[
Bennett, T. J., 2021. Detotalization and retroactivity: black pyramid semiotics. Available at: < 10.13140/RG.2.2.28140.49288. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, T. J., 2022. Biosemiotic Aesthetics May Unify General Semiotics. Biosemiotics, 15, available at: < 10.1007/s12304-022-09483-x. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, T. J., Chávez Barreto, E. I., Miyamoto Gómez, O. S. et al., 2022. Funktionskreis and the biosemiotic signifieds: Towards the integration of semiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 2/3(50), 433–452, available at: < 10.12697/SSS.2022.50.2-3.07 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brier, S., 2008. Cybersemiotics: why information is not enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., 2010. The cultural implications of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 3, 225–244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Springer: Dordrecht.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawkins, R., 1976. The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deacon, T., 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2022. The Biosemiotic Fundamentals of Aesthetics: Beauty is the Perfect Semiotic Fitting. Biosemiotics, 15, 1–22, available at: < 10.1007/s12304-022-09476-w. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacková, Ľ., Faltýnek, D., Matlach, V., 2019. Bases are Not Letters: On the Analogy between the Genetic Code and Natural Language by Sequence Analysis. Biosemiotics, 12(2), available at: < 10.1007/s12304-019-09353-z >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacková, Ľ., Faltýnek, D., 2021. The lower threshold as a unifying principle between Code Biology and Biosemiotics. Biosystems, 210(1), 104523, available at: < 10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104523 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robuschi, C., 2018. CULTURAL BIOSEMIOTICS. L’EMERGENZA DELLA CULTURA DALLA NATURA. Available at: < 10.15160/2282-5460/1647. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharov, A. A., 2017. Composite agency: Semiotics of modularity and guiding interactions. Biosemiotics, 10(2), 157–178, available at: < 10.1007/s12304-017-9301-z >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viidalepp, A., 2022. The semiotic functioning of synthetic media. Információs Társadalom, 22(4), 109–118, available at: < 10.22503/inftars.XXII.2022.4.9 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zolyan, S., 2021. On the context-sensitive grammar of the genetic code. Biosystems, 208, 104497, available at: < 10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104497. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zolyan, S., 2022. From matter to form: the evolution of the genetic code as semio-poiesis. Semiotica, 2022, available at: < 10.1515/sem-2020-0088. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zolyan, S., 2023. On the minimal elements of the genetic code and their semiotic functions (degeneracy, complementarity, wobbling). Biosystems, 231, 104962, available at: < 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104962. >.
]Search in Google Scholar
