Varieties of Logical Form

Davidson, D. 1967. Truth and meaning. Synthese 7: 307–23.10.1007/BF00485035Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1967/1980. Criticism, comment and defense. Reprinted in his Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980: 122–48.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1968. On saying that. Synthese 19: 130–46.10.1007/BF00568054Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1879. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle, L. Nebert. Page numbers refer to Conceptual Notation and Related Articles translated and edited by T. W. Bynum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1891. Function and concept. In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Edited by Brian McGuinness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984: 137–56.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1892. On sense and meaning. In Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Edited by Brian McGuinness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984: 157–77.Search in Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. 1972. A program for syntax. In Semantics of Natural Language. Synthese Library vol 40, edited by D. Davidson and G. Harman. Dordrecht: Springer: 483–97.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. London: Andrew Millar.10.1093/oseo/instance.00032980Search in Google Scholar

Iacona, A. 2018. Logical Form. Dordrecht: Springer Synthese Library.10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3Search in Google Scholar

Kamp, H. 2015. Using proper names as intermediaries between labelled entity representations. Erkenntnis 80: 263–312.10.1007/s10670-014-9701-2Search in Google Scholar

Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-1616-1Search in Google Scholar

Lasswitz, K. 1879. Review of the Conceptual Notation. Jenaer Literaturzeitung 6: 248–9. Reprinted and translated in T. W. Bynum Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. New York: Technology Press of MIT and John Wiley and Sons Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Read, S. 2012. The medieval theory of consequence. Synthese 187: 899–912.10.1007/s11229-011-9908-6Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1904. Letter to Victoria Welby, 2/3/1904. Reprinted in Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Edited by R. Monk and A. Palmer. Bristol: Thoemmes Press: 58–60.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–93.10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1910–11. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–28.10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1913. Theory of Knowledge. London: George, Allen and Unwin, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1914. Logic as the essence of philosophy. In his Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen and Unwin: 42–69.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1919a. The philosophy of logical atomism, III. The Monist 29: 332–63.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1919b. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1951. Reply to criticisms. In The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Edited by P. A. Schilpp, 3rd edition. New York: Tudor Publishing Company: 681–741.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. and Whitehead, A. N. 1910–13. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar