Zacytuj

Formalization of a part of [11]. Unfortunately, not all is possible to be formalized. Namely, in the paper there is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 3. It states that there exists xM1 such that M1(x) > N1(x) and (∀yN1)xy. It should be M1(x) ⩾ N1(x). Nevertheless we do not know whether xN1 or not and cannot prove the contradiction. In the article we referred to [8], [9] and [10].

eISSN:
1898-9934
ISSN:
1426-2630
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Informatyka, inne, Matematyka, Matematyka ogólna