<DIV align=left> ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration is published jointly by the Institute of Austrian Historical Research (IÖG) and the Swiss Federal Archives (SFA) in cooperation with the Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, Frankfurt and the Munich Centre for Global History, LMU Munich. Why subscribe and read ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration is published once a year and covers a wide range of perspectives, from biographical to discourse analysis. Spanning multiple eras and with an international orientation that extends beyond Europe, it raises awareness of continuities and fractures, and enables exchange between national knowledge cultures and epistemic communities. In order to retain focus while encouraging that diversity, each individual volume of the yearbook is devoted to a specific topic that creates space for dialogue. In addition to articles on that topic, there is an open area containing articles on current issues relating to the history of states and administrations, in particular methodological innovations, and research reports. Why submit ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration aims to foster debate on the history of states and administrations. With its innovative articles and broad methodological and theoretical spectrum, the yearbook is a key interface between historical and cultural science research, and discussions on the state and administration in the social, legal and political sciences. ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration publishes articles in English and German. You can easily submit your manuscript online. Simply go to: <A href="https://www.editorialmanager.com/ADHI">www.editorialmanager.com/ADHI</A> and you will be guided through the whole peer-reviewing and publishing process. Review ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration publishes submissions that meet the most exacting academic standards. Each submission is evaluated by the editorial team and then subjected to a double-blind peer review process. The reviewer is asked to give an opinion on the academic excellence of the submission and offer suggestions as to how it might be revised if necessary. A period of around four weeks is allowed for the review. Archiving Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in <A href="https://www.portico.org/">Portico</A> - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections. Plagiarism Policy The editorial board is participating in a growing community of <A href="https://www.crossref.org/services/similarity-check/">Similarity Check System's</A> users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. </DIV>

Journal for the History of Public Administration / Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsgeschichte

Administory

<article-title>Frontmatter</article-title>

{"article-title":"Frontmatter"}

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>Files may seem an obvious topic for historians of public administration, but that is by no means self-evident. Despite the interest in files from sociologists and archival scientists in the early 20th century, historians have engaged more with the contents of files than with their genres, materialities and functions. After tracing the theoretical and methodological engagements with files from Max Weber and Heinrich Otto Meisner to Cornelia Vismann and Bruno Latour, we argue firstly that files are defined by their relation to other records they compile. At the same time, they transmute these documents into cases and bureaucratic objects. Secondly, just as files bring documents together, they connect the activities of individuals and organizations. However, we argue that the degree to which files are instruments of formal administrative control and organizational coherence has been exaggerated, obscuring the agency of users and the potential for files to serve other ends.</abstract>

Abstract

<article-title>Towards a History of Files</article-title>

{"article-title":"Towards a History of Files"}

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>This paper provides an analysis of micro-level processes in the land administration of two different monastic estates, Lambach in Upper Austria and Klosterneuburg in Lower Austria, in the 15th and early 16th centuries. It argues that several different institutional factors can be seen as driving forces of administrative progress and innovation. To keep up with not always congruent economic, legal and social demands, the two monasteries pursued different strategies in administering their landed property. Their approaches and advancements indicate that the development of bureaucratic use of written texts should not be seen as one of the ever-increasing rationalities but rather as the result of a multilayered cultural process.</abstract>

<article-title>Organising Landed Property: Manorial Administration Strategies in the 15th and Early 16th Centuries</article-title>

Organising Landed Property: Manorial Administration Strategies in the 15 and Early 16 Centuries

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>The file is synonymous with British bureaucracy but it had a long gestation from at least the 16th century. It emerged slowly from the chrysalis of the docket during the 19th century, differentially in the various departments of state and became a fixity following reforms in the aftermath of the First World War. Even then the system of recording information in government was not uniform and was subject to the exigencies of the financial crisis and the commitment of officials. Although India and the rest of the Empire had separate administration, there was very little attempt to manage and preserve information effectively. Most initiatives met only with partial success and were often resented by junior officials. Registries in keeping with long-held commitment to paucity in government spending were and are poorly staffed and resourced. This article traces the evolution of the file until its demise in the digital age.</abstract>

<article-title>How the File was Invented</article-title>

{"article-title":"How the File was Invented"}

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>Much has been said on the role of judges, legal officials, and courts in the making of colonial regimes. Nevertheless, historiography lacks specific methodological reflections on lawsuits in the Iberian Empires. In order to raise some methodological issues concerning lawsuits as primary sources, I argue that historians could also engage with legal files by looking at instead of just looking through them. In this sense, I seek to establish a dialogue with discussions that anthropologists and social scientists put forward concerning the role of documents as constitutive of bureaucracies and administrative institutions. In order to do so, I will focus on specific aspects of the Benguela District Court collection of legal files.</abstract>

<article-title>Legal Files and Empires: Form and Materiality of the Benguela District Court Documents</article-title>

Legal Files and Empires: Form and Materiality of the Benguela District Court Documents

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>This article provides a particular history of the file. It does not focus on the content of specific files or the development of filing systems. Instead it moves files from a history of administrative writing to a history of information storage technologies. My argument is that if we get ›under the hood‹ of the filing cabinet and manila folder to understand how they work we learn how information was conceptualized and understood such that it could contribute to the goals of efficiency critical to corporate capitalism. It is the contention of this article that information is a historically specific concept and the early 20th century emergence of the tabbed manila folder and the vertical filing cabinet offer insights into the development of a distinctly modern conception of information as impersonal, discrete, and therefore easily extracted. I offer the concept of ›granular certainty‹ to show how information was conceptualize, practically constituted and organized. This emphasizes the overlap between the importance of efficiency’s embrace of standardization and the specific and a conception of information as something specific. The tabbed manila folder and the vertical filing cabinet emerged from this overlap between efficiency and information.</abstract>

<article-title>Granular Certainty, The Vertical Filing Cabinet, and the Transformation of Files</article-title>

Granular Certainty, The Vertical Filing Cabinet, and the Transformation of Files

{"article-title":"Granular Certainty, The Vertical Filing Cabinet, and the Transformation of Files"}

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>In this essay I lay out an argument about the scholarship on the emergent rationality of files. Looking at the case of Heinrich Otto Meisner’s groundbreaking modern diplomatics of files and the conditions and possibilities that shaped the argument of his work both practically and politically, I suggest a model for the analysis of bureaucratic mediocracy in historical perspective. I argue for an historical anthropology that acknowledges the epistemic violence and politics of inclusion and exclusion in bureaucracy in order to arrive at an historical anthropology of reason that does not deny, but instead attempts to think through its unequal terms.</abstract>

<article-title>Revisions and Revisionisms in H.O. Meisner’s Modern Diplomatics of Files: An Essay in the Historical Anthropology of Bureaucratic Mediocracy</article-title>

Revisions and Revisionisms in H.O. Meisner’s Modern Diplomatics of Files: An Essay in the Historical Anthropology of Bureaucratic Mediocracy

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>This article deals with the question of how issues of late colonial housing in Zambia were passed through various segments and between various layers of an encompassing colonial administration. It is equally about the question how the researcher retraces that process of administering housing. The main argument is that a discourse clad in techno-scientific language in the colonial metropole assumed undertones of development and morality in the colony. The text pays particular attention to the bureaucratic individuals seizing opportunities – often in cooperation with one or two colleagues, or across racial dividing lines. Furthermore, the contribution ponders on the significance of the researcher's encounters with both archival staff in London and Lusaka as through these interactions initial research agendas become redirected and adjusted.</abstract>

<article-title>Asking Appropriate Questions, Reconsidering Research Agendas: Moving between London and Lusaka, in- and outside the Archive</article-title>

Asking Appropriate Questions, Reconsidering Research Agendas: Moving between London and Lusaka, in- and outside the Archive

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>This article examines how dossier files informed the handling of personnel misconduct in Chinese work units using an investigation of adultery as a case study. By the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), the disciplinary functions of the dossier system were an embedded feature of social control in the work unit, partially shifting responsibility for policing petty crime to local administrators. In this case, the revelation of an extramarital relationship in 1974 set off a bureaucratic operation to produce documentary proof of the alleged wrongdoing. The thick case file prepared by the work unit investigators grew to include a tranche of seized love letters, a series of dubious confessions, and detailed bureaucratic reports. The preparation of evidence bound for the dossier demonstrates the extent to which the demands of documentation formed a distinct end of the investigative process, while revealing how people and paper were mobilized to deal with a minor administrative affair.</abstract>

<article-title>Paper Affairs: Discipline by the Dossier in a Mao-Era Work Unit</article-title>

Paper Affairs: Discipline by the Dossier in a Mao-Era Work Unit

{"article-title":"Paper Affairs: Discipline by the Dossier in a Mao-Era Work Unit"}

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>The Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory Project was launched by the former President Mandela in 2004 as a special project of the Nelson Mandela Foundation (NMF). In 2006, the Foundation’s Board of Trustees decided to adopt the Centre as the Foundation’s core operational function, a decision to be implemented in terms of a 5-year transition plan. In February 2012, the latter ended with a public announcement of the organisation’s new mandate to work in the memory–dialogue nexus and intention to unveil the Centre as a public facility in 2013. This fundamental organisational transition (with many subsidiary change management processes) was informed by four dedicated research interventions, all conducted within an overarching action research framing: an investigation of the ›memory for justice‹ tradition in South Africa and its possible institutional application by the NMF; a global benchmarking study of cognate institutions; a study of dialogue as an element of Mandela’s legacy in relation to the memory–dialogue nexus; and a marketing and branding survey. Verne Harris and Shadrack Katuu provide an account of these interventions, highlighting in each case the research designs and subsidiary research and analysis techniques. The article begins with a tracing of relevant historical and archival contexts and concludes with an assessment of the organisation’s change management process and the efficacy of the organisational research agenda.</abstract>

<article-title>Nelson Mandela’s Archive: a Case Study in Research-driven Institutional Change Management</article-title>

Nelson Mandela’s Archive: a Case Study in Research-driven Institutional Change Management

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>The Institute for Pain Management in Kolkata, like other modern institutions, is organised by record keeping. But the central object of its records, pain, presents a fundamental challenge to documentation. Pain is marked by a non-relational attribute that limits attempts to communicate and express it. I follow the institutional life of one patient and his struggles with health care through his documentary productions. As the paper traces clinical management of his pain, a proliferation of medical records is revealed. The forms of this documentary multiplicity, its materiality and how it enacts pain’s therapeutics are described. The challenge of pain’s communication is addressed by translating a body in pain constituted through artefacts and intersubjective relationships to a body in pain that exists almost entirely on paper. This translation proves efficacious in the eyes of doctors and patients, and is critical to the management of chronic pain in Kolkata.</abstract>

<article-title>Pain’s Records: An Anthropological Account of Medical Documentation in South Asia</article-title>

Pain’s Records: An Anthropological Account of Medical Documentation in South Asia

<abstract><title style='display:none'>Abstract</title>This Relektüre revisits Cornelia Vismann’s book Files: Law and Media Technology almost 20 years after its initial publication. Situating the book in the media historical and intellectual constellations in which it originally appeared, this article provides an overview of Vismann’s approach to legal and administrative history and sheds light on the book’s reception.</abstract>

<article-title>Wieder gelesen: Cornelia Vismann, »Akten« (2000)</article-title>

Wieder gelesen: Cornelia Vismann, »Akten« (2000)

{"article-title":"Wieder gelesen: Cornelia Vismann, »Akten« (2000)"}

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html><head> <meta http-equiv=content-type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta content="mshtml 6.00.6000.17104" name=generator></head> <body> Administory is covered by the following services: <UL><LI>Baidu Scholar</LI><LI>CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)</LI><LI>CNPIEC - cnpLINKer</LI><LI>EBSCO Discovery Service</LI><LI>Google Scholar</LI><LI>J-Gate</LI><LI>KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)</LI><LI>Microsoft Academic</LI><LI>MyScienceWork</LI><LI>Naver Academic</LI><LI>Primo Central (ExLibris)</LI><LI>QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)</LI><LI>ReadCube</LI><LI>Semantic Scholar</LI><LI>Summon (ProQuest)</LI><LI>TDNet</LI><LI>WanFang Data</LI><LI>WorldCat (OCLC)</LI></UL></body></html>

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html><head> <meta http-equiv=content-type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta content="mshtml 6.00.6000.17104" name=generator></head> <body> Administory ist in den folgenden Services indiziert: <UL><LI>Baidu Scholar</LI><LI>CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)</LI><LI>CNPIEC - cnpLINKer</LI><LI>EBSCO Discovery Service</LI><LI>Google Scholar</LI><LI>J-Gate</LI><LI>KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)</LI><LI>Microsoft Academic</LI><LI>MyScienceWork</LI><LI>Naver Academic</LI><LI>Primo Central (ExLibris)</LI><LI>QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)</LI><LI>ReadCube</LI><LI>Semantic Scholar</LI><LI>Summon (ProQuest)</LI><LI>TDNet</LI><LI>WanFang Data</LI><LI>WorldCat (OCLC)</LI></UL></body></html>

Editor-in-Chief Peter Becker, University of Vienna, Austria Deputy Editor Stefan Nellen, Swiss Federal Archives, Switzerland Managing Editor Franz Adlgasser, Austrian Academy of Science, Austria Editorial Advisory Board Arndt Brendecke, University of Munich, Germany John Deak, University of Notre Dame, USA Caroline Dufour, York University, Canada Stefan Fisch, German University of Public Administration, Germany Elisabeth Gruber, University of Salzburg, Austria Waltraud Heindl, University of Vienna, Austria Pavel Himl, University of Prague, Czech Republic Olivier Ihl, Sciences Po Grenoble, France Patrick Joyce, University of Manchester, United Kingdom Pierre Karila-Cohen, University of Rennes 2, France Christine Lebeau, University of Paris, France Fredrik Lindström, Lund University, Sweden Anna Gianna Manca, University of Trento, Italy Petr Mat’a, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria Brigitte Mazohl, University of Innsbruck, Austria Jana Osterkamp, Collegium Carolinum, Germany Magdalena Pöschl, University of Vienna, Austria Nico Randeraad, Maastricht University, Netherlands Birgit Sauer, University of Vienna, Austria Martin Scheutz, University of Vienna, Austria Anton Tantner, University of Vienna, Austria Werner Telesko, Austrian Academy of Science, Austria Markus Twellmann, University of Konstanz, Germany Frits van der Meer, Leiden University, Netherlands Thomas Winkelbauer, University of Vienna, Austria Editors Peter Collin, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, Germany Thomas Rohringer, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany Roland Wenzelhuemer, Munich Centre for Global History, Germany Cover Art Lena Appl (Volume 1 and 2) Elif Süsler (Volume 3 and 4) Publisher De Gruyter Poland Bogumiła Zuga 32A Str. 01-811 Warsaw, Poland T: +48 22 701 50 15

<DIV align=left> You can easily submit your manuscript online. Simply go to: <A href="https://www.editorialmanager.com/ADHI">www.editorialmanager.com/ADHI</A> and you will be guided through the whole peer-reviewing and publishing process. Open Access Statement The journal is an Open Access journal that allows a free unlimited access to all its contents without any restrictions upon publication to all users. <A href="https://sciendo-parsed-feed.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/ADHI/Open_Access_License.docx">Open Access License</A> </DIV>

Ausgaben

Zeitschriften und Ausgaben

Administory

Suche

Volume 4 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

Details zu Zeitschrift und Ausgabe

Suche

Artikel

Editorial

Towards a History of Files

Relektüre

Editorial

Towards a History of Files

Relektüre

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo