[
Abkowitz, M., Lepofsky, M., & Cheng, P. (1992). Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes. Transportation Research Record, 1333(2.2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahuja, R. K., Goodstein, J., Mukherjee, A., Orlin, J. B., & Sharma, D. (2007). A Very Large-Scale Neighborhood Search Algorithm for the Combined Through-Fleet-Assignment Model. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 19(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1060.019310.1287/ijoc.1060.0193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bagheri, M., Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2014). Transport Mode Selection for Toxic Gases: Rail or Road? Risk Analysis, 34(1), 168–186.10.1111/risa.12063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barkan, C. P. L., Ukkusuri, S. V, & Waller, S. T. (2007). Optimizing the design of railway tank cars to minimize accident-caused releases. Computers & Operations Research, 34(5), 1266–1286.10.1016/j.cor.2005.06.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batta, R., & Chiu, S. S. (1988). Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Operations Research, 36(1), 84–92.10.1287/opre.36.1.84
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bianco, L., Caramia, M., Giordani, S., & Piccialli, V. (2013). Operations research models for global route planning in hazardous material transportation. In Handbook of OR/MS Models in Hazardous Materials Transportation (pp. 49–101). Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6794-6_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackwell, K. (2011). Enhancing Railroad Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/em/Blackwell_NTSF_2011.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bury, A., Paraskevakis, D., Ren, J., & Saeed, F. (2017). A framework for use in modelling the modal choice decision making process in North West England’s Atlantic Gateway. Logistics \& Sustainable Transport, 8(1).10.1515/jlst-2017-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. (2019). Crude Oil: Forecast, Market and Transportation. Retrieved from https://www.capp.ca/publications/2019-crude-oil-forecast-markets-and-transportation/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, J., Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2017). Impact of train makeup on hazmat risk in a transport corridor. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 9(2), 167–194.10.1080/19439962.2016.1162890
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colson, B., Marcotte, P., & Savard, G. (2007). An overview of bilevel optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 153(1), 235–256.10.1007/s10479-007-0176-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
der Vlies, A. V, & Suddle, S. I. (2008). Structural measures for a safer transport of hazardous materials by rail: The case of the basic network in The Netherlands. Safety Science, 46(1), 119–131.10.1016/j.ssci.2006.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drèze, J., & Stern, N. (1987). The theory of cost-benefit analysis. In Handbook of public economics (Vol. 2, pp. 909–989). Elsevier.10.1016/S1573-4420(87)80009-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erkut, E., & Verter, V. (1995). A framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 15(5), 589–601.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00755.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ESRI. (2016). ArcGIS Version 10.3.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1962). Flows in networks princeton university press. Princeton, New Jersey, 276, 22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glickman, T. S. (1983). Rerouting railroad shipments of hazardous materials to avoid populated areas. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 15(5), 329–335.10.1016/0001-4575(83)90012-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harangozó, G., & Szerényi, Z. M. (2012). A Cost-Benefit Approach for Evaluating Transportation-Based Noise Control Projects. Logistics \& Sustainable Transport, 3(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosseini, S. D., & Verma, M. (2017). A Value-at-Risk (VAR) approach to routing rail hazmat shipments. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 54, 191–211.10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosseini, S. D., & Verma, M. (2018). Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 110, 79–103.10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM. (2020). ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://www.ibm.com/ca-en/products/ilog-cplex-optimization-studio
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kara, B. Y., & Verter, V. (2004). Designing a road network for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Science, 38(2), 188–196.10.1287/trsc.1030.0065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowrance, W. W. (1976). Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety.10.1149/1.2132690
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcotte, P., Mercier, A., Savard, G., & Verter, V. (2009). Toll policies for mitigating hazardous materials transport risk. Transportation Science, 43(2), 228–243.10.1287/trsc.1080.0236
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzarotta, B. (2002). Risk reduction when transporting dangerous goods: road or rail? Risk, Decision and Policy, 7(01), 45–56.10.1017/S1357530902000479
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milazzo, M. F., Lisi, R., Maschio, G., Antonioni, G., Bonvicini, S., & Spadoni, G. (2002). HazMat transport through Messina town: from risk analysis suggestions for improving territorial safety. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15(5), 347–356.10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00028-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nivolianitou, Z., & Papazoglou, I. A. (2014). Risk-based land use planning around hazardous chemical installations. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 17(3), 246–264.10.1504/IJRAM.2014.062779
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, M. J., & others. (2004). An introduction to game theory (Vol. 3). Oxford university press New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Provencher, M. (2008). The movement and handling of dangerous goods in Canada for the year 2004. Transport Dangerous Goods Directorate.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quadros, S. G. R., & Nassi, C. D. (2015). An evaluation on the criteria to prioritize transportation infrastructure investments in Brazil. Transport Policy, 40, 8–16.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quah, E., & Toh, R. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis: Cases and materials. Routledge.10.4324/9780203697542
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Railroad Performance Measures. (2018). Performance Reports. Retrieved January 20, 2018, from https://railroadpm.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saat, M. R., & Barkan, C. P. L. (2011). Generalized railway tank car safety design optimization for hazardous materials transport: Addressing the trade-off between transportation efficiency and safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189(1), 62–68.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.136
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistics Canada. (2017). Railway carloadings statistics, by total tonnage transported, monthly. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=2310021601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, R. E., Zamejc, E. R., & Ahlbeck, D. R. (1992). Hazardous materials car placement in a train consist.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Transport Canada. (2018). Transportation in Canada 2018 - Statistical Addendum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2012). Hazardous Materials Shipments by Transportation Mode. Retrieved August 17, 2020, from https://www.bts.gov/hazardous-materials-shipments-transportation-mode-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). ALOHA Software.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaezi, A., & Verma, M. (2018). Railroad transportation of crude oil in Canada: Developing long-term forecasts, and evaluating the impact of proposed pipeline projects. Journal of Transport Geography, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.01910.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaezi, Ali, Dalal, J., & Verma, M. (2021). Designing emergency response network for rail hazmat shipments under uncertainties: Optimization model and case study. Safety Science, 141, 105332.10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105332
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaezi, Ali, & Verma, M. (2017). An analytics approach to dis-aggregate national freight data to estimate hazmat traffic on rail-links and at rail-yards in Canada. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management.10.1016/j.jrtpm.2017.12.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, M. (2009). A cost and expected consequence approach to planning and managing railroad transportation of hazardous materials. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(5), 300–308.10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, M. (2011). Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: A conditional exposure approach to minimize transport risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(5), 790–802.10.1016/j.trc.2010.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2007). Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins. Computers & Operations Research, 34(5), 1287–1303.10.1016/j.cor.2005.06.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2013). Railroad Transportation of Hazardous Materials: Models for Risk Assessment and Management. In Handbook of OR/MS Models in Hazardous Materials Transportation (pp. 9–47). Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6794-6_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, M., Verter, V., & Gendreau, M. (2011). A tactical planning model for railroad transportation of dangerous goods. Transportation Science, 45(2), 163–174.10.1287/trsc.1100.0339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Žerovnik, J. (2015). Heuristics for NP-hard optimization problems: simpler is better!? Logistics \& Sustainable Transport, 6(1), 1–10.10.1515/jlst-2015-0006
]Search in Google Scholar