Validity and Reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer for Measuring Hip Adduction Strength

António Carlos Sousa; Diogo Luís Marques; António Manuel Calado; Carlos Pacheco; Daniel Almeida Marinho; Mário Cardoso Marques; Bruno Filipe Travassos

Journal & Issue Details

Journal of Human Kinetics

Journal Details

Format: Journal
eISSN: 1899-7562
First Published: 13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe: 5 times per year
Languages: English

We analyzed the Smart Groin Trainer device's validity and reliability to measure the isometric hip adduction strength during the adductor squeeze strength test. Fifteen professional soccer players (25.33±4.06 years) and fifteen university students (21.60±1.76 years) participated in this study. All participants performed the squeeze strength test using two portable dynamometers: Smart Groin Trainer and Globus Ergometer. Three maximal isometric hip adduction contractions lasting 5s, interspersed by 3min rest intervals, were performed. Reliability was analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurements, and minimal detectable change. The absolute percent error and inter-device accuracy were also analyzed. Correlation analysis assessed the inter-device concurrent validity. The results found no significant differences (p>0.05) between devices in the squeeze strength test values in soccer players and university students. Inter-device comparisons revealed excellent levels of reliability and accuracy in soccer players. Concurrent validity measures revealed strong inter-device relationships in soccer players (r=0.89) and very strong relationships in university students (r=0.99). Intra-device analysis using the Smart Groin Trainer showed excellent relative and absolute reliability in tested soccer players. Our data demonstrated excellent levels of agreement between both dynamometers during the squeeze strength test, suggesting the Smart Groin Trainer as a valid, reliable, and accurate device to measure isometric hip adduction strength.

Key words

portable dynamometer
squeeze test
groin
accuracy
measurement error

Article

Introduction

In sports contexts, hip adduction strength measures are helpful to identify athletes with a high risk of a groin injury and provide an objective result when assessing an athlete's ability to return to play (Thorborg et al., 2011; Tyler et al., 2001). Scientific evidence suggests that groin injuries are common in different sports that require quick changes of movement directions and consequently high levels of accelerations and decelerations, such as in ice hockey and soccer (Esteve et al., 2015; Fulcher et al., 2010; Tyler et al., 2010). Athletes with low levels of isometric hip adduction strength are more prone to develop injuries (Moreno-Pérez et al., 2017; Rodriguez, 2020; Ryan et al., 2014; Tyler et al., 2010). Therefore, measuring hip adduction strength during the season is essential to examine the athlete's needs and prescribe preventive strategies to avoid groin injuries (Tyler et al., 2010).

The force generated by the hip muscles can be measured using different methods, including isokinetic dynamometers, handheld dynamometers, and manual muscle testing (Keep et al., 2016; Meyer et al., 2013). Isokinetic and handheld dynamometers provide quantitative measures, while manual muscle testing offers a qualitative result, which might be more prone to measurement error than the former methods (Keep et al., 2016; Meyer et al., 2013; Nadler et al., 2000). Although isokinetic dynamometers are considered the reference criterion (Stark et al., 2011), they are expensive, non-portable, time-consuming and require large spaces (Martins et al., 2017; Romero-Franco et al., 2019). As an alternative, handheld dynamometers are portable, user-friendly, and cheaper than isokinetic dynamometers (Keep et al., 2016; Martins et al., 2017; Meyer et al., 2013). On the other hand, handheld dynamometers may lead to a lack of stabilization and small substantial changes in the starting position and can generate problems with the placement of the dynamometer (Keep et al., 2016). Nevertheless, several authors have considered handheld dynamometers valid and reliable devices to measure hip adduction strength (Thorborg et al., 2009). Therefore, using a portable dynamometer to measure maximal isometric hip adduction strength seems a valid and reliable option within several sports contexts.

A recent study analyzed the reliability of a portable dynamometer known as a Smart Groin Trainer to measure isometric hip adduction strength in twenty-five university students (Gonçalves et al., 2021). The results demonstrated good inter- and intra-device reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] values between 0.89-0.94 and coefficient of variation [CV] values between 3-4%) for the maximal isometric hip adduction strength measured in a supine and a seated position. According to those authors, the Smart Groin Trainer presented reliability levels like those reported in previous studies, making it a reliable device to measure hip adduction strength in sports and rehabilitation contexts. In fact, a previous prospective cohort study with seventy-one elite soccer players used the Smart Groin Trainer device to assess the hip adductor strength and track the incidence of groin injury during a competitive season (Moreno-Pérez et al., 2019). In addition, Moreno-Pérez et al. (2019) reported high reliability and relatively low measurement error when using the Smart Groin Trainer device to assess the hip adduction strength through a soccer-specific test called a squeeze strength test.

Nevertheless, despite the findings mentioned above, to our best knowledge, no study has compared the validity and reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer with another portable dynamometer to measure isometric hip adduction strength. Therefore, comparing the results obtained with the Smart Groin Trainer with another portable dynamometer, such as the Globus Ergometer (Morouço et al., 2014; Neiva et al., 2011), will make it possible to infer the validity and accuracy of this device in different sports contexts.

In this sense, in the current research, we aimed to analyze the intra- and inter-device validity and reliability of the portable Smart Groin Trainer device to measure the isometric hip adduction strength in professional soccer players and university students. We hypothesized that the Smart Groin Trainer device would present high intra- and inter-device validity and reliability to measure the hip adduction strength in professional soccer players and university students.

Methods

Experimental Approach to the Problem

In this crossover study, we analyzed the intra- and inter-device validity and reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer to measure the isometric hip adduction strength during the squeeze strength test in professional soccer players and university students. Before testing, all participants underwent a familiarization session to learn the adductor squeeze strength test's correct technique. Following the familiarization session, participants performed twice the squeeze strength test using two devices. The first was the Smart Groin Trainer (NeuroExcellence, Braga, Portugal), and the second was the Globus Ergometer (Globus™, Codigné, Italy). The data collection was randomized between participants, and all performed the same number of repetitions. The testing sessions were performed in a university laboratory with a room temperature between 22 and 24º C.

Participants

Fifteen male professional soccer players from the 2^nd main league of the country (age: 25.33±4.06 years; body mass: 78.71±10.35 kg; body height: 1.81±0.06 m) and fifteen male sport sciences students who regularly performed physical exercise (age: 21.60±1.76 years; body mass: 72.23±8.21 kg; body height: 1.77±0.08 m) volunteered to participate in this study. All participants were free of ankle, knee, or hip injury for the past six months, and none of them presented medical problems in the previous three months. They were instructed to avoid strenuous exercise at least two days before the testing session. All participants received detailed information regarding the study procedures and signed a written informed consent form. The Ethics Committee of the University of Beira Interior approved this study which followed the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Procedures

Measurement equipment and data acquisition

The Smart Groin Trainer consists of a uniaxial load cell interfaced to a personal laptop through a 12-bit analog-to-digital data acquisition board and custom software. The device measures the applied force up to 4905 N at a sampling frequency of 100Hz (Gonçalves et al., 2021). The Globus Ergometer consists of a data acquisition system that can either export or exhibit the data recorded by a load cell. The load cell measures the exerted force up to 5000N at a sampling frequency of 100Hz (Morouço et al., 2014; Neiva et al., 2011). In both devices, the force data were presented in kg due to the fact that it is easier for coaches/teachers to understand.

Adductor Squeeze Strength Test

Testing sessions started with a general warm-up of 10 min, consisting of running at low to moderate intensity, followed by joint mobilization. Then, all participants performed the adductor squeeze strength test following the procedures described by Moreno-Pérez et al. (2019). They lay down on a mat in a supine position with 45^⍛ hip flexion and 90^⍛ knee flexion, and the dynamometer was placed between the knees and attached to the thighs with Velcro straps (Figure 1). A specific warm-up of three submaximal isometric hip adduction contractions lasting 5 s, interspersed by 30 s rest intervals, was conducted. After recovery, participants performed three maximal isometric hip adduction contractions ("squeeze the cuff as hard as possible") lasting 5s, followed by 3min rest intervals between the following attempts. Three valid measures with both dynamometers were averaged and registered for further analysis.

Statistical Analysis

The normality was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test, histograms, and Q-Q plots, while the homogeneity of variances was tested using the Levene's test. Paired samples t-tests were used to verify whether a mean difference between devices existed. The Hedge's g effect size analyzed the magnitude of the differences between devices. The effect size was interpreted as: <0.2, trivial; 0.2-0.6, small; 0.6-1.2, moderate; 1.2-2.0, large; 2.0-4.0, very large; >4.0, extremely large (Hopkins et al., 2009). Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were used to illustrate the two devices' systematic differences (Sainani, 2017). The relative reliability was assessed using the ICC with a 95% confidence interval. The type of the ICC used was the two-way random-effects, absolute agreement, multiple raters/measurements model [ICC_(2,k)] (Koo and Li, 2016). ICC values were interpreted as: <0.50, poor; 0.50-0.75, moderate; 0.75-0.90, good; >0.90, excellent (Koo and Li, 2016). The linear regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) analyzed the concurrent validity between devices. The magnitude of correlation was interpreted as: 0.00-0.10, negligible; 0.10-0.39, weak; 0.40-0.69, moderate; 0.70-0.89, strong; 0.90-1.00, very strong (Schober et al., 2018). The standard error of the estimate was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of the residuals. The absolute reliability was analyzed by estimating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the CV. The inter-device SEM was calculated as the SD of the difference between devices divided by the √2 (de Vet et al., 2011). The intra-device SEM was calculated as the SD of the mean of the three repetitions x √1-ICC (Sainani, 2017). The CV (%) was calculated as the SEM divided by the mean. CV values were interpreted as: >10%, poor; 5-10%, moderate; <5%, good (Scott et al., 2016). The sensitivity to change was estimated using the minimal detectable change (MDC) derived from the SEM (√2 x SEM x 1.96) (Sainani, 2017). The absolute percent error (APE = ((|Smart Groin Trainer – Globus Ergometer)/Globus Ergometer|) x 100), and accuracy ((Globus Ergometer – (|Globus Ergometer – Smart Groin Trainer|)/Globus Ergometer) x 100) were also calculated. An APE value <10% was considered acceptable (Montoye et al., 2017). Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS v27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel. Figures were designed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, USA).

Results

Inter-device magnitude of differences

We did not observe significant differences between devices in the squeeze strength test's mean values in soccer players and university students (Table 1).

Table 1

Magnitude of inter-device differences in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

		Squeeze Strength Test (kg)
Participants	Device	Mean ± SD	Range	p	g
Soccer players	Globus Ergometer	46.18 ± 8.41	26.77 to 59.53
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	45.69 ± 7.69	30.80 to 61.47	0.626	0.06 (trivial)

Students	Globus Ergometer	42.56 ± 12.07	22.90 to 62.53
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	42.04 ± 12.00	24.77 to 61.03	0.354	0.04 (trivial)

The effect size was calculated using the Hedge's g formula; p: alpha value between devices.

The Bland-Altman plots are presented in Figure 2.

Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (dotted lines) in soccer players (A) and university students (B); Solid lines represent the mean difference between devices (Globus Ergometer vs. Smart Groin Trainer).

Inter-device reliability and accuracy

Table 2 presents the inter-device reliability and accuracy in the measurement of the isometric hip adduction strength. The ICC data revealed excellent inter-device relative reliability, and CV values moderate and excellent inter-device absolute reliability in soccer players and university students, respectively. The highest MDC was recorded for soccer players. In both cases, the APE was lower than 10%, representing an acceptable measurement error, and the accuracy was higher than 92%, thus revealing a high accuracy level.

Table 2

Inter-device reliability and accuracy in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

	Soccer Players (n = 15)	Students (n = 15)
ICC (95% CI)	0.94 (0.83-0.98)	0.99 (0.98-1.00)
SEM (kg)	2.71	1.46
CV (%)	5.90	3.45
MDC (kg)	7.51	4.05
APE (%)	7.51	4.08
Accuracy (%)	92.49	95.92

APE: absolute percent error; CI: confidence interval; CV: coefficient of variation; ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient; MDC: minimal detectable change; SEM: standard error of measurement.

The regression models for the two groups are presented in Figure 3. The correlation between devices was strong in soccer players and very strong in university students.

Linear regression models in soccer players (A) and university students (B); CI: confidence interval; r²: coefficient of determination; r: Pearson's correlation coefficient; SEE: standard error of the estimate.

Intra-device reliability

Table 3 presents the intra-device reliability in the measurement of the isometric hip adduction strength. The ICC revealed excellent relative reliability in soccer players, and the CV showed good absolute reliability using both devices. The MDC was higher in the Globus device than the Smart Groin Trainer. The ICC revealed excellent relative reliability in university students using both devices, and the CV presented good absolute reliability. The MDC was higher in the Smart Groin Trainer than in the Globus device.

Table 3

Intra-device reliability in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

Participants	Device	ICC (95% CI)	SEM (kg)	CV (%)	MDC (kg)
Soccer Players	Globus Ergometer	0.95 (0.88-0.98)	1.92	4.15	5.31
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	0.98 (0.94-0.99)	1.17	2.57	3.25

Students	Globus Ergometer	0.99 (0.98-1.00)	0.96	2.26	2.67
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	0.99 (0.98-1.00)	1.09	2.60	3.03

CI: confidence interval; CV: coefficient of variation; ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient; MDC: minimal detectable change; SEM: standard error of measurement.

Discussion

The current research examined the intra-and inter-device validity and reliability of the portable Smart Groin Trainer dynamometer to measure isometric hip adduction strength in professional soccer players and university students during the squeeze test. Our results demonstrated that the Smart Groin Trainer device is valid and reliable for measuring the adductors' strength during the squeeze test, confirming our hypothesis. Therefore, our data suggest the Smart Groin Trainer as a valuable portable device for professional and recreational sports to measure hip adduction strength during the squeeze test.

Previous studies determining the relative reliability of dynamometers to measure hip adduction strength in a supine position observed ICCs from 0.76 to 0.98 when using handheld dynamometers (Kelln et al., (2008), ICC: 0.77 to 0.97; Mentiplay et al., (2015), ICC: 0.84 to 0.98; Thorborg et al., (2009), ICC: 0.76 to 0.98), and ICCs from 0.79 to 0.93 when using an isokinetic dynamometer (Meyer et al., 2013). Therefore, taken together, these results suggest that both devices provide high relative reliability values when measuring hip adduction strength in a supine position. In fact, a previous metanalysis aiming to determine the reliability between isokinetic and handheld dynamometers to measure the force production during different types of joint movements observed ICC values ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 for hip adduction strength measured in a supine position (Chamorro et al., 2017).

Nevertheless, despite the findings mentioned above, to our knowledge, only one study has analyzed the relative reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer to measure hip adduction strength in a supine position (Gonçalves et al., 2021). In that study, the authors observed an ICC value of 0.94 (0.86-0.97) for the maximal isometric hip adduction contraction (N), which is similar to values presented in our research for the intra-device analysis. Our analysis also demonstrated that the Smart Groin Trainer presented high inter-device relative reliability to measure hip adduction strength in professional soccer players and university students. The high ICCs were accompanied by high accuracy values, low APE results, and strong to very strong relationships between devices. Therefore, as stated for handheld and isokinetic dynamometers, a portable and stabilized dynamometer (i.e., that "fixes" or "stabilizes" the load sensor in the assessed muscle region) presents high relative reliability, accuracy, and validity to measure hip adduction strength during the squeeze test.

The intra-device analysis demonstrated small SEM and CV values when using the Smart Groin Trainer. The CV results are similar to those presented in previous research that used the same device to measure the maximal isometric hip adduction contraction (N) in a supine position (Gonçalves et al., 2021). Similar values of absolute reliability were also observed in studies which measured hip adduction strength in a supine position using handheld dynamometers (Kelln et al., 2008; Mentiplay et al., 2015; Thorborg et al., 2009) or an isokinetic dynamometer (Meyer et al., 2013). Besides these results, our study also demonstrates that the SEM and CV data extracted from the comparisons between devices confirm the Smart Groin Trainer's excellent reliability to measure hip adduction strength during the squeeze test. It is essential to notice that the latter test is highly used in soccer contexts due to its high validity and reliability to diagnose groin injuries (Delahunt et al., 2011; Moreno-Pérez et al., 2019). Therefore, using the Smart Groin Trainer during the squeeze strength test might be a valid and reliable strategy to identify athletes with a high risk of groin injuries and monitor changes in adductor strength over the season (Moreno-Pérez et al., 2019).

This study has some limitations that must be considered. Firstly, it is worth mentioning that the study sample does not enable us to generalize the results to other athletic populations. Secondly, the homogeneity of players considering their different playing positions was not taken into account because it could cause increased levels of variability in the final results. Thirdly measuring hip abduction strength would allow us to examine the Smart Groin Trainer's inter-device reliability and analyze the hip adductor to abductor strength ratio. Fourthly, measuring kinetic variables such as the rate of force development over different periods would help us analyze the Smart Groin Trainer's inter-device reliability. Finally, recruiting athletes of various sports with different hip strength levels would be essential to examine the dynamometer's reliability to identify these differences. Therefore, future studies should recruit a broad spectrum of sports athletes to examine the Smart Groin Trainer device's validity and reliability to measure isometric hip adduction and abduction strength and other mechanical variables.

Conclusion

Our results revealed that the Smart Groin Trainer device is valid and accurate to measure isometric hip adduction strength in professional soccer players and university students. This device can be used in clinical and sports contexts to measure isometric hip adduction strength during the squeeze strength test and hip strength changes during the training and rehabilitation process. In addition, the Smart Groin Trainer’s features (portable, small, and easy-to-use) make it a suitable device to be used by coaches and researchers in the sports field.

Figures & Tables

Linear regression models in soccer players (A) and university students (B); CI: confidence interval; r2: coefficient of determination; r: Pearson's correlation coefficient; SEE: standard error of the estimate.

Inter-device reliability and accuracy in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

	Soccer Players (n = 15)	Students (n = 15)
ICC (95% CI)	0.94 (0.83-0.98)	0.99 (0.98-1.00)
SEM (kg)	2.71	1.46
CV (%)	5.90	3.45
MDC (kg)	7.51	4.05
APE (%)	7.51	4.08
Accuracy (%)	92.49	95.92

Intra-device reliability in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

Participants	Device	ICC (95% CI)	SEM (kg)	CV (%)	MDC (kg)
Soccer Players	Globus Ergometer	0.95 (0.88-0.98)	1.92	4.15	5.31
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	0.98 (0.94-0.99)	1.17	2.57	3.25

Students	Globus Ergometer	0.99 (0.98-1.00)	0.96	2.26	2.67
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	0.99 (0.98-1.00)	1.09	2.60	3.03

Magnitude of inter-device differences in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

		Squeeze Strength Test (kg)
Participants	Device	Mean ± SD	Range	p	g
Soccer players	Globus Ergometer	46.18 ± 8.41	26.77 to 59.53
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	45.69 ± 7.69	30.80 to 61.47	0.626	0.06 (trivial)

Students	Globus Ergometer	42.56 ± 12.07	22.90 to 62.53
(n = 15)	Smart Groin Trainer	42.04 ± 12.00	24.77 to 61.03	0.354	0.04 (trivial)

References

Chamorro, C., Armijo-Olivo, S., Dela Fuente, C., Fuentes, J., & Javier Chirosa, L. (2017). Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Medicine, 12(1), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0052 Chamorro C. Armijo-Olivo S. Dela Fuente C. Fuentes J. & Javier Chirosa L. 2017 Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis Open Medicine 121 359 375 10.1515/med-2017-0052565140429071305Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. In Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996214 de Vet H. C. W. Terwee C. B. Mokkink L. B. & Knol D. L. 2011 Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide In Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511996214Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Delahunt, E., Kennelly, C., McEntee, B. L., Coughlan, G. F., & Green, B. S. (2011). The thigh adductor squeeze test: 45° of hip flexion as the optimal test position for eliciting adductor muscle activity and maximum pressure values. Manual Therapy, 16(5), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2011.02.014 Delahunt E. Kennelly C. McEntee B. L. Coughlan G. F. & Green B. S. 2011 The thigh adductor squeeze test: 45° of hip flexion as the optimal test position for eliciting adductor muscle activity and maximum pressure values Manual Therapy 165 476 480 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.01421429785Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Esteve, E., Rathleff, M. S., Bagur-Calafat, C., Urrútia, G., & Thorborg, K. (2015). Prevention of groin injuries in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(12), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094162 Esteve E. Rathleff M. S. Bagur-Calafat C. Urrútia G. & Thorborg K. 2015 Prevention of groin injuries in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials British Journal of Sports Medicine 4912 785 791 10.1136/bjsports-2014-09416225730819Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Fulcher, M. L., Hanna, C. M., & Raina Elley, C. (2010). Reliability of handheld dynamometry in assessment of hip strength in adult male football players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.11.007 Fulcher M. L. Hanna C. M. & Raina Elley C. 2010 Reliability of handheld dynamometry in assessment of hip strength in adult male football players Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 131 80 84 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.11.00719376747Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, B. A. M., Mesquita, R. N. O., Tavares, F., Brito, J., Correia, P., Santos, P., & Mil-Homens, P. (2021). A New Portable Device to Reliably Measure Maximal Strength and Rate of Force Development of Hip Adduction and Abduction. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ah. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003872 Gonçalves B. A. M. Mesquita R. N. O. Tavares F. Brito J. Correia P. Santos P. & Mil-Homens P. 2021 A New Portable Device to Reliably Measure Maximal Strength and Rate of Force Development of Hip Adduction and Abduction Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ah 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003872Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, W. G., Marshall, S. W., Batterham, A. M., & Hanin, J. (2009). Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 41(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278 Hopkins W. G. Marshall S. W. Batterham A. M. & Hanin J. 2009 Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science Med Sci Sports Exerc 411 3 12 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb27819092709Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Keep, H., Luu, L., Berson, A., & Garland, S. J. (2016). Validity of the Handheld Dynamometer Compared with an Isokinetic Dynamometer in Measuring Peak Hip Extension Strength. Physiotherapy Canada, 68(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2014-62 Keep H. Luu L. Berson A. & Garland S. J. 2016 Validity of the Handheld Dynamometer Compared with an Isokinetic Dynamometer in Measuring Peak Hip Extension Strength Physiotherapy Canada 681 15 22 10.3138/ptc.2014-62496131227504043Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Kelln, B. M., McKeon, P. O., Gontkof, L. M., & Hertel, J. (2008). Hand-Held Dynamometry: Reliability of Lower Extremity Muscle Testing in Healthy, Physically Active, Young Adults. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 17(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.17.2.160 Kelln B. M. McKeon P. O. Gontkof L. M. & Hertel J. 2008 Hand-Held Dynamometry: Reliability of Lower Extremity Muscle Testing in Healthy, Physically Active, Young Adults Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 172 160 170 10.1123/jsr.17.2.16018515915Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Koo T. K. & Li M. Y. 2016 A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 152 155 163 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012491311827330520Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Martins, J., da Silva, J. R., da Silva;, M. R. B., & Bevilaqua-Grossi, D. (2017). Reliability and Validity of the Belt-Stabilized Handheld Dynamometer in Hip- and Knee-Strength Tests. Journal of Athletic Training, 52(9), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.04 Martins J. da Silva J. R. da Silva; M. R. B. & Bevilaqua-Grossi D. 2017 Reliability and Validity of the Belt-Stabilized Handheld Dynamometer in Hip- and Knee-Strength Tests Journal of Athletic Training 529 809 819 10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.04563422928787180Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Mentiplay, B. F., Perraton, L. G., Bower, K. J., Adair, B., Pua, Y.-H., Williams, G. P., McGaw, R., & Clark, R. A. (2015). Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0140822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140822 Mentiplay B. F. Perraton L. G. Bower K. J. Adair B. Pua Y.-H. Williams G. P. McGaw R. & Clark R. A. 2015 Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study PLoS ONE 1010 e0140822 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822462494026509265Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, C., Corten, K., Wesseling, M., Peers, K., Simon, J.-P., Jonkers, I., & Desloovere, K. (2013). Test-Retest Reliability of Innovated Strength Tests for Hip Muscles. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e81149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081149 Meyer C. Corten K. Wesseling M. Peers K. Simon J.-P. Jonkers I. & Desloovere K. 2013 Test-Retest Reliability of Innovated Strength Tests for Hip Muscles PLoS ONE 811 e81149 10.1371/journal.pone.0081149383426024260550Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Montoye, A. H. K., Mitrzyk, J. R., & Molesky, M. J. (2017). Comparative Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Activity Tracker and a Smart Shirt for Physical Activity Assessment. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21(4), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1331166 Montoye A. H. K. Mitrzyk J. R. & Molesky M. J. 2017 Comparative Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Activity Tracker and a Smart Shirt for Physical Activity Assessment Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 214 201 211 10.1080/1091367X.2017.1331166Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Moreno-Pérez, V., Lopez-Valenciano, A., Barbado, D., Moreside, J., Elvira, J. L. L., & Vera-Garcia, F. J. (2017). Comparisons of hip strength and countermovement jump height in elite tennis players with and without acute history of groin injuries. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 29, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.04.006 Moreno-Pérez V. Lopez-Valenciano A. Barbado D. Moreside J. Elvira J. L. L. & Vera-Garcia F. J. 2017 Comparisons of hip strength and countermovement jump height in elite tennis players with and without acute history of groin injuries Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 29 144–149 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.04.00628433808Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

oreno-Pérez, V., Travassos, B., Calado, A., Gonzalo-Skok, O., Del Coso, J., & Mendez-Villanueva, A. (2019). Adductor squeeze test and groin injuries in elite football players: A prospective study. Physical Therapy in Sport, 37, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.001 oreno-Pérez V. Travassos B. Calado A. Gonzalo-Skok O. Del Coso J. & Mendez-Villanueva A. 2019 Adductor squeeze test and groin injuries in elite football players: A prospective study Physical Therapy in Sport 37 54–59 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.00130856592Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Morouço, P. G., Marinho, D. A., Keskinen, K. L., Badillo, J. J., & Marques, M. C. (2014). Tethered Swimming Can Be Used to Evaluate Force Contribution for Short-Distance Swimming Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(11), 3093–3099. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000509 Morouço P. G. Marinho D. A. Keskinen K. L. Badillo J. J. & Marques M. C. 2014 Tethered Swimming Can Be Used to Evaluate Force Contribution for Short-Distance Swimming Performance Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2811 3093 3099 10.1519/JSC.000000000000050924796981Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Nadler, S. F., DePrince, M. L., Hauesien, N., Malanga, G. A., Stitik, T. P., & Price, E. (2000). Portable dynamometer anchoring station for measuring strength of the hip extensors and abductors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(8), 1072–1076. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.7165 Nadler S. F. DePrince M. L. Hauesien N. Malanga G. A. Stitik T. P. & Price E. 2000 Portable dynamometer anchoring station for measuring strength of the hip extensors and abductors Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 818 1072 1076 10.1053/apmr.2000.716510943757Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Neiva, H., Morouço, P., Silva, A. J., Marques, M. C., & Marinho, D. A. (2011). The Effect of Warm-up on Tethered Front Crawl Swimming Forces. Journal of Human Kinetics 29A, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0066-1 Neiva H. Morouço P. Silva A. J. Marques M. C. & Marinho D. A. 2011 The Effect of Warm-up on Tethered Front Crawl Swimming Forces Journal of Human Kinetics 29A 113–119 10.2478/v10078-011-0066-1358889423486375Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez, R. (2020). Measuring the Hip Adductor to Abductor Strength Ratio in Ice Hockey and Soccer Players: A Critically Appraised Topic. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 29(1), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2018-0250 Rodriguez R. 2020 Measuring the Hip Adductor to Abductor Strength Ratio in Ice Hockey and Soccer Players: A Critically Appraised Topic Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 291 116 121 10.1123/jsr.2018-025030676199Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Romero-Franco, N., Fernández-Domínguez, J. C., Montaño-Munuera, J. A., Romero-Franco, J., & Jiménez-Reyes, P. (2019). Validity and reliability of a low-cost dynamometer to assess maximal isometric strength of upper limb. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(15), 1787–1793. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1594570 Romero-Franco N. Fernández-Domínguez J. C. Montaño-Munuera J. A. Romero-Franco J. & Jiménez-Reyes P. 2019 Validity and reliability of a low-cost dynamometer to assess maximal isometric strength of upper limb Journal of Sports Sciences 3715 1787 1793 10.1080/02640414.2019.159457030897030Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, J., DeBurca, N., & Mc Creesh, K. (2014). Risk factors for groin/hip injuries in field-based sports: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(14), 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092263 Ryan J. DeBurca N. & Mc Creesh K. 2014 Risk factors for groin/hip injuries in field-based sports: a systematic review British Journal of Sports Medicine 4814 1089 1096 10.1136/bjsports-2013-09226324795341Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Sainani, K. L. (2017). Reliability Statistics. PM&R, 9(6), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.001 Sainani K. L. 2017 Reliability Statistics PM&R 96 622 628 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.00128602174Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5). https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 Schober P. Boer C. & Schwarte L. A. 2018 Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5) 10.1213/ANE.000000000000286429481436Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Scott, M. T. U., Scott, T. J., & Kelly, V. G. (2016). The Validity and Reliability of Global Positioning Systems in Team Sport. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(5), 1470–1490. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001221 Scott M. T. U. Scott T. J. & Kelly V. G. 2016 The Validity and Reliability of Global Positioning Systems in Team Sport Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 305 1470 1490 10.1519/JSC.000000000000122126439776Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Stark, T., Walker, B., Phillips, J. K., Fejer, R., & Beck, R. (2011). Hand-held Dynamometry Correlation With the Gold Standard Isokinetic Dynamometry: A Systematic Review. PM&R, 3(5), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.025 Stark T. Walker B. Phillips J. K. Fejer R. & Beck R. 2011 Hand-held Dynamometry Correlation With the Gold Standard Isokinetic Dynamometry: A Systematic Review PM&R 35 472 479 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.02521570036Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Thorborg, K., Petersen, J., Magnusson, S. P., & Hölmich, P. (2009). Clinical assessment of hip strength using a hand-held dynamometer is reliable. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20(3), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00958.x Thorborg K. Petersen J. Magnusson S. P. & Hölmich P. 2009 Clinical assessment of hip strength using a hand-held dynamometer is reliable Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 203 493 501 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00958.x19558384Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Thorborg, K., Serner, A., Petersen, J., Madsen, T. M., Magnusson, P., & Hölmich, P. (2011). Hip Adduction and Abduction Strength Profiles in Elite Soccer Players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510378081 Thorborg K. Serner A. Petersen J. Madsen T. M. Magnusson P. & Hölmich P. 2011 Hip Adduction and Abduction Strength Profiles in Elite Soccer Players The American Journal of Sports Medicine 391 121 126 10.1177/036354651037808120929931Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, T. F., Nicholas, S. J., Campbell, R. J., & McHugh, M. P. (2001). The Association of Hip Strength and Flexibility with the Incidence of Adductor Muscle Strains in Professional Ice Hockey Players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290020301 Tyler T. F. Nicholas S. J. Campbell R. J. & McHugh M. P. 2001 The Association of Hip Strength and Flexibility with the Incidence of Adductor Muscle Strains in Professional Ice Hockey Players The American Journal of Sports Medicine 292 124 128 10.1177/0363546501029002030111292035Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, T. F., Silvers, H. J., Gerhardt, M. B., & Nicholas, S. J. (2010). Groin Injuries in Sports Medicine. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 2(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738110366820 Tyler T. F. Silvers H. J. Gerhardt M. B. & Nicholas S. J. 2010 Groin Injuries in Sports Medicine Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach 23 231 236 10.1177/1941738110366820344511023015943Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Journal of Human Kinetics

Validity and Reliability of the Smart Groin Trainer for Measuring Hip Adduction Strength

Published Online: 26 Apr 2022

Volume & Issue: Volume 82 (2022) - Issue 1 (April 2022)

Page range: 51 - 59

Journal of Human Kinetics

Key words

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Inter-device reliability and accuracy in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

Intra-device reliability in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

Magnitude of inter-device differences in the measurement of isometric hip adduction strength.

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo