[Aldrich PR, Jagtap M, Michler CH, Romeo-Severson J (2003) Amplification of North American red oak microsatellite markers in European white oaks and Chinese chestnut. Silvae Genetica 52(3-4): 176-179 Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215(3): 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-210.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barreneche T, Casasoli M, ussell K, Akkak A, Meddour H, Plomion C, Villani F, Kremer A (2004) Comparative mapping between Quercus and Castanea using simple-sequence repeats (SSRs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 558-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1462-210.1007/s00122-003-1462-214564395]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brown GR, Kadel III EE, Bassoni DL, Kiehne KL, Temesgen B, van Buijtenen JP, Sewell MM, Marshall KA, Neale DB (2001) Anchored reference loci in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) for integrating pine genomics. Genetics 159: 799-80910.1093/genetics/159.2.799146182111606554]Search in Google Scholar
[Buiteveld J, Vendramin GG, Leonardi S, Kamer K, Geburek T (2007) Genetic diversity and differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands varying in management history. Forest Ecology and Management 247: 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.01810.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Buonaccorsi VP, Kimbrell CA, Lynn EA, Hyde JR (2012) Comparative population genetic analysis of Bocaccio Rockfish Sebastes paucispinis using anonymous and gene-sssociated Simple Sequence Repeat loci. Journal of Heredity 103 (3): 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/ess00210.1093/jhered/ess00222490232]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Comps B, Gömöry D, Letouzey J, Thiébaut B, Petit RJ (2001) Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech. Genetics 157: 389-39710.1093/genetics/157.1.389146149511139519]Search in Google Scholar
[Demesure B, Comps B, Petit RJ (1996) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Europe. Evolution 50: 2515-2520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03638.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03638.x28565658]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dounavi A, Netzer F, Celepirovic N, Ivankovic M, Burger J, Figueroa AG, Schön S, Simon J, Cremer E, Fussi B, Konnert M, Rennenberg H (2016) Genetic and physiological differences of European beech provenances (F. sylvatica L.) exposed to drought stress. Forest Ecology and Management 361: 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.01410.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Durand J, Bodenes C, Chancerel E, Frigerio J-M, Vendramin G, Sebastiani F, Buonamici A, Gailing O, Koelewijn H-P, Villani F, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Goicoechea PG, Herran A, Ikaran Z, Cabane C, Ueno S, Alberto F, Dumolin P-Y, Guichoux E, de Daruvar A, Kremer A, Plomion C (2010). A fast and cost-effective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics 11(570): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-57010.1186/1471-2164-11-570309171920950475]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ellis JR, Burke JM (2007) EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 99(2): 125-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.680100110.1038/sj.hdy.680100117519965]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fang J, Lechowicz M (2006) Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. Journal of Biogegraphy 33: 1804- 1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01533.x10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01533.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gailing O, von Wühlisch G (2004) Nuclear markers (AFLPs) and chloroplast microsatellites differ between Fagus sylvatica and F. orientalis. Silvae Genetica 53(3): 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2004-001910.1515/sg-2004-0019]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gailing O, Langenfeld-Heysert R, Polle A, Finkeldey R (2008) Quantitative trait loci affecting stomatal density and growth in a Quercus robur progeny: implications for the adaption to changing environments. Global Change Biology 14: 1934- 1946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01621.x10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01621.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Goudet J (2002) Software Fstat 2.9.3. Department of Ecology & Evolution, Biology Building, Lausanne University [online]. Available at <https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm> [cited 04/15/2018]]Search in Google Scholar
[Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, Leger P, Lepais O, Lepoittevin C, Malausa T, Revardel E, Salin F, Petit RJ (2011) Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x21565126]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harmon M, Lane T, Staton M, Coggeshall MV, Best T, Chen C-C, Liang H, Zembower N, Drautz-Moses DI, Hwee YZ, Schuster SC, Schlarbaum SE, Carlson JE, Gailing O (2017) Development of novel genic microsatellite markers from transcriptome sequencing in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.). BMC Research Notes 10(369): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2653-210.1186/s13104-017-2653-2554931628789702]Search in Google Scholar
[Kölling C, Zimmermann L (2007) Die Anfälligkeit der Wälder Deutschlands gegenüber dem Klimawandel. Klimaschutz 67(6): 259-268]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubisiak T, Carey D, Burdine C, Koch J (2009) Characterization of ten EST-based polymorphic SSR loci isolated from American beech, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. Permanent Genetic Resources Note added to Molecular Ecology Resources Volume: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02759.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02759.x21564933]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lalagüe H, Csilléry K, Oddou-Muratorio S, Safrana J, de Quattro C, Fady B, González-Martínez SC, Vendramin GG (2014) Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium at 58 stress response and phenology candidate genes in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) population from southeastern France. Tree Genetics & Genomes 10: 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0658-010.1007/s11295-013-0658-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lesur I, Bechade A, Lalanne C, Klopp C, Noirot C, Leplé J-C, Kremer A, Plomion C, le Provost G (2015) A unigene set for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and its use to decipher the molecular mechanisms involved in dormancy regulation. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.1237310.1111/1755-0998.1237325594128]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Liesebach H (2012) Genotypisierung mit nuklearen Mikrosatellitenmarkern - Möglichkeiten der Daten-auswertung am Beispiel von Buchenpopulationen (Fagus sylvatica L.) aus einem Herkunftsversuch. Applied Agricultural and Forestry Research 4:221-236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mishra B, Gupta DK, Pfenninger M, Hickler T, Langer E, Nam B, Paule J, Sharma R, Ulaszewski B, Warmbier J, Burczyk J, Thines M (2018) A reference genome of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). GigaScience 7: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy06310.1093/gigascience/giy063601418229893845]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Müller M, Seifert S, Finkeldey R (2015) Identification of SNPs in candidate genes potentially involved in bud burst in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Silvae Genetica 64: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-000110.1515/sg-2015-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Müller M, Seifert S, Lübbe T, Leuschner C, Finkeldey R (2017) De novo transcriptome assembly and analysis of differential gene expression in response to drought in European beech. PLoS one 12(9): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.018416710.1371/journal.pone.0184167558480328873454]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Paffetti D, Travaglini D, Buonamici A, Nocentini S, Vendramin GG, Giannini R, Vettori C (2012) The influence of forest management on beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand structure and genetic diversity. Forest Ecology and Management 284: 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.02610.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pastorelli R, Smulders MJM, van’t West-Ende WPC, Vosman B, Giannini R, Vettori C, Vendramin GG (2003) Characterization of microsatellite markers in Fagus sylvatica L. and Fagus orientalis Lipsky. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00355.x10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00355.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Paule L (1995) Gene conservation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forest Genetics 2(3): 161-170 Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6(1): 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28(19): 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts46010.1093/bioinformatics/bts460346324522820204]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rajendra KC, Seifert S, Prinz K, Gailing O, Finkeldey R (2014) Subtle human impacts on neutral genetic diversity and spatial patterns of genetic variation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Forest Ecology and Management 319: 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.00310.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x21585727]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18(2): 233-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/7270810.1038/7270810657137]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Shanjani PS, Vendramin GG, Calagari M (2010) Genetic diversity and differentiation of Fagus orientalis Lipsky in Hyrcanian forests revealed by nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Conservation Genetics 11(6): 2321-2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-010-0118-410.1007/s10592-010-0118-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Steinkellner H, Lexer C, Turetschek E, Glössl J (1997) Conservation of (GA)n microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Molecular Ecology 6: 1189-1194. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00288.x10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00288.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tanaka K, Tsumura Y, Nakamura T (1999) Development and polymorphism of microsatellite markers for Fagus crenata and the closely related species, F. japonica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 11-15 The Uniprot Consortium (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleid Acids Research 45: 158- 169. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw109910.1093/nar/gkw1099521057127899622]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ueno S, Taguchi Y, Tomaru N, Tsumura Y (2009) Development of EST-SSR markers from an inner bark cDNA library of Fagus crenata (Fagaceae). Conservation Genetics 10: 1477-1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9764-110.1007/s10592-008-9764-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vornam B, Decarli N, Gailing O (2004) Spatial distribution of genetic variation in a natural beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L.) based on microsatellite markers. Conversations Genetics 5: 561-570. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:coge.0000041025.82917.ac .10.1023/b:coge.0000041025.82917.ac]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar