1. bookVolume 21 (2009): Issue 2009 (June 2009)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1899-7562
ISSN
1640-5544
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Validity of Mechanical Power Output Measurement at Bench Press Exercise

Published Online: 17 Jul 2009
Volume & Issue: Volume 21 (2009) - Issue 2009 (June 2009)
Page range: 33 - 40
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1899-7562
ISSN
1640-5544
First Published
13 Jan 2009
Publication timeframe
5 times per year
Languages
English
Validity of Mechanical Power Output Measurement at Bench Press Exercise

In sport training and rehabilitation practice, it is usual to use methods of mechanical muscle power output measurement, which are based mainly on indirect force measurement. The aim of this study was to verify the validity of indirect measurement for mechanical muscle power output with bench press exercise. As a criterion of validity, we selected a combination of kinematic and dynamic analyses. Ten men participated in this study. Average age of tested subjects was 28.0 ± 3.4 years. At mechanical power output measurement, these subjects lifted at maximum possible speed loads of 18, 26.5, 39.2 and 47.7 kg. Validity of mechanical power output measurement by means of a method using indirect force measurement was estimated using Spearmen's Correlation Coefficient. Factual significance of differences in average values of power output, force and velocity, measured by a method using indirect force measurement, in comparison to the selected criterion, was evaluated by means of effect of size. Power output measurement method using indirect force measurement showed lower values of force in relation to the criterion in the whole scope of selected loads. Velocity values in the whole scope of selected loads did not show any significant difference between the criterion and the verified method. The mechanical muscle power output measured by the method using indirect force measurement is lower in relation to the criterion, especially in the low scope of loads, where also validity rate was low (R = 0.5).

Keywords

Caldwell G.E., Robertson D.G.E., Whittlesey S.N. Forces and Measurement. In, Research methods in Biomechanics, Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2004. p. 73-102.Search in Google Scholar

Cormie P., McBride M.J., McCaulley O.G. Validation of power measurement techniques in dynamics lower body resistance exercises. J Appl Biomech, 2007. 23: 103-11810.1123/jab.23.2.103Search in Google Scholar

Dugan E., Doyle T.J.A., Humphries B., Hasson C.J. Newton R.U. Determining the optimal load for jump squats: a review of methods and calculations. Journal of Force and Conditioning Research, 2004. 18: 668-68410.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<668:DTOLFJ>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Falvo J.M., Schiling K.B., Weiss W.L. Techniques and considerations for determining isoinertial upper-body power. Sports Biomechanics, 2005. 5: 293-31110.1080/14763140608522879Search in Google Scholar

Hori N., Newton, U.R., Andrews A.W., Kawamori N., McGuigan R.M., Nosaka K. Comparison of four different methods to measure power output during the hang power clean and the weighted jump squat. J Force Condition Res, 2007. 21: 314-32010.1519/00124278-200705000-00005Search in Google Scholar

Hori N., Newton U.R., Nosaka K., McGuigan R.M. Comparison of different methods of determining power output in weightlifting exercises. Force Condition Jl, 2006. 28: 34-4010.1519/00126548-200604000-00006Search in Google Scholar

Jennings C.L., Viljoen W., Durant J., Lambert, I.M. The Reliability of FitroDyne as a Measure of Muscle Power. Journal of Force and Conditioning Research, 2005. 19: 859-86310.1519/00124278-200511000-00023Search in Google Scholar

Kraemer W.J., Newton R.U. Training for muscular power. Scientific Principles of Sport Rehabilitation, 2000. 11: 341-36810.1016/S1047-9651(18)30133-5Search in Google Scholar

Niewiadomski V., Laskowska D., Gasiorowska A., Cybulski G., Strasz A. Langfort J. Determination and Prediction of One Repetition Maximum (1RM): Safety Considerations. J Hum Kinetics, 2008. 19: 109-12010.2478/v10078-008-0008-8Search in Google Scholar

Schickhofer P. Silovo-rychlostné schopnosti veslárov a karatistov. Tělesná výchova a šport,2000. 10: 19Search in Google Scholar

Thomas J.R., Nelson J.K., Silverman S.J. Research methods in physical activity (5th ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Vdoleček F., Palenčár R., Halaj M. Nejistoty v měření I: vyjadřování nejistot. Automa, 2001. 7: 50-54Search in Google Scholar

Zatsiorsky V., Kraemer J.W. Science and practice of force training (2nd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetice, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo