The Worst and the Best of Propaganda

Anderson, L. 2018. Calling, addressing, and appropriation. In Bad Words. Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, ed. by D. Sosa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6–28.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, K. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124–62.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. 2014. Slurs and appropriation: an echoic account. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 35–44.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Jorgensen R. 2017. The pragmatics of slurs. Noûs 51(3): 439–462.10.1111/nous.12090Search in Google Scholar

Camp, E. 2013. Slurring Perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3): 330–49.10.1111/phib.12022Search in Google Scholar

Carston, R. 2002. Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17 (1–2): 127–48.Search in Google Scholar

Cepollaro, B. 2017a. When evaluation changes—an echoic account of appropriation and variability. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 29–40.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Cepollaro, B. 2017b. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs and Thick Terms. PhD Dissertation, PSL Research University, Institut Jean Nicod, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Cepollaro, B. and Stojanovic, I. 2016. Hybrid evaluatives. Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (3): 458–88.10.1163/18756735-09303007Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, R. 1983. Quantiication and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-015-6932-3Search in Google Scholar

Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present, available online athttp://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Search in Google Scholar

Del Prete, F. and Zucchi, S. 2017. A unified non monstrous semantics for third person pronouns. Semantics and Pragmatics 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.10.10.3765/sp.10.10Search in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2013. Social Meaning and Philosophical Method, APA Presidential Address, handout.Search in Google Scholar

Jeshion, R. forthcoming. Pride and prejudiced. On the reclamation of slurs. Grazer Philosophische Studien.Search in Google Scholar

McCready, E. 2010. Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics 3 (8): 1–57.10.3765/sp.3.8Search in Google Scholar

Miščević, Nenad and Perhat, Julija. 2016. A Word which Bears a Sword. Zagreb, KruZak.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, S. 2014. Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics 7 (2): 1–53.10.3765/sp.7.2Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, G. 2018. The social life of slurs. In New Work on Speech Acts, ed. by D. Fogal, D. W. Harris and M. Moss. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 237–295.Search in Google Scholar

Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Potts, C. 2007. The centrality of expressive indexes. Reply to commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 255–268.10.1515/TL.2007.019Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport, J. forthcoming. Communicating with slurs. The Philosophical Quarterly.Search in Google Scholar

Ritchie, K. 2017. Social identity, indexicality, and the appropriation of slurs. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (2): 155–80.Search in Google Scholar

Sbisà, M. 1999. Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In Language and Ideology. Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, ed. by J. Verschueren: 492–509. Antwerp.Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400865802Search in Google Scholar