This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Almoqhim, F., Millard, D.E., & Shadbolt, N. (2013). An approach to building high-quality tag hierarchies from crowdsourced taxonomic tag pairs. In A. Jatowt et al. (Eds.), Social Informatics (pp. 129–138). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.AlmoqhimF.MillardD.E.ShadboltN.2013An approach to building high-quality tag hierarchies from crowdsourced taxonomic tag pairsJatowtA.129138BerlinSpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_12Search in Google Scholar
Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., & Ieong, S. (2009). Diversifying search results. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 5–14). New York: ACM.AgrawalR.GollapudiS.HalversonA.IeongS.2009Diversifying search results514New YorkACM10.1145/1498759.1498766Search in Google Scholar
Begelman, G., Keller, P., & Smadja, F. (2006). Automated tag clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved on February 4, 2017, from http://www.ra.ethz.ch/cdstore/www2006/www.rawsugar.com/www2006/20.pdf.BegelmanG.KellerP.SmadjaF.2006Automated tag clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag spaceRetrieved on February 4, 2017, fromhttp://www.ra.ethz.ch/cdstore/www2006/www.rawsugar.com/www2006/20.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Benz, D., Hotho, A., Stützer, S., & Stumme, G. (2010). Semantics made by you and me: Selfemerging ontologies can capture the diversity of shared knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2nd Web Science Conference (WebSci10), Raleigh, NC, USA. Retrieved on February 4, 2017, from http://journal.webscience.org/361/.BenzD.HothoA.StützerS.StummeG.2010Semantics made by you and me: Selfemerging ontologies can capture the diversity of shared knowledgeRetrieved on February 4, 2017, fromhttp://journal.webscience.org/361/Search in Google Scholar
Camiña, S.L. (2010). A comparison of taxonomy generation techniques using bibliometric methods: Applied to research strategy formulation. Retrieved on January 10, 2017, from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62632.MIT.2010.CamiñaS.L.2010A comparison of taxonomy generation techniques using bibliometric methods: Applied to research strategy formulationhttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62632.MIT.2010Search in Google Scholar
Candan, K.S., Di Caro, L., & Sapino, M.L. (2008). Creating tag hierarchies for effective navigation in social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Workshop on Search in Social Media - SSM ’08 (pp. 75–82). New York: ACM.CandanK.S.Di CaroL.SapinoM.L.2008Creating tag hierarchies for effective navigation in social media7582New YorkACM10.1145/1458583.1458597Search in Google Scholar
Carbonell, J., & Goldstein, J. (1998). The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 335–336). New York: ACM.CarbonellJ.GoldsteinJ.1998The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries335336New YorkACM10.1145/290941.291025Search in Google Scholar
Chen, C., Luo, P., Liu, X., & Lu, Y. (2012). The structure patterns of Web resources’ hierarchical organization (in Chinese). Journal of Library Science in China, 38(202), 72–80.ChenC.LuoP.LiuX.LuY.2012The structure patterns of Web resources’ hierarchical organization (in Chinese)382027280Search in Google Scholar
Dellschaft, K., & Staab, S. (2006). On how to perform a gold standard based evaluation of ontology learning. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2006 (pp. 228–241). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.DellschaftK.StaabS.2006On how to perform a gold standard based evaluation of ontology learning228241BerlinSpringer-Verlag10.1007/11926078_17Search in Google Scholar
Gemmell, J., Shepitsen, A., Mobasher, B., & Burke, R. (2008). Personalizing navigation in folksonomies using hierarchical tag clustering. In Proceedings of Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 196–205). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.GemmellJ.ShepitsenA.MobasherB.BurkeR.2008Personalizing navigation in folksonomies using hierarchical tag clustering196205BerlinSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_19Search in Google Scholar
Golub, K., & Lykke, M. (2009). Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing. Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 901–925.GolubK.LykkeM.2009Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing65690192510.1108/00220410910998915Search in Google Scholar
Halpin, H., Robu, V., & Shepherd, H. (2007). The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 211–220). New York: ACM.HalpinH.RobuV.ShepherdH.2007The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging211220New YorkACM10.1145/1242572.1242602Search in Google Scholar
Helic, D., Trattner, C., Strohmaier, M., & Andrews, K. (2010). On the navigability of social tagging systems. In 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 161–168). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.HelicD.TrattnerC.StrohmaierM.AndrewsK.2010On the navigability of social tagging systems161168Washington, DCIEEE Computer Society10.1109/SocialCom.2010.31Search in Google Scholar
Helic, D., Strohmaier, M., Trattner, C., Muhr, M., & Lerman, K. (2011). Pragmatic evaluation of folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 417–426). New York: ACM.HelicD.StrohmaierM.TrattnerC.MuhrM.LermanK.2011Pragmatic evaluation of folksonomies417426New YorkACM10.1145/1963405.1963465Search in Google Scholar
Helic, D., & Strohmaier, M. (2011). Building directories for social tagging systems. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 525–534). New York: ACM.HelicD.StrohmaierM.2011Building directories for social tagging systems525534New YorkACM10.1145/2063576.2063655Search in Google Scholar
Heymann, P., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2006). Collaborative creation of communal hierarchical taxonomies in social tagging systems. Info Lab Technical Report 2006-10. Retrieved on January 10, 2016, from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/775/1/2006-10.pdf.HeymannP.Garcia-MolinaH.2006Collaborative creation of communal hierarchical taxonomies in social tagging systemsRetrieved on January 10, 2016, fromhttp://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/775/1/2006-10.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output10246165691657210.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915Search in Google Scholar
Huang, H., Gao, Y., Chen, L., Li, R., Chiew, K., & He, Q. (2013). Browse with a social web directory. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 865–868). New York: ACM.HuangH.GaoY.ChenL.LiR.ChiewK.HeQ.2013Browse with a social web directory865868New YorkACM10.1145/2484028.2484141Search in Google Scholar
Li, R., Bao, S., Yu, Y., Fei, B., & Su, Z. (2007). Towards effective browsing of large scale social annotations. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 943–952). New York: ACM.LiR.BaoS.YuY.FeiB.SuZ.2007Towards effective browsing of large scale social annotations943952New YorkACM10.1145/1242572.1242700Search in Google Scholar
Luo, P., & Chen, C. (2013). Resource organization systems from folksonomy to hierarchical: Constructing the tag tree by exploiting clustering information (in Chinese). Journal of Library and Information Service, 57(22), 120–125.LuoP.ChenC.2013Resource organization systems from folksonomy to hierarchical: Constructing the tag tree by exploiting clustering information (in Chinese)5722120125Search in Google Scholar
Markines, B., Cattuto, C., Menczer, F., Benz, D., Hotho, A., & Stumme, G. (2009). Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 641–650). New York: ACM.MarkinesB.CattutoC.MenczerF.BenzD.HothoA.StummeG.2009Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging641650New YorkACM10.1145/1526709.1526796Search in Google Scholar
Rafiei, D., Bharat, K., & Shukla, A. (2010). Diversifying web search results. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 781–790). New York: ACM.RafieiD.BharatK.ShuklaA.2010Diversifying web search results781790New YorkACM10.1145/1772690.1772770Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R., & Zhao, S.X. (2015). A general conceptual framework for characterizing the ego in a network. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 145–149.RousseauR.ZhaoS.X.2015A general conceptual framework for characterizing the ego in a network9114514910.1016/j.joi.2014.12.002Search in Google Scholar
Si, X., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2010). Explore the structure of social tags by subsumption relations. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1011–1019). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.SiX.LiuZ.SunM.2010Explore the structure of social tags by subsumption relations10111019Stroudsburg, PAAssociation for Computational LinguisticsSearch in Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15–29.SinclairJ.Cardew-HallM.2008The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful?341152910.1177/0165551506078083Search in Google Scholar
Song, Y., Qiu, B., & Farooq, U. (2011). Hierarchical tag visualization and application for tag recommendations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 1331–1340). New York: ACM.SongY.QiuB.FarooqU.2011Hierarchical tag visualization and application for tag recommendations13311340New YorkACM10.1145/2063576.2063769Search in Google Scholar
Strohmaier, M., Körner, C., & Kern, R. (2012). Understanding why users tag: A survey of tagging motivation literature and results from an empirical study. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 17, 1–11.StrohmaierM.KörnerC.KernR.2012Understanding why users tag: A survey of tagging motivation literature and results from an empirical study1711110.1016/j.websem.2012.09.003358746123471473Search in Google Scholar
Strohmaier, M., Helic, D., Benz, D., Körner, C., & Kern, R. (2012). Evaluation of folksonomy induction algorithms. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4), Article No. 74.StrohmaierM.HelicD.BenzD.KörnerC.KernR.2012Evaluation of folksonomy induction algorithms34article no. 7410.1145/2337542.2337559Search in Google Scholar
Suchanek, F.M., Vojnovic, M., & Gunawardena, D. (2008, October). Social tags: Meaning and suggestions. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 223–232). New York: ACM.SuchanekF.M.VojnovicM.GunawardenaD.2008, OctoberSocial tags: Meaning and suggestions223232New YorkACM10.1145/1458082.1458114Search in Google Scholar
Tsai, F., Cheng, Y., Li, S., & Chen, C. (2009). Heuristic-based approach for constructing hierarchical knowledge structures. In Proceedings of Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems (pp. 439–448). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.TsaiF.ChengY.LiS.ChenC.2009Heuristic-based approach for constructing hierarchical knowledge structures439448BerlinSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-02568-6_45Search in Google Scholar
Tsui, E., Wang, W.M., Cheung, C.F., & Lau, A.S.M. (2010). A concept-relationship acquisition and inference approach for hierarchical taxonomy construction from tags. Information Processing & Management, 46(1), 44–57.TsuiE.WangW.M.CheungC.F.LauA.S.M2010A concept-relationship acquisition and inference approach for hierarchical taxonomy construction from tags461445710.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.009Search in Google Scholar
Verma, C., Mahadevan, V., Rasiwasia, N., Aggarwal, G., Kant, R., Jaimes, A., & Dey, S. (2015). Construction and evaluation of ontological tag trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(24), 9587–9602.VermaC.MahadevanV.RasiwasiaN.AggarwalG.KantR.JaimesA.DeyS.2015Construction and evaluation of ontological tag trees42249587960210.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.057Search in Google Scholar
Wiesman, F., van den Herik, H.J., & Hasman, A. (2004). Information retrieval by metabrowsing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(7), 565–578.WiesmanF.van den HerikH.J.HasmanA.2004Information retrieval by metabrowsing55756557810.1002/asi.10410Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, S.X., Rousseau, R., & Ye, F.Y. (2011). h-Degree as a basic measure in weighted networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 668–677.ZhaoS.X.RousseauR.YeF.Y.2011h-Degree as a basic measure in weighted networks5466867710.1016/j.joi.2011.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, M., Bao, S., Wu, X., & Yu, Y. (2007). An unsupervised model for exploring hierarchical semantics from social annotations. In K. Aberer et al. (Eds.), The Semantic Web: The 6th International Semantic Web Conference, the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, (ISWC 2007 & ASWC 2007), Busan, Korea, November 11–15, 2007 (pp. 680–693). Berlin: Springer- Verlag.ZhouM.BaoS.WuX.YuY.2007An unsupervised model for exploring hierarchical semantics from social annotationsAbererK.680693BerlinSpringer- Verlag10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_49Search in Google Scholar