1. bookVolume 59 (2019): Issue 1 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Democracy and Language in Jürgen Habermas’s Discourse Theory

Published Online: 10 Jan 2020
Page range: 7 - 25
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

The concept of hermeneutic science is outlined by Habermas as a reflection within the ordinary language, addressed to the dialogic dimension of intersubjective recognition and connected to the juridical guarantee. The guarantee function fulfilled by the discursive agreement towards every real dialogue is obvious: it indicates the main reference point for the regulation and coordination of social action, tracing a line of demarcation between being and having to be, facts and norms. Speech, communicative agreement and legal guarantee are mutually qualified terms where the public discussion of institutional issues makes it possible to define the normative validity as non-assimilatory generality, placed beyond any populistic yearning, tracing a line of demarcation between law and power. The idea of deliberative democracy expresses the relationship and distinction between the universalism of rights and the factuality of the norm issuing, between the idea of good and the idea of right, in order to support democratic decision-making legitimacy. Combining the reasons of the markets with those of civil solidarity, through independent forms of regulation both from the obsolete state sovereignties and from the traditional international perspectives, represents a primary challenge of the Habermasian theory where the critical role of the rational public sphere appears fundamental.

Keywords

Agire comunicativo e logica delle scienze sociali (1980). Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Dialogo su Dio e il mondo. Intervista con Edoardo Mendieta (1999). Teoria politica, 15(2–3), 419–38.Search in Google Scholar

Die Postnationale Konstellation (1998). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (2000b) La costellazione postnazionale. Mercato globale, nazioni e democrazia, Milano: Feltrinelli.Search in Google Scholar

Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (1992), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (1996) Fatti e norme. Contributi a una teoria discorsiva del diritto e della democrazia, Milano: Guerini.Search in Google Scholar

Für eine demokratische Polarisierung. Wie man dem Rechtspopulismus den Boden entzieht. Jürgen Habermas im Interview (2016). Blätter für deutsche und international Politik, 11, 35–42; it. transl. Jürgen Habermas. La risposta democratica al populismo di destra, Micromega, 2017, 2, 4–24.Search in Google Scholar

Further Reflections on the Public Sphere (1992a), in: Calhoun C. (Eds.) Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 421–461). Cambridge – Massachusetts – London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas J. (1963) Teorie und Praxis, Neuwied: Luchterhand; it. transl. (1971) Teoria e prassi nella società tecnologica, Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas J. Ratzinger J. (2005), Ragione e fede in dialogo. Le idee di Benedetto XVI a confronto con un grande filosofo Venezia: Marsilio.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas J., Luhmann N. (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtecnologie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (1983) Teoria della società o tecnologia sociale. Che cosa offre la ricerca del sistema sociale?, Milano: Etas Kom.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas su web e sfera pubblica. Quello che la rete non sa fare (2014). Retrieved July 22, 2014, from http://www.reset.it. ISSN 2611–5883.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16 (4), 411–426.Search in Google Scholar

Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (1973), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (1976) La crisi della razionalità nel capitalismo maturo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln (1983), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (2000a) Etica del discorso, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Public space and political public sphere – the biographical roots of two motifs in my thought (2004). In Commemorative Lecture, Nov. 11, 2004, 1–10, Kyoto.Search in Google Scholar

Recht und Moral. (Tanner Lectures) (1992c); it. transl. Morale, diritto, politica, Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Solidarietà tra estranei. Interventi su “Fatti e norme” (1997), Milano: Guerini.Search in Google Scholar

Stato di diritto e democrazia: nesso paradossale di principi contraddittori? (2000c.) Teoria politica, 16(3), 3–17.Search in Google Scholar

Tempo di passaggi (2004), Milano: FeltrinelliSearch in Google Scholar

Texte und Kontexte (1991), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. tr. (1993) Testi filosofici e contesti storici, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. II. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft (1981), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; it. transl. (1986) Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, vol. II. Critica della ragione funzionalistica, Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Vergangenheit als Zukunft (1992b), Zürich: Pendo-Verlag; it. transl. (1992) Dopo l’utopia, Venezia: Marsilio.Search in Google Scholar

Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze (2005), Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp; it. transl. 2007 La condizione intersoggettiva, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

“Discorso” e decisione. Il tentativo di Habermas di fondare una razionalità politica (1982), In Bovero M. (Eds.) Ricerche politiche. Saggi su Kelsen, Horkeimer, Habermas, Luhmann, Foucault, Rawls, (49–82) Milano: Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Accarino B. (1983) Comunicazione e democrazia in Habermas. Democrazia e diritto, 23(2) 103–111.Search in Google Scholar

Agazzi E. (1983) Prefazione In Carmagnola F. (Eds.) La ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, (5–22). Palermo: Ila Palma.Search in Google Scholar

Allen A. (2012) The Public Sphere: Ideology and/or Ideal? Political Theory, 40(6), 822–829.10.1177/0090591712457664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bauman Z., Leoncini T. (2017) Nati liquidi, Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein R. J. (2012) The Normative Core of the Public Sphere. Political Theory, 40(6), 767–778.10.1177/0090591712457666Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bovero M. (Eds.) (1982) Ricerche politiche. Saggi su Kelsen, Horkeimer, Habermas, Luhmann, Foucault, Rawls, (49–82) Milano: Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Brunkhorst H. (2005) Jürgen Habermas. Die Rächende Gewalt der kommunikativen Vernunft. In Henningfeld J., Jansohn H. (Eds.) Philosophen der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung, (198–215). Darmstadt: WBG Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Bube T. (2008) Von der Kritischen Theorie zur Kritischen Hermeneutik? Jürgen Habermas’ Transformationen der Verstehenslehre. In Faber R., Ziege E. M. (Eds.) Das Feld der Frankfurter Kultur und Sozialwissenschaften nach 1945, (139–66). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Carmagnola F. (1983) Ragion pratica. Nodi della tradizione filosofica in Habermas. In Carmagnola F. (eds.) La ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas (25–90). Palermo: Ila Palma.Search in Google Scholar

Carmagnola F. (Eds.) (1983) La ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas. Palermo: Ila Palma.Search in Google Scholar

Ceppa L. (2004) Il dibattito Denninger-Habermas sulla Costituzione. Teoria politica, 20(1), 133–143.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlberg L. (2014) The Habermasian Public Sphere and Exclusion. Communication Theory, 24(1) 21–41.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlgren P. (2005) The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162.10.1080/10584600590933160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Di Donato G. (2018) I luoghi della democrazia, Senso Comune, Retrived September, 16, 2018 from www.senso-comune.it.Search in Google Scholar

Donolo C. (1971) Prefazione. In Habermas J. Teoria e prassi nella società tecnologica, (5–39). Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Emden C. J., Midgley D. (2012) Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere. New York – Oxford: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar

Faber R., Ziege M. (2008) Das Feld der Frankfurter Kultur und Sozialwissenschaften nach 1945. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrarese M. R. (2000) Le istituzioni della globalizzazione. Diritto e diritti nella società transnazionale. Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Finlayson J. G. (2009) Morality and Critical Theory. On the Normative Problem of Frankfurt School Criticism. Telos, 146, 7–41.Search in Google Scholar

Florida A. (2017) Un’idea deliberativa della democrazia. Genealogia e principi. Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Geuss R. (1981) The Idea of a Critical Theory. Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; it. transl. (1989) L’idea di una teoria critica. Habermas e la Scuola di Francoforte. Roma: Armando.Search in Google Scholar

Gorz A. (2003) L’immatériel. Connaissance, valeur et capital. Paris: Galilée; it. transl. (2003) L’immateriale. Conoscenza, valore e capitale. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Search in Google Scholar

Grondin J. (1994) Die Hermeneutik und Habermas. In Grondin J. (Eds.) Der Sinn für Hermeneutik, 103–46. Darmstadt: WGB Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Hart H.L.A. (1982) Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.Search in Google Scholar

Henningfeld J., Jansohn H. (2005) Philosophen der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung, Darmstadt: WBG Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Il diritto al presente. Globalizzazione e tempo delle istituzioni (2002). Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Kalyvas A. (2001) The Politics of Autonomy and the Challenge of Deliberation. Thesis Eleven, 64, 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Keul H. K. (2002) Subjectivity and intersubjectivity. Remarks on the concept of freedom in Kant and Habermas. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(2–3), 253–66.Search in Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick G. (2003) Evolution or progress? A (critical) defence of Habermas’s theory of social development, Thesis Eleven, 72, 91–112.Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann N. (1996) Die Realität der Massenmedien, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag; it. transl. (2000) La realtà dei mass media, Milano: Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

MacCormick D. N. (1981) H.L.A. Hart, London: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacCormick D. N. (1994; I ed. 1978) Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford: Oxford Scholarship; it. transl. (2001) Ragionamento giuridico e teoria del diritto, Torino: Giappichelli.Search in Google Scholar

Maffettone S. (1980) Critica e analisi. Saggio sulla filosofia di Jürgen Habermas, Napoli: Liguori.Search in Google Scholar

Manetti M. (2017) Costituzione, partecipazione democratica, populismo. In Report on the AIC Congress Democrazia oggi, Modena 10–11 November 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Mansbridge J. (2012) Conflict and Commonality in Habermas’s Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Political Theory, 40(6), 789–801.10.1177/0090591712457661Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mazzei A. (2006) Networking Communication Research: la 56° Conferenza dell’ICA a Dresda. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from http://www.ferpi.it.Search in Google Scholar

Minc A. (1998) Au nom de la lois. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Müller J. W. (2016) What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press; it tr. (2017) Cos’è il populismo? Milano: Università Bocconi Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Müller-Doohm S. (2015) Addio al passato. Habermas oltre la scuola di Francoforte. Retrieved July 10, 2015 from http://www.reset.it, ISSN 2611–5883.Search in Google Scholar

Norval A. (2012) Don’t Talk Back! The Subjective Conditions of Critical Public Debate. Political Theory, 40(6), 802–810.10.1177/0090591712457662Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (1992) Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas. Milano: Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Privitera W. (1983) Comunicazione ed emancipazione. La svolta linguistica della teoria di Jürgen Habermas. In Carmagnola F. (Eds.) La ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, (175–224). Palermo: Ila Palma.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen D. M. (1990) Reading Habermas Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; it. transl. (1993) Leggere Habermas, Napoli: Liguori.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen T. (2008) The Internet and Differentiation in the Political Public Sphere. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 73–83.Search in Google Scholar

Rifkin J. (1995) The End of the Work. The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market-Era, New York: Putnam Publishing Group; it. transl. (2002) La fine del lavoro. Il declino della forza lavoro globale e l’avvento dell’era post-mercato, Milano: Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar

Rusconi G. E. (1980) Introduzione. In Habermas J. Agire comunicativo e logica delle scienze sociali, (7–30). Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Scheuerman W. E. (2006) Critical Theory beyond Habermas. In: Dryzek J. S., Honig B., Phillips A. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, (85–105) Oxford (USA): Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sfera pubblica e democratizzazione (2001). Roma-Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Steinhoff U. (2009) The Philosophy of Jürgen Habermas. A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Susen S. (2011) Critical Notes on Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37–62.Search in Google Scholar

Urbinati N. (2014) La crisi europea tra populismi e nuove costituzioni. Retrieved April, 08, 2014 from http://www.reset.it, ISSN 2611–5883.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenberghe F. (2002) Working out Marx. Marxism and the end of the work society. Thesis Eleven, 69, 21–46.10.1177/0725513602069001003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Waizbort R. (2004) Objectivity in Social Science. Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(1), 151–62.10.1177/0048393103261740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo