1. bookVolume 69 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-9357
First Published
30 Mar 2019
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

From Unicorns to Lipizzan Horses. Romanian Folklore Studies on the Way to the Implementation of the UNESCO 2003 Convention

Published Online: 24 Jan 2022
Page range: 487 - 500
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-9357
First Published
30 Mar 2019
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

As a country officially engaged in the intangible cultural heritage (hereafter ICH) inventorying and other safeguarding mechanisms of the UNESCO 2003 Convention, Romania provides an example of how folklorists strive to transcend the traditional rules of their discipline and to adapt their methodology and overview to supporting the implementation of the Convention. Starting from the recent Romanian contribution to the multinational file for inscribing the “Lipizzan horse breeding traditions” on the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, this paper highlights the counterbalancing influences encountered during this process. Given the distance between this ICH element and the topoi that stand in the mainstream of Romanian folklore studies, the author will provide arguments for considering horse husbandry as a worthy example of living heritage in Romania, ensuring visibility to this tradition in a context dominated by the definition of folklore as an artistic or expressive phenomenon that is being (re)presented as ICH and less by folklife and aesthetic social and cultural manifestations. Using other examples of Romanian living heritage less visible at the level of scholarly and policy initiatives, the author pleads for a middle ground between traditional folklore studies and the theory and current practices of documenting living heritage. The topic may thus contribute to greater efforts to break the old rules of the discipline, turning experts’ eyes from mythological horses to real ones.

Keywords

Aarne, A., Thompson, S (1961). The Types of the Folktale. A Classification and Bibliography, Second Edition, Helsinki, Academia Scientiarium Fennica. Search in Google Scholar

Balotescu, I. (2018). Patrimoniul cultural imaterial încontext intern și internațional. Dinamica unui concept [Intangible cultural heritage in a national and international context. The dynamics of a concept]. Iași: Editura Universității “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”. Search in Google Scholar

Baron, R. (2016). Public folklore dialogism and critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(8), 588–606.10.1080/13527258.2016.1150320 Search in Google Scholar

Bârlea, O. (2014). Mică enciclopedie a poveștilor românești [Small encyclopaedia of Romanian folktales], Second edition. Craiova: Aius. Search in Google Scholar

Bendix, R. (2015). Archived and Archival Culture: Ethnographic Reflections on Cultural Habits. Storia della Storiografia, 68(2), 143–163. Search in Google Scholar

Birke, L., Thompson, K. (2017). (Un)stable relations: Horses, humans and social agency. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Blake, J. (2019). Further reflections on community involvement safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. In: N. Akagawa, L. Smith (Eds.), Safeguarding Intangible Heritage. Practices and politics (pp. 17–35). London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Borges, J. L. (1957). The Book of Imaginary Beings (M. Guerrero, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics. Search in Google Scholar

Bortolotto, Ch. (2007). From Objects to Processes: UNESCO’s ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage’. Journal of Museum Ethnography, 19, 21–33. Search in Google Scholar

Čapo, J., Gulin Zrnić, V. (2017). Grounding contemporary Croatian cultural anthropology in its own ethnology. In: A. Barrera-González, M. Heintz, A. Horolets (Eds.), European Anthropologies (pp. 230–249). Oxford, New York: Berghan Books. Search in Google Scholar

Coman, M. (1996). Bestiarul mitologic românesc [Romanian mythological bestiary]. Bucharest: Editura Fundației Culturale Române. Search in Google Scholar

Cornu, M., Vaivade, A. (2020). Introduction: dialogues between international and national laws relating to intangible cultural heritage. In: M. Cornu, A. Vaivade, L. Martinet, C. Hance (Eds.), Intangible Cultural Heritage under National and International Law. Going beyond the 2003 UNESCO Convention (pp. 1–15). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Dundes, A. (1971). Folk Ideas as Units of Worldview. The Journal of American Folklore, 84 (331), Toward New Perspectives in Folklore (Jan. - Mar., 1971), 93–103.10.2307/539737 Search in Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (1975). Some Observations on European Witchcraft. History of Religions, 14(4), 56–62.10.1086/462721 Search in Google Scholar

Fournier, L.-S. (2012). Intangible Cultural Heritage in France: From State Culture to Local Development. In: R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage Regimes and the State (pp. 327–340). Göttingen University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Fruntelată, I. (2020). Despre interpretarea etnologică [About the ethnological interpretation]. Bucharest: Etnologica. Search in Google Scholar

Haase, D. (2008). The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Folktales and Fairy Tales. Westport, London, Greenwood Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hafstein, V. T. (2007). Sauvegarde du patrimoine immatériel et gouvernance communautaire. In: J. Boel (Ed.), 60 ans d‘histoire de l‘Unesco, Actes du colloque international, Paris, 16-18 novembre 2005 (pp. 337–348). Paris: Maison de l‘Unesco. Search in Google Scholar

Hamar, J., Voľanská, Ľ (2015). Between Politics, Science and Bearers. Implementation of the UNESCO-Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Národopisná revue (Journal of Ethnology), 25(5), 34–46. Search in Google Scholar

Hausman, G., Hausman, L. (2003). The mythology of horses: Horse legend and core throughout the ages. New York: Three Rivers Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hedenborg, S., White, M. H. (2013). From glamour to drudgery – Changing gender patterns in the equine sector: A comparative study of Sweden and Great Britain in the twentieth century. In: M. Adelman, J. Knijnik (Eds.), Gender and equestrian sport: Riding around the world (pp. 15–36). Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Hedeșan, O. (2008). Doing Fieldwork in Communist Romania. In: V. Mihailescu, I. Iliev, S. Naumovic (Eds.), Studying Peoples in the People’s Democracies II: Socialist Era Anthropology in South-East Europe (Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia) (pp. 21–39). Berlin: LIT Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Ispas, S. (1998–1999). The National Archives of Folklore and Ethnography. In: Anuarul Institutului de Etnografie şi Folclor C. Brăiloiu, New series, Tom 9–10 (1998–1999), 69–76. Search in Google Scholar

Ispas, S. (2016). Some aspects of conservation and protection of profound culture. In: S. Ispas, M. Bercovici, Folkmedia. Folkloric Multimedia Deposit (pp. 22–46). Bucharest: Constantin Brailoiu Institute of Ethnography and Folklore. Search in Google Scholar

Ispas, S. (2021). Viewpoints on the current research in Romanian folkloristics. Journal of Ethnography and Folklore, New Series, 1–2, 85–97. Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, M. (2020). Words Matter… The Arsenal and the Repertoire: UNESCO, ICOM, and European Frameworks. Volkskunde, 121(4), 267–286. Search in Google Scholar

Kaneff, D. (2004). Who owns the past?: the politics of time in a “model” Bulgarian village. Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books. Search in Google Scholar

Karnoouh, C. (1982). National unity in Central Europe: The state, peasant folklore, and monoethnism. Telos. Critical Theory of the Contemporary, 53, 95–105. Search in Google Scholar

Khaznadar, Ch. (2011). La relation de la France au patrimoine culturel immatériel. In: C. Hottin (Ed.), Le patrimoine culturel immatériel. Premierès expériences en France (pp. 11–23). Paris: Babel, Maison des Cultures du Monde. Search in Google Scholar

Kiliánová, G. (2017). Ethnology in Slovakia in crucial historical periods (after 1968 and 1989): from a historical to a social sciences discipline? Národopisná revue (Journal of Ethnology), 27(5), 65–91. Search in Google Scholar

Kligman, G. (1981). Căluș: Symbolic Transformation in Romanian Ritual, with a fore-word of Mircea Eliade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kozak, M. W. (2017). Making Trails: Horses and Equestrian Tourism in Poland. In: M. Adelman, K. Thompson (Eds.), Equestrian Cultures in Global and Local Contexts (pp. 131–154). Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Kuutma, K. (2012). Between Arbitration and Engineering: Concepts and Contingencies in the Shaping of Heritage Regimes. In: R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage Regimes and the State, Göttingen Studies in Cultural Property, Volume 6 (pp. 21–38). Universitätsverlag Göttingen. Search in Google Scholar

Kuutma, K. (2016). From Folklore to Intangible Heritage. In: W. Logan, M Nic Craith, U. Kockel (Eds.), A Companion to Heritage Studies (pp. 41–54). Logan: Wiley-Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Kuutma, K. (2019). Inside the UNESCO apparatus. From intangible representations tangible effects. In: N. Akagawa, L. Smith (Eds.), Intangible Heritage: the practices and politics of safeguarding (pp. 68–83). London: Routledge, Taylor&Francis. Search in Google Scholar

Lixinski, L. (2011). Selecting heritage: The Interplay of Art, Politics and Identity. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 81–100.10.1093/ejil/chr001 Search in Google Scholar

Mengel, M. (2015). The archaeology of an archive: Uses of knowledge at the Institut de Etnografie și Folclor in Bucharest. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln im Fach Musikwissenschaft. Search in Google Scholar

Mușlea, I. (1924). Le cheval merveilleux dans l’épopée populaire. In: Mélanges de l’Ecole Roumaine en France, Partie III (pp. 67–110), Paris-Bucarest. Search in Google Scholar

Repciuc, I. (2018). A New Perspective on the Old Documents Concerning the Analysis of Animal Folk Masquerade. In: O. Achim, L. Botoșineanu, D. Butnaru, M.-R. Clim, V. Olariu (Eds.), Clasic și modern în cercetarea filologică românească actuală (pp. 456–466). Iași: Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”. Search in Google Scholar

Ropa, A. (2019). Introduction. In: A. Ropa, T. Dawson (Eds.), The Horse in Premodern European Culture (pp. 1–10). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Santova, M. (2014). To capture the elusive. Intangible cultural heritage. Sofia: Prof. Marin Drinov Academic Publishing House. Search in Google Scholar

Scafidi, S. (2005). Who Owns Culture? Appropriation and Authenticity in American Law. New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Semuc, I. (2019). Câteva reprezentări și semnificații ale calului [A few representations and meanings of the horse]. Anuarul Institutului de Etnografie și Folclor Constantin Brailoiu, T. 30 (pp. 67–75). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române. Search in Google Scholar

Senn, H. (1982). Romanian Werewolves: Seasons, Rituals, Cycles. Folklore, 93(2), 206–215.10.1080/0015587X.1982.9716240 Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, Carol (1983). The politics of folklore in Bulgaria. Anthropological Quarterly, 56(2), 55–61.10.2307/3317339 Search in Google Scholar

Slavec Gradišnik, I. (2010). Slovenian Folk Culture: Between Academic Knowledge and Public Display. Journal of Folklore Research, 47(1–2), 123–151.10.2979/jfr.2010.47.1-2.123 Search in Google Scholar

Smeets, R. (2006). The intangible heritage convention: it’s official! Ratified by 30 States in record time, the ICH Convention enters into force on 20 April 2006. The Intangible Heritage Messenger, 1:1, 1–2. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203602263 Search in Google Scholar

Španiček, Ž. (2019). Tradicije uzgoja konja lipicanaca u Slavoniji, Baranji i Srijemu: između kulturnih praksi i kulturnih politika. In: A. Svetel, T. Petrović Leš (Eds.), Nesnovna dediščina med prakso in registri, 15. Vzporednice med slovensko in hrvaško etnologijo (pp. 210–226). Ljubljana: Slovensko etnološko društvo; Zagreb: Hrvaško etnološko društvo. Search in Google Scholar

Știucă, N. ([2002] 2009). Patrimoniul cultural și legile lui [Cultural heritage and its laws]. In: Sinteze (1994-2008) (pp. 560–564). Bucharest: CNCPCT. Search in Google Scholar

Taloș, I. (2001). Gândirea magio-religioasă la români. Dicționar [Magical and religious thinking of Romanians. A dictionary]. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică. Search in Google Scholar

Tauschek, M. (2012). The Bureaucratic Texture of National Patrimonial Policies. In: R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage Regimes and the State. Göttingen Studies in Cultural Property, Volume 6 (pp. 195–212).Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. Search in Google Scholar

Tornatore, J.-L. (2012). Anthropology’s Pay-back: “The Gastronomic Meal of the French”. The Ethnographic Elements of a Heritage Distinction. In: R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage Regimes and the State (pp. 314–368). Göttingen: Göttingen University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Van Gennep, A. (1924). Le Folklore. Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Vâlsan, G. (1927/2001). Menirea etnografiei în România [The mission of ethnography in Romania]. In: Studii antropogeografice, etnografice si geopolitice (pp. 7–13). Cluj: EFES. Search in Google Scholar

Vuia, R. (1975). Originea jocului de Călușari [The origin of the Călușari dance]. In: Studii de etnografie și folclor (pp. 110–140). Bucharest: Minerva. Search in Google Scholar

Vulcănescu, R. (1979). Dicţionar de etnologie. I. Terminologie [Dictionary of ethnology. I. Terminology]. Bucharest: Editura Albatros. Search in Google Scholar

Walkowitz, D. J. (2010). City folk: English country dance and the politics of the folk in modern America. New York: New York University Press.10.18574/nyu/9780814794692.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo