Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 44 (2022): Edition 1 (March 2022)
Accès libre
An iterative algorithm for random upper bound kinematical analysis
Marcin Chwała
Marcin Chwała
| 10 nov. 2021
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 44 (2022): Edition 1 (March 2022)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Original Study
Publié en ligne:
10 nov. 2021
Pages:
13 - 25
Reçu:
29 mai 2021
Accepté:
27 sept. 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0027
Mots clés
random bearing capacity
,
shallow foundation
,
scale of fluctuation
,
iterative algorithm
,
upper bound
,
spatial variability
© 2022 Marcin Chwała, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
The three algorithms discussed in the study. Path ‘A’ is the base iterative algorithm, which is described in detail in the text, the path ‘B’ differs only from ‘A’ in Step 3 (see the description in the text), and the path ‘C’ is dedicated to a constant covariance matrix. Both ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’ are repeated N times in the Monte Carlo framework.
Figure 2
Failure geometry for two-layered soil for the probabilistic case. The indicated points and lengths are used to determine the failure geometry.
Figure 3
Eight randomly selected results among 200 Monte Carlo realizations for the case of θh=2 m, θv=1 m, and a=2 m.
Figure 4
Bearing capacity mean values as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (a). Bearing capacity standard deviations as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (b). Case k=0 is for the constant covariance matrix. Results for two-layered soil, vertical scale of fluctuation θv=0.5 m,, foundation width b=1 m and averaging lengths a=2 m and a=8 m.
Figure 5
Bearing capacity mean values as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (a). Bearing capacity standard deviations as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (b). Case k=0 is for the constant covariance matrix. Results for two-layered soil, vertical scale of fluctuation θv=1 m,, foundation width b=1 m and averaging lengths a=2 m and a=8 m.
Figure 6
Three-dimensional failure geometry of the rough foundation base for the probabilistic case. The indicated angles and lengths are used to determine the failure geometry.
Figure 7
Bearing capacity mean values as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (a). Bearing capacity standard deviations as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (b). Case k=0 is for the constant covariance matrix. Results for a square foundation of size 1 m × 1 m.
Figure 8
Bearing capacity mean values as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (a). Bearing capacity standard deviation as a function of covariance matrix iteration number (b). Case k=0 is for the constant covariance matrix. Results for a rectangular foundation of size 1 m × 4 m.
Figure 9
Bearing capacity mean values (a), standard deviations (b), and coefficient of variations (c) as a function of coefficient of variation of undrained shear strength. Two-layered soil considered with homogenous top layer (all parameters not mentioned here are the same as for earlier analyses).
Figure 10
Stabilisation of bearing capacity mean values (a) and standard deviations (b) for the iterative approache for k=6.
Aperçu