[
[1] BNC-BYU. Accessible at: https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Kortmann, B. (1991). Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London, New York: Routledge, 253 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Huddelson, R. D., and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1842 p.10.4324/9780203015469
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Hasselgård, H. (2012). Possessive absolutes in English and Norwegian. In C. Fabricius-Hansen and D. T. T. Haug (eds.), Big events, small clauses: The grammar of elaboration, pages 229–258, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Schönefeld, D. (2015). A constructional analysis of English un-participle constructions. Cognitive linguistics, 26(3), pages 423–466.10.1515/cog-2014-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Hoffmann, T. (2019). The more data, the better: A usage-based account of the English comparative correlative construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(1), pages 1–36.10.1515/cog-2018-0036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Horsch, J. (2020). Slovak comparative correlative CC’ constructions from a construction grammar perspective. Jazykovedný časopis, 71(1), pages 25–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Hilpert, M., and Diessel, H. (2017). Entrenchment in Construction grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (ed.), Language and the human lifespan series. Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, pages 57–74. American Psychological Association; De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Gries, S. T. (2015). The role of quantitative methods in cognitive linguistics: corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman and H. Cuyckens (eds.), Change of paradigms – new paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics, pages 311–325. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Stefanowitsch, A., and Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. In International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), pages 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Gries, S. T. (2007). Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x. Accessible at: http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/teaching/groningen/index.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 233 p.10.1017/CBO9781139004206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] FrameNet. Accessible at: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Demonte, V. (2008). Meaning-form correlations and adjective position in Spanish. In L. McNally and C. Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs. Syntax, semantics, and discourse, pages 71–100, New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Dryer, M. S. (1985). The Role of thematic relations in adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(2), pages 320–326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 561 p.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Frith, C. (2009). Role of facial expressions in social interactions. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, № 364, pages 3453–3458.10.1098/rstb.2009.0142
]Search in Google Scholar
