1. bookVolume 12 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Thinking Together Digitalization and Social Innovation in Rural Areas: An Exploration of Rural Digitalization Projects in Germany

Published Online: 09 Jul 2020
Page range: 193 - 208
Received: 05 Feb 2020
Accepted: 21 May 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Digitalization and social innovation are often discussed separately and without any spatial reference or in relation to cities, although newer works show the importance of social innovation also for rural areas. Existing digitalization projects illustrate the potential of digital technologies for rural development. Current debates on smart villages refer to both digitalization and social innovation but still in a rather unsystematic way. The paper seeks to think together digitalization and social innovation in rural areas more systemically and proposes to conceptually connect them with the help of sensitizing concepts, which are developed out of debates on social and digital social innovation. Along these concepts, the paper explores rural digitalization projects in Germany. On the one hand, this highlights the spectrum of these initiatives and, on the other hand, provides a framework under which digitalization and social innovation can be analyzed and smart villages may be supported systematically.

Keywords

[1] Angelidou, M. & Psaltoglou, A. (2017). An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 33, 113–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.016.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bauriedl, S. & Strüver, A., eds. (2018). Smart CityKritische Perspektiven auf die Digitalisierung in Städten. Bielefeld: Transcript.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Blumer, H. (1954). What is Wrong with Social Theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. DOI: 10.2307/2088165.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Brennen, J. S. & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 556–566). Hoboken, NJ: Willey-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bria, F. (2015). Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe: DSI final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Butkeviciene, E. (2009). Social innovation in rural communities: methodological framework and empirical evidence. Socialiniai mokslaiSocial Sciences, 1, 80–88.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Christmann, G. B. (2011). Soziale Innovationen, Social Entrepreneurs und Raumbezüge. In Jähnke, P., Christmann, G. B. & Balgar, K., eds., Social Entrepreneurship. Perspektiven für die Raumentwicklung (pp. 193–210). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Christmann, G. B. (2017). Analysing Changes in Discursive Constructions of Rural Areas in the Context of Demographic Change: Towards Counterpoints in the Dominant Discourse on “Dying Villages”. Comparative Population Studies, 41(3–4), 359–378. DOI: 10.12765/CPoS-2017-03en.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Christmann, G. B. (2019). Introduction: Struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. European Planning Studies, 4(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J. & Walther, U.-J. (2016). Wie kommt Neuartiges in die räumliche Planung? In Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H. & Hutter, M., eds., Innovationsgesellschaft heute: Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle (pp. 273–300). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2019). Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts. European Planning Studies, 3(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639399.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Elberzhager, F., Koch, M. & Weitzel, B. (2018). Towards a Digital Ecosystem for Rural Areas: Experiences from Three Years of Development. In Kuhrmann, M. et al., ed., Product-focused software process improvement (pp. 98–105). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03673-7_7.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fink, M., Lang, R. & Richter, R. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship in Marginalised Rural Europe: Towards Evidence-Based Policy for Enhanced Social Innovation. Regions Magazine, 306(1), 6–10. DOI: 10.1080/13673882.2017.11878963.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gillwald, K. (2000). Konzepte sozialer Innovation [working paper]. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für soziale Wissenschaften..Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hamdouch, A. & Galvan, A. (2019). Social Innovation as a Driver of Urban Transformation? The Case of Planning Approaches in the Dominican Republic. Urban Planning, 4(1), 31–43. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1740.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Howaldt, J. & Schwarz, M. (2016). Social innovation and its relationship to social change. [SI-DRIVE project paper]. Dortmund: Technische Universität.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Howaldt, J. & Schwarz, M. (2019). Soziale Innovation. In Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. & Windeler, A., eds., Springer Reference. Handbuch Innovationsforschung (pp. 1–17). Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ievoli, C., Belliggiano, A., Marandola, D., Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2019). Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy. European Countryside, 11(4), 475–496. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0027.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L. & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis? In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A., eds., The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Mass.): E. Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Löw, M. & Sept, A. (2020). Innovationen in Stadt und Raum. In Blättel-Mink, B. Schulz-Schaeffer, I. & Windeler, A., eds., Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lytras, M., Visvizi, A. & Mudri, G. eds. (2019). Smart Villages in the EU and beyond. Emerald studies in politics and technology. Bingley: Emerald.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Design thinking, design theory. Cambridge (Mass.), London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Martin, A. V. & Tulla, A. F. (2019). Innovation, Spatial Loyalty, and ICTs as Locational Determinants of Rural Development in the Catalan Pyrenees. European Countryside, 11(4), 517–540. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0029.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Matern, A., Binder, J. & Noack, A. (2019). Smart regions: Insights from hybridization and peripheralization research. European Planning Studies, 6(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1703910.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Meijer, A. & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564308.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D. & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A., eds., The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 13–24). Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Mass.): E. Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. eds. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Mass.): E. Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000065442.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Mulgan, G. & Pulford, L. (2010). Study on Social Innovation. Oxford: SAID Business School.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H. & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Noack, A. (2017). Elderly People in Rural Regions as Promoters of Social Innovations and Changing Knowledge. In Svels, K., ed., Uneven processes of rural change: on diversity, knowledge and justice (pp. 118–119). Kraków: Jagiellonian University.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Noack, A. & Federwisch, T. (2019). Social Innovation in Rural Regions: Urban Impulses and Cross-Border Constellations of Actors. Sociologia Ruralis, 59(1), 92–112. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12216.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Nyseth, T. & Hamdouch, A. (2019). The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development. Urban Planning, 4(1), 1. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1950.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ogburn, W. F. (1964). On Culture and Social Change. Chicago: Phoenix Books; University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Richter, R. (2016). Social Innovations in Rural Life Worlds. In Carlow, V. M., ed., Ruralism (pp. 148–155). Berlin: Jovis.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Richter, R., Fink, M., Lang, R. & Maresch, D. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and innovation in rural Europe. Routledge studies in social enterprise & social innovation: Vol. 9. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Rüede, D. & Lurtz, K. (2012). Mapping the various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. [research paper]. Friedrichshof: Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Salemink, K., Strijker, D. & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (2007). Technik als sozialer Akteur und als soziale Institution: Sozialität von Technik statt Postsozialität [working paper] Berlin: Technische Universität.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Seidler, R., Sharma, G. & Telwala, Y. (2016). Climate Vulnerability, Water Vulnerability. In Developments in Earth Surface Processes (pp. 279–308). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63787-1.00007-X.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Slee, B. (2019). Delivering on the Concept of Smart Villages – in Search of an Enabling Theory. European Countryside, 11(4), 634–650. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0035.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Soligno, R., Scorza, F., Amato, F., Casas, G. L. & Murgante, B. (2015). Citizens Participation in Improving Rural Communities Quality of Life. In Gervasi, O. & et al., eds., Computational Science and Its ApplicationsICCSA 2015 (pp. 731–746). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21407-8_52.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Stebbins, R. A. (2008). Exploratory Research. In Given, L. M., ed., The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412963909.n166.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Stokes, M., Baeck, P. & Baker, T. (2017). What next for digital social innovation? Realising the potential of people and technology to tackle social challenges [project report]. Brussel: European Community.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Townsend, L., Wallace, C. & Fairhurst, G. (2015). ‘Stuck Out Here’: The Critical Role of Broadband for Remote Rural Places. Scottish Geographical Journal, 131(3-4), 171–180. DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2014.978807.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Van der Have, R. P. & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy 45(9), 1923–1935. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Van Dyck, B. & van den Broek, P. (2013). Social innovation: a territorial process. In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A., eds., The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 131–141). Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Mass.): E. Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Visvizi, A. & Lytras, M. (2018). It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts. Sustainability 10(8). DOI: 10.3390/su10082727.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Williger, B. & Wojtech, A. (2018). Digitalisierung im ländlichen Raum: Status Quo & Chancen für Gemeinden. [white paper]. Nürnberg: Fraunhofer Institut.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zapf, W. (1989). Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt, 40(1–2), 170–183.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Ed.) (1987). Räumliche Wirkungen der Telematik. Hannover: Vincentz.Search in Google Scholar

[54] BBSR (2017). Wachsen und Schrumpfen von Städten und Gemeinden im bundesweiten Vergleich. https://gis.uba.de/maps/resources/apps/bbsr/index.html?lang=de.Search in Google Scholar

[55] BMVI (2019). Regionalstatistische Raumtypologie (RegioStaR). https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Artikel/G/regionalstatistische-raumtypologie.html.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Christ, P. (2019, January 8). Der Therapeut am Laptop. Main Post.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Coconat (2020). Coconat – A Workation Retreat. http://coconat-space.com/de.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Dorfmobil Barsikow (2020). Dorfmobil Barsikow – Wir teilen uns ein Elektroauto. http://dorfmobil.barsikow.de.Search in Google Scholar

[59] DVS (2017). Themenheft „Digitale Lösungen für‘s Land”. LandInForm (3).Search in Google Scholar

[60] ECORYS (2019). Pilot project smart eco-social villages: Presentation. Brüssel.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Entwicklungsagentur Rheinland-Pfalz e.V. (2017). #LandlebenUnsere Zukunft im digitalen Dorf. https://www.demografie-portal.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/GutePraxis/Digitale-Doerfer.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.Search in Google Scholar

[62] ENRD (2018a). Digital and social innovation in rural services. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

[63] ENRD (2018b). Digital Villages Germany: Working Document. European Network for Rural Development website: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/tg_smart-villages_case-study_de.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[64] ENRD (2018c). German strategies for digitising rural areas. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/enrd_publications/digital-strategies_case-study_de.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Entwicklungsagentur Rheinland-Pfalz e.V. (2020). Schreibtisch in Prüm. https://schreibtischinpruem.de.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Fraunhofer IESE (2020). DIGITALE DÖRFER – VOM LAND FÜRS LAND. https://www.digitale-doerfer.de.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Loikumer Glasfaser Modell (2020). Loikumer-Glasfaser-Modell. http://www.derglasfaserbauer.de.Search in Google Scholar

[68] OstWestfalenLippe (2019). Smart Country Side. https://www.owl-morgen.de/projekte/smart-country-side.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Sourceboat (2020). Knoop – Beleuchtung bei Bedarf. https://knoop.sh.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo