1. bookVolume 32 (2012): Issue 2012 (May 2012)
    Aquatic Sports and Activities
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Estimating the Trunk Transverse Surface Area to Assess Swimmer's Drag Force Based on their Competitive Level

Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
Estimating the Trunk Transverse Surface Area to Assess Swimmer's Drag Force Based on their Competitive Level

The aim of this study was to compute and validate trunk transverse surface area (TTSA) estimation equations to be used assessing the swimmer's drag force according to competitive level by gender. One group of 130 swimmers (54 females and 76 males) was used to compute the TTSA estimation equations and another group of 132 swimmers (56 females and 76 males) were used for its validations. Swimmers were photographed in the transverse plane from above, on land, in the upright and hydrodynamic position. The TTSA was measured from the swimmer's photo with specific software. It was also measured the height, body mass, biacromial diameter, chest sagital diameter (CSD) and the chest perimeter (CP). With the first group of swimmers it was computed the TTSA estimation equations based on stepwise multiple regression models from the selected anthropometrical variables. The TTSA prediction equations were significant and with a prediction level qualitatively considered as moderate. All equations included only the CP and the CSD in the final models. In all prediction models there were no significant differences between assessed and estimated mean TTSA. Coefficients of determination for the linear regression models between assessed and estimated TTSA were moderate and significant. More than 80% of the plots were within the 95% interval confidence for the Bland-Altman analysis in both genders. So, TTSA estimation equations that are easy to be computed by coached and researchers were developed. All equations accomplished the validation criteria adopted.

Keywords

Barbosa TM, Fernandes RJ, Keskinen KL, Colaço P, Cardoso C, Silva J, Vilas-Boas JP. Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. Int J Sports Med, 2006; 27: 894-89910.1055/s-2006-923776Search in Google Scholar

Barbosa TM, Fernandes RJ, Morouço P, Vilas-Boas JP. Predicting the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass from segmental velocities in butterfly stroke: a pilot study. J Sport Sci Med, 2008; 7: 201-209Search in Google Scholar

Barbosa TM, Costa MJ, Marques MC, Silva AJ, Marinho DA. A model for active drag force exogenous variables in young swimmers. J Hum Sport Exerc, 2010; 5: 379-38810.4100/jhse.2010.53.08Search in Google Scholar

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1986; i: 307-31010.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8Search in Google Scholar

Caspersen C, Berthelsen PA, Eik M, Pâkozdi C, Kjendlie PL. Added mass in human swimmers: age and gender differences. J Biomech, 2010; 43: 2369-237310.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.022Search in Google Scholar

Clarys JP. Human morphology and hydrodynamics. In: Swimming III. Eds: Terauds, J and Bedingfield, EW. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979; 3-42Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins WG. Bias in Bland-Altman but not regression validity analyses. Sportscience, 2004; 8: 42-46Search in Google Scholar

Kjendlie P-L, Stallman RK. Drag characteristics of competitive swimming children and adults. J Appl Biomech, 2008; 24: 35-4210.1123/jab.24.1.35Search in Google Scholar

Knechtle B, Baumann B, Knechtle P, Wirth A, Rosemann T. A Comparison of Anthropometry between Ironman Triathletes and Ultra-swimmers. J Hum Kinetics, 2010; 24: 57-6410.2478/v10078-010-0020-7Search in Google Scholar

Kolmogorov S, Duplishcheva O. Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity. J Biomech, 1992; 25: 311-31810.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-YSearch in Google Scholar

Kolmogorov S, Lyapin S, Rumyantseva O, Vilas-Boas JP. Technology for decreasing active drag at maximal swimming velocity. In: Applied Proceedings of the XVIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports - Swimming. Eds: Sander, RH and Hong Y. Edinburgh: Faculty of Education of the University of Edinburgh, 2000; 39-47Search in Google Scholar

Lee J Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Computers Biol Med, 1989; 19: 61-7010.1016/0010-4825(89)90036-XSearch in Google Scholar

Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Klendlie P-L, Vilas-Boas JP, Alves FB, Rouboa AI, Silva AJ Swimming Simulation. In: Computational Fluid Dynamics for sport simulation. Ed: Peter M. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009; 33-61Search in Google Scholar

Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Mantripragada N, Vilas-Boas JP, Rouard AI, Mantha VR, Rouboa AI, Silva AJ. The gliding phase in swimming: the effect of water depth. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI. Eds: Kjendlie, P-L, Stallman, TK and Cabri, J. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 2010a; 122-124Search in Google Scholar

Mazza J, Ackland TR, Bach T, Cosolito P. Absolute body size. In: Kineanthropometry in Aquatic Sports. Eds: Carter, L and Ackland TR. Champaign, Illinois: Human kinetics, 1994; 15-54Search in Google Scholar

Morais JE, Costa MJ, Mejias JE, Marinho DA, Silva AJ, Barbosa TM (2011). Morphometric study for estimation and validation of trunk transverse surface area to assess human drag force on water. J Hum Kinetics, 2011; 28: 5-1310.2478/v10078-011-0017-xSearch in Google Scholar

Nicolas G, Bideau B, Colobert B, Berton E. How are Strouhal number, drag, and efficiency adjusted in high level underwater monofin-swimming? Hum Mov Sci, 2007; 26: 426-44210.1016/j.humov.2007.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Nicolas G, Bideau B. A kinematic and dynamic comparison of surface and underwater displacement in high level monofin swimming. Hum Mov Sci, 2009; 28: 480-49310.1016/j.humov.2009.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Ohlberger J, Staaks G, Holker F. Swimming efficiency and the influence of morphology on swimming cost in fishes. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2006; 176. 17-2510.1007/s00360-005-0024-0Search in Google Scholar

Silva AJ, Rouboa A, Moreira A, Reis VM, Alves F, Vilas-Boas JP, Marinho DA. Analysis of drafting effects in swimming using computational fluid dynamics. J Sport Sci Med, 2008; 7: 60.-66Search in Google Scholar

Strzała M, Tyka A, Zychowska M, Woznicki P. Components of physical work capacity, somatic variables and technique in relation to 100 and 400m time trials in young swimmers. J Hum Kinetics, 2005; 14: 105-116Search in Google Scholar

Strzała M, Tyka A, Krężałek P. Physical endurance and swimming technique in 400 meter front crawl race. J Hum Kinetics, 2007; 18: 73.-86Search in Google Scholar

Ungerechts B. A comparasion of the movement of the rear part of dolphins and butterfly swimmers. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Eds: Hollander AP, Huijing P and de Groot G. Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1983; 215-221Search in Google Scholar

Westgard JO. Basic method validation. Madison, Wisconsin: Westgard QC, 2008Search in Google Scholar

Zamparo P, Gatta G, Pendergast D, Capelli C. Active and passive drag: the role of trunk incline. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2009; 106: 195-20510.1007/s00421-009-1007-8Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo