1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8985
ISSN
1857-9345
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship

Published Online: 27 Feb 2020
Volume & Issue: AHEAD OF PRINT
Page range: -
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8985
ISSN
1857-9345
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Aim: To present the inappropriate types of authorship and practice, and the most recent developments related to basic principles and criteria to a fair system for allocating authorship in scientific publications.

Methods: An analysis of relevant materials and documents, sources from the internet and published literature and personal experience and observations of the author.

Results: Working in multidisciplinary teams is a common feature of modern research processes. The most sensitive question is how to decide on who to acknowledge as author of a multi-authored publication. The pertinence of this question is growing with the increasing importance of individual scientists’ publication records for professional status and career. However, discussions about authorship allocation might lead to serious conflicts and disputes among coworkers which could even endanger cooperation and successful completion of a research project. It seems that discussion and education about ethical standards and practical guidelines for fairly allocating authorship are insufficient and the question of ethical practices related to authorship in multi-authored publications remains generally unresolved.

Conclusion: It is necessary to work for raising awareness about the importance and need for education about principles of scientific communication and fair allocation of authorship, ethics of research and publication of results. The use of various forms of education in the scientific community, especially young researchers and students, in order to create an ethical environment, is one of the most effective ways to prevent the emergence of scientific and publication dishonesty and fraud, including pathology of authorship.

Keywords

1. Neill US. Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Invest. 2008; 118: 2368.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bilić-Zulle L. Research integrity – a cornerstone of existence and development of science [In Croatian]. Biochemia Medica. 2007; 17: 143–50.Search in Google Scholar

3. Donev D. Scientific and Publication Ethics and Misconduct. [In Macedonian]. Vox Medici. Dec 2012; 77: 235–40. Available at: http://www.lkm.org.mk/VoxMedici/77.pdf Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

4. Donev D. Principles and ethics in scientific communication in biomedicine. Acta Informatica Medica. 2013; 21 (4): 228–33. Available at: http://www.scopemed.org/?jid=6 Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dobric S. Authorship misusing in scientific publiccations. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2012; 69(12): 1028–30.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ignjatovic M. The authors and “authors”. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2006; 63(3): 239–46.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hwang K. How to Write a Scientific Paper: Three Tips to Remember. Arch Plast Surg. 2012 January; 39(1): 77. Available at: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3385294/pdf/aps-39-77A.pdf Accessed: June 30, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Eggert LD. Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi-Authored Articles. Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 196. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164109/ Accessed: Jun 24, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

9. Horner J, Minifie F. D. Research ethics III: publiccation practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011; 54: S346–S362.10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)Search in Google Scholar

10. Wager E, Kleinert S. Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors? Journal of Global Health. 2013; 3(2): 1–7. Available at: http://jogh.org/documents/forthcoming/V1%20Wager%20FINAL.pdf Accessed: Sept 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2011). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Authorship and Contributorship. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html Accessed: June 30, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

12. ICMJE. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals* – Updated December 2013. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf Accessed: Apr 7, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

13. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat. Res. 2005 Jan; 589(1): 17–30.10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.00315652224Search in Google Scholar

14 Steneck N, Mayer T. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. Available at: http://www.singaporestatement.org/ Accessed: Apr 7, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

15. Council of Science Editors. CSEs White paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. 2012 Update. Available at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/ Accessed: Aug 14, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

16. Committee on Publication Ethics. Promoting integrity in research publication. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/ Accessed: Jul 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

17. American Medical Association. Manual of Style. Available at: http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/ Accessed: Jul 20, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

18. Smith E, Smith E, William-Jones B. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012; 18(2): 199–212.10.1007/s11948-011-9263-521312000Search in Google Scholar

19. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997; 314: 1009–12. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/314/7086/1009?ijkey=bd3d533c7224960ab169a64e4ecdf00808154574&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha Accessed: Sept 20, 2014Search in Google Scholar

20. Kakkar N. Authorship trends in the Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology: going the global way? – Correspondence. J Clin Pathol. 2004; 57: 670. Available at: http://jcp.bmj.com/content/57/6/670.1.full Accessed: Apr 20, 2014Search in Google Scholar

21. Marusic A, Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006 Jun; 22(6): 1035–44.10.1185/030079906X10488516862642Search in Google Scholar

22. Seeman JI, House MC. Influences on authorship issues: an evaluation of giving credit. Account. Res. 2010; 17(3): 146–69.Search in Google Scholar

23. Godlee F. More than 20% of medical articles have a “guest” author. British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition). 2009; 339(7722): p652. Available at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/44376071/more-than-20-medical-articles-have-a-guest-author Accessed: Sept 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

24. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Authorship and disputes. Available at: http://search.nih.gov/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&affiliate=nih&query=Authorship+and+disputes&commit.x=31&commit.y=6 Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

25. WAME. The Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. Available at: http://www.wame.org/News/Details/2 Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

26. European Association of Science Editors. EASE Guidelines for authors and translators of scientific articles to be published in English. June 2013. Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/ease_guidelines-june2013-english.pdf Accessed: Apr 8, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

27. The Office of Research Integrity. Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/ori_annual_report_2010.pdf Accessed: Jul 18, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

28. American Psychological Association (2011). Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship. Available at: http://www.apa.org/research/responsible/publication/index.aspx Accessed: Aug 26, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

29. Science. General Information for Authors. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/prep/gen_info.xhtml Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

30. PLoS ONE. Guidelines for Authors. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

31. Nature. Authorship Policies. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7242/full/4581078a.html Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

32. Masic I, Kujundzic E. Science editing of academic periodicals in biomedical and social sciences. Avicena. Sarajevo, 2013: 278.Search in Google Scholar

33. Montreal 4th World Conference on Research Integrity. Montreal Statement on Research Integrity. Available at: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/olpd/MontrealStatement.pdf Accessed: Sept 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

34. Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009 Feb 20; 62(2): 109–12.10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.00119147308Search in Google Scholar

35. Katavić V. Responsible conduct of research. In: Marušić M (ed.) Principles of research in medicine. Zagreb: Medicinska naklada. 2008: 234–45.Search in Google Scholar

36. Albert T, Wager E. How to Handle Authorship Disputes: A Guide For New Researchers. The COPE Report 2003 (July 1). Available at: http://www.publicationethics.org/resources/guidelinesSearch in Google Scholar

37. Heitman E, Litewka S. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urol. Oncol. 2011; 29(1): 104–8.Search in Google Scholar

38. Scheetz M. The Teaching Scholars Program: a proposed approach for promoting research integrity. In: Carmi A, Ferris L, Nachshon D, eds. Medicine and law – Theme issue on scientific misconduct. World Association for Medical Law. Medicine and Law. 2007; 26(3): 599–614.Search in Google Scholar

39. Wagena E.J. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. J. Med. Ethics. 2005 May; 31(5): 308.10.1136/jme.2004.009308173414715863695Search in Google Scholar

40. Marusic A, Katavic V, Marusic M. Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. In: Carmi A, Ferris L, Nachshon D, eds. Medicine and law – Theme issue on scientific misconduct. World Association for Medical Law. Medicine and Law. 2007; 26(3): 545–66.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo