[Aarrestad P.A., Myking T., Stabbetorp O.E., Tollefsrud M.M. 2014. Foreign Norway spruce (Picea abies) provenances in Norway and effects on biodiversity. NINA Report 1075, Trondheim, Norway.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreassen K., Solberg S., Tveito O.E., Lystad S.L. 2006. Regional differences in climatic responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) growth in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 222, 211–221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giertych M. 1989. Genetic value of local Scots pine: Forest genetics, breeding and physiology of woody plants (in Russian). In.: Proceedings of the International Symposium 25–30 September 1989, Voronezh, Russia (ed.: S.A. Petrov), 24–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giertych M. 2009. Participation of Poland in IUFRO studies on Picea abies. Dendrobiology, 61, 15–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kapeller S., Lexer M.J., Geburek T., Hiebl J., Schueler S. 2012. Intraspecific variation in climate response of Norway spruce in the eastern Alpine range: Selecting appropriate provenances for future climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 271, 46–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krajmerová D., Longauer R., Pacalaj M., Gömöry D. 2009. Influence of provenance transfer on the growth and survival of Picea abies provenances. Dendrobiology, 61, 17–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krasnobaeva K.V. 1972. The dynamics of growth of thick stands of fir grove, depending on climatic factors (in Russian). Lesovedenie, 4, 51–56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindgren D., Persson A. 1995 Vitalization of results from provenance tests: Caring for the Forest: Research in a Changing World. In.: Proceedings of IUFRO XX World Congress 6–12 August 1995, Tampere, Finland (eds.: R. Pälvinen, J. Vanclay, S. Minna), 249.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matras J. 2009. Growth and development of Polish provenances of Picea abies in the IUFRO 1972 experiment. Dendrobiology, 61, 145–158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakvasina E.N., Gvozduhina O.A. 2005. An assessment of the state and growth of geographic cultures of pine and spruce in the Arkhangelsk Region. Problems of forest science and forestry. In.: Proceedings of 3th Conference by Melekhov (Arkhangelsk, 15–16 September 2005). Arkhangelsk: ASTU, Russia, 58–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakvasina E.N., Tarkhanov S.N., Ulissova N.V., Sizov I.I., Bedritskaya T.V. 1990. Geographic cultures of pine and spruce in the European North. In.: Proceedings of International Simp. Northern forests: state, dynamics, anthropogenic impact (Arkhangelsk, 16–26 July, 1990). Moscow, USSR, V.2, 131–140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakvasina E.N., Yudina O.A., Prozherina N.A., Kamalova I.I., Minin N.S. 2008. Provenance test in gene-ecological studies in the European North (in Russian). Arkhangelsk, Russia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikolaeva M.A., Faizulin D. Kh., Potokin A.P., Jamaleev O.A. 2014. Comparative evaluation of preservation and growth of spruce climatypes based on long-term provenance trials in Russia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Ser. A – Forestry, 56 (1), 56–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pacalaj M., Longauer R., Krajmerova D., Gömöry D. 2002. Effect of site altitude on the growth and survival of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) provenances on the Slovak plots of IUFRO experiment 1972. Journal of Forest Science, 48 (1), 16–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popov P.P. 2005. Spruce European and Siberian: structure, integration and differentiation of the population systems (in Russian). Science, Novosibirsk, Russia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pravdin L.F. 1972. Immediate tasks of scientific research and practical work on forest genetics and breeding in the USSR (in Russian). In: Genetics and breeding of forest trees (eds. V. Ramanauskas et al.). Kaunas, USSR, 3–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pravdin L.F. 1975. Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karsten) and Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledebour) in the USSR (in Russian). Science, Moscow, Russia. Rodin A.R., Prokazin A.Y. 1996. About study problems of provenance trial of basic forest species. Forestry, 4, 16–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodin A.R., Prokazin A.Y. 1997. Study of geographic variation of the main forest-forming species (in Russian). In: Forest use and reproduction of forest resources (ed.: O.A. Kharin). Moscow, Russia, 70–75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shutyaev A.M., Giertych M. 1997. Height growth variation in a comprehensive Eurasian provenance experiment of (Pinus sylvestris L.). Silvae Genetica, 46 (6), 332–349.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shutyaev A.M., Giertych M. 2003. Scots pinе (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Eurasia – a map album of provenance site interaction. Institute of Dendrology, Kórnik, Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shutyaev A.M. 1990. Basics forest seeds zoning (in Russian). In: Increased productivity, sustainability and the protective role of forest ecosystems: proceeding of scientific papers (ed. A.V. Veretennikov). Voronezh, Russia, 62–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarkhanov S.N. 1998. Variability of spruce in the provenance test in the Komi Republic. Ekaterinburg, Russia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tishin D.V. 2008. Dendroclimatic study Finnish spruce (Picea × fennica (Regel)) Kom. on the southern border area (in Russian). Scientific Notes of the Kazan State University, 150 (4), 219–225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulbrichová I., Podrázský V., Olmez Z., Beran F., Procházka J., Fulín M., Kubeček J., Zahradník D. 2013. Growth performance of Norway spruce in the Czech-German provenance trial plot Ledeč. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 44 (4), 223–231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulbrichová I., Podrázský V., Beran F., Zahradník D., Fulín M., Procházka J., Kubeček J. 2015. Picea abies provenance test in the Czech Republic after 36 years – Central European provenances. Journal of Forest Science, 61 (11), 465–477.]Search in Google Scholar
