[1. European Commission “Guidelines for the waste audits before demolition and renovation works of buildings”. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. European Commission, The Directorate-General for Environment “EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol”. Official Journal of the European Union. 2016. No. June, p. 1–22. DOI 10.3390/su11133638.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Menegaki M & Damigos D: “A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management”. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, Vol 13, 2018, pp. 8-15.10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Ibrahim M & Ibrahim M: “Estimating the sustainability returns of recycling construction waste from building projects”. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol 23, 2016, pp. 78-93.10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Jin Ruoyo J, Li B, Zhou T, Wanatowski D & Piroozfar P: “An empirical study of perceptions toward construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol 126, 2017, pp. 86-98.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.034]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Tucker R & Park J: “Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature”. International Journal of Construction Management, Vol 17, No 3, 2017, pp. 228-237.10.1080/15623599.2016.1192248]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Umar U, Shafiq N, Malakahmad A, Nuruddin M & Khamidi M: “A review on adaptation of novel techniques in construction waste management and policy”. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol 19, No 2, 2017, pp. 1361-1373.10.1007/s10163-016-0534-8]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Domingo N & Luo H: “Canterbury earthquake construction and demolition waste management: issues and improvement suggestions”. Internation journal of disaster risk reduction, Vol 22, 2017, pp. 130-138.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Faleschini F, Zanini M, Hofer L, Zampieri P & Pellegrino C: “Sustainable management of demolition waste in post-quake recovery processes: The Italian experience”. International journal of disaster risk reduction, Vol 24, 2017, pp. 172-182.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.015]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Abarca-Guerrero L, Maas G & Twillert H: “Barriers and Motivations for Construction Waste Reduction Practices in Costa Rica”. Resources, Vol 6, No 4, 2017, pp. 69.10.3390/resources6040069]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Magalhães R, Danilevicz  & Saurin T: “Reducing construction waste: A study of urban infrastructure projects”. Waste Management, Vol 67, 2017, pp. 265-277.10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.02528551278]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ding Z, Zhu M, Tam V, Yi G & Tran C: “A system dynamics-based environmental benefit assessment model of construction waste reduction management at the design and construction stages”. Journal of cleaner production, Vol 176, 2018, pp. 676-692.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.101]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Ajayi S, Oyedele L, Bilal M, Akinade O, Alaka H & Owolabi H: “Critical management practices influencing on-site waste minimisation in construction projects”. Waste Management, Vol 59, 2017, pp. 330-339.10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.04027839690]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hajek, P. C3 Design of sustainable construction. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021] Available from: https://slideplayer.com/slide/15831861/.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Swedish Iron and Steel Makers Association; Jernkontoret: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. European Commission: “Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives”. Official Journal of the European Union, Vol 312, No 3, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Thanwadee C: “Investigation of factors affecting a construction waste recycling decision”. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, Vol 33, No 3, 2016, pp. 214-226.10.1080/10286608.2016.1161030]Search in Google Scholar
[18. European Environment Agency: “Construction and demolition waste: challenges and opportunities in a circular economy”. Jan 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. SINTEF Byggforsk: “700.804”, “Planlegging av rivearbeider”. Oslo, Norway, 2011 (In Nowegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[20. European Environment Agency: “The case for increasing recycling: Estimating the potential for recycling in Europe”. Jun 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. European Environment Agency: “The European environment – state and outlook 2020”. Dec 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R & Ren J: “Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol 129, 2018, pp. 36-44.10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Yuan H: “Barriers and countermeasures for managing construction and demolition waste: A case of Shenzhen in China”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 157, 2017, pp. 84-93.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.137]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Ajayi, Saheed O & Lukumon O: “Policy imperatives for diverting construction waste from landfill: Experts’ recommendations for UK policy expansion”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 147, 2017, pp. 57-65.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.075]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ann T, Poon C, Wong A, Yip R & Jaillon L: “Impact of Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme on Work Practices at Construction Sites in Hong Kong”. Waste Management, Vol 33, No 1, 2013, pp. 138-146.10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.02323122205]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Oyedele L, Ajayi S & Kadiri K: “Use of recycled products in UK construction industry: An empirical investigation into critical impediments and strategies for improvement”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol93, 2014, pp. 23-31.10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.011]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Lu W & Tam V: “Construction waste management policies and their effectiveness in Hong Kong: A Longitudinal review”. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, Vol 23, 2013, pp. 214-223.10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Hossain, Uzzal M, Wu Z & Poon C: “Comparative environmental evaluation of construction waste management through different waste sorting systems in Hong Kong”. Waste Management, Vol 69, 2017, pp. 325-335.10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.04328781157]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ulubeyli S, Kazaz A & Arslan V: “Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues”. Procedia Engineering, Vol 172, 2017, pp. 1190-1197.10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.139]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Statisk sentralbyrå, Avfall fra byggeaktivitet. [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Miljødirektoratet, Avfallsplan 2020-2025. [online]. [Accessed 22 February 2021]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c6a9a384d90c4af18bfd8458f3167708/avfallsplan-2020-2025.pdf (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Lovdata, Lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling (plan- og bygningsloven). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-27-71/*#* (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Lovdata, Lov om vern mot forurensinger og om avfall (Forurensningsloven). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1981-03-13-6 (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Lovdata, Forskrift om gjenvinning og behandling av avfall (avfallsforskriften). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-930/*#* (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Lovdata, Forskrift om begrensning I bruk av helse- og miljøfarlige kjemikalier og andre produkter (produktforskriften). [Online]. [Accessed 23 February 2021]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-922 (In Norwegian)]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Iacoboaea C, Aldea M & Petrescu F “Construction and demolition waste-a challenge for the construction and demolition waste - a challenge for the European Union? Theoretical and empirical researches in urban management”. 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Haku - Suomi.fi. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.suomi.fi/haku?p=0&q=Purkamisluvat&sl=false (In Finish).]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Norwegian Standard: “NS 3459:2012”, “Exchange of data for specifications, price information and settlements in building and civil engineering works”. Norway, 2012, 56 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Byggforskerserien [Online]. [accessed 16.02.2021]. Available from: https://www.byggforsk.no/byggforskserien (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Directory for Buildingquality: “TEK17” [online]. [Accessed 11.02.2021]. Available from: https://dibk.no/regelverk/byggteknisk-forskrift-tek17/ (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Nation Standards of Russia: “Construction Standards and Regulations 12-04-2002”, “Safty in construction. Part 2. Construction works”. Moscow, Russia, 2002, 36 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Lehtonen K “Purkutyöt – opas tekijöille ja teettäjille”. Ministry of the environment publications [online]. 2019. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161884/YM_2019_29.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y#page=5&zoom=auto,-82,754 (In Finish).]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Norwegian Standard: “NS 8141-2:2013”, “Vibration and shock - Guideline limit values for construction work, open-pit and pit mining and traffic - Part 2: Effects of vibration on construction works from construction activities other than blasting, and from traffic”. Norway, 2013, 20 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Norwegian Standard: “NS 9431:2011”, “Classification of Waste”. Norway, 2011, 24 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Interstate standard “GOST 32495-2013. Aggregates, fines and its mixtures made from recycled reinforced and non-reinforced concrete. Specifications”. Moscow, Russia, 2015, 13 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Norwegian Environment agency “Faktaark M-14/2003 Disposal of concrete and brick waste”, 2 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Government Decree on the Recovery of Certain Wastes in Earth Construction (843/2017) – Legislation in force – FINLEX ®. [Online]. [Accessed 8 February 2021]. Available from: 843/2017 English - Translations of Finnish acts and decrees - FINLEX.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Land Use and Building Act 132/1999 - Legislation in force - FINLEX ®. [online]. [Accessed 23 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1999/19990132 (In Finish).]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Ympäriston-suojelu Ympäristöasioiden hallinta kiviainestuotannossa Suomen ympäristökeskus Paras käyttökelpoinen tekniikka (BAT). In : ISBN 978-952-11-3810-2 (In Finish).]Search in Google Scholar
[50. SINTEF Byggforsk: “241.070” “Avfallshåndtering I byggesaker. Planlegging og dokumentasjon”. Oslo, Norway, 2017. (In Nowegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[51. SINTEF Byggforsk: “700.802”, “Miljøkartlegging og miljøanering ved riving og ombygging”. Oslo, Norway, 2018, 19 pp. (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Nation Standards of Russia: “SP 325.1325800.2017”, “Building and construction. Rules for the production of demolition and recycling”. Moscow, Russia, 2017, 56 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Nation Standards of Russia: “ Construction regulation 51.13330.2011”, “Noise protection and rooms acoustics”. Moscow, Russia, 2011, 33 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. NOSTROY: “No 2.33.53-2011”, “Demolition (dismantling) of buildings and structures”. Moscow, Russia, 2012, 38 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. European Panel Federation (EPF), 2016. [online]. [Accessed 16 February 2021]. Available from: http://www.fir-recycling.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Baumann H & Tillman A: “The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA”, Studentlitteratur, Dimograf, Poland, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Broadbent C: “Steel’s recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol 21, No 11, 2016, pp. 1658-1665.10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Knoeri C, Sanyé-Mengual E & Althaus H: “Comparative LCA of recycled and Conventional concrete for structural applications”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol 18, No 5, 2013, pp. 909-918.10.1007/s11367-012-0544-2]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Mah C M, Fujiwara T & Ho C S: “Concrete Waste Management Decision Analysis Based On Life Cycle Assessment”. Chemical Engineering Transaction, Vol. 56, pp. 25-30. DOI:10.3303/CET1756005.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. European Commission: “Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste”. Official Journal of the European Union, Vol 182, No 1, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Norwegian Environment agency “Betong- og teglavfall”. [Online]. [Accessed 16 February 2021]. Available from: https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/tema/avfall/avfallstyper/betong--og-teglavfall/ (In Norwegian).]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Norwegian Standard: “NS-EN 12620:2002+A1:2008+NA:2016”, “Aggregates for Concrete”. Norway, 2016, 68 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Norwegian Standard: “NS-EN 206:2013+A1:2016+NA:2020”, “Concrete – Specification, performance, production and conformity”. Norway, 2020, 120 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Nation Standards of Russia: “GOST 26633-2015”, “Heavy-weight and sand concrete. Specifications”. Moscow, Russia, 2016, 16 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Fedotkina O, Gorbashko E & Vatolkina E: “Circular Economy in Russia: Drivers and Barriers for Waste Management Development”. Sustainability, Vol 11, No 5837, 2019.10.3390/su11205837]Search in Google Scholar
