1. bookVolume 57 (2008): Issue 1-6 (December 2008)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Strategies for Optimal Deployment of Related Clones into Seed Orchards

Published Online: 14 Oct 2017
Page range: 119 - 127
Received: 24 Oct 2006
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This study deals with how the deployed proportion of each candidate clone can be decided at the establishment of a seed orchard when the breeding values are available for each candidate in a population of unrelated half-sib families. The following deployment strategies were compared: (a) truncation selection by selecting the clones with the breeding values exceeding certain threshold and deploying equal number of ramets (Truncation strategy); (b) truncation selection by selecting only one best individual within each family (Truncation unrelated); (c) maximizing gain at a given effective clone number (Linear deployment); (d) linear deployment by selecting one best individual within each family (Linear deployment unrelated) and (e) maximizing net gain at a given gene diversity (Optimal proportions). The study focused on the latest alternative and described its superiority and characteristics for a number of possible typical cases. The genetic gain adjusted for predicted inbreeding depression (Net gain), gene diversity and effective clone number were considered as the main ranking criteria. The strategies optimizing the number of related individuals and the linear deployment strategy with restriction on relatedness returned the highest Net gain. If there is a large diversity to select from (the status number of the candidates is more than 8 times greater than the status number desired in the seed orchard), a relatively simple advice is to select the best individual within the best families and deploy the clones linearly according to their breeding values (the number of families selected depends on the desired status number). If the diversity available to select from is small, it seems recommendable to allow half-sibs among the selections and use the Optimal proportions deployment strategy. As the breeding cycles proceed, the status number of the candidate population will decrease and the Optimal proportions strategy is likely to become more favorable.

Keywords

DANUSEVIČIUS, D. and D. LINDGREN (2002): Efficiency of Selection Based on Phenotype, Clone and Progeny Testing in Long-term Breeding. Silvae Genetica 51: 19-26.Search in Google Scholar

GRATTAPAGLIA, D., V. J. RIBEIRO and G. D. S. P. REZENDE (2004): Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: an alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109 (1): 192-199.10.1007/s00122-004-1617-915004676Search in Google Scholar

GUPTA, A. K., B. Y. KANG, J. K. ROY and O. P. RAJORA (2005): Large scale development of selectively amplified microsatellite polymorphic loci (SAMPL) markers in spruce (Picea). Mol. Ecol. Notes 5 (3): 481-483.10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00963.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

HODGE, G. R. and T. L. WHITE (1993): Advanced-generation wind-pollination seed orchard design. New Forestry 7: 213-236.10.1007/BF00127387Search in Google Scholar

JOHNSON, R. and S. LIPOW (2002): Compatibility of breeding for increased wood production and long-term sustainability: the genetic variation of seed orchard seed and associated risks. In: Proceedings wood compatibility initiative workshop 18, p. 169-179.Search in Google Scholar

KANG, K. S. (2001): Genetic gain and gene diversity of seed orchard crops. Ph.D thesis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Silvestria 187.Search in Google Scholar

KJÆR, E. D. (1995): Assessment of genetic variation in clone seed plantations- illustrated with an example from Sitka spruce. Dansk Skovbruks Tidskrift 80: 57-77.Search in Google Scholar

KUMAR, S., S. GERBER, T. E. RICHARDSON and L. GEA (2007): Testing for unequal paternal contributions using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of radiata pine. Tree Genetics and Genome 3: 207-214.10.1007/s11295-006-0056-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. (1974): Aspects of suitable number of clones in a seed orchard. Proc. of the IUFRO joint meeting of working parties on population and ecological genetics, breeding theory and progeny testing. Stockholm, the Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden. p 293-305.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and J.-E. NILSSON (1985): Calculations concerning selection intensity. Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report No. 5.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and A. C. MATHESON (1986): An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genetica 35: 173-177.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and K.-S. KANG (1997): Status number - a useful tool for tree breeding. Research Report of the Forest Genetic Research Institute of Korea 33, pp. 154-165.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and T. J. MULLIN (1998): Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 276-283.Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D. and F. PRESCHER (2005): Optimal clone number for seed orchards with tested clones. Silvae Genetica 54: 80-92.10.1515/sg-2005-0013Search in Google Scholar

LINDGREN, D., O. ROSVALL and D. DANUSEVIČIUS: Unequal deployment of clones to a seed orchard when candidates are related (submitted manuscript).Search in Google Scholar

NIKKANEN, T. and S. RUOTSALAINEN (2000): Variation in flowering abundance and its impact on the genetic diversity of the seed crop in a Norway spruce seed orchard. Silva Fennica 34: 205-222.10.14214/sf.626Search in Google Scholar

OLSSON, T. (2001): Parameters, relationship and selection in Pines. Doctoral thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Silvestria 192, 27 p. (and 4 papers).Search in Google Scholar

OLSSON, T., D. LINDGREN and B. LI (2001): Balancing genetic gain and relatedness in seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 50: 222-227.Search in Google Scholar

ROSVALL, O. (1999): Enhancing Gain from Long-Term Forest Tree Breeding while Conserving Genetic Diversity. Ph.D thesis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. Silvestria 109.Search in Google Scholar

ROSVALL, O., G. JANSSON, B. ANDERSSON, T. ERICSSON, B. KARLSSON, J. SONESSON and L.-G. STENER (2001): Genetic gain from present and future seed orchards and clone mixtures. Rep. of the For. Res. Inst. of Sweden 1: 36-41. ISSN 1103-4580.Search in Google Scholar

WANG TONGLI, S. N. AITKEN, J. H. WOODS, K. R. POLSSON and S. MAGNUSSEN (2003): Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas fir growth and yield in operational plantations: a model-based approach. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1162-1171.Search in Google Scholar

WOODS, J. H. and J. C. HEAMAN (1989): Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglasfir. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 54-59.Search in Google Scholar

ZOBEL, B. and J. TALBERT (1984): Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, Prospect Heights, Ill.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo