[
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York, London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2011) Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect Publishers.10.26530/OAPEN_606390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. and B. De Cleen (2007). Bringing discourse theory into media studies. Journal of Language and Politics, 6:2, 265-293.10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. and E. Spinog, eds. (2008) Discourse theory and cultural analysis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corner, J. (2016) ‘”Ideology” and media research’. Media, Culture & Society, vol 38(2) 265-273.10.1177/0163443715610923
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahlberg, L. and S. Phelan, eds. (2011) Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230343511
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dolphijn, R. and I. van der Tuin (2012) New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Downing, J. (2018) Book review: The Discursive-Material Knot. International Journal of Communication 12, 1638-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Downey, J., G. Titley and J. Toynbee (2014) ‘Ideology critique: the challenge for media studies’. Media, Culture & Society, vol 36(6) 878-887.10.1177/0163443714536113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geras, N. (1987) “Post-Marxism?” New Left Review (163) 40-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glynos, J. & D. Howarth (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203934753
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howarth, D., A. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis, eds. (2000) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jørgensen, M. and L. Phillips (2002) ‘Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory’, in their Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage, pp. 24-59.10.4135/9781849208871.n2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laclau, E. (2006) ‘Ideology and post-Marxism’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11:2, 103-114.10.1080/13569310600687882
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed. London:Verso.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Los Angeles: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McQuail, D. (2000) Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction 4th ed. London: Sage
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phelan, S. (2016) ‘Reinvigorating ideology critique: between trust and suspicion’. Media, Culture & Society 38:2 274-28310.1177/0163443715610921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahman, M. and A. Witz (2003) “What Really Matters? The Elusive Quality of the Material in Feminist Thought,” Feminist Theory, 4(3): 243–261.10.1177/14647001030043001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, A. M. (1999). Laclau and Mouffe. The Radical Democratic Imaginary. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stavrakakis, Yannis (1999) Lacan and the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torfing, J. (1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau Mouffe, and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
