1. bookVolume 15 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Ortega y Gasset on Georg Cantor’s Theory of Transfinite Numbers

Published Online: 30 Apr 2016
Page range: 46 - 70
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Ortega y Gasset is known for his philosophy of life and his effort to propose an alternative to both realism and idealism. The goal of this article is to focus on an unfamiliar aspect of his thought. The focus will be given to Ortega’s interpretation of the advancements in modern mathematics in general and Cantor’s theory of transfinite numbers in particular. The main argument is that Ortega acknowledged the historical importance of the Cantor’s Set Theory, analyzed it and articulated a response to it. In his writings he referred many times to the advancements in modern mathematics and argued that mathematics should be based on the intuition of counting. In response to Cantor’s mathematics Ortega presented what he defined as an ‘absolute positivism’. In this theory he did not mean to naturalize cognition or to follow the guidelines of the Comte’s positivism, on the contrary. His aim was to present an alternative to Cantor’s mathematics by claiming that mathematicians are allowed to deal only with objects that are immediately present and observable to intuition. Ortega argued that the infinite set cannot be present to the intuition and therefore there is no use to differentiate between cardinals of different infinite sets.

Keywords

Beck, M. and Geoghegan, R., 2011, The Art of Proof. Basic Training for Deeper Mathematics, New York, Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, G., 2015, “Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, in Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers. Translated by Philip E.B. Jourdain, Dover Publications, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Dauben, J.W., 1989, Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Search in Google Scholar

Einstein, A., 2007, ‘Geometry and Experience’, An expanded form of Address to the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin of January 27th, 1921. In: The Essential Einstein. His Greatest Works. Edited, with commentary by Stephen Hawking, (Penguin Books)Search in Google Scholar

Harold, E., 1988, Kronecker’s Place in History. In: “History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics”, W. Aspray and P. Kitcher, eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 11, Univ. of Minn. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gillies, D.A., 1980, “Brouwer’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Review Article”. In: “Erkenntnis 15, 105-126.Search in Google Scholar

Gillman, L., 2012, “Two Classical Surprises Concerning the Axiom of Choice and the Continuum Hypothesis”, In: The Mathematical Association of America (Monthly 109).Search in Google Scholar

Jech, T., 2006. Set Theory, The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expended, Berlin Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Morón, A., 1968, El sistema de Ortega y Gasset, Madrid, Ediciones Alcalá.Search in Google Scholar

Natorp, P., 1912, Kant und die Marburger Schule, in Kant Studien 17 (1-3): 193-221, Wurzburg, Kabitsch.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset, J., 1983, En torno a Galileo (1933), Obras completas. Tomo V, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset 1987, Cartas de un joven español, Madrid, El Arquero.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset 1992a, La idea de principio en Leibniz y la evolución de la teoría deductiva, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset 1992b, La idea de principio en Leibniz y la evolución de la teoría deductiva, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset 1995, Qué es filosofía? (Introducción: Ignacio Sánchez Cámara), Editorial Espasa Calpe, Madrid (1929).Search in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset 2004, “Vicistudes en las ciencies” (1930), in Meditacion de la tecnica y otros ensyaos sobre ciencia y filosofía, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H., The Philosophy of Space and Time. Translated by Maria Reichenbach and John Freund with Introduction and remarks by Rudolf Carnap, New York, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B., 1917, “Mathematics and the Metaphysicians”, In: Mysticism and Logic, London, George Allen.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 2009, “Mathematics and Logic” in The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, London, New York, Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 2010, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London, George Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez, C., 1995, Introducción a Qué es filosofía (in Qué es filosofía) Espasa Calpe, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

San Martín, J,. 1994, Ensayos sobre Ortega, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Thiele, R., 2005, “Georg Cantor (1845-1918)”, In: Mathematics and the Divine, Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 525-547.Search in Google Scholar

Trudeau, R.J., 1993, Introduction to Graph Theory, New York. Dover Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Winskel, G., 2010, Set Theory for Computer Science, https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~gw104/STfCS2010.pdf. (Accessed 6 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Zamora Bonilla, J., 2005, El impulse orteguiano a la ciencia espanola, Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo