Open Access

Parasitological examination of northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) pups for presence of hookworms (Uncinaria spp.) on San Miguel Island, California


Cite

Introduction

There are 34 species of pinnipeds (Suborder Pinnipedia Illiger, 1811) assigned to three families of the mammalian order Carnivo-ra Bowdich, 1821: Otariidae Gray, 1825, Phocidae Gray, 1821 and Odobenidae Allen, 1880 (Jefferson et al. 1993; Higdon et al. 2007). Hookworms from the genus Uncinaria Frölich, 1789 have been reported in 15 pinniped species – 12 otariids (six species of fur seals, and six species of sea lions) and three phocids (Lyons et al., 2011; Nadler et al., 2013).

Four species of hookworms have been described in pinnipeds – Uncinaria lucasi Stiles, 1901, a parasite of northern fur seals (NFSs) (Callorhinus ursinus) and Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus); Uncinaria hamiltoni Baylis, 1933, a parasite of South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) and South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis); Uncinaria sanguinis Marcus, Higgins, Šlapeta, Gray 2014, a parasite of Australian sea lions (Neo-phoca cinerea) and, probably, Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) and New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) (Mar-cus et al., 2014); Uncinaria lyonsi Kuzmina and Kuzmin 2015, a parasite of California sea lions (CSLs) (Zalophus californianus). In addition, three species from the genus Uncinaria were found and determined from nucleotide sequence data in the New Zealand sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri), southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) and Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) (Castinel et al., 2006; Nadler et al., 2013; Ramos et al., 2013). Hookworms (Uncinaria spp.) have also been reported from Juan Fernandez fur seal pups (Arctocephalus philippii) (Sepúlveda, 1998) and Guadaloupe fur seals (Arctocephalus townsendi) (Ly-ons et al., personal communication).

From the family Phocidae (earless or true seals), hookworms were found only in the southern elephant seal, ringed seal (Phoca hispida) and Mediterranean monk seal (Lyons etal., 2011; Nadler et al., 2013). Despite the reference that hookworm eggs were detected i n feces of a northern elephant seal (NES) (Mirounga angustirostris) pup at The Marine Mammal Center (TMMC), Sausalito, California (Dailey, 2001), this information is still questionable. Extensive par-asitological examination of NESs for hookworms (Uncinaria spp.) has been carried out at the Año Nuevo State Reserve in central California in 2012 (Lyons etal., 2012). However, hookworm eggs, larvae or adults were not found in NES pups or larvae in the environment.

San Miguel Island, California, is the sixth largest of the eight California's Channel Islands, located across the Santa Barbara Channel in the Pacific Ocean, California. Currently, six species of pinnipeds may occur on San Miguel Island: California sea lions, northern elephant seals, northern fur seals, harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), and Steller sea lions. CSL, harbor seals, NES and NFS have viable breeding populations there (DeLong & Melin, 2002). The population of NFSs was reestablished on San Miguel Island in the 1950s, and has since increased exponentially. It has become the largest breeding population for the species, approximately 83 % of the population, numbering some 50,000 animals (Stewart and DeLong, 1993; Le Boeuf et al., 2011).

Two species of hookworms (U. lyonsi and U. lucasi) have been found in CSLs and NFSs, respectively, at San Miguel Island (Lyons etal., 1997, 2000; Kuzmina and Kuzmin, 2015). The primary objective of our work was to perform parasitological examination of dead NES pups on San Miguel Island for presence of hookworms from the genus Uncinaria. The reason for examining NES pups for hookworms was that these parasites are known to be present in CSLs and NFSs on the Island. Since all three pinniped species have a sympatric relationship on some rookeries it was decided to find out if hookworms that parasitized CSLs and NFSs there could be a source of infection in NES pups.

Materials and Methods

Our research was performed in February 7 - 15, 2015, at three NES rookeries on San Miguel Island (34°2'N and 120°23'W): West Cove, Adams Cove and Judith Cove. The breeding season of NESs on the Island begins in early December with the arrival of the adult males, and reaches a peak during the period from about January 26 to February 2 which defined the period of our studies. Basic necropsies were done on 18 recently dead NES pups according to standard procedure (Spraker, 1985). Two of these pups were neonates (stillbirth) which had never been nursed; 15 pups were "black-coats" (of one to eight weeks old), and one "silver-coat" (of eight to ten weeks old). Detailed parasitological techniques for examining the stomach and intestines were as published previously (Lyons, 1963; Lyons et al. 2001, 2005). Samples of blubber (about 50 - 100 g each) were collected from 13 of the dead NES pups and from one dead NES bull which was estimated to be 6 - 7 years old. Blubber was cut into small pieces and placed in a Baermann funnel apparatus containing fresh water for 10-12 hours, and examined at about eight hours later under a dissecting and a compound microscope for presence of hookworm larvae (L3). Sand samples were examined for free-living third stage hookworm larvae (known to be present there in the fall and winter) produced from hookworm eggs passed in feces of CSL and NFS pups (Lyons et al., 2000).

Results and Discussion

Parasitological examination of dead NESs did not reveal hookworms in the stomach or intestines of 16 pups and blubber of 13 pups, even though hookworm free-living larvae (FLL3) were found in rookery soil (Table 1). Also hookworm larvae were not recovered from blubber of a dead NES bull. These negative results mirror that from NESs on the Año Nuevo State Reserve (Lyons et al., 2012). As no other pinniped species were present on the NES rookeries on Año Nuevo State Reserve, additional studies on rookeries inhabited by other pinniped species infected by hookworms such as on San Miguel Island, were necessary. Moreover, blubber samples obtained from ten NES pups that died at The Marine Mammal Center (TMMC), Sausalito, California, in 2013 - 2015 were negative for hookworm parasitic L3 (E.T. Lyons, personal communication).

Summary of data on search for hookworms (Uncinaria spp) in or associated with northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) (NES)on San Miguel Island, California (February, 2015)

Type of samples examinedNumber of samplesResults of examination No. positive / No. of specimens
Dead NES pups - stomach and intestines18negative
Dead NES pups - blubber13negative
Dead NES bull-blubber1negative
Samples of sand

Plant/soil free living nematodes were found in all sand samples

318(26%)/1-6FLL3each

Taking into account the presence of at least two Uncinaria species on the Island (U. lyonsi and U. lucasi), identified by different molecular and morphological characteristics of the adult hookworms, CSL and NFS free living third stage larvae were present in the soil/ sand of rookeries. This allowed NESs, because of the sympatric relationship with the aforementioned pinnipeds, to get infected by these parasitic nematodes; however this did not happen.

Hookworms in the genus Uncinaria have been found in several species of pinnipeds from different regions of the world (Lyons et al., 2011; Nadler et al., 2013; Dailey, 2001), that lead to the interest in trying to find if these parasites are present in NESs. However, despite extensive studies of NES pups and the environment performed in 2012 on the Año Nuevo State Reserve (Lyons et al., 2012), in examination of NES pups from TMMC and in the present study on San Miguel Island, evidence of Uncinaria parasitizing this species of pinnipeds has not been found.

Regarding why hookworms do not seem to parasitize NESs, there can be numerous speculations, none of which are provable at this time. Of particular interest is the assumption that these parasites are strictly specific to this species of pinnipeds, and they may have disappeared due to a dramatic decrease of the NES population. It should be mentioned that the population of NESs declined to near extinction - the effective population size in 1884 may have been as low as 20 elephant seals due to their harvest for oil for lamps and other uses (Bartholomew & Hubbs, 1960; Le Boeuf et al., 2011).Possibly during those times the NESs were infected with hookworms but the pool of worms become too low to keep infections "recycled" because of so few animals. This is what seems to be happening in NFSs on the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, where hookworm prevalence was up to 100 % in the 1950 - 60s when the population of NFSs was high (Lyons & Olsen, 1962; Lyons, 1963). However, currently on these islands, hookworms are almost extinct from the parasite fauna of NFSs which have had a tremendous decrease in number the last several decades (DeLong, 2007; Lyons et al., 2011, 2014).

It is of interest that in contrast to NES, hookworms have been found in southern elephant seals (Johnston & Mawson, 1945; Ramos et al., 2013). Southern elephant seals were exploited but the population apparently was not reduced to numbers as low as NESs.

The specificity of hookworms to their pinniped hosts has repeatedly been suggested (George-Nascimento et al., 1992; Nadler et al., 2013; Ramos et al., 2013). Twelve species of Uncinaria which significantly differ both morphologically and according to molecular studies were described in pinnipeds (Castinel et al., 2006; Nadler et al., 2013; Ramos et al., 2013). The fact that two species of Otariidae (CSL and NFS) inhabit and breed on the same areas on San Miguel Island in the same season and have two different species of hookworms - U. lucasi and U. lyonsi which differ in biology and morphology (Lyons et al., 1997, 2000; Lyons & DeLong, 2005) adds support to this hypothesis. Free-living third stage hookworm larvae of one or both of these two hookworm species repeatedly have been found, including in the present study, in the sand on the rookeries on the Island (Lyons et al., 1997, 2000), but as mentioned already, cases of NES infection by these nematodes have not been reported.

In conclusion, the research reported here, showing absence of hookworms in NESs on San Miguel Island, plus similar finding at the Año Nuevo State Reserve and TMMC, provides strong indication that NESs now are not appropriate hosts for these nematodes. It is still unknown why NESs are not infected with hookworms, whereas their close relative, the southern elephant seal, clearly is a host for these nematodes. It seems that, at this time, further search for hookworms in NES would be nonproductive.

eISSN:
1336-9083
ISSN:
0440-6605
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Zoology, Ecology, other, Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Microbiology, Virology and Infection Epidemiology