1. bookVolume 33 (2012): Issue 2012 (June 2012)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Relationship Between Motor Variability, Accuracy, and Ball Speed in the Tennis Serve

Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
Relationship Between Motor Variability, Accuracy, and Ball Speed in the Tennis Serve

The main objective of this study was to analyze the motor variability in the performance of the tennis serve and its relationship to performance outcome. Seventeen male tennis players took part in the research, and they performed 20 serves. Linear and non-linear variability during the hand movement was measured by 3D Motion Tracking. Ball speed was recorded with a sports radar gun and the ball bounces were video recorded to calculate accuracy. The results showed a relationship between the amount of variability and its non-linear structure found in performance of movement and the outcome of the serve. The study also found that movement predictability correlates with performance. An increase in the amount of movement variability could affect the tennis serve performance in a negative way by reducing speed and accuracy of the ball.

Keywords

Bartlett RM. Movement variability and its implications for sports scientists and practitioners: an overview. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2008; 1(3): 113-124.10.1260/174795408784089397Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein N. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Nueva York: Pergamon Press; 1967.Search in Google Scholar

Best RJ, Bartlett RM, Sawyer RA. Optimal javelin release. J Appl Biomech 1995; 11: 371-394.10.1123/jab.11.4.371Search in Google Scholar

Darling WG, Cooke JD. Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. J Motor Behav 1987; 19(3): 291-309.10.1080/00222895.1987.10735414Search in Google Scholar

Davids K, Button C, Bennett S. Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott B. Biomechanics and tennis. In: Correia PP, Coutinho C, editors. Investigação e Ténis, Lisboa: FMH edições; 2007. p. 9 - 23.Search in Google Scholar

Elliot B, Fleisig G, Nicholls R, Escamilla R. Technique effects on upper limb loading in the tennis serve. J Sci Med Sport 2003; 6(1): 76-87.10.1016/S1440-2440(03)80011-7Search in Google Scholar

Elliott B, Reid M, Crespo M. Techinique development in tennis stroke production. London: International Tennis Federation; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Glazier PS, Davids K, Bartlett RM. (2003). Dynamical system theory: A relevant framework for performanceoriented sports biomechanics research? Sport Sci (online) 2003 march 7 (cited 2009). Available in: http//www.sportsci.org/jour/03/psg.htm. http://www.sportsci.org/jour/03/psg.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Hamilton GR, Reinschmidt C. Optimal trayectory for basketball free throw. J Sport Sci 1997; 15: 491-504.10.1080/026404197367137Search in Google Scholar

Kugler PN, Turvey MT. Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. New York: Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Latash M L. Synergy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333169.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Menayo R. Analysis of the relationship between consistency in the execution of motor pattern in tennis service, accuracy and learning in variability conditions (thesis). Cáceres: University of Extremadura; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Menayo R, Moreno FJ, Fuentes JP, Reina R, García JA. Relationship between variability of practice and variability of execution in flat tennis service. Motricidad. Eur J Hum Mov 2010; 25: 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

Mendes P, Mendes, RM, Fuentes JP, Campos FJ, Menayo R and Araújo D. Performance factors in the first serve in competitive tennis players. Rev. Educ. Fis./UEM. 2011; 22 (3): 315-326.Search in Google Scholar

Messier J, Kalaska JF. Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 1999; 125: 139-152.10.1007/s002210050669Search in Google Scholar

Miller SA. Variability in basketball shooting: practical implications. In: Hong Y, editor. International Research in Sports Biomechanics. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 27-34.Search in Google Scholar

Nashner L.M., McCollum G. The organization of postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behav Brain Sci 1985; 26: 135-172.Search in Google Scholar

Newell KM, Corcos DM. Issues in variability and motor control. In: Newell KM, Corcos DM, editors. Variability and Motor Control. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 1993. p. 1-12.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez MA, Nussbaum MA. Posture and motion variability in non-repetitive manual materials handling tasks. Hum Movement Sci 2006; 25(3): 409-421.10.1016/j.humov.2006.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. In: Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences of the USA. USA: 1991. 88(6). p. 2297-2301.10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297Search in Google Scholar

Riley MA, Turvey M. Variability and determinism in motor behaviour. J Motor Behav 2002; 64: 99-125.Search in Google Scholar

Robins M, Wheat J, Irwin G, Bartlett R. The effect of shooting distance on continuous coordination variability in basketball. J Hum Movement Sci 2006; 20: 218-238.Search in Google Scholar

Van Emmerik REA, van Wegen EEH. On variability and stability in human movement. J Appl Biomech 2000; 16: 394-406.10.1123/jab.16.4.394Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo