1. bookVolume 27 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
30 Jul 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

The current status of orchard meadows in Central Europe: Multi-source area estimation in Saxony (Germany) and the Czech Republic

Published Online: 21 Jan 2020
Page range: 217 - 228
Received: 23 Dec 2018
Accepted: 10 Nov 2019
Journal Details
First Published
30 Jul 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Orchard meadows are appreciated as an integrated land use of high cultural and biological value. While such meadows are typical habitats for temperate Europe, they experienced a decline in their total area during the second half of the 20th century, both in Western and Eastern Europe. In this contribution, we compare their current area and status in terms of semantics, law, public support in general, and the efficiency of public support in both Saxony and the Czech Republic. We estimated the area in Saxony on the basis of three public mapping projects. In the Czech Republic, where no recent mapping included orchard meadows as a specific land-use type, we carried out our own mapping. Hence, we mapped 124 randomly selected plots of 1 km2. To cross-reference results from both countries, we used the pan-EU project LUCAS (Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey). According to various different sources, the orchard meadows cover 0.09–0.55% of Saxony and 0.01–0.72% of the Czech Republic. Interestingly, the results of the three mapping projects conducted in Saxony vary from each other. Although orchard meadows are supported by financial incentives of the respective governments in both countries, the Saxon approach concentrating more on individual activities (sanitation of old trees, planting, grassland management), seems more focused than the single measure practised in the Czech Republic. One key to a greater public awareness of the orchard meadow problematic can lie in the promotion of a simple expression referring to this specific landscape feature in Czech, similar to the phrase common in the German language: ‘Streuobstwiese’. Our suggestion for the Czech language is: ‘luční sad’.


ANTROP, M. (2005): Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan, 70: 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003. DOISearch in Google Scholar

BEAUFOY, G. (2014): Wood-pastures and the Common Agricultural Policy. Rhetoric and reality. In: Hartel T., Plieninger, T. [eds.]: European Wood-Pastures in Transition: A Social-Ecological Approach. Routledge, pp. 273–281.Search in Google Scholar

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1992): Directive 92/43/EEC of 21st May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [online]. [cit. 22.01.2018]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31992L0043&from=ENSearch in Google Scholar

CZECH OFFICE FOR SURVEYING, MAPPING AND CADASTRE (2017): Orthophoto of the Czech Republic. [online]. [cit. 22.01.2018]. Available at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(ozvgtuliuqhe2buzqrmv3b0u))/Default.aspx?mode=TextMeta&text=ortofoto_info&side=ortofoto&menu=23Search in Google Scholar

DAHLBERG, A. (2015): Categories are all around us: Towards more porous, flexible, and negotiable boundaries in conservation-production landscapes. Nor Geogr Tidsskr, 69:207–218. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2015.1060258.10.1080/00291951.2015.1060258Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DEMKOVÁ, K., LIPSKÝ, Z. (2015): Změny nelesní dřevinné vegetace v jihozápadní části Bílých Karpat v letech 1949–2011. Geografie-Sborník ČGS, 120(1): 64–83.Search in Google Scholar

DEN HERDER, M., MORENO, G., ROSA, M., MOSQUERALOSADA, R. M., et al. (2017): Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 241: 121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017. DOISearch in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2015): LUCAS primary data 2015 [online]. [cit. 22.01.2018]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas/data/primary-data/2015Search in Google Scholar

EWERT, J. (2019): Erhalt und Aufwertung von Streuobstwiesen in urbanen Räumen am Beispiel Dresden (Masterarbeit). Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden.Search in Google Scholar

FISHER, M. (2007): Streuobst - Betreiberkonzepte und sortenempfehlung. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 49: 141–147. doi: 10.1007/s10341-007-0049-5.10.1007/s10341-007-0049-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GÖTTLICHER, H.-P. (1999): Sächsisches Naturschutzgesetz : (SächsNatSchG); Kommentar. Kommunal- und Schulverl, Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar

HANUŠIN, J., LACIKA, J. (2018): Vybrané environmentálne súvislosti zmien historickej lazníckej krajiny (na príklade obce Hrušov okres Vel’ký Krtíš). Geografický časopis, 70: 57–77.Search in Google Scholar

HERZOG, F. (1998): Streuobst: A traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agroforestry Systems, 42(1): 61–80. doi: 10.1023/A:1006152127824.10.1023/A:1006152127824Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HORAK, J. (2014): Fragmented habitats of traditional fruit orchards are important for dead wood-dependent beetles associated with open canopy deciduous woodlands. Naturwissenschaften, 101: 499–504. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1179-x.10.1007/s00114-014-1179-x24821117Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HORAK, J., PELTANOVA, A., PODAVKOVA, A., SAFAROVA, L., BOGUSCH, P., ROMPORTL, D., ZASADIL, P. (2013): Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape. AgricULTURE, ecosystems & environment, 178: 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013. DOISearch in Google Scholar

JAKOBSSON, S., LINDBORG, R. (2015): Governing nature by numbers – EU subsidy regulations do not capture the unique values of woody pastures. Biological Conservation, 191:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015. DOISearch in Google Scholar

KAJTOCH, Ł. (2017): The importance of traditional orchards for breeding birds: The preliminary study on Central European example. Acta Oecologica, 78: 53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2016. DOISearch in Google Scholar

KRČMÁŘOVÁ, J., JELEČEK, L. (2017): Czech traditional agroforestry: historic accounts and current status. Agroforestry Systems, 91(6): 1087–1100. doi: 10.1007/s10457-016-9985-0.10.1007/s10457-016-9985-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LfULG (2002): Karten und Geodaten der Selektiven Biotopkartierung im Offenland in Sachsen [online]. [cit. 22.01.2018]. Available at: https://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/natur/30735.htm#article30751Search in Google Scholar

LfULG (2005): Biotoptypen- und Landnutzungskartierung (BTLNK). Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie [online]. [cit. 22.01.2018]. Available at: https://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/natur/25140.htmSearch in Google Scholar

MANNSFELD, K., SYRBE, R.-U. (2008): Naturräume in Sachsen. Deutsche Akademie für Landeskunde, Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

MILTON, S. J., DEAN, W. R. J., KLOTZ, S. (1997): Thicket Formation In Abandoned Fruit Orchards: Processes and Implications For the Conservation Of Semi Dry Grasslands In Central Germany. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(2): 275–290. doi: 10.1023/a:1018300321411.10.1023/a:1018300321411Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC (2016): Metodika k provádění nařízení vlády č. 76/2015 Sb., o podmínkách provádění opatření ekologické zemědělství, ve znění pozdějších předpisů pro rok 2016, Praha, Ministerstvo zemědělství.Search in Google Scholar

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC (2018): Landscaping orchards, shapefile. 22nd January 2018.Search in Google Scholar

NERLICH, K., GRAEFF-HÖNNINGER, S., CLAUPEIN, W. (2013): Agroforestry in Europe: A review of the disappearance of traditional systems and development of modern agroforestry practices, with emphasis on experiences in Germany (Agroforestry Systems, 87(2): 475–492, doi: 10.1007/s10457-013-9618-9.10.1007/s10457-013-9618-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

OHNESORGE, B., BIELING, C., SCHLEYER, C., PLIENINGER, T. (2015): The Example of Orchard Meadows in the Swabian Alb Biosphere Reserve. In: Grunewald, K., Bastian, O. [eds.]: Ecosystem Services – Concept, Methods and Case Studies (pp. XII, 312). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

PLIENINGER, T. (2012): Monitoring directions and rates of change in trees outside forests through multitemporal analysis of map sequences. Applied Geography, 32(2): 566–576. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011. DOISearch in Google Scholar

PLIENINGER, T., BIELING, C., OHNESORGE, B. et al. (2013): Exploring Futures of Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes through Participatory Scenario Development in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Ecology and Society, 18(3): art39. doi: 10.5751/ES-05802-180339.10.5751/ES-05802-180339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PLIENINGER, T., HARTEL, T., MARTÍN-LÓPEZ, B., BEAUFOY, G., BERGMEIER, EL, |KIRBY, K., MONTERO M. J., MORENO, G., OTEROS-ROZAS, E., UYTVANCK, V. (2015a): Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social–ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biological Conservation, 190: 70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015. DOISearch in Google Scholar

PLIENINGER, T., LEVERS, C., MANTEL, M., COSTA, A., SCHAICH, H., KUEMMERLE, T. (2015b): Patterns and drivers of scattered tree loss in agricultural landscapes: orchard meadows in Germany (1968–2009). PLoS One, 10(5): e0126178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126178.10.1371/journal.pone.0126178441676225932914Search in Google Scholar

ROST, K. (2011): Ergebnisse der Streuobstkartierung im Biosphärenreservat Karstlandschaft Südharz. Naturschutz im L Sachsen-Anhalt, 48: 135–140.Search in Google Scholar

SCHÖNHART, M., SCHAUPPENLEHNER, T., SCHMID, E., MUHAR, A. (2011): Analysing the maintenance and establishment of orchard meadows at farm and landscape levels applying a spatially explicit integrated modelling approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(1): 115–143. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.502763.10.1080/09640568.2010.502763Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ŠPULEROVÁ, J., PISCOVÁ, V., GERHÁTOVÁ, K., BAČA, A., KALIVODA, H., KANKA, R. (2015): Orchards as traces of traditional agricultural landscape in Slovakia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 199: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014. DOISearch in Google Scholar


STEFFAN-DEWENTER I., LESCHKE, K. (2003): Effects of habitat management on vegetation and above-ground nesting bees and wasps of orchard meadows in Central Europe. Biodiversity & Conservaton, 12(9): 1953–1968. doi: 10.1023/A:1024199513365.10.1023/A:1024199513365Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

THIEL, A., SCHLEYER, C., PLIENINGER, T. (2012): Wolves are Mobile, While Fruit Trees are not! How Characteristics of Resources and Supranational Regulatory Frameworks Shape the Provision of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3): 189–204. doi: 10.1002/eet.1578.10.1002/eet.1578Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

THIEM, K., BASTIAN, O. (2014): Historische Kulturlandschaftselemente Sachsens. Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaf und Geologie (Freistaat Sachsen).Search in Google Scholar

TOJNKO, S., ROZMAN, Č., UNUK, T., PAŽEK, K., PAMIČ, S. (2011): A Qualitative Multi-Attribute Model for The Multifunctional Assessment of “Streuobst Stands” in NE Slovenia. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 53(4): 157–166. doi: 10.1007/s10341-011-0149-0.10.1007/s10341-011-0149-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

TÓTH, A., TIMPE, A. (2017): Exploring urban agriculture as a component of multifunctional green infrastructure: Application of figure-ground plans as a spatial analysis tool. Moravian Geographical Reports, 25(3): 208–218. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2017-0018.10.1515/mgr-2017-0018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WOLSKI, J. (2016): The landscape of abandoned villages in the western bieszczady: The problem of definition and classification. Geographia Polonica, 89(3): 371–387. doi: 10.7163/GPol.0064.10.7163/GPol.0064Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ŽARNOVIČAN, H. (2012): Manažment sadových lúk myjavsko-bielokarpatských kopaníc v minulosti a v súčasnosti. Životné prostredie, 46(5): 271–275.Search in Google Scholar

ŽARNOVIČAN, H., KOLLÁR, J., ŠKODOVÁ, I. (2017): Grassland communities of traditional orchards in the Western Carpathians (Slovakia). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 86(2): 1–16. doi: 10.5586/asbp.3552.10.5586/asbp.3552Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ILLICH-OLLECK, A., BAUSCHMANN, G. (1991): Die Aktion “Rettet die Obstwiesen” als Möglichkeit zur Erhaltung gefährdeter Tier- und Pflanzenarten. Artenschutzreport, 1: 33–35.Search in Google Scholar

ZOPK (2017): Zákon č. 123/2017 Sb. Zákon, kterým se mění zákon č. 114/1992 Sb. o ochraně přírody a krajiny, ve znění pozdějších předpisůSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo