1. bookVolume 17 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A Quality Assessment Directory for Evaluating Multi-functional Public Spaces

Published Online: 22 Dec 2021
Page range: 136 - 151
Received: 18 Apr 2021
Accepted: 14 Nov 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-8764
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Public spaces facilitate opportunities for social interaction and promote social life. The social-spatial complexity of public spaces can be explored through the relationship between built forms and users’ daily social activities. The contemporary needs of users have retrofitted or replaced the controversial public spaces such as streets, depriving the prime function of sustaining and facilitating social life. Thus, any factors influencing users’ social/public life impact the quality of public spaces. Also, contextualization and definition of public spaces necessitate an evaluation of their quality. The lack of a quality assessment directory (QAD) for evaluating multi-functional public spaces motivated us to address it. To achieve the aim, this research has conducted a systematic literature review applying the content analysis to explore the principles and indicators influencing and enhancing social interactions in multi-functional public space design and then performed a normalization analysis to measure the weight of each indicator. The QAD constitutes five criteria (C1 – Inclusiveness, C2 – Desirable activities, C3 – Comfort, C4 – Safety, C5 – Pleasurability), and forty-two (42) embedded sub-criteria. The research found that Inclusiveness (WnC1 = 4.38) and Pleasurability (WnC2 = 3.88) have received the highest weights. Also, the research found that the sub-criteria ‘Physical/visual connection or openness to adjacent spaces’ (WnSc.4.1 = 1.00), ‘Users of diverse ages’ and ‘Community gathering third places’ (Wn = 0.750) have received the highest weights. Using such a QAD, urban professionals can quantify the effectiveness and efficiency of public spaces’ environmental and physical qualities in promoting social interactions and sociability.

Keywords

1. Mehta, V. Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 19, no. 1, 2014, pp. 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.85469810.1080/13574809.2013.854698 Search in Google Scholar

2. Androulaki, M., Frangedaki, E., Antoniadis, P. Optimization of public spaces through network potentials of communities. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 44, 2020, pp. 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.23410.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.234 Search in Google Scholar

3. Banerjee, T. The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 67, 2007, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436010897635210.1080/01944360108976352 Search in Google Scholar

4. Chavoya Gama, J. I. Public Space and Identity in the Coastal Tourist City, Puerto Vallarta-Bay of Banderas, Mexico Case. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment – Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno, vol. 11, no. 31, 2016, pp. 177–190. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.11.31.465810.5821/ace.11.31.4658 Search in Google Scholar

5. Frank, K., Stevens, Q. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. New York: Routledge, 2007. 303 p. ISBN 978-0415701174. Search in Google Scholar

6. Cooper Marcus, C., Francis, M. People Places: Design guidelines for urban open space (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1998. 384 p. ISBN 978-0471288336. Search in Google Scholar

7. UN Women. Building Safe and Inclusive Cities for Women : a Practical Guide. New Delhi: Jagori, 2011. 32 p. Search in Google Scholar

8. Ziemeļniece, A. Restoration and Preservation of the Identity of Historical Cultural landscape. Architecture and Urban Planning, vol. 5, 2011, pp. 66–69. Search in Google Scholar

9. Survey of the physical environment in local neighborhoods : Spaces instrument: Observers Manual. Nedlands, Western Australia: The University of Western Australia, 2002. 28 p. [cited 13.07..2021]. https://activelivingresearch.org/sites/activelivingresearch.org/files/SPACES_Observation_Manual.pdf Search in Google Scholar

10. Keyvanfar, A., Shafaghat, A., Abd Majid, M. Z., Lamit, H. B., Hussin, M. W., Ali, K. N. B., Saad, A. D. User satisfaction adaptive behaviors for assessing energy efficient building indoor cooling and lighting environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 39, 2014, pp. 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.09410.1016/j.rser.2014.07.094 Search in Google Scholar

11. Liu, G., Krishnamurthy, S., Van Wesemael, P. Conceptualizing cycling experience in urban design research: a systematic literature review. Applied Mobilities, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, pp. 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2018.149434710.1080/23800127.2018.1494347 Search in Google Scholar

12. Cook, D. J, Mulrow, C. D, Haynes, R. B. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 126, 1997, pp. 364–371. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-0000610.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006 Search in Google Scholar

13. Wolf, F. M, Shea, J. A, Albanese, M. A. Toward setting a research agenda for systematic reviews of evidence of the effects of medical education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, 2001, pp. 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1301_1110.1207/S15328015TLM1301_11 Search in Google Scholar

14. Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, vol. 104, 2019, pp. 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.03910.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 Search in Google Scholar

15. Lievense, A.,Bierma-Zeinstra, S., Verhagen, A., Verhaar, J., Koes, B. Influence of work on the development of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review. The Journal of rheumatology, vol. 28, no. 11, 2001, pp. 2520–2528. PMID: 11708427. Search in Google Scholar

16. Shafaghat, A., Keyvanfar, A., Ferwati, M. S., Alizadeh, T. Enhancing staff ’s satisfaction with comfort toward productivity by sustainable Open Plan Office Design. Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 19, 2015, pp. 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.08.00110.1016/j.scs.2015.08.001 Search in Google Scholar

17. Bell, E., Bryman, A., Harley, B. Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2018. 688 p. ISBN 978-0198809876. Search in Google Scholar

18. White, M. D., Marsh, E. E. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, vol. 55, no. 1, 2006, pp. 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.005310.1353/lib.2006.0053 Search in Google Scholar

19. Van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., van Beukering, P. J. Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 132, 2014, pp. 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.01210.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012 Search in Google Scholar

20. Cervero, R, Kockelman, K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 2, no. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-610.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6 Search in Google Scholar

21. Ewing, R., Connors, M. B., Goates, J. P., Hajrasouliha, A., Neckerman, K., Nelson, A. C., Greene, W. Validating urban design measures. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, 13-1662, 2013. 18 p. Search in Google Scholar

22. Monteiro de Cambra, P. J. Pedestrian Accessibility and Attractiveness Indicators for Walkability Assessment. MSc thesis in Urban Studies and Territorial Management. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 2010 [cited 13.07.2021]. https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/2589873355564/Dissertacao.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

23. Stevenson, D. The City. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. 224 p. ISBN 978-0745648903. Search in Google Scholar

24. Rapoport, A. Culture and built form – a reconsideration. In K. D. Moore ed., Culture–Meaning–Architecture : Critical Reflections on the Work of Amos Rapoport, London: Routledge, 2019, pp. 175–216. ISBN 9781138712324.10.4324/9781315200248-10 Search in Google Scholar

25. Low, S. M. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000. 296 p. ISBN 978-0292747142.10.7560/747135 Search in Google Scholar

26. Furlan, R., Almohannadi, M., Zaina, S., Zaina, S. Integrated Approach for the Improvement of Human Comfort in the Public Realm: The Case of the Corniche, the Linear Urban Link of Doha. American Journal of Sociological Research, vol. 5, no. 4, 2015, pp. 89–100. Search in Google Scholar

27. Madanipour, A. Design of Urban Space : An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process. New York: Wiley, 1996. 254 p. ISBN 978-0471966739. Search in Google Scholar

28. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., Stone, A. M. Public Space. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 420 p. ISBN 978-0521359603. Search in Google Scholar

29. Mitchell, D. T he E nd o f P ublic S pace? P eople’s P ark, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 85, no. 1, 1995, pp. 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.x10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.x Search in Google Scholar

30. Duncan, N. Renegotiating Gender and Sexuality in Public and Private Spaces. In N. Duncan ed., BodySpace : Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 127–145. ISBN 0-415-14441-8.10.4324/9780203974070 Search in Google Scholar

31. Rybczynski, W. The New Downtowns. Atlantic Monthly, vol. 271, 1993, pp. 98–106. Search in Google Scholar

32. Berman, M. Take it to the Streets: Conflict and Community in Public Space. New York: Dissent, 1986. 10 p. Search in Google Scholar

33. Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985. 332 p. ISBN 0-226-02598-5. Search in Google Scholar

34. Oldenburg, R. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House, 1989. 338 p. Search in Google Scholar

35. Furlan, R., Faggion, L. The Development of Vital Precincts In Doha: Urban Regeneration and Socio-Cultural Factors. American Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, 2015, pp. 120–129. Search in Google Scholar

36. Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon Schuster, 2000. 544 p. ISBN 978-0743203043. Search in Google Scholar

37. Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House, 1961. 458 p. ISBN 978-0679741954. Search in Google Scholar

38. Lynch, K. The Image of the City (1st edition). USA: The MIT Press, 1960. 187 p. ISBN 0-262-62001-4. Search in Google Scholar

39. George, V., Steve, T. Assessing the Publicness of Public Space: The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010, pp. 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.50235010.1080/13574809.2010.502350 Search in Google Scholar

40. Hester, R. Sacred Structures and Everyday Life: A Return to Manteo, North Carolina. In D. Seamon ed., Dwelling Seeing and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology, New York: State University of New York Press, 1993, pp. 217–298. ISBN 978-0791412787. Search in Google Scholar

41. McMillan, D. W., Chavis, D. M. Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 14, no. 1, 1986, pp. 6–23.10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I Search in Google Scholar

42. Lofland, L. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1998. 326 p. ISBN 9780202306087. Search in Google Scholar

43. Davis, M., Morrowm, R. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso, 2006. 441 p. ISBN 978-1844675685. Search in Google Scholar

44. Perkins, D. D., Meeks, J. W., Taylor, R. B. The Physical Environment of Street Blocks and Resident Perceptions of Crime and Disorder: Implications for Theory and Measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 12, no. 1, 1992, pp. 21–34.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80294-4 Search in Google Scholar

45. Craig, C. L., R. C. Brownson, S. E. Cragg, Dunn, A. L. Exploring the Effect of the Environment on Physical Activity: A Study Examining Walking to Work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 23, no. 2, 2002, pp. 36–43.10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00472-5 Search in Google Scholar

46. Clark, A., Dornfeld, M. Traffic Calming, Auto-restricted Zones, and Other Traffic Management Techniques: Their Effects on Bicycling and Pedestrians, National bicycling and walking study, Federal Highway Administration Case Study 19. 1994 [online]. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration [cited 13.07.2021]. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/PED_BIKE/docs/case19.pdf Search in Google Scholar

47. Bosselmann, P., Flores, J., Gray, W., Priestley, T., Anderson, R., Arens, E., Dowty, P., So, S., Kim, J. J. Sun, Wind, and Comfort: A Study of Open Spaces and Sidewalks in Four Downtown Areas. 1984 [online]. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, College of Environmental Design, University of California [cited 7.13.2021]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/937953v1 Search in Google Scholar

48. Rapoport, A. Culture and built form: a reconsideration. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000. 277 p. ISBN 9781315200248. Search in Google Scholar

49. Heath, T., Smith, S. and Lim, B. The Complexity of Tall Building Facades. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, vol. 17, 2000, pp. 206–220. Search in Google Scholar

50. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Ehrenfeucht, R. Sidewalks: Conflict and negotiation over public space. MIT Press. 2009, p. 344. doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7423.001.000110.7551/mitpress/7423.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

51. Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., Knuiman, M. Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of environmental psychology, vol. 32, no. 4, 2012, pp. 401–409.10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

52. Johnston, C. What is Social Value? Teaching Heritage. 1992 [cited 13.07.2021]. https://www.contextpl.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/What-is-Social-Value.pdf Search in Google Scholar

53. Sullivan, W. C., Kuo, F. E., Depooter, S. F. T he f ruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and behavior, vol. 36, no. 5, 2004, pp. 678–700.10.1177/0193841X04264945 Search in Google Scholar

54. Gehl, J., Gemzoe, L. New City Spaces. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press. 2000. 264 p. ISBN 978-87-74072-93-5. Search in Google Scholar

55. Granell, C., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., Degbelo, A., Gould, M., Kray, C., Painho, M, Trilles, S. Geo-C: Enabling Open Cities and The Open City Toolkit. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, 2018, pp. 61–68.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W8-61-2018 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo