<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This paper addresses the issue of selecting a suitable location for a fire station in canton of Fribourg, as a result of a fire brigades’ merger, by applying Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. Solving the problem of determining fire station locations through various methods has been analyzed in-depth by researchers. However, a different approach, based on application of ELECTRE I and ELECTRE II methods is advanced in this paper. The selection of the most suitable fire station site is obtained by applying the designated methods to five distinctive alternatives (called scenarios), taking into consideration the relatively limited information and specifics, and the extensive number of relevant criteria that summed up to sixty-one. Taking the merger of the three local fire departments as an example, the proposed methods for selecting a suitable location for the fire station demonstrate and justify the reason behind this choice. Research shows that the applied methods have been proven to be useful and powerful tools that exhibited acceptable levels of consistency when selecting the best project. The main finding is that one scenario in particular proved to be preferred over the others and most suitable in determining the fire station location.</abstract>

Finding the Adequate Location Scenario After the Merger of Fire Brigades Thanks to Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Methods

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Many fields of modern science rely more and more on the immense computing power of supercomputers. Modern, multi-thousand node systems can consume megawatts of electrical energy in highly uneven manner, challenging the data center infrastructure, both power and cooling coils. The traditional way of managing the infrastructure makes each subsystem of a data center (e.g. cooling) independent from all other in the way it relies only on local sensors to manage the infrastructure. The erratic nature of computing in a large data center makes this approach suboptimal. In the paper we show that by challenging the traditional split between the infrastructure and the computing equipment, one can gain significant boost in energy efficiency of the entire ecosystem. A solution that predicts cooling power demand basing on the information from a supercomputer resource manager, and then sets up the parameters of the cooling loop, is presented along with potential benefits in terms of reduction of the power draw.</abstract>

Improving energy efficiency of supercomputer systems through software-aided liquid cooling management

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Reliability is one of the bigest challenges faced by service-oriented systems. Therefore, to solve this problem, we have proposed ReServE - Reliable Service Environment. ReServE increases fault-tolerance of SOA systems and ensures consistent processing despite failures. However, the proposed environment imposes also the performance overhead. Thus, in this paper, we extended ReServE and added a monitoring feature provided by the M3 service. As a consequence, the extended environment can adjust appropriately the load of its modules to the changing interaction and behaviour patterns of service oriented systems. We have experimentally shown that the proposed solution, while providing the required level of reliability, decreases significantly the performance overhead.</abstract>

On Monitoring and Self-Adaptation to Dynamic Nature of SOA in ReServE Environment

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Today, many efforts have been made to implement information systems for supporting research evaluation activities. To produce a good framework for research evaluation, the selection of appropriate measures is important. Quality aspects of the systems’ implementation should also not be overlooked. Incomplete or faulty data should not be used and metric computation formulas should be discussed and valid. Correctly integrated data from different information sources provide a complete picture of the scientific activity of an institution. Knowledge from the data integration field can be adapted in research information management. In this paper, we propose a research information system for bibliometric indicator analysis that is incorporated into the adaptive integration architecture based on ideas from the data warehousing framework for change support. A data model of the integrated dataset is also presented. This paper also provides a change management solution as a part of the data integration framework to keep the data integration process up to date. This framework is applied for the implementation of a publication data integration system for excellence-based research analysis at the University of Latvia.</abstract>

Architecture Enabling Adaptation of Data Integration Processes for a Research Information System

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 49 (2024): Issue 1 (February 2024)

Volume 48 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 48 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 48 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 48 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 47 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022) Special issue: “Recent advances on supply chain network design”

Volume 47 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 47 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 47 (2022): Issue 1 (February 2022)

Volume 46 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 46 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 46 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 46 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 45 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 45 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 45 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 45 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 44 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 44 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 44 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 44 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 43 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 43 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 43 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 43 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 42 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 42 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 42 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 42 (2017): Issue 1 (February 2017)

Volume 41 (2016): Issue 4 (November 2016)

Volume 41 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 41 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 41 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 40 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 40 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 40 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 40 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 39 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 39 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 39 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 39 (2014): Issue 1 (February 2014)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Volume 37 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 37 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)

Volume 37 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)

Volume 37 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences

ISSN: 0867-6356 (print version)  Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences (until 1990 Foundations of Control Engineering) is a quarterly peer-reviewed international journal published since 1975. One of its main aims is its focus on the links between Computing (understood in the sense defined in the report of the ACM Task Force on the Core of Computer Science chaired by Peter J. Denning: Computing as a Discipline, CACM, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1989) and broadly understood Decision Sciences.  Scope of topics  The journal provides a forum for exchange of ideas for researchers in the fields of computing and decision sciences. The scope of the journal covers various areas of computing and decision sciences, particularly:    approximate reasoning,  artificial intelligence,  combinatorial optimization,  computational complexity theory,  databases and data warehouses,  intelligent decision support,  knowledge engineering,  machine learning and data mining,  metaheuristics,  multiple criteria decision analysis,  networking and distributed systems,  parallel computing and concurrency,  production and project scheduling,  scheduling theory,  soft and granular computing,  software engineering.     Why submit   International editorial board composed of distinguished scholars highly representative of the field of computing and decision sciences,  Quick turnaround,  Comprehensive peer review with at least two highly competent referees assessing each manuscript,  Promotion of published papers in the vast scientific community of researchers working in the field.   Rejection Rate   ca. 60%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process (iThenticate, https://www.ithenticate.com/ ). 