1. bookVolume 30 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Manipulation of Financial Statements Through the Use of Creative Accounting. Case of Romanian Companies

Published Online: 16 Jul 2020
Page range: 90 - 107
Received: 01 Feb 2020
Accepted: 01 Apr 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

The manipulation of the information presented through financial statements could represent a significant red flag for suspected fraud. In our paper, we investigated the extent to which the Romanian companies resort to manipulation of information data presented through the reported annual financial statements. For this purpose, we used a group consisting of 62 non-financial companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange for the analyzed period 2017-2018. The results of our study show that a majority percentage of the Romanian companies (approx. 84%) resort to manipulation of information provided through financial statements. Following the analysis carried out by activity fields, the results show that the companies activating in the fields of tourism, constructions, trade and transport resort to the manipulation of financial statements in the percent of 100%, followed by the companies activating in the field of production (86%) and services (50%). Our results are extremely useful to the users of financial information who must acknowledge the risks that they are exposed to in their decision-making process.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Abdul, A.N., Othman, R., Arif, S.M.M., Malek, M.A.A., Omar, N. (2013), Fraud Detection: Benford’s Law vs Beneish Model, Conference: IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research (SHUSER), 1-6Search in Google Scholar

2. ACFE, (2010), Reports to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and abuse, Association of Certified Fraud ExaminersSearch in Google Scholar

3. Achim, M.V., Borlea, N.S., (2019), Criminalitatea economico-financiară, Corupția, economia subterană și spălarea banilor, Cauze, efecte, soluții. Abordări teoretice și practice, Ed. Economică, Cluj-Napoca.Search in Google Scholar

4. Achim, M.V., (2008), Analiza economico-financiară, Ed. Risoprint, Cluj-NapocaSearch in Google Scholar

5. Administrative Leadership Academy, UISD, (2011), Fraud and Ethics Compliance, Laredo, Texas, USASearch in Google Scholar

6. Adrian, N.K., Lawrence, A., Cristal, L.A.S., (2009), Forensic Accounting: public Acceptance towards Occurance of Fraud Detection, International Journal of Business and Management, 4(11), 145-149Search in Google Scholar

7. Albrecht, W.A., (2004), Fraud Examination and Prevention, Mason, OH: South-WesternSearch in Google Scholar

8. Balaciu, D., Bogdan, V., Vladu, B.A., (2009), A Brief Review of Creative Accounting Literature and Its Consequences in Practice, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Seres Economica 11 (1), 170-183Search in Google Scholar

9. Barnea, A., Ronen, J., Sadan, S., (1976), Classificatory smoothing of income with extraordinary items, The Accounting Review, January, 110-122Search in Google Scholar

10. Bhasin, M.L., (2010), Creative Accounting Practices in the Indian Corporate Sector: An Empirical Study, International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Oct-4(10), 35-52Search in Google Scholar

11. Beneish, M.D., (1999), The detection of earnings manipulation, Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 24–36Search in Google Scholar

12. Beneish, M.D., Press, E., (1993), Costs of technical violation of accounting-based debt covenants, The Accounting Review, 68 (2), 233–257Search in Google Scholar

13. Bertolus, J., (1988), L’art de truquer un bilan, Science &Vie Economie, 40, 17-23Search in Google Scholar

14. Cernuşca, L., David, D., Nicolaescu, C., Gomoi, B.C., (2016), Empirical Study on the Creative Accounting Phenomenon, Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldiş” Arad, 26(2), 63-87Search in Google Scholar

15. Dechow, M.P., Sloan, R.G., Sweeney, A.P., (1995), Detecting earnings management, The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225Search in Google Scholar

16. Feleagă, N., Malciu, L., (2002)., Politici și opțiuni contabile, Ed. Economică, BucureștiSearch in Google Scholar

17. Groșanu, A., Răchișan, P.R., Berinde, S.R., (2011), Study regarding the influence of Romanian accounting regulations on creative accounting techniques, Annals of Oradea University, Economics Series, 1(2), 523-528Search in Google Scholar

18. Groșanu, A., (2013), Contabilitate creativă, Ed. ASE, BucureștiSearch in Google Scholar

19. Hasan, M.S., Omar, N., Barnes, P., Handley-Schachler, M., (2017), A cross country study on manipulations in financial statements of listed companies: evidence from Asia, Journal of Financial Crime 22, 1-10Search in Google Scholar

20. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), (2019), International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), © IFRS Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

21. Jensen, M.C., Meckley, W.H., (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency costs and ownership structure, Harvard Business Review 3(4), 23-27Search in Google Scholar

22. Kranacher, M.J., (2010), Chapter 3: Who Commits Fraud and Why: Criminology and Ethics, In M.J. Kranacher, R. Riley, & J. T. Wells, Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 58-85Search in Google Scholar

23. Ledouble, D., (1993), La creativite en comptabilite, Semaine juridique (JCP), 224, Ed. E Droit ComptableSearch in Google Scholar

24. Lignon, M., (1989), L’art de calculer ses beneficies, L’entreprise, 50Search in Google Scholar

25. Mironiuc, M., Chersan, I.C., Robu, I.B., (2011), The Fraud Auditing Mission: the Identification of a Fraud Risk Profile Using “Red Flags” Technique, Audit Financiar, no. 9, 22-29Search in Google Scholar

26. Naser, H.M., (1993), Creative financial accounting: it’s nature and use, Ed. Prentice HallSearch in Google Scholar

27. Neamțu, H., Moldovanu, U., (2011), Studiu de caz privind evaluarea denaturărilor identificate și efectul acestora asupra pragului de semnificație în audit și a opiniei auditorului independent, Audit financiar, 9, no.73Search in Google Scholar

28. Robu, I.B, Robu, M.A., (2013), Proceduri de audit pentru estimarea riscului de fraudă bazate pe indici de detectare a manipularilor contabile, Audit financiar, XI, 106, 4-15Search in Google Scholar

29. Singh, S., (2011), The Common Types of Fraud, It’s Causes and Impact to a Public Sector Organization, National Public Sector Accountants Conference Kuching: KPMG Malaysia, 1-30Search in Google Scholar

30. Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R., (1997), US government information policy, University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

31. Standardul Internaţional de Audit 240 responsabilitatea auditorului de a lua în considerare frauda şi eroarea într-un angajament de audit al situaţiilor financiare, available:http://auditeam.ro/wp-content/uploads/240-Responsabilitateaauditorului.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

32. Talab, H.R., Hammod, H., Ali, S.I., (2017), Role of Beneish M-scor Model in Detecting of Ernings Management Practices: Empirical Study in Listed Banks of Iraqi Stock Exchange, International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15 (3), no.23 (part2), 1-17Search in Google Scholar

33. Vladu, A.B, Amat, O., Cuzdriorean, D.D., (2017), Truthfulness in Accounting: How to Discriminate Accounting Manipulatores from non-manipulators, Journal of Business Ethics, 140 (4), 633-648Search in Google Scholar

34. Watts, R.L., Zimmerman, J.L., (1978, 1986), Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective, The Accounting Review 65(1), 131-156Search in Google Scholar

35. Wells, J., (2011), Corporate Fraud Handbook – Prevention and Detection. 3rd Edition, Hoboken: NJ.: John Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo