1. bookVolume 4 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A cross-linguistic database of phonetic transcription systems

Published Online: 28 Jun 2019
Page range: 21 - 53
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English

Contrary to what non-practitioners might expect, the systems of phonetic notation used by linguists are highly idiosyncratic. Not only do various linguistic subfields disagree on the specific symbols they use to denote the speech sounds of languages, but also in large databases of sound inventories considerable variation can be found. Inspired by recent efforts to link cross-linguistic data with help of reference catalogues (Glottolog, Concepticon) across different resources, we present initial efforts to link different phonetic notation systems to a catalogue of speech sounds. This is achieved with the help of a database accompanied by a software framework that uses a limited but easily extendable set of non-binary feature values to allow for quick and convenient registration of different transcription systems, while at the same time linking to additional datasets with restricted inventories. Linking different transcription systems enables us to conveniently translate between different phonetic transcription systems, while linking sounds to databases allows users quick access to various kinds of metadata, including feature values, statistics on phoneme inventories, and information on prosody and sound classes. In order to prove the feasibility of this enterprise, we supplement an initial version of our cross-linguistic database of phonetic transcription systems (CLTS), which currently registers five transcription systems and links to fifteen datasets, as well as a web application, which permits users to conveniently test the power of the automatic translation across transcription systems.

Keywords

Anonymous. 2014. Index Diachronica. <https://chridd.nfshost.com/diachronica/>Search in Google Scholar

Bell, A. 1867. Visible speech: The science of universal alphabetics: Or, self-interpreting physiological letters, for the writing of all languages in one alphabet. Illustrated by tables, diagrams, and examples. London: Simpkin, Marshall.Search in Google Scholar

Běijīng Dàxué 北京大学. 1964. Hànyǔ fāngyán cíhuì [Chinese dialect vocabularies]. Běijīng: Wénzì Gǎigé 文字改革.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Y. 2006. A system of ‘tone letters’. In: Wu, Z.-J. and X.-N. Zhao (eds.), Linguistic essays by Yuenren Chao. Běijīng: Shāngwù. 98–102.Search in Google Scholar

Charpentier, J.-M. and A. François. 2015. Linguistic atlas of French Polynesia / Atlas linguistique de la Polynésie française. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Crowley, T. 2006. The Avava Language of Central Malakula (Vanuatu). The Australian National University: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Crowley, T. 2006. Nese: A Diminishing Speech Variety of Northwest Malakula (Vanuatu). The Australian National University: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Dediu, D. and S. Moisik. 2016. Defining and counting phonological classes in cross-linguistic segment databases. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 1955–1962.Search in Google Scholar

Dench, A. 2002. Descent and diffusion: The complexity of the Pilbara situation. In: Aikhenvald, A. and R. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 105–133.Search in Google Scholar

Dodd, R. 2014. V’ënen Taut: Grammatical topics in the Big Nambas Language of Malekula. (PhD dissertation, University of Waikato.)Search in Google Scholar

Dolgopolsky, A. 1964. Gipoteza drevnejšego rodstva jazykovych semej Severnoj Evrazii s verojatnostej točky zrenija [A probabilistic hypothesis concering the oldest relationships among the language families of Northern Eurasia]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2. 53–63.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, M. and M. Haspelmath. 2011. The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Search in Google Scholar

Eden, E. 2018. Measuring phonological distance between languages. (PhD dissertation, University College London.)Search in Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. 2001. Phonological regularities of consonant systems across Khoesan lineages. University of Leipzig Papers on Africa 16. 1–50.Search in Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. 2014. ‘Khoisan’ linguistic classification today. In: Güldemann, T. and A.-M. Fehn (eds.), Beyond ‘Khoisan’. Historical relations in the Kalahari Basin. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–40.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, H., R. Forkel, and M. Haspelmath. 2017. Glottolog. Version 3.0. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories. Language 86(3). 663–687.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. and R. Forkel. 2015. CLLD – Cross-Linguistic Linked Data. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology: Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Herzog, G., S. Newman, E. Sapir, M. Swadesh, M. Swadesh, and C. Voegelin. 1934. Some orthographic recommendations. American Anthropologist 36(4). 629–631.Search in Google Scholar

Honeybone P. 2005. Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of laryngeal specifications. In: van Oostendorp, M. and J. van de Weijer (eds.), The internal organisation of phonological segments. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin and New York. 319–354.Search in Google Scholar

Hóu Jīngyī 侯精一 (ed.). 2004. Xiàndài Hànyǔ fāngyán yīnkù 现代汉语方言音库 [Phonological database of Chinese dialects]. Shànghǎi 上海: Shànghǎi Jiàoyù 上海 教育.Search in Google Scholar

Huáng, B. and X. Liào. 2002. Xiàndài Hànyǔ 现代汉语 [Modern Chinese]. Běijīng: Gāoděng Jiàoyù.Search in Google Scholar

International Institute of African Languages and Cultures. 1930. Practical orthography of African languages. (Revised edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association. 1912. The Principles of the International Phonetic Association. Bourg-la-Reine and London: Paul Passy and Daniel Jones.Search in Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association. 2015. The International Phonetic Alphabet. (Revised to 2015.)Search in Google Scholar

Department of Linguistics. 2017. Multimedia IPA chart. Victoria: University of Victoria.Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, J.M. 1963. Prefixation and infixation in old Mon, old Khmer, and modern Khmer. Linguistic comparison in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. 62–70.Search in Google Scholar

Jäger, G., J.-M. List and P. Sofroniev. 2017. Using support vector machines and state-of-the-art algorithms for phonetic alignment to identify cognates in multi-lingual wordlists. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (Long papers.) 1204–1215.Search in Google Scholar

Kalusky, W. 2017. Die Transkription der Sprachlaute des Internationalen Phonetischen Alphabets: Vorschläge zu einer Revision der systematischen Darstellung der IPATabelle. München: LINCOM Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Kieviet, P. 2017. A Grammar of Rapa Nui. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, O., P. Ladefoged, J. Snyman, A. Traill and R. Vossen. 1988. The symbols for clicks. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 18(2). 140–142.Search in Google Scholar

Kümmel, M. 2008. Konsonantenwandel [Consonant change]. Reichert: Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar

Lepsius, C. 1854. Das allgemeine linguistische Alphabet: Grundsätze der Übertragung fremder Schriftsysteme und bisher noch ungeschriebener Sprachen in europäische Buchstaben. Wilhelm Hertz: Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.-M. 2014. Sequence comparison in historical linguistics. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.-M. and J. Prokić. 2014. A benchmark database of phonetic alignments in historical linguistics and dialectology. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 288–294.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.-M., M. Cysouw, and R. Forkel. 2016. Concepticon. A resource for the linking of concept lists. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 2393–2400.Search in Google Scholar

List, J.-M., S. Greenhill, and R. Gray. 2017. The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PLOS ONE 12(1). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, J. 2016. Malakula internal subgrouping: Phonological evidence. Oceanic Linguistics 55(2). 399–431.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, I., S. Flavier, E. Marsico, C. Coupé and F. Pellegrino. 2013. LAPSyD: Lyon-Albuquerque Phonological Systems Database. In: Proceedings of Interspeech.Search in Google Scholar

Malau, C. 2016. A grammar of Vurës, Vanuatu. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter:Search in Google Scholar

Mann, M. and D. Dalby. 1987. A thesaurus of African languages: A classified and annotated inventory of the spoken languages of Africa with an appendix on their written representation. London: Zell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, S., P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath and M. Huber. 2013. The Atlas of Pidign and Creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Mielke, J. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, S. and M. Cysouw. 2017. The Unicode cookbook for linguists. Managing writing systems using Orthography Profiles. Zürich: Zenodo.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, S., D. McCloy and R. Wright (eds.). 2014. PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Search in Google Scholar

Mortensen, D. 2017. PanPhon. Python API for accessing phonological features of IPA Segments. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science.Search in Google Scholar

Nakagawa, H. 2006. Aspects of the phonetic and phonological structure of the Gui language. (PhD dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.)Search in Google Scholar

Nikolaev, D., A. Nikulin and A. Kukhto. 2015. The database of Eurasian phonological inventories. Moscow: RGGU. <http://eurasianphonology.info>Search in Google Scholar

Press, M. L. 1980. Chemehuevi: A grammar and lexicon. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, G. and W. Ladusaw. 1996. Phonetic symbol guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ruhlen, M. 2008. A global linguistic database. Moscow: RGGU.Search in Google Scholar

Salisbury, M.C. 2002. A grammar of Pukapukan. (PhD dissertation, The University of Auckland.)Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, E. 1930. Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Boston: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. 1878. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Setälä, E. 1901. Über transskription der finnisch-ugrischen sprachen. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen 1. 15–52.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, A. 1999. Fundamental problems in comparative phonetics and phonology: does UPSID help to solve them. In: Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Starostin, G. and P. Krylov (eds.). 2011. The global lexicostatistical database. Compiling, clarifying, connecting basic vocabulary around the world: From free-form to tree-form. <http://starling.rinet.ru/new100/main.htm>Search in Google Scholar

Starostin, G. (ed.) 2017. Annotated Swadesh wordlists for the Hmong group (Hmong-Mien family).Search in Google Scholar

Stimson, J. F. and D.S. Marshall. 1964. A dictionary of some Tuamotuan dialects of the Polynesian language. Leiden: M. Nijhoff.Search in Google Scholar

Sweet, H. 1877. A handbook of phonetics, including a popular exposition of the principles of spelling reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tadadjeu, M. and E. Sadembouo. 1979. Alphabet Générale des langues Camerounaises. Yaoundé: Departement des Langues Africaines et Linguistique, Université de Yaoundé.Search in Google Scholar

Traill A. 1993. The feature geometry of clicks. In: van Staden, P.M.S. (ed.), Linguistica: Festschrift E. B. van Wyk: ’n huldeblyk. Pretoria: van Schaik. 134–140.Search in Google Scholar

Tregear, E. 1899. Dictionary of Mangareva: Or Gambier Islands. Wellington: J. Mackay.Search in Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie [Foundations of phonology]. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. 1978. African languages. In: Proceedings of the meeting of experts on the transcription and harmonization of African languages.Search in Google Scholar

Wichmann, S., E. Holman and C. Brown. 2016. The ASJP database. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Search in Google Scholar

Wikipedia contributors. 2018. International Phonetic Alphabet. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Phonetic_Alphabet&oldid=822828531>. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo