1. bookVolume 17 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6512
First Published
30 May 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods

Published Online: 09 Dec 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2021) - Issue 2 (December 2021)
Page range: 500 - 512
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6512
First Published
30 May 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article deals with designing and analysing a wrapped geogrid reinforced structure (GRS) with a passive facing system. The analysis has been done using analytical calculation and numerical modelling. The analytical calculations were executed using FINE Geo5 geotechnical software, and numerical modelling was executed using Plaxis 2D software. The analysis is focused mainly on comparing tension forces in geogrids and the stability of the reinforced embankment determined using both computational methods. The deformation analysis was done only using numerical modelling. The numerical modelling allowed for a more detailed analysis of the wrapped GRS. Each construction phase was modelled step by step according to an actual construction procedure. Two complex road embankments supported by GRS were modelled and analysed. The first model consisted of three GRS, which not affected each other. In the second model, the GRS at each side of the embankment influenced each other. The analysis results showed that tension forces in geogrids, determined using both computational methods, can differ significantly from each other. The stability of the reinforced embankment determined using numerical modelling was within the range of 0.87 – 1.22 of the stability determined using analytical calculation. The numerical modelling results showed that the final horizontal deformation of the passive facing is about 2.8 – 3.8 times smaller than the deformation of the wrapped GRS, which occurs during the construction of the embankment.

Keywords

[1] ALLEN, T. M. - BARTHUS, R. J.: Design and Performance of 6.3 m High, Block-Faced Geogrid Wall Designed Using K-Stiffness Method. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 140, Iss. 2, 2014, p. 12, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001013.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001013 Search in Google Scholar

[2] DOLINAJOVA, K. - SNAHNICAN, J.: Geogrid and Double Twist Steel Mesh Reinforced Soil Walls Subjected to High Loads in a Seismic Area. Proceedings of the 12th Slovak Geotechnical Conference: 55 Years of Geotechnical Engineering in Slovakia, 1st-2nd June, 2015, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2015, pp. 79–87. Search in Google Scholar

[3] SCOTLAND, I. - DIXON, N. - FROST, M. - WACKROW, R. - FOWMES, G. - HORGAN, G.: Measuring Deformation Performance of Geogrid Reinforced Structures Using a Terrestrial Laser Scanner. Proceedings of 10th International Conference of Geosynthetics, September 2014, Berlin, Germany, 2014, p. 8, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286860094_Measuring_deformation_performance_of_geogrid_reinforced_structures_using_a_terrestrial_laser_scanner. Search in Google Scholar

[4] SILBER-HASSLACHER, T. - SNAHNICAN, J.: Active and Passive Facing Systems for Reinforced Soil Structures. 13th Geosynthetics Annual Conference 2019, 7-8. February, 2019, Zilina, Slovakia, 2019, p. 9, http://www.geosoul.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/GEOSYNTETIKA2019_ACTIVE-AND-PASSIVE-FACING-SYSTEMS-FOR-REINFORCED-SOIL-STRUCTURES.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[5] BUSSERT, F. - CAVANAUGH, J.: Recent Research and Future Implications of the Actual Behaviour of Geogrids in Reinforced Soil. Proceedings of Earth Retention Conference 3, August 2010, Washington, USA, 2010, pp. 460–477, https://doi.org/10.1061/41128(384)46.10.1061/41128(384)46 Search in Google Scholar

[6] BARNES, G.E.: Soil Mechanics: Principles and Practice. 3rd edition, London: Palgrave, UK, 2010, p. 560. Search in Google Scholar

[7] ALLEN, T. M. - BATHURST, R. J.: Observed Long-term Performance of Geosynthetic Walls and Implications for Design. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 9, Iss. 5–6, 2002, pp. 567–606, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.9.0228.10.1680/gein.9.0228 Search in Google Scholar

[8] ALLEN, T. - BATHURST, R. J.: An Improved Simplified Method for Prediction of Loads in Reinforced Soil Walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 141, Iss. 11, 2015, p. 14, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001355.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001355 Search in Google Scholar

[9] WU, J. T. H.: CTI-UCD-1-94: Design and Construction of Low Cost Retaining Walls: The Next Generation in Technology. Colorado Transport Institute, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1994, p. 152, https://www.codot.gov/programs/research/pdfs/1994-research-reports/retainingwalls.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[10] HRLICH, M. - MIRMORADI, S. H.: Evaluation of the Effects of Facing Stiffness and Toe Resistance on the Behavior of GRS walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 40, 2013, pp. 28–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.012.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.012 Search in Google Scholar

[11] DRUSA, M. - VLCEK, J.: Importance of Results Obtained from Geotechnical Monitoring for Evaluation of Reinforced Soil Structure - Case Study. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 2016, pp. 23–27, https://doi.org/10.1515/jaes-2016-0002.10.1515/jaes-2016-0002 Search in Google Scholar

[12] WANG, Z. - JACOBS, F. - ZIEGLER, M.: Visualization of Load Transfer Behaviour between Geogrid and Sand Using PFC2D. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 42, Iss. 1, 2014, pp. 83–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.01.001.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.01.001 Search in Google Scholar

[13] YASHIMA, A. - TSUJI, S. - YOSHIDA, K. - YOKOTA, Y.: A New Optical Fibre Sensor to Assess the Stability of Geogrid-reinforced Soil Walls. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 16, Iss. 4, 2009, pp. 238–245, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.4.238.10.1680/gein.2009.16.4.238 Search in Google Scholar

[14] BENJAMIM, C. V. S. - ZORNBERG, J. G. - BUENO, B. S.: Field Monitoring Evaluation of Geotextile-Reinforced Soil-retaining Walls. Geosynthetic International, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 2007, pp. 100–118, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.2.100.10.1680/gein.2007.14.2.100 Search in Google Scholar

[15] LEE, Y. B. - KO, H. Y. - MCCARTNEY, J. S.: Deformation Response of Shored MSE Walls under Surcharge Loading in the Centrifuge. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 17, Iss. 6, 2010, pp. 389–402, https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2010.17.6.389.10.1680/gein.2010.17.6.389 Search in Google Scholar

[16] EHRLICH, M. - MIRMORADI, S. H. - SARAMAGO, R. P.: Evaluation of the Effects of Compaction on the Behavior of Geosynthetic-reinforced Soil Walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 34, 2012, p. 108–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.05.005.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.05.005 Search in Google Scholar

[17] SCOTLAND, I. - DIXON, N. - FROST, M. - FOWMES, G. - HORGAN, G.: Modelling Deformation During the Construction of Wrapped Geogrid Reinforced Structures. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 23, Iss. 3, 2016, pp. 219–232, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00049.10.1680/jgein.15.00049 Search in Google Scholar

[18] FINE GEO5 - User Guide 3/2021. https://www.finesoftware.eu/user-guides/. Search in Google Scholar

[19] NGUYEN, G.: Determination of Stress in Spread Foundation Subsoil by Various Approaches. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2015, pp. 28–36, https://doi.org/10.1515/cee-2015-0004.10.1515/cee-2015-0004 Search in Google Scholar

[20] PLAXIS 2D CE V21.01:1 - Tutorial Manual, https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/46137/manuals---plaxis. Search in Google Scholar

[21] SCHANZ, T. - VERMEER, P. A. - BONNIER, P. G.: The Hardening Soil Model: Formulation and Verification. In: Beyound 2000 in Computational Geotechnics – 10 Years of Plaxis, International Symposium, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 281–296, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315138206-27.10.1201/9781315138206-27 Search in Google Scholar

[22] MIRMORADI, S. H. - EHRLICH, M.: Modeling of the Compaction-induced Stress on Reinforced Soil Walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 2015, pp. 82–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.001.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

[23] DRUSA, M. - VLCEK, J. - HOLICKOVA, M. - KAIS, L.: Analytical and Numerical Evaluation of Limit States of MSE Wall Structure. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2016, pp. 145–152, https://doi.org/10.1515/cee-2016-0020.10.1515/cee-2016-0020 Search in Google Scholar

[24] STACHO, J. - SULOVSKA, M. - SLAVIK, I.: Determining the Shear Strength Properties of a Soil-geogrid Interface Using a Large-scale Direct Shear Test Apparatus. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Vol. 64, Iss. 4, 2020, pp. 989–998, https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.15766.10.3311/PPci.15766 Search in Google Scholar

[25] SULOVSKA, M. - STACHO, J.: Design of Road Embankment Reinforced Using a Geogrid. SGEM 2019. 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference. Vol. 19. Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019, pp. 145–152, https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/5.4/S22.047.10.5593/sgem2019/5.4/S22.047 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo