[
Adell, N., Bendix, R. Bortolotto, C., Tauschek, M. (Eds.) (2015). Between Imagined Communities and Communities of Practice. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.10.4000/books.gup.191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akagawa, N., Smith, L. (Eds.) (2019). Safe -guarding Intangible Heritage. Practices and Politics. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bendix, R., Eggert, A., Peselmann, A. (Eds.) (2013). Heritage Regimes and the State. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Götingen.10.4000/books.gup.348
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blake, J. (2009). UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Implications of Community Involvement in “safe guarding”. In: L. Smith, N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible Heritage (pp. 45–73). London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blake, J. (2017). From Traditional Culture and Folklore to Intangible Cultural Heritage: Evolution of a Treaty. Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2(3), 41–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bortolotto, C., Demgenski, P., Karampampas, P., Toji, S. (2020). Proving participation: vocational bureaucrats and bureaucratic creativity in the implementation of the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Social Anthropology, 28(1), 66–82.10.1111/1469-8676.12741
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyer, D. (2008). Thinking through the Anthropology of Experts. Anthropology in Action, 15(2), 38–46.10.3167/aia.2008.150204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’amico Soggetti, G. (2020). Article 15: Participation of Communities, Groups and Individuals – Participation and Democracy. In: J. Blake, L. Lixinski (Eds.), The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary (pp. 290–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Regional Development Fund (2020). UNESCO-tourism. EstLat Results. Interreg Estonia—Latvia. Accessible at: https://estlat.eu/en/estlat-results/unesco-tourism.html (Accessed November 30, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foster, M. D., Gilman, L. (Eds.) (2015). UNESCO on the Ground: Local Perspectives on Intangible Cultural Heritage. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Oakland: University of California Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, M. (1989). Paths toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, M. (2020). Article 15: Participation of Communities, Groups, and Individuals – CGIs, not Just ‘the Community’. In: J. Blake, L. Lixinski (Eds.), The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary (pp. 273–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kroeber, C. (2018). How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data. Representation, 54(3), 241–259.10.1080/00344893.2018.1504112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuutma, K. (2019a). Inside the UNESCO apparatus: from intangible representations to tangible effects. In: N. Akagawa, L. Smith (Eds.), Safeguarding Intangible Heritage: Practices and Politics (pp. 68−83). London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429507137-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuutma, K. (2019b). Afterword. The Politics of Scale for Intangible Cultural Heritage: Identification, Ownership, and Representation. In: T. Lähdesmäki, S. Thomas, Y. Zhu (Eds.), Politics of Scale: New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies (pp. 156−170). New York, Oxford: Berghahn.10.2307/j.ctv12pnscx.15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosse, D. (2011). Introduction: The Anthropology of Expertise and Professionals in International Development. In: D. Mosse (Ed.), Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development (pp. 1–31). New York, Oxford: Berghahn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noyes, D. (2003). Group. In: B. Feintuch (Ed.), Eight Words for the Study of Expressive Culture (pp. 7–41). Urbana, Chicago, Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orgad, L. (2015). The Cultural Defense of Nations: A Liberal Theory of Majority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668687.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rapport, N., Overing, J. (2007). Agent and Agency; Hybridity. In: Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts (pp. 3–11; 197–208). Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosaldo, R., Lavie, S., Narayan, K. (1993). Introduction: Creativity in Anthropology. In: S. Lavie, K. Narayan, R. Rosaldo (Eds.), Creativity/Anthropology (pp. 1–8). Series: The Anthropology of Contemporary Issues. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smeets, R. (2021). Overview of the development of the listing mechanisms of the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage up to 2008. Expert meeting in the framework of the global reflection on the listing mechanisms under the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Online, 7, 26 and 27 May 2021. Document LHE/21/EXP/3 Rev. Accessible at: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/LHE-21-EXP-3_Rev-EN.docx (Accessed November 30, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203602263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, L. (2015). Intangible Heritage: A challenge to the authorised heritage discourse? Etnologia: Revista d’Etnologia de Catalunya, 40, 133–142.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strathern, M. (2021). Terms of engagement. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 29(2), 283–297.10.1111/1469-8676.13026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsing, A. (2013). Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 21–43.10.14318/hau3.1.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 32nd session, General Conference (Paris, from 29 September to 17 October 2003).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2016). Adoption of the summary records of the tenth session of the Committee. 11th session, Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (Addis Ababa, 28 November to 16 December 2016), ITH/16/11.COM/4. Accessible at: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/ITH-16-11.COM-4-EN.docx (Accessed November 30, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2020). Report of the Evaluation Body on its work in 2020. 15th session, Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (Online – 14 to 19 December 2020), LHE/20/15.COM/8. Accessible at: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/LHE-20-15.COM-8-EN.docx (Accessed November 30, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2021). Report of the Evaluation Body on its work in 2021. 16th session, Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (Online – 13 to 18 December 2021), LHE/21/16.COM/8. Accessible at: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/LHE-21-16.COM-8-EN.docx (Accessed November 30, 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaivade, A. (2017). Discursive Legacies of Folklore in International Law. In: D. Bula, S. Laime (Eds.), Mapping the History of Folk lore Studies: Centers, Borderlands and Shared Spaces (pp. 306–335). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaivade, A. (2020). Article 13. Other Measures of Safeguarding. Developing Intangible Cultural Heritage Policies and Legislation at the National Level. In: J. Blake, L. Lixinski (Eds.), The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary (pp. 199–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yarrow, T. (2017). Where knowledge meets: heritage expertise at the intersection of people, perspective, and place. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(S1), 95–109.10.1111/1467-9655.12596
]Search in Google Scholar