1. bookVolume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Aug 2008
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Attentional actions – an ecological-enactive account of utterances of concrete words

Online veröffentlicht: 27 Jul 2018
Seitenbereich: 90 - 123
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Aug 2008
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

This paper proposes an ecological-enactive account of utterances of concrete words - words used to indicate observable situations, events, objects, or characteristics. Building on the education of attention model of learning, utterances of concrete words are defined as attentional actions: a repeatable form of behaviour performed by a person to indicate (i.e. point out) a particular aspect of the current situation to someone in order to achieve something. Based on recent empirical evidence on categorical colour perception, attentional actions are proposed to constrain the ongoing phenotypic reorganisation of persons into task-specific devices. The paper ends by situating the proposed account in a wider theoretical perspective on language. This paper serves two purposes: first, it undermines the scope objection against the ecological-enactive approach, and second, it provides a novel explanation for recent empirical evidence with respect to the role of language in categorical colour perception

Adolph, K. E., & Kretch, K. S. (2015). Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, 2015, 127-134. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-110.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91-130. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-710.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2016). Précis of after phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1-45. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X1500063110.1017/S0140525X15000631Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Andrick, G., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1986). The acquisition of colour terms. Journal of Child Language, 13(1), 119-134. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000 033710.1017/S0305000900000337Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., Kuipers, J., & Thierry, G. (2009). The Whorfian mind. Electrophysiological evidence that language shapes perception. Journal Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(4), 332-334. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.4.840010.4161/cib.2.4.8400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Aristotle (1975). Categories and De Interpretatione. J.L. Ackrill (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baggs, E. (2015). A radical empiricist theory of speaking: Linguistic meaning without conventions. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 251-264. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2015.106865510.1080/10407413.2015.1068655Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). The dialogical imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. California, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bingham, G. P. (1988) Task-specific devices and the perceptual bottleneck. Human Movement Science, 2(2-4), 225-264. doi: 10.1016/0167- 9457(88)90013-910.1016/0167-9457(88)90013-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Boutonnet, B., Dering, B., Viñas-Guasch, N., & Thierry, G. (2013). Seeing objects through the language glass. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1702-1710. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00415 Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139 - 159.Search in Google Scholar

Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(599), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599Search in Google Scholar

Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2016). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, 1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1239-110.1007/s11229-016-1239-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cairns, H. & Cairns, C. (1976) Psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1-27. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X10.1017/S0140525X1500031XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1996). Linguistic anchors in the sea of thought? Pragmatics & Cognition, 4(1), 93-103. doi: 10.1075/pc.4.1.09cla10.1075/pc.4.1.09claOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101, 401-431.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (1981). Acquisitional principles in lexical development. In: S.A. Gelman & J.P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought interrelations in development (pp. 31-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cowley, S. J. (2011a). Distributed language. In: Cowley, S. (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185-210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Cowley, S. J. (2011b). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23, 1-25. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2011.59127210.1080/10407413.2011.591272Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2015). From participatory sense-making to language: there and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089-1125. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9404-910.1007/s11097-014-9404-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. (2017). The Lexicon. In: M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics 2nd edition (pp. 235-254). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Davidoff, J., & Luzzatti, C. (2005). Language impairment and colour categories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4), 494-495. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X05280081/10.1017/S0140525X05280081Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davidoff, J., & Roberson, D. (2004) Preserved thematic and impaired taxonomic categorisation: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 137-174. doi: 10.1080/0169096034400012510.1080/01690960344000125Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davidson, D., 1986. A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 433-446). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, H.G., Taylor, T. J. (Eds.). (1990). Redefining linguistics. London/New York, NY: Routledge. Davis, H.G., Taylor, T. J. (Eds.). (2003). Rethinking linguistics. London/New York, NY RoutledgeCurzon.Search in Google Scholar

Degenaar, J., & Myin, E. (2014). Representation hunger reconsidered. Synthese, 191, 3639-3648. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0484-410.1007/s11229-014-0484-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Devitt, M. (2006). Ignorance of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Haan, S., Rietveld, E., Stokhof, M., & Denys, D. (2013) The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: An enactive affordance-based model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013. 0065310.3389/fnhum.2013.00653Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

De Saussure, F. (2011). Cours de linguistique generale (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published in 1922).Search in Google Scholar

Drivonikou, G. V., Kay, P., Regier, T., Ivry, R. B., Gilbert, A. L., Franklin, A., & Davies, I. R. L., (2007). Further evidence that Whorfian effects are stronger in the right visual field than the left. PNAS, 104(3), 1097-1102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061013210410.1073/pnas.0610132104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dummett, M. (1975). Wang’s paradox. Synthese, 3(4), 201-232. doi: 10.1007/ BF0048504810.1007/BF00485048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Engel, K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., & König, P. (2013). Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006 Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, S. J., Bates, E., Thal, D. J ., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, (5, serial No. 242).10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006Fenson..S.ReznickS.J..ThalD.J.,&Pethick,S.J.(1994)..59(5,serialNo.242)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A., (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Clifford, A., Kay, P., Regier, T., Davies, I. R. L. (2008). Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition. PNAS, 105(47), 18221-18225. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0809952105 Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Bevis, L., Davies, I. R. L., Kay, P., Regier, T. (2008). Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults. PNAS, 105(9), 3221-3225. doi:10.1073/pnas.071228610510.1073/pnas.0809952105.........(2008)..PNAS,105(9),3221-3225.doi:10.1073/pnas.0712286105Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2015). Seeing things in the right way: How social interaction shapes perception. In D. Maxime and Th. Breyer (Eds.), Normativity in perception (pp. 117-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. J. (1953). Improvement in perceptual judgments as a function of controlled practice or training. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 401-431.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E.J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 29- 59. Gibson, E. J. & Rader, N. (1979). Attention - The perceiver as performer. In G. Hale (Ed.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1-21). New York, NY: Plenum Press. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. PNAS, 103(2), 489-494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050986810310.1073/pnas.0509868103Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination. Brain and Language, 105(2), 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.06.00110.1016/j.bandl.2007.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Harris, R. (1980). The language-makers. London: Duckworth. Harris, R. (1990). On redefining linguistics. In H. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Pergamon, Oxford. Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90-129. Haugeland, J. (2013). Dasein disclosed. Cambridge, MA.: The Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representation to the education of attention. In: H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113-153). New York, NY: Berg. Jackendoff, R. (1996). How language helps us thinks. Pragmatics & Cognition, 4(1), 1-34. doi: 10.1075/pc.4.1.03jac10.1075/pc.4.1.03jacOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ježek, E. (2016). The lexicon: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kiverstein, J. & Clark, A. (2009) Introduction: Mind embodied, embedded, enacted: One church or many? Topoi, 28, 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11245-008- 9041-410.1007/s11245-008-9041-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kiverstein, J. & Rietveld, E. (2018). Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, 1-17. doi: 10.1177/10597123187727710.1177/105971231877277Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kravchenko, A. V. (2007). Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29, 650-671. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci. 2007.01.00410.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kravchenko, A. V. (2009). The experiental basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 527-548. doi: 10.1075/ p&c.17.3.03kra10.1075/p&c.17.3.03kraOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kukla, R. (2017). Ostension and assertion. In: Z. Adams and J. Browning (Eds.) Giving a damn - Essays in dialogue with John Haugeland (pp. 103-130). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. (2004). An essay concerning human understanding. R. Woolhouse (Ed.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1690)Search in Google Scholar

Love, N. (1990). The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics. In: H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics (pp. 53-118). London/ New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525- 544. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.00310.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Love, N. (2007). Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29, 690-709. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.00810.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Love, N. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.00110.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0005410.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lupyan, G. (2016). The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516-553. doi: 10.1111/lang.1215510.1111/lang.12155Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LupyanG., & Spivey, M.J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2236- 2253. doi: 10.3758/BF03196698Search in Google Scholar

Lupyan, G. & Swingley, D. (2012). Self-directed speech affects visual search performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1068-1085. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.64703910.1080/17470218.2011.647039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Markman, E.M. (1981). The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In: S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought Interrelations in development, 72-107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller, G. A. & Lenneberg, E. (Eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, R., (2003). Does linguistic competence require knowledge of language? In: Barber, A. (Ed.), Epistemology of Language (pp. 187-213). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Myin, E. (2016). Perception as something we do. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(5-6), 80-104.Search in Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. London/New York, NY: Routledge. O’Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 883-917. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X0100011510.1017/S0140525X01000115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Papafragou, A. (2005). Relations between language and thought: Individuation and the count/mass distinction. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (pp. 256-272). Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Pilling, M., Wiggett, A., Özgen, E., & Davies, I.R.L. (2003). Is color “categorical perception” really perceptual? Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 538-551. doi: 10.3758/BF0319609510.3758/BF03196095Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Pitchford, N. J. & Mullen, K. T. (2002). Is the acquisition of basic-colour terms in young children constrained? Perception, 31, 1349-1370. doi: 10.1068/p340510.1068/p3405Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Proffitt, D. R., & Linkenauger, S. A. ( 2013 ). Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. In: W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 171 - 197). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2009). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 653-676.Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2011). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H. Pattee (Ed.), Laws, language and life: Howard Pattee's classic papers on the physics of symbols (pp. 295-333). Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2016) How does a word become a message? An illustration on a developmental time-scale. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.00110.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: Toward a dynamic psycholinguistics. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 193-207.Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2013). Young children's dialogical actions: the beginnings of purposeful intersubjectivity. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 210-221. doi: 10.1109/TAMD.2013.2273258.10.1109/TAMD.2013.2273258Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd Edition) (pp. 164-201). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. (1995). The ecological approach to language development: A radical solution to Chomsky's and Quine's problems. Language & Communication, 15(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1016/0271-5309(94)E0010-910.1016/0271-5309(94)E0010-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Regier, T. & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(10), 439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.tics. 2009.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Rietveld, E. & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325-352. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2014. 95803510.1080/10407413.2014.958035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roberson, D. & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions- the effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 977-986. doi: 10.3758/BF0320934510.3758/BF03209345Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 554-571. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.55410.1037/0096-3445.133.4.554Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roberson, D., Davies, I. R. L., & Davidoff, J., (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 369-398. doi: 10.1037//10 096-3445.129.3.36910.1037//10096-3445.129.3.369Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rosch Heider, E., & Olivier, D. C. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337-354.Search in Google Scholar

Runeson, S. (1977).On the possibility of “smart” perceptual mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 172-179.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1945a). Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 46, 1-16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4544405Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1945b) Philosophical arguments. In G. Ryle (2009) Collected Essays 1929-1968, 203-221. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind 60th anniversary edition. J. Tanney (Ed.). London/New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published in 1949)Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, J. (2010). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Suegami, T., Aminihajibashi, S., & Laeng, B. (2014). Another look at category effects on colour perception and lateralisation. Cognitive Processing, 15(2), 217-226. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0595-810.1007/s10339-013-0595-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tanney, J. (2015) Gilbert Ryle. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ryle/>.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. (1990). Normativity and linguistic form. In H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics (pp. 118-148). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. (1992). Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press/ Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. (2000). Language constructing language: the implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory. Language Sciences, 22, 483-499. doi: 10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-410.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. (2010). Where does language come from? The role of reflexive enculturation in language development. Language Sciences, 32, 14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.01410.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Taylor, T. J. (2013). Calibrating the child for language: Meredith Williams on a Wittgensteinian approach to language socialization. Language Sciences, 40, 308-320. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.00210.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wigget, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. PNAS, 106(11), 4567-4570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081115510610.1073/pnas.0811155106Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition, 9, 237- 304.Search in Google Scholar

Van den Herik, J. C. (2017). Linguistic know-how and the orders of language. Language Sciences, 61, 17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.00910.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, L., Withagen, R., & Bongers, R. M. (2015). Information without content: A Gibsonian reply to enactivists’ worries. Cognition, 134, 210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.01210.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Elk, M., Slors, M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Embodied language comprehension requires an enactivist paradigm of cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(234), 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.0023410.3389/fpsyg.2010.00234Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615-628.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E., (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Verbrugge, R. R. (1985). Language and event perception: steps toward a synthesis. In W. H. Warren, & R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change. Proceedings of the first international conference on event perception (pp. 157-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V.N. (1930/1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). New York, NZ/London: Seminar Press.Search in Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. New York, NZ: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.0005810.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. doi: 10.3758/BF0319632210.3758/BF03196322Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. PNAS, 104(19), 7780-7785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070164410410.1073/pnas.0701644104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009). Philosophical investigations (Revised 4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2010). Learning to perceive the affordance for long-distance throwing: smart mechanism or function learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 862-875. doi: 10.1037/a001873810.1037/a0018738Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zukow-Goldring, P. & Ferko, K. R. (1994). An ecological approach to the emergence of the lexicon: Socializing attention. In V. John-Steiner, C. Panofsky, & L. Smith (Eds.), Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy: an interactionist perspective (pp. 170-194). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo