1. bookVolume 66 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1899-4849
First Published
31 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Why Pluralism, Relativism, and Panthareism: An Ethical Landscape with Sport in the Background*

Published Online: 10 Jul 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 66 (2015) - Issue 1 (June 2015)
Page range: 75 - 87
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1899-4849
First Published
31 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In reference to the monograph entitled “Sports and Ethics: Philosophical Studies”, published in the “Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research” quarterly (2014, vol. 62), and in particular in reference to the paper entitled “The Normative Ethics and Sport” (Kosiewicz, 2014, pp. 5-22), the article presents new and at the same time supplementary views on the relationships between sports and normative ethics. The main objective of the paper is to provide a rationale as to why these relationships may be viewed in the context of the assumptions of ethical pluralism, ethical relativism, ethical panthareism, and axionormative negationism.

The text is of a strictly cognitive and extra-ideological nature and it attempts to avoid moral valuation, moralism, and moralizing. The view it postulates is also labeled as ethical negationism, which rejects the necessity for external support and enhancement of sports rivalry rules with moral principles. It assumes that regulations, book rules, and game rules as well as the principles of sports rivalry ought to be of an entirely amoral character, independent of ethics.

The article suggests minimizing the impact of moral postulates on sport. It postulates a need for widespread propagation of this point of view in competitive, professional, spectator, and Olympic sport disciplines, as well as in top-level sports or elite sports. The views presented in the paper point to the need to separate normative ethics from sports as far as it is at all possible in contemporary sports indoctrinated with obligations or attitudes of a moral tenor. This is because normative ethics – according to the author - is relative ethics, depending on an unlimited number of variables, e.g., various social contexts or individual points of view.

The text engages in a polemic with colloquial and evaluative opinions of those sports fans who by all means strive to bolster its formal, functional, and axiological status. A significant part of them erroneously attributes sports to an extraordinary moral mission related to promoting an intuitively understood good with a religious and extra-confessional tenor.

Keywords

Bauman, Z. (1996). Etyka ponowoczesna /Postmodern Ethics/. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalizacja. I co z tego dla ludzi wynika /Globalization and Human Coseqences/. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo: PIW.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2006). Moralność w niestabilnym świecie /Morality in an Unstable World/. Poznań: Księgarnia św. Wojciecha.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2007). Szanse etyki w globalnym świecie /Chances of Ethics in the Global World/. Translated on the basis of: Lectures in the Institute for the Human Sciences. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.Search in Google Scholar

Benisz, H. (1997). Od pierwszego do drugiego „przewrotu kopernikańskiego”. Sformułowanie podstaw nowej filozofii jako rezultatu twórczej polemiki Nietzschego z poglądami Kanta /From the First to the Second ‘Copernican Revolution’. Formulating the Bases of New Philosophy as a Result of Nietzsche’s Creative Polemic with Kantian Views/. Edukacja Filozoficzna /Philosophical Education/ 23, pp. 145-159.Search in Google Scholar

Copleston, F. (1963). A History of Philosophy. Fichte to Nietzsche. Vol. 7. Great Britain: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Czerwiński, M. (1986), Przedmowa /Preface/. In T. Hołówka, Myślenie potoczne /Colloquial Thinking/. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PIW, pp. 5-12.Search in Google Scholar

Hołówka, T. (1986). Myślenie potoczne /Colloquial Thinking/. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PIW.Search in Google Scholar

Kosiewicz, J. (1989). W poszukiwaniu źródła i sensu wartości /In Search for the Source and Sense of Values/. Człowiek i Światopogląd /The Human and the Worldview/ 1 (376), pp. 83-94.Search in Google Scholar

Kosiewicz, J. (2009). Sokrates Attitude towards Knowledge and Morality. In: Greek Philosophy and the Issue of our Age. Athens: International Association of Greek Philosophy; International Center of Greek Philosophy and Culture & K.B, pp. 104-123.Search in Google Scholar

Kosiewicz, J. (2011). Considerations on General Methodological Assumptions of the Sciences of Sport. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, LVI, 65-101. DOI: 10.2478(v10141-012-0026-z.Search in Google Scholar

Kosiewicz, J. (2014). Normative Ethics and Sport: A Moral Manifesto. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, LXII, 5-22. DOI: 10.2478/pcssr-2014-0008.10.2478/pcssr-2014-0008Search in Google Scholar

Krokiewicz, A. (1995). Zarys filozofii greckiej /An Outline of Greek Philosophy/. Warszawa: Fundacja ALETHEIA, pp. 231-237.Search in Google Scholar

Plato (2002). Theajtet /Theaetetus/. Kęty: ANTYK.Search in Google Scholar

Plato (2014). https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71th/theaetetus.html – access: April 18, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Plato (1995). Protagoras. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Protagoras, O bogach /On the Gods/. This work was burned, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Protagoras, Prawda lub obuchy (Aletheia e kataballontes) /Truth or Refutations/. This work was unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Rosik, S. (1986). Sytuacjonizm etyczny a chrześcijańska roztropność chrześcijańska /Ethical Situationism and Christian Prudence/. Poznań: Księgarnia Świętego Wojciecha.Search in Google Scholar

Reid, T. (1764). Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense.10.1037/11974-000Search in Google Scholar

Reid, T. (2010-2015). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/reid1785essay6.pdf – access: April 18, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Sartre, J-P. (1985). Człowiek nie może uciec od odpowiedzialności /Man Cannot Escape Responsibility/. In: Kosiewicz, J. Współczesna filozofia człowieka /Contemporary Philosophy of Man/. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo AWF, pp. 40-50.Search in Google Scholar

Stróżewski, W. (1981). Istnienie i wartość /Existence and Value/. Kraków: Wydawnictwo ZNAK, pp. 176 -179.Search in Google Scholar

The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense (1960). Oxford: Oxford University.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo