1. bookVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
01 Jan 1997
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest

Published Online: 18 Aug 2021
Page range: 120 - 144
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
01 Jan 1997
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper analyses politicians’ selection of adverbs of certainty and extreme case formulations (ECFs) in both the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit (2016). This analysis helped discover if politicians in the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit: (a) framed a similar or different reality through their discourse choices and (b) used the same types of adverbs of certainty and ECFs and with the same frequency. For this purpose, we contrasted both the time (the 1975 Referendum vs. the Brexit) and the position (Anti-Europe vs. Pro-Europe). The corpus was made up of eight different recordings. Four of them were about the Brexit and four about the 1975 Referendum. In the case of the Brexit corpus, two recordings were Pro-Europe, two were Anti-Europe, and the same was in the case of the 1975 Referendum corpus.

Keywords

Akiba, D. (2016). On modal interpretations in noun phrases. Sophia Linguistica, 65. Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. Methuer. Search in Google Scholar

Ball, T. (2011). Manipulation: As old as democracy itself (and sometimes dangerous). In W. Le Cheminant, & J. M. Parrish (Eds.), Manipulating democracy: Democratic theory, political psychology, and mass media (pp. 4158). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Biber. D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Brim, O. G. (1955). Attitude content-intensity and probability expectations. American Sociological Review, 20(1), 68–76. Search in Google Scholar

Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2014). Economic growth and political integration: Estimating the benefits from membership in the European Union using the synthetic counterfactuals method. Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 8162. Search in Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L. (2005). The soft power of war. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 1–10. Search in Google Scholar

Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm. Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, D. (2016). 82% circulation advantage in favour of Brexit as The Sun declares. Centre for Research in Communication and Culture, Loughborough University, June 14. Search in Google Scholar

Denton, R. E., & Woodward, G. C. (1990). Political communication in America. Praeger. Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2018). Intercultural and interdisciplinary variation in the use of epistemic lexical verbs in linguistics and economics research articles. Linguistica Pragensia, 28(2), 154–167. Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373. Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (2004). Discursive psychology. In K. Fitch, & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage Publications, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Search in Google Scholar

Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2018). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection”. (May 2018). Working Paper 24631. National Bureau of Economic Research. Search in Google Scholar

Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In J. A. Krosnick, & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-245). Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Guttman, L., & Suchman, E. A. (1947). Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis. American Sociological Review, 12(1), 57–67. Search in Google Scholar

Hänska, M., & Bauchowitz, S. (2017). Tweeting for Brexit: How social media influenced the Referendum. In J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, & R. Tait (Eds.), Brexit, Trump and the media (pp. 31–35). Abramis Academic Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157. Search in Google Scholar

Herrman, J. (2016). ‘Brexit’ talk on social media favored the ‘Leave’ side. New York Times, July 16. Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ilkhanipour, N. (2016). Tense and modality in the nominal domain. Linguistica, 56(1), 143–160. Search in Google Scholar

Kaid, L. L., Gerstle, J., & Sanders, K. R. (Eds.). (1991). Mediated politics in two cultures: Presidential campaigning in the United States and France. Praeger. Search in Google Scholar

Katz, D. (1944). The measurement of intensity. In H. Cantril (Ed.), Gauging public opinion (pp. 51–65). Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–162. Search in Google Scholar

McDill, E. L. (1959). A comparison of three measures of attitude intensity. Social Forces, 38(2), 95–99. Search in Google Scholar

McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. Taylor and Francis. Search in Google Scholar

Melkumian, A. A. (2018). A note on the demographics of UK referendums on "staying or leaving the European Union". The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(5), 40–45. Search in Google Scholar

Minford, P. (2006). Measuring the economic costs and benefits of the EU. Open Economies Review, 17(4–5), 509–524. Search in Google Scholar

Nye, J. (2004). Soft power. The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs. Search in Google Scholar

Ottaviano, G. I., Pessoa, J.P., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU. Center for Financial Studies Working Paper Series, 472, 1–18. Search in Google Scholar

Pain, N., & Young, G. (2004). The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU. Economic Modeling, 21(3), 387–408. Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. (1990). Modality and the English modals. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Perloff, R. M. (2018). The dynamics of political communication. Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Polonski, V. (2016). Social media voices in the UK’s EU referendum. Medium, May 15. Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2-3), 219–229. Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Sidney, G., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Rozumko, A. (2017). Adverbial markers of epistemic modality across disciplinary discourses: A contrastive study of research articles in six academic disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 52(1), 73–101. Search in Google Scholar

Salazar, D., & Verdaguer, I. (2009). Polysemous verbs and modality in native and non-native argumentative writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Studies, 9(3), 209–219. Search in Google Scholar

Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. Search in Google Scholar

Simon-Vandenbergen, A., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Suchman, E. A. (1950). The intensity component in attitude and opinion research. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazardsfeld, S. A. Star, & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 213–276). Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, P. H. (1956). Initial attitude toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 413–425. Search in Google Scholar

Tendera-Właszczuk, H. (2018). Study on the brexit's background and causes. Ekonomia i Prawo, 17(3), 307–317. Search in Google Scholar

Van linden, A. (2012). Modal adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in diachrony and synchrony. Mouton de Gruyter Search in Google Scholar

Velasquez Chafloque, H. (2014). A reduplicative analysis of sentence modal adverbs in Spanish. PhD Thesis. University of Southern California. Search in Google Scholar

Whitehead, K. A. (2015). Extreme-case formulations. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2019). A semantic approach to the English modality. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 879–885. Search in Google Scholar

Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the Internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo