1. bookVolume 47 (2021): Issue 2 (July 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
access type Open Access

Caseworker Prejudice: Exploring Secondary Non-Take-Up from Below Among Latino Immigrants in Madrid, London, and New York City

Published Online: 20 Jul 2021
Page range: 201 - 220
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year

This article investigates the understudied phenomenon of secondary non-take-up (NTU) among Latino immigrants in Madrid, London, and New York City from their own perspective. It examines the reasons behind secondary NTU across the three sites and examines the relevance of type of welfare state in which they live. The findings of this paper suggest that secondary NTU is prevalent in these three sites. It identifies prejudice from social workers as the leading cause of secondary NTU among Latino immigrants.


Achiume, E. Tendayi. 2014. Beyond Prejudice: Structural Xenophobic Discrimination Against Refugees. Georgetown Journal of International Law 45(2): 323–382.Search in Google Scholar

Arango, Luis, Dolores Mata, and Nataly Obando. 2015. Echoes of the Crises in Spain and US in the Colombian Labor Market: A Differences-in-Differences Approach. SERIEs 6(4): 441–477.Search in Google Scholar

Arendt, Florient and Narin Karadas. 2019. Ethnic Concordance in Patient–Physician Communication: Experimental Evidence from Germany. Journal of Health Communication 24(1): 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Ayón, Cecilia. 2015. Economic, Social and Health Effects of Discrimination on Latino Immigrant Families. Migration Policy Institute: Washing DC. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/economic-social-and-health-effects-discriminationlatino-immigrant-families.Search in Google Scholar

Bargain, Olivier, Herwig Immervoll, and Heikki Viitamäki. 2012. No Claim, No Pain. Measuring the Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance Using Register Data. The Journal of Economic Inequality 10(3): 375–395.Search in Google Scholar

Blix, Marten. 2018. Digitalization, Immigration and the Welfare State New Thinking in Political Economy Series Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Sweden Publication.Search in Google Scholar

Bourgois, Philippe and Jeff Schonberg. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend. University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brodkin, Evelyn. and Malay Majmundar. 2010. Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 827–848.Search in Google Scholar

Bruckmeier, Kerstin and Jürgen Wiemers. 2017. Differences in Welfare Take-Up Between Immigrants and Natives – a Microsimulation Study. International Journal of Manpower 38(2): 226–241.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, Bridget, Claire Alexander, Omar Khan, James Nazro, and William Shankley (eds.). 2020. Ethnicity and Race in the UK: State of the Nation. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Bristol University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Calderon, Jose. 1992. Hispanic and Latino: The Viability of Categories for Panethnic Unity. Latin American Perspectives 19(4): 37–44.Search in Google Scholar

Crepaz, Markus and Regan Damron. 2009. Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes About Immigrants. Comparative Political Studies 42(3): 437–463.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, Janet. 2004. The Take Up of Social Benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research. pp. 80–148 in Auerbach, Alan, David Card, and John Quigley (eds), Public policy and the income distribution, New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Dragos, Radu, Maria Hudson and Joan Phillips. 2010. Migrant Workers’ Interactions with Welfare Benefits: A Review of Recent Evidence and its Relevance for the Tax Credits System. HMRC Research Report 115.Search in Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2012. Comparing Welfare State Regimes: Are Typologies an Ideal or Realistic Strategy? European Social Policy Analysis Network. ESPAnet Conference.Search in Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eurofund. 2015. Access to Social Benefits: Reducing Non-Take-Up. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1536en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Tony. 2016. Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Finn, Daniel and Jo Goodship. 2014. Take-Up of Benefits and Poverty: An Evidence and Policy Review. Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion. London.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Carly. 2008. The Welfare Queen: Race, Gender, Class, and Public Opinion. Race, Gender & Class 15(3/4): 162–179.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Michael, Katrin Gasior, Tamara Premrov, Katarina Hollan, and Anette Scoppetta. 2020. Falling through the Social Safety Net? Analysing Non-Take-up of Minimum Income Benefit and Monetary Social Assistance in Austria. Social Policy & Administration 54: 827–843.Search in Google Scholar

Flores, René. 2015. The Resurgence of Race in Spain: Perceptions of Discrimination Among Immigrants. Social Forces 94(1): 237–269.Search in Google Scholar

Glick Schiller, Nina, Ayşe Çağlar, and Thaddeus C. Guldbrandsen. 2006. Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation. American Ethnologist 33(4): 612–633.Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, Ashley, Kim Fleming, Nicole Markwick, Louise Lagimodiere, and Thomas Kerr. 2017. “They Treated Me Like Crap And I Know It Was Because I Was Native”: The Healthcare Experiences of Aboriginal Peoples Living in Vancouver’s Inner City. Social Science and Medicine 17: 87–94.Search in Google Scholar

Grosios, Konstantina, Peter Gahan, and Jane Burbidge. 2010. Overview of Healthcare in the UK. The EPMA journal 1(4): 529–534.Search in Google Scholar

Hainmueller, Jens and Daniel Hopkins. 2014. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17(1): 225–249.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Jennifer. 2020. The Digitization of Advice and Welfare Benefits Services: Re-Imagining the Homeless User. Housing Studies 35(1): 143–162.Search in Google Scholar

Hooijer, Gerda and Georg Picot. 2015. European Welfare States and Migrant Poverty: The Institutional Determinants of Disadvantage. Comparative Political Studies 48(14): 1879–1904.Search in Google Scholar

Isakjee, Arshad. 2017. Welfare State Regimes: A Literature Review’, IRiS Working Paper Series, 18/2017 (UPWEB Working Paper Series, No. 5/2017) Birmingham: Institute for Research into Super-diversity.Search in Google Scholar

Jessen, Jorunn and Per A. Tufte. 2014. Discretionary Decision-Making in a Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms. Journal of Social Policy 43(2): 269–288.Search in Google Scholar

Jo, Yongmie. 2013. Psycho-Social Dimensions of Poverty: When Poverty Becomes Shameful. Critical Social Policy 33: 514–531.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kevin. 2009. The Intersection of Race and Class in U.S. Immigration Law and Enforcement. Law and Contemporary Problems 72(4): 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

Kayser, Hilke and Joachim Frick. 2000. Take It or Leave It:(Non-)Take-Up Behavior of Social Assistance in Germany. Discussion Paper No. 210. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).Search in Google Scholar

Leruth, Benjamin and Peter Taylor-Gooby. 2019. Does Political Discourse Matter? Comparing Party Positions and Public Attitudes on Immigration in England. Politics 39(2): 154–169.Search in Google Scholar

Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy; Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Ming-Cheng and Roxana Bahar. 2013. Resisting the Colonization of the Lifeworld? Immigrant Patients’ Experiences with Co-ethnic Healthcare Workers. Social Science & Medicine 87: 68–76.Search in Google Scholar

Lott, Bernice and Heather Bullock. 2007. Psychology and Economic Injustice: Personal, Professional, and Political Intersections. American Psychological Association. The book is 190 pagesSearch in Google Scholar

Mallet, Marie and Johanna Pinto-Coelho. 2018. Investigating Intra-Ethnic Divisions Among Latino Immigrants in Miami, Florida. Latino Studies 16: 91–112.Search in Google Scholar

Mar-Molinero, Clare 2002. The Politics of Language in the Spanish-Speaking World: From Colonization to Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mazet, Pierre. 2014. Analysis of the Non-Take-Up of Benefits: A Public Policy Assessment Tool. Service de lutte contre la pauvreté, la précarité et l’exclusion sociale, Bruxelles, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

McIlwaine, Cathy. 2015 Legal Latins: Creating Webs and Practices of Immigration Status among Latin American Migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(3): 493–511.Search in Google Scholar

McLaren, Lauren. 2015. Immigration and Perceptions of National Political Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Morales, Laura and Alfonso Echazarra. 2013. Will We All Hunker Down? The Impact of Immigration and Diversity on Local Communities in Spain. Journal of Elections. Public Opinion & Parties 23(3): 343–366.Search in Google Scholar

Moreno Fuentes, Francisco and Maria Bruquetas Callejo. 2011. Immigration and the Welfare State in Spain. Barcelona: Coleccion Estudios Sociales. LaCaixa.Search in Google Scholar

Petropoulos, Georgias, Scott Marcus, Nicolas Moës, and Enrico Bergamini. 2019. Digitalization and European Welfare States. Bruegel Blueprint Series 30.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, Lakeisha. 2006. Illegal Immigrants Should Not Receive Social Services. International Social Science Review 81(1/2): 66–72.Search in Google Scholar

Reijnders, Mark, Jelmer Schalk, and Trui Steen. 2018. Services Wanted? Understanding the Non-Take-Up of Social Support at the Local Level. VOLUNTAS 29(6): 1360–1374.Search in Google Scholar

Reitz, Jeffrey G., Patrick Simon, and Emily Laxer. 2017. Muslims’ Social Inclusion and Exclusion in France, Québec, and Canada: Does National Context Matter? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(15): 2473–2498.Search in Google Scholar

Riphahn, Regina, Monika Sander, and Christoph Wunder. 2013. The Welfare Use of Immigrants and Natives in Germany: The Case of Turkish Immigrants. International Journal of Manpower 34(1): 70–82.Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Friederike. 2017. Generous to All or ‘Insiders Only’? The Relationship between Welfare State Generosity and Immigrant Welfare Rights. Journal of European Social Policy 27(2): 173–196.Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane. 2006. Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 229–244.Search in Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane. 2012. Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth, and Clara Holzinger. 2018. ‘Damn It, I Am a Miserable Eastern European in the Eyes of the Administrator’: EU Migrants’ Experiences with (Transnational) Social Security. Social Inclusion 6(3): 201–209.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Leiyu, Gregory Stevens, Lydie Lebrun, Pegah Faed, and Jenna Tsai. 2008. Enhancing the Measurement of Health Disparities for Vulnerable Populations. Journal of public health management and practice 14: 45–52.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Laura. 2010. Multicultural Foundations of Psychology and Counseling Series. Psychology, Poverty, and the Rnd of Social Exclusion: Putting our Practice to Work. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. 2017. International Migration Report 9. New York: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

U. S. Census Bureau. 2015. Population Estimates, https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/(27.06.2020).Search in Google Scholar

USCIS. 2018. Final Rule on Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility. www.uscis.gov/archive/archive-news/final-rule-public-charge-ground-inadmissibility (27.06.2020).Search in Google Scholar

van Oorschot, Wim. 1991. Non-Take-Up of Social Security Benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 1(1): 15–30.Search in Google Scholar

van Oorschot, Wim. 1995. Realizing Rights: A Multi-Level Approach to Non-take-up of Means-tested Benefits. Aldershot: Avebury.Search in Google Scholar

van Oorschot, Wim. 1996. Modelling Non-Take-Up: The Interactive Model of Multi-Level Influences and the Dynamic Model of Benefit Receipt. In New Perspectives on the Non-take-up of Social Security Benefits, edited by Wim van Oorschot. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Warin, Philippe. 2008. Le non-recours par désintérêt : la possibilité d’un « vivre hors droits ». Vie sociale 1(1): 9–19.Search in Google Scholar

Warin, Philippe. 2014. What Is the Non-Take-Up of Social Benefits. Books and Ideas 9: 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Weinberg, Merlinda. 2010. The Social Construction of Social Work Ethics: Politicizing and Broadening the Lens. Journal of Progressive Human Services 21(1): 32–44.Search in Google Scholar

Yemane, Ruta and Mariña Fernández-Reino. 2019. Latinos in the United States and in Spain: the Impact of Ethnic Group Stereotypes on Labour Market Outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(6): 1240–1260. Doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1622806.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo