1. bookVolume 131 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
23 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
access type Open Access

Women’s health in times of COVID-19 pandemic. Do sex and gender matter?

Published Online: 23 Dec 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 131 (2021) - Issue 1 (January 2021)
Page range: 71 - 75
Journal Details
First Published
23 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
1 time per year

The COVID-19 epidemic has negatively affected all spheres of life, leading to the deterioration of health and quality of life. Although it has affected both men and women, it has had an extraordinary impact on the latter, exposing and exacerbating the existing health inequalities among those groups.

There is increasing evidence that both sex and gender-related factors make women more prone to the harmful effects of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, it is expected that the crisis caused by coronavirus will have long-term severe medical, social, and economic consequences in this population. This paper aimed to investigate the key factors contributing to the different outcomes of COVID-19 in men and women and present multi-dimensional effects of coronavirus pandemic from the perspective of women.

Sex and gender differences must not be ignored in analyzing the impact of COVID-19. Sex/gender-oriented approach should be implemented in all public health actions: from collecting sex-disaggregated data to designing tailored repair post-COVID policies.


1. Portal UN Women: COVID-19: emerging gender data and why it matters. New York (NY): UN Women; 2020. [https://data.unwomen.org/resources/covid-19-emerging-gender-data-and-why-it-matters] (acces: 20.01.2021). Search in Google Scholar

2. Portal United Nations Women: COVID-19 Global Gender Response Tracker. New York: UN Women; 2020. [https://data.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/documents/Publications/UNDP-UNWomen-COVID19-Tracker-Factsheet-1.pdf] (acces: 30.05.2021). Search in Google Scholar

3. Oertelt-Prignone S. The impact of sex and gender in the COVID-19 pandemic. Case study. Independent Experts Report – H2020 Expert Group to update and expand „Gender Innovations/Innovation through Gender”. Document prepared for the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2020. Search in Google Scholar

4. Burki T. The Indirect impact of COVID-19 on women. Lancet. 2020;20:904-5.10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30568-5 Search in Google Scholar

5. Portal World Health Organization: Gender and COVID-19, advocacy brief 14 May, 2020. Geneva: WHO; 14.05.2020. [http://WHO/2019-nCoV/Advocacy_brief/Gender/2020.1] (acces: 10.04.2021). Search in Google Scholar

6. Shreeves R. COVID-19: The need for a gendered response. European Parliamentary Research Service – briefing. Brussels: PE 68348; February 2021. Search in Google Scholar

7. Gender Equality Index 2020: digitalisation and the future of work. Domain of Health. COVID- 19 and gender equality. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE); April 2020. Search in Google Scholar

8. Wenham C. The gendered impact of the COVID-19 crisis and post-crisis period. Document requested by FEMM Committee – European Parliament’s Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equity. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Directorate – General for Internal Polices. Brussels: PE 658.227; September 2020. Search in Google Scholar

9. Brannon L. Psychologia rodzaju. Kobiety i mężczyźni: podobni czy różni. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne; 2002. Search in Google Scholar

10. Mandrysz W. Płeć: między biologią a kulturą. Pisma Humanistyczne.2003;5:182-98. Search in Google Scholar

11. Mandal E. Podmiotowe i interpersonalne konsekwencje stereotypów związanych z płcią. Katowice: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach; 2000. p.28. Search in Google Scholar

12. Wróblewska AM. Polityka gender mainstreaming w Unii Europejskiej. In: K. Palus (ed). Płeć. Między ciałem, umysłem i społeczeństwem. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNS UAM; 2011. p.15-27. Search in Google Scholar

13. Humm M. Słownik teorii feminizmu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Semper; 1993. Search in Google Scholar

14. Klein SL, Dhakal S, Ursin RL, et al. Biological sex impacts COVID-19 outcomes. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(6):e1008570.10.1371/journal.ppat.1008570730772532569293 Search in Google Scholar

15. Portal GlobalHealth5050. Towards Gender Equity in Global Health. The sex, gender and COVID-19 Project. [https://globalhealth5050.org/] (access: 10.06.2021). Search in Google Scholar

16. Thibaut F, van Wijngaarden-Cremers PJM. Women’s mental health in the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Front Glob Women’s Health. 2020;1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.588372.10.3389/fgwh.2020.588372859396834816164 Search in Google Scholar

17. Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, et al. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6317.10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6772656333298944 Search in Google Scholar

18. Oficjalna strona rządowa: Koronawirus – informacje i zalecenia. Raport zakażeń koronawirusem (SARS-CoV-2). Dane historyczne od początku trwania pandemii. [https://www.gov.pl/web/koronawirus/wykaz-zarazenkoronawirusem-sars-cov-2] (access: 15.05.2021) Search in Google Scholar

19. Portal Our World in Data. [https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/Poland] (access: 14.06.2021). Search in Google Scholar

20. Portal Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Evidence used to update the list of underlying medical conditions that increase a person’s risk of severe illness from COVID-19. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021. [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extraprecautions/evidence-table.html ] (access: 14.06.2021). Search in Google Scholar

21. Figliozzi S, Masci PG, Ahmadi N, et al. Predictors of adverse prognosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(10):e13362.10.1111/eci.1336232726868 Search in Google Scholar

22. Portal European Center for Disease Prevention and Control: Risk factors and risk groups. Stockoholm: ECDC; 2020. [https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/latest-evidence/risk-factors-risk-groups] (access: 20.06.2021). Search in Google Scholar

23. Haitao T, Vermunt JV, Abeykoon J, et. al. COVID-19 and sex differences: Mechanisms and biomarkers. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(10):2189-203.10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.024740220833012349 Search in Google Scholar

24. Carino A, Moraca F, Fiorillo B, et al. Hijacking SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 receptor interaction by natural and semi-synthetic steroidal agents acting on functional pockets on the receptor binding domain. Front Chem. 2020;8:572885.10.3389/fchem.2020.572885764507233195060 Search in Google Scholar

25. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;10:626-38. Search in Google Scholar

26. Zeng F, Dai C, Cai P, et al. A comparison study of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody between male and female COVID-19 patients: A possible reason underlying different outcome between sex. J Med Virol. 2020;92(10):2050-4.10.1002/jmv.25989726722832383183 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gargaglioni LH, Marques DA. Let’s talk about sex in the context of COVID-19. J Appl Physiol. 2020;128:1533-8.10.1152/japplphysiol.00335.2020730372932437244 Search in Google Scholar

28. Obias-Manno D, Scott PE, Kaczmarczyk J, et al. The Food and Drug Administration Office of Women’s Health: impact of science on regulatory policy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007;16(6):807-17.10.1089/jwh.2006.013517678451 Search in Google Scholar

29. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. E Clinical Medicine. 2021;38:101019. Search in Google Scholar

30. Galasso V, Pons V, Profeta P, et al. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. PNAS. 2020;117(44):27285-91.10.1073/pnas.2012520117 Search in Google Scholar

31. Gambin M, Sękowski M, Woźniak-Prus M, et al. Uwarunkowania objawów depresji i lęku uogólnionego u dorosłych Polaków w trakcie epidemii COVID-19 – raport z pierwszej fali badania podłużnego. Warszawa: Wydział Psychologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego;2020. [http://psych.uw.edu.pl/wpcontent/uploads/sites/98/2020/05/Uwarunkowania_objawow_depresji_leku_w_trakcie_pandemii_raport.pdf] (access: 13.04.2021). Search in Google Scholar

32. GalassoV, Pons V, Profeta P. Gender differences in COVID-19 perception and compliance. VoxEU.org, 7 Nov 2020. [https://voxeu.org/article/gender-differences-covid-19-perception-and-compliance] (access: 29.11.2020). Search in Google Scholar

33. Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. Gender and COVID-19 Working Group. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):846-8.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2 Search in Google Scholar

34. Portal UN Women: Policy brief: the impact of COVID-19 on women. United Nations;2020. [https://www.un.org/sexualviolenceinconflict/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/report/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women-en-1.pdf] Search in Google Scholar

35. Portal World Health Organization: COVID-19: operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak: interim guidance. Geneva: WHO; 25 March 2020. [https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331561] (access: 15.09.2020). Search in Google Scholar

36. Giannubilo SR, Giannella L, Delli Carpini G, et al. Regional Group for the Health Emergencies. Obstetric Network reorganization during the COVID-19 pandemic: suggestions from an Italian regional model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;249:103-5.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.062 Search in Google Scholar

37. Cousins S. COVID-19 has „devastating” effect on women and girls. Lancet. 2020;396:301-2.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31679-2 Search in Google Scholar

38. Abdalla S, Katz EG, Darmstadt GL. Gender and the impact of COVID-19 on demand for and access to health care: analysis of the data from Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9 (Special issue):S7.10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00115-7 Search in Google Scholar

39. International Labour Organization, June 2020. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Fifth Edition. Updated estimates and analysis. [https://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2021/report-on-the-un-women-global-response-tocovid-19-en.pdf?la=en&vs=1258] (access: 27.01.2021). Search in Google Scholar

40. Portal Aktualności Europarlamentu.[https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/pl/headlines/society/20210225STO98702/wplyw-pandemii-covid-19-na-sytuacje-kobiet-infografiki] (access: 20.03.2021). Search in Google Scholar

41. Portal UN Women. [https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/explainer/covid19/en/index.html ] (access: 15.05.2021). Search in Google Scholar

42. McKinsey Global Institute. COVID-19 and Gender Equality: Countering the regressive effects. [https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/covid-19-and-gender-equality-countering-the-regressive-effects] (access: 27.01.2021). Search in Google Scholar

43. Connor J, Madhavan S, Mokashi M, et al. Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the Covid-19 pandemic: A review. Soc Sci Med. 2020;266:113364.10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113364748714732950924 Search in Google Scholar

44. World Health Organization (2019b). Delivered by women, led by men: A gender and equity analysis of the global health and social workforce. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 24). Search in Google Scholar

45. Centralny Rejestr Lekarzy RP przy Naczelnej Radzie Lekarskiej. [https://nil.org.pl/rejestry/centralny-rejestr-lekarzy/informacje-statystyczne] (access: 19.10.2021). Search in Google Scholar

46. Centralny Rejestr Pielęgniarek i Położnych przy Naczelnej Izbie Pielęgniarek i Położnych. [https://nipip.pl/liczba-pielegniarek-poloznychzarejestrowanych-zatrudnionych/] (access: 19.10.2021). Search in Google Scholar

47. Almeida M, Shrestha AD, Stojanac D, Miller LJ. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women’s mental health. Arch Womens Ment Health.2020;(6):741-8.10.1007/s00737-020-01092-2770781333263142 Search in Google Scholar

48. Su Z, McDonnell D, Roth S, et al. Mental health solutions for domestic violence victims amid COVID-19: a review of the literature. Glob Health. 2021;17:67.10.1186/s12992-021-00710-7823838034183030 Search in Google Scholar

49. Garcia-Fernandez L, Romero-Ferreiro V, Padilla S, et al. Gender differences in emotional response to COVID-19 outbreak in Spain. Brain Behav. 2021;11:e01934.10.1002/brb3.1934782162933305891 Search in Google Scholar

50. Horesh D, Lev-Ari RK, Hasson-Chayon I. Risk factors for psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel: loneliness, age, gender and health status play an important role. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(4):925-33.10.1111/bjhp.12455740490732656926 Search in Google Scholar

51. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.10.3390/ijerph17051729708495232155789 Search in Google Scholar

52. Gaudagni V, Umilta A, Iaria G. Sleep quality, empathy and mood during the isolation period of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian population: females and women suffered the most. Front Glob Womens Health. 2020;1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.585938.10.3389/fgwh.2020.585938859394234816161 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo