1. bookVolume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Aug 2008
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
access type Open Access

Utterances as tool-mediated specifications of affordances - ecological pragmatics

Online veröffentlicht: 27 Jul 2018
Seitenbereich: 124 - 163
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Aug 2008
Erscheinungsweise
1 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

The established descriptions of information structure assume that the basic cognitive unit is a categorization, and that the basic semantic structure is a predication. Descriptions based on these assumptions, however, cannot provide an adequate analysis of certain types of utterances that form a part of activities. The article presents a solution to this problem based on Wittgenstein’s private language argument and the concept of information in Gibson's theory of affordances. The basic cognitive assumption is that performers of activities attend to variations in the environment, for example visibility, and perceive the states of variations (e.g., 3000 feet). A state is defined as a local, temporary occurrence of a stimulus configuration that specifies an affordance. The basic pragmatic assumption, then, is that performers of activities share the states of variations by means of utterances. This ecological-pragmatic assumption allows for a rethinking of the usefulness of the reference-predicate distinction and bring forward different dimensions of informational analysis of utterances. It is claimed that an informative and accurate analysis of utterances that form a part of activities relies two distinctions: a distinction between a convention based regulation of attention and a convention based specification of an affordance, and a distinction between sharing information and nesting information

Adolph, K. E. (2008). Learning to move. Current directions in psychological science, 17, 213-218.Search in Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (2001/1936). Language, truth and logic. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Barwise, J., Perry. J. (1983). Situation and attitudes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Borchmann, S. (2007). Hvad skriver vi om -topik på sætningsniveau. In P. Widell & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Det bedre argument (pp. 53-85). Århus: Wessel & Huitfeldt.Search in Google Scholar

Borchmann, S. (2013). Det mentale cockpit -en epistemologisk og psykologisk karakteristik af den meddelelsesstrukturelle konstituent variablen. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog, 14, 77-101.Search in Google Scholar

Borchmann, S. (2015). ”Fordi man ved aldrig” - emne, fokus og kohærens i informativ udøversprogbrug. Skandinaviske Sprogstudier, 6(4), 17-109.Search in Google Scholar

Borchmann, S. (2016). En funktionel semantik baseret på økologisk psykologi. NyS 50 - Nydansk sprogstudier (pp. 183-220). Frederiksberg: Dansk Sprognævn. Borchmann, S. (in press). The spectator bias in the linguistic descriptions of information structure. Language sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1925). Vorstellung und Urteil, zwei Klassen. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (pp. 38-82). Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, K., (1965/1934). Sprachtheorie, die Darstellung der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Defineteness, Subjects Topics, and Point of View. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). Academic Press: London.Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25-49). New York, NY: Palgrave, Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Cowley, S. (2011). Distributed language. In S. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Cowley, S. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & cognition 17(3), 495-507.Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: WW. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding ‘human error’. London: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2006). Performance specification PC based Runway Visual Range (RVR) system. Lighting Systems Office RVR Product Team (AJW-46).Search in Google Scholar

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2010). Air Traffic Organization policy, order JO 7110.65T.Search in Google Scholar

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014A). Approach plate: CHICAGO MIDWAY INTL(MDW), 41°47'N-87°45'W ILS or LOC/DME RWY 31C.Search in Google Scholar

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014B). Approach plate: BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON NATIONAL/ADAMS FIELD (LIT), 34°44'N-92°13'W ILS or LOC RWY 4R.Search in Google Scholar

Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2013). Standards for airport markings 150/5340-1L. Flach, J. M. & J. Rasmussen (2000). Cognitive engineering. designing for situation awareness. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 153-179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Flach, J. M., Jacques, P. F., Patrick, D. L., Amelink, M. H. J., Van Paassen, M. M., and Mulder, M. (2003). A Search for Meaning: A Case Study of the Approach-to-Landing. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task analysis (pp. 171-191). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. (2005/1986). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

von der Gabelentz, G. (1869). Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 6, 376-384.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. J. & Rader, N. (1979). Attention: The perceiver as performer. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1-21). New York, NY & London: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, E. J. & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Golonka, S. (2015). Laws and conventions in language-related behaviors. Ecological psychology, 27(3), 236-250.Search in Google Scholar

Gregor, J. A. (2006). Specialist’s factual specialist report of investigation, DCA06MA009. National Transportation Safety Board, Vehicle Recorders Division: Washington, D.C. 20594Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (2001/1975) Logic and conversation. In C. Henriksen (Ed.), Can you reach the salt? Gylling (pp. 199-219). Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J. K. & Fretheim, T. (2005). Topic and focus. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 174-196). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J. K. (2012). Pragmatics and information structure. In K. Allen & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 585- 598). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haberland, H. (2006). Thetic-categorial distinction. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd edition 12 (pp. 676-677). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessn, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routhledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994/1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, E. & Heltoft, L. (2011). Grammatik over det danske sprog. Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Search in Google Scholar

Harder, P (2010). Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, L. (1993/1943). Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. København: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, B. H., Steffensen, S. V., & Martin, J. E. (2012). Caring, conversing, and realizing values: New directions in language studies. Language sciences, 34, 499-506.Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 628-652.Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, B. H. (2007). Good prospects: ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in conversation. Language sciences, 29, 584-604.Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, B. H. & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the theory of social behavior, 22, 263-294.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of psychology, 1 & 2. New York, NY: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows. Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kristoffersen, J. F., Rasmussen, D. S. L., & Mikkelsen, K. B. (2016). Ja og der er masser af plads til jer og så skyd for helvede udefra en pragmatisk analyse af fokus og emne i tetiske sætninger og imperativsætninger. Roskilde Universitet. Retrived from: http://docplayer.dk/25132983-Ja-og-der-er-masser-af-plads-til-jer-og-saa-skyd-for-helvede-udefra.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic inquiry, 3, 269-320.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972). The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of language, 9, 153-185.Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S.-Y. (2005). Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of Wa and Ga in Japanese. Journal of east asian linguistics, 14(1), 1-58.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leibowitz, H. W. (1988). The human senses in flight. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 83-110). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1946/1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning: a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism (pp.m 296-336). Eighth edition. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Search in Google Scholar

Marty, A. (1940). Von den logisch begründeten Synsemantika beim Urteilsausdruck. Psyche und Sprachstruktur. Bern: A. Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Mathesius, V. (1975/1961). A functional analysis of present day english on a general linguistic basis. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. (2000). On clear and confused ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board (2001). Runway overrun during landing American Airlines flight 1420 McDonnell Douglas MD-82, N215AA Little Rock, Arkansas June 1, 1999. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-01/02. Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

National Transportation Safety Board (2007). Runway overrun and collision, Southwest Airlines flight 1248, Boeing 737-7H4, N471WN, Chicago Midway International Airport, Chicago, Illinois, December 8, 2005. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-07/06. Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

Odling-Smee, J. F., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plumert, J. M., Kearney, J. K., & Cremer, J. F. (2004). Children’s perception of gap affordances: Bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in an immersive virtual environment. Child development, 75, 4.Search in Google Scholar

Raczazek-Leonardi, J. (2009). The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 653-676.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M. & Goodstein, L. P. (1993). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reimer, M. & Michaelson, E. (2017). Reference. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/reference/]Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. (1982) Pragmatics and linguistics. Analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, M. (1988). General Aviation. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 561-589). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosengren, I. (1997). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics, 35, 439-479.Search in Google Scholar

Sasse, H. J. (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511-580.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seibt, J. (2016). Process Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter edition. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/process-philosophy/]Search in Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (1995). Approaches to summarization: Discourse analysis and language education. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (2004/1950). On referring, logico-linguistic papers. Ashgate: Aldershote.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1974). Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, A. (2012). Referring in discourse. In A. Keith & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.,Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.Search in Google Scholar

Verstraete, J.-C. (in press) Formal criteria for subordination in the Germanic languages: in search of an explanation. In B. Cornillie, D. Divjak, P. Mertens, & P. Swiggers (Eds.), Structuring linguistic form (Orbis supplementa). Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, S. (1994). The november Oscar incident. Air & space, march, 80-87. Wilson, A. D. & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1968/1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Zukow-Goldring, P. & Arbib, M. A. (2007). Affordances, effectivities, and assisted imitation: Caregivers and the directing of attention, Neurocomputing, 70, 2181-2193.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo