1. bookVolume 27 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6202
First Published
30 Jul 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Citizen science as a new approach in Geography and beyond: Review and reflections

Published Online: 21 Jan 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 27 (2019) - Issue 4 (December 2019)
Page range: 254 - 264
Received: 20 Sep 2019
Accepted: 12 Dec 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6202
First Published
30 Jul 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Issues related to the evolving role of citizen science and open science are reviewed and discussed in this article. We focus on the changing approaches to science, research and development related to the turn to openness and transparency, which has made science more open and inclusive, even for non-researchers. Reproducible and collaborative research, which is driven by the open access principles, involves citizens in many research fields. The article shows how international support is pushing citizen science forward, and how citizens’ involvement is becoming more important. A basic scientometric analysis (based on the Web of Science Core Collection as the source of peer reviewed articles) provides a first insight into the diffusion of the citizen science concept in the field of Geography, mapping the growth of citizen science articles over time, the spectrum of geographical journals that publish them, and their citation rate compared to other scientific disciplines. The authors also discuss future challenges of citizen science and its potential, which for the time being seems to be not fully utilized in some fields, including geographical research.

Keywords

ALBAGLI, S., MACIEL, M., ABDO, A. (2015): Open Science, open issues. Rio de Janeiro, Unirio.10.18225/978-85-7013-111-9Search in Google Scholar

BADEN, T, CHAGAS, A. M., GAGE, G., MARZULLO, T., PRIETO-GODINO, L., EULER, T. (2015): Open Labware: 3-DPrinting Your Own Lab Equipment. PLOS Biology, 13(3): e1002086.Search in Google Scholar

BARTLING, S., FRIESIKE, S. (2014): Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Cham, Springer International Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

BERTI SUMAN, A. PIERCE, R. (2018): Challenges for citizen science and the EU open science agenda under the GDPR. European Data Protection Law Review, 4(3): 284–295.10.21552/edpl/2018/3/7Search in Google Scholar

BIO INNOVATION SERVICE (2018): Citizen science for environmental policy: development of an EU-wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment under the contract 070203/2017/768879/ETU/ENV.A.3, in collaboration with Fundacion Ibercivis and The Natural History Museum. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

BONNEY, R., COOPER, C. B., DICKINSON, J., KELLING, S., PHILLIPS, T., ROSENBERG, K. V., SHIRK, J. (2009): Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59: 977–984.10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9Search in Google Scholar

CAPINERI, C., HAKLAY, M., HUANG, H., ANTONIOU, V., KETTUNEN, J., OSTERMANN, F., PURVES, R. (2016): European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. London, Ubiquity Press.10.5334/baxSearch in Google Scholar

CONNORS, J. P., LEI, S., KELLY, M. (2012): Citizen science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6): 1267–1289.10.1080/00045608.2011.627058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

COOPER, A., COETZEE, S., KOURIE, D. (2017): Volunteered geographical information, crowdsourcing, citizen science and neogeography are not the same. Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association, 1: 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

DAVID, P. A. (2008): The Historical Origins of’Open Science’: an essay on patronage, reputation and common agency contracting in the scientific revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3(2).10.2202/1932-0213.1040Search in Google Scholar

DEVICTOR, V., WHITTAKER, R. J., BELTRAME, C. (2010): Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions, 16(3): 354–362.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.xSearch in Google Scholar

DICKINSON, J. L., SHIRK, J., BONTER, D., BONNEY, R., CRAIN, R. L., MARTIN, J., PHILLIPS, T., PURCELL, K. (2012): The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297.10.1890/110236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DÖRLER, D., HEIGL. F. (2019): Citizen Science in Österreich. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen Und Bibliothekare. [online first] 72(2). Doi: 10.31263/voebm.v72i2.283610.31263/voebm.v72i2.2836Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DROEGE, S. (2007): Just Because You Paid Them Doesn’t Mean Their Data Are Better. In: McEver, C. et al. [eds.]: Citizen Science Toolkit Conference. (pp. 13–26). Ithaca, NY, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology.Search in Google Scholar

DUŽÍ, B., OSMAN, R., LEHEJČEK, J., NOVÁKOVÁ, E., TARABA, P., TROJAN, J. (2019): Exploring citizen science in post-socialist space: Uncovering its hidden character in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 27(4): 241–253.10.2478/mgr-2019-0019Search in Google Scholar

ECSA (2015): Ten principles of citizen science [online]. Available at: https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/sites/default/files/ecsa_ten_principles_of_citizen_science.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

EITZEL, M., CAPPADONNA, J., SANTOS-LANG, C., DUERR, R., WEST, S. E., VIRAPONGSE, A., KYBA, C., BOWSER, A., COOPER, C., SFORZI, A., METCALFE, A. (2017): Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1): 1–20.10.5334/cstp.96Search in Google Scholar

FELL, M. J. (2019): The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. Publications, 7(3): 46.10.3390/publications7030046Search in Google Scholar

FOLLETT, R., STREZOV, V. (2015): An analysis of citizen science based research: usage and publication patterns. PloS one, 10(11): e0143687.10.1371/journal.pone.0143687465807926600041Search in Google Scholar

FOODY, G., SEE, L., FRITZ, S., MOONEY, P., OLTEANURAIMOND, A.-M., FONTE, C.C., ANTONIOU, V. (2017): Mapping and the Citizen Sensor. London, UK, Ubiquity Press.Search in Google Scholar

FOSTER (2016): Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond. Foster Plus Project Website [online]. Available at: https://www.fosteropenscience.euSearch in Google Scholar

FRIESIKE, S. (2014): Creative Commons Licences. In: Bartling S., Friesike S. [eds.]: Opening Science (pp. 287–288). Cham, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_19Search in Google Scholar

GADERMAIER, G., DÖRLER, D., HEIGL, F., MAYR, S., RÜDISSER, J., BRODSCHNEIDER, R., MARIZZI, C. (2018): Peer-reviewed publishing of results from Citizen Science projects. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3): L01.10.22323/2.17030101Search in Google Scholar

GOODCHILD, M. (2007): Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4): 211–221.10.1007/s10708-007-9111-ySearch in Google Scholar

GREEN, S. (2017): An Illustrated History of Open Science [online]. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/network/societyleaders/open-science/an-illustrated-history-of-open-scienceSearch in Google Scholar

HADJ-HAMMOU, J., LOISELLE, S., OPHOF, D., THORNHILL, I. (2017): Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data. PloS One, 12(12): e0188507.10.1371/journal.pone.0188507571842429211752Search in Google Scholar

HAKLAY, M. (2013): Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In: Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. [eds.]: Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7Search in Google Scholar

HAKLAY, M., WEBER, P. (2008): Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4): 12–18.10.1109/MPRV.2008.80Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HECKER, S., HAKLAY, M., BOWSER, A., MAKUCH, Z., VOGEL, J., BOON, A. (2018): Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London, UCL Press.10.2307/j.ctv550cf2Search in Google Scholar

IRWIN, A. (1995): Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. London and New York, Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

KERSKI, J. J. (2015): Geo-awareness, geo-enablement, geotechnologies, citizen science, and storytelling: Geography on the world stage. Geography Compass, 9(1): 14–26.10.1111/gec3.12193Search in Google Scholar

KULLENBERG, C., KASPEROWSKI, D. (2016): What is citizen science? A scientometric meta-analysis. PloS one, 11(1): e0147152.10.1371/journal.pone.0147152471307826766577Search in Google Scholar

LESZCZYNSKI, A. (2014): On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(1): 60–79.10.1080/00045608.2013.846159Search in Google Scholar

MEASHAM, T. G. (2007): Building capacity for environmental management: local knowledge and rehabilitation on the Gippsland Red Gum Plains. Australian Geographer, 38(2): 145–159.10.1080/00049180701392758Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MIMS, F. M. (1999): Amateur Science - StrongTradition, Bright Future. Science, 284(5411): 55–56.10.1126/science.284.5411.55Search in Google Scholar

MIROWSKI, P. (2018): The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2): 171–203.10.1177/030631271877208629726809Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ODENWALD, S. (2018): A Citation Study of Citizen Science Projects in Space Science and Astronomy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2): 5–10.10.5334/cstp.152Search in Google Scholar

PEARCE, J. (2012): Building Research Equipment with Free, Open-Source Hardware. Science, 337(6100): 1303–1304.10.1126/science.122818322984059Search in Google Scholar

SCHADE, S., MANZONI BRUSATI, M., TSINARAKI, C., KOTSEV, A., FULLERTON, K., SGNAOLIN, R., SPINELLI, F. and MITTON, I. (2017a): Using new data sources for policymaking. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

SCHADE, S., TSINARAKI, C., ROGLIA, E. (2017b): Scientific data from and for the citizen. First Monday, 22(8).10.5210/fm.v22i8.7842Search in Google Scholar

SOROKOWSKI, P., KULCZYCKI, E., SOROKOWSKA, A., PISANSKI, K. (2017): Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543(7646): 481.10.1038/543481a28332542Search in Google Scholar

SUI, D., ELWOOD, S., GOODCHILD, M. (2012): Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2Search in Google Scholar

THEOBALD, E. J. et al. (2015): Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181: 236–244.10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021Search in Google Scholar

TURNER, A. (2006): Introduction to neo-geography. Sebastopol, CA, O’Reilly Media, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

WILKINSON, M. D., DUMONTIER, M., AALBERSBERG, I. J., APPLETON, G., AXTON, M., BAAK, A., MONS, B. (2016): The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 1–9.10.1038/sdata.2016.18479217526978244Search in Google Scholar

WILSON, M. W., GRAHAM, M. (2013): Situating Neogeography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(1): 3–9.10.1068/a44482Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo