1. bookVolume 19 (2021): Issue 1 (November 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Plesionyms as a Vocabulary Teaching Tool: The Case of Estonian EFL Learners

Published Online: 15 Nov 2021
Page range: 203 - 226
Journal Details
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

The present study investigated the effectiveness of using plesionyms, or near-synonyms, as a vocabulary teaching tool in the English as a foreign language classroom and attempted to determine at what level of proficiency this technique could be incorporated. 40 Estonian university students who were enrolled in three different ESP courses participated in the study. The students were divided into 4 groups according to their level of proficiency: one experimental and one control group consisted of B1 level students; and one experimental and one control group consisted of B2 level students. The experimental groups learned the vocabulary in plesionymic pairs by discussing the differences as well as the similarities between near-synonyms. Meanwhile, the control groups learned the same words non-adjacently, meaning that the words were taught independently and neither differences nor similarities between words were discussed. Based on the findings, it was concluded that teaching vocabulary through plesionymic pairs facilitates immediate recall and long term memory retention among B2 level students. This vocabulary teaching method could be considered more effective at more advanced levels of proficiency.


Ahangari S., & Dogolsara, S. A. (2015). Comparing the effect of using monolingual versus bilingual dictionary on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p14110.5539/elt.v8n6p141 Search in Google Scholar

Alanazi, M. (2017). The comprehension of synonyms by Saudi EFL learners: Acquisition and pedagogical implications. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(3), 58–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.5810.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.58 Search in Google Scholar

Ansarin, A. A., & Khojasteh, M. R. B. (2013). Retention in meaning-based vocabulary instruction. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, 7–19. Search in Google Scholar

Cambridge English Dictionary. (n.d.). Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english Search in Google Scholar

Carter, R. (2012). Vocabulary. Applied linguistic perspectives. Routledge.10.4324/9780203124659-11 Search in Google Scholar

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

DiMarco, C., Hirst, G., & Stede, M. (1993). The semantic and stylistic differentiation of synonyms and near-synonyms. AAAI Technical Report, 120–127. Search in Google Scholar

Edmonds, P., & Hirst, G. (2002). Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistic, 28(2), 105–144. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Edmonds+Hirst-2002.pdf10.1162/089120102760173625 Search in Google Scholar

Estonian speaking countries. (n.d.). Worlddata. https://www.worlddata.info/languages/estonian.php Search in Google Scholar

Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.14510.1093/applin/17.2.145 Search in Google Scholar

Hilton, H. (2008). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957173080238998310.1080/09571730802389983 Search in Google Scholar

Hirst, G. (1995). Near-synonymy and the structure of lexical knowledge. AAAI Technical Report, 51–56. Search in Google Scholar

Islamiyah, M., & Muchamad, A. A. F. (2019). Skinny, slim, and thin: A corpus-based study of synonymous adjectives and its implication for English language teaching. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v8i1.89410.26499/rnh.v8i1.894 Search in Google Scholar

Khazaal, E. (2019). Investigating and analyzing ESP college students’ errors in using synonyms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p32810.5539/ijel.v9n5p328 Search in Google Scholar

Krebt, D. M. (2017). An assessment of Iraqi EFL learners’ performance in using synonymy and antonymy. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 183–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.1310.24093/awej/vol8no2.13 Search in Google Scholar

Liu, D., & Shouman, Z. (2016). L2 vs. L1 use of synonymy: An empirical study of synonym use/acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu02210.1093/applin/amu022 Search in Google Scholar

McGeoch, J., & McDonald, W. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition. The American Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/141515910.2307/1415159 Search in Google Scholar

Miso, K. (2020). A qualitative analysis of EFL learners’ discrimination of near-synonyms in a data-driven learning task. English Teaching, 75(3), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.2510.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.25 Search in Google Scholar

Mohammed, N. M. A. (2014). The reasons behind the errors made by EFL learners in using English synonyms [Master’s thesis, University of Gezira]. Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486494 Search in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759 Search in Google Scholar

Petcharat, N., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2017). A corpus-based study of English synonyms: Appropriate, proper, and suitable. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 10(2), 10–24. Search in Google Scholar

Porter, D. (2007). Check your vocabulary for academic English. A & C Black. Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). The Philosophical Library. Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Y. (2010). EFL learners’ synonymous errors: A case study of glad and happy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.1.1-710.4304/jltr.1.1.1-7 Search in Google Scholar

Sotoudehnama, E., & Soleimanifard, F. (2013). The effect of teaching vocabulary through synonymous, semantically unrelated, and hyponym sets on EFL learners’ retention. Language Teaching, 2(2), 27–56. http://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1362.html Search in Google Scholar

Staehr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957173080238997510.1080/09571730802389975 Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Estonia. (2020). Population by sex, ethnic nationality and county (RV0222U) [Data set]. http://andmebaas.stat.ee/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RV0222U&lang=en Search in Google Scholar

Storjohann, P. (2009). Plesionomy: A case of synonymy or contrast? Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2140–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.03610.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.036 Search in Google Scholar

Sun, X. (2011). Analysis on the function of cultural connotation in vocabulary teaching and learning of English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(9), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.9.1207-121210.4304/tpls.1.9.1207-1212 Search in Google Scholar

Tajik, F. (2018). The impact of teaching English synonym and antonym pairs adjacently and non-adjacently on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 8(3), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.26655/mjltm.2018.3.1010.26655/mjltm.2018.3.10 Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. R. (2002). Near-synonyms as co-extensive categories: High and tall revisited. Language Sciences, 25(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(02)00018-910.1016/S0388-0001(02)00018-9 Search in Google Scholar

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Q. (2019). A corpus-based contrastive study on semantic prosody of English near-synonyms: A case study of motive and motivation. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1–15. https://theartsjournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/1552 Search in Google Scholar

Webb, S. (2007). The effects of synonymy on second-language vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(2), 120–136. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/item/144 Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold. Search in Google Scholar

Wongkhan, P., & Thienthong, A. (2020). EFL learners’ acquisition of academic collocation and synonymy: Does their academic experience matter? RELC Journal, 1(16), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219895046 Search in Google Scholar

Yazdi, S. S. H. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions about monolingual dictionaries and their vocabulary proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.46110.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.461 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo