburne J., Hellborg L., Einarsson A., Sandberg K., Cothran G., Vilà C., Binns M., Ellegren H.: Limited number of patrilines in horse domestication. Nature Genet 2004, 36, 335–336.10.1038/ng1326Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Manly B.F.J.: The statistics of natural selection on animal populations. Chapman and Hall, London 1985.10.1007/978-94-009-4840-2Search in Google Scholar

22. Michelizzi V.N., Dodson M.V., Pan Z., Amaral M.E.J., Michal J.J., McLean D.J., Womack J.E., Jiang Z.: Water buffalo genome science comes of age. Int Biol Sci 2010, 6, 333–349.10.7150/ijbs.6.333Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Mishra B.P., Kataria R.S., Bulandi S.S., Prakash B., Kathiravan P., Mukesh M., Sadana D.K.: Riverine status and genetic structure of Chilika buffalo of eastern India as inferred from cytogenetic and molecular marker-based analysis. J Anim Breed Genet 2009, 126, 69–79.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00759.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Moioli B., Georgoudis A., Napolitano F., Catillo G., Giubilei E., Lgda C., Hassanane M.: Genetic diversity between Italian, Greek, and Egyptian buffalo populations. Live Prod Sci 2001, 70, 203–211.10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00175-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Mukesh M., Sodhi M., Bhatia S., Mishra B.P.: Genetic diversity of Indian native cattle breeds as analyzed with 20 microsatellite loci. J Anim Breed Genet 2004, 121, 416–424.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2004.00468.xSearch in Google Scholar

26. Nei M.: Genetic distance between populations. Amer Nat 1972, 106, 283–292.10.1086/282771Search in Google Scholar

27. Nei M.: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 1973, 70, 3321–3323.10.1073/pnas.70.12.33214272284519626Search in Google Scholar

28. Nei M.: Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance. In: Population Genetics and Ecology. Edited by Karlin S., Nevo E., Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 723–766.10.1016/B978-0-12-398560-6.50036-5Search in Google Scholar

29. Nei M.: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 1978, 89, 583–590.10.1093/genetics/89.3.583121385517248844Search in Google Scholar

30. Peter C., Bruford M., Perez T., Dalamitra S., Hewitt G., Erhardt G.: Genetic diversity and subdivision of 57 European and Middle-Eastern sheep breeds. Anim Genet 2007, 38, 37–44.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01561.x17257186Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Sajid I.A.: Molecular genetic variation among Nili, Ravi and Nili-Ravi buffalo breeds. MSc Thesis. Dept. Anim. Breed. Genet., Univ. Agri. Faisalabad, Pakistan, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

32. Sambrook J., Russell D.W.: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 2001.Search in Google Scholar

33. SanCristobal M., Chevalet C., Haley C.S., Joosten R., Rattink A.P., Harlizius B., Groen M.A.M, Amigues Y., Boscher M.Y., Russell G., Law A., Davoli R., Russo V., Désautés A., Fimland E., Bagga M., Delgado J.V., Vega-Pla J.L., Martinez A.M., Ramos M., Glodek P., Meyer J.N., Gandini G.C., Matassino D., Plastow G.S., Siggens K.W., Laval G., Archibald A.L., Milan D., Hammond K., Cardellino R.: Genetic diversity within and between European pig breeds using microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2006, 37, 189–198.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01385.x16734675Search in Google Scholar

34. Toro M.A., Fernández J., Caballero J.: Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. Livest Sci 2009, 120, 174–195.10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.003Search in Google Scholar

35. Weir B.S.: Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 1979, 35, 235–254.10.2307/2529947Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Yeh F., Boyle C., Rongcai T., Ye Z.Y., Xian J.M.: A Microsoft window based free ware for population genetic analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton (available at: http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/). 1999.Search in Google Scholar

37. Zhang Y., Sun D., Yu Y., Zhang Y.: Genetic diversity and differentiation of Chinese domestic buffalo based on 30 microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2007, 38, 569–575.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01648.x17980000Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo