[Fiengo, R. and May, R. 2006. De Lingua Belief. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2286.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, K. 2007. Semantic Relationism. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470690826]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, J. 2008. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 1993. The grounds for the model-theoretic account of the logical properties. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34: 107–31.10.1305/ndjfl/1093634568]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2000. A presuppositional account of reference-fixing. Journal of Philosophy 97: 109–47.10.2307/2678500]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2003. Gómez-Torrente on modality and Tarskian logical consequence. Theoria 18(47): 159–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2004. Logical form: syntax and semantics. In Wittgenstein Today, ed. by A. Coliva and E. Picardi. Padova: Il Poligrafo.]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2006. Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Crítica 38: 35–68.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2006.466]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2014. Understanding anaphoric dependence: a reply to Glezakos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 53(136): 119–24.]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, M. 2018. The Mill-Frege theory of proper names. Mind 127(508): 1107–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodsell, T. 2014. Is de jure coreference non-transitive? Philosophical Studies 167: 291–312.10.1007/s11098-012-0051-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Heck, R.G. Jr. 2012. Solving Frege’s puzzle. Journal of Philosophy 109: 132–74.10.5840/jphil20121091/25]Search in Google Scholar
[Iacona, A 2018. Logical Form: Between Logic and Natural Language. Synthese Library. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, A. 2012. Modals and Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. 1979. A puzzle about belief. In Meaning and Use, ed. by A. Margalit. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-1-4020-4104-4_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawlor, K. 2010. Varieties of coreference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81: 485–95.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00406.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Perry, J. 1988. Cognitive significance and new theories of reference. Noûs 22: 1–18. Also in his The Problem of the Essential Indexical and other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinillos, N. Á. 2011. Coreference and meaning. Philosophical Studies 154: 301–24.10.1007/s11098-010-9543-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Pryor, J. 2017. De jure codesignation. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by B. Hale, C. Wright, and A. Miller. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118972090.ch41]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. 2013. Mental Files. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659982.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. 2016: Mental Files in Flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790358.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sainsbury, M. and Tye, M. 2012. Seven Puzzles of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695317.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeter, L. 2012. Bootstrapping our way to samesaying. Synthese 189 (1): 177–97.10.1007/s11229-012-0099-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeter, L. 2007. The illusion of transparency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 597–618.10.1080/00048400701654820]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeter, L. and Schroeter, F. 2016. Semantic deference versus semantic coordination. American Philosophical Quarterly 53(2): 193–210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yalcin, S. 2014. Semantics and metasemantics in the context of generative grammar. In Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning, ed. by A. Burgess and B. Sherman, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669592.003.0002]Search in Google Scholar