Open Access

Bacteriological, Clinical and Virulence Aspects of Aeromonas-associated Diseases in Humans


Cite

Introduction

Aeromonads are recognized not only as an important disease-causing pathogen of fish and other coldblooded organisms but also as a causative organism in a variety of infectious complications in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised humans. The name Aeromonas is derived from Greek noun aeros (air, gas) and monas (unit). Members of the genus Aeromonas can be referred to as aeromonad. Aeromonads (Phylum Proteobacteria, Class Gammaproteobacteria, Order Aeromonadales, Family Aeromonadaceae) are Gram-negative, non-spore forming, rod shaped, facultative anaerobic bacteria that occur in natural water bodies of the environment. They are similar in many characters to Enterobacteriaceae family.

The DNA-DNA hybridization studies showed the presence of 33 DNA hybridization groups, including 19 genospecies. Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, A. sobria, A. veronii, and A. schubertii are mesophilic, whereas, A. salmonicida are non-motile and psychrophilic. Widely distributed, aeromonads have been isolated from various sources like freshwater fishes, drinking water supply, environmental samples, polluted waters, food items like meat, fish, milk, ready to eat items and oysters (Abeyta et al., 1986; Altwegg et al., 1990; Manna et al., 2013, Figueras et al., 2017). Aeromonas have been found in the Aedes aegyptii and Culex quinque fasciatus mosquitoes’ midgut, in monkey faeces and bivalve molluscs (Pidiyar et al., 2002), larvae of Chironomus plumosus (Rouf and Rigney, 1993).

Over the past few years, researchers have renewed interest in the genus Aeromonas as an emergent human pathogen (Janda and Abbott, 1998). Aeromonads have been implicated in septicaemia in variety of aquatic organisms and gastrointestinal/extra-intestinal diseases in humans (Janda and Duffey, 1988; Janda and Abbott, 1996). Several species of genus Aeromonas have been implicated in pathogenic cases in human, like cellulitis, surgical wound infections, nosocomial pneumonia, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, sepsis, peritonitis, meningitis, urinary tract infections, and severe muscle degeneration. In all the cases it seems that Aeromonas-mediated pathogenesis occurs both in cases of immunosuppression and immunocompetence (Wang et al., 2003). However, Aeromonas-mediated mechanism of pathogenesis in both aquatic organisms and in human subjects remains to be elucidated.

Aeromonas spp. possess multifactorial virulence genes and systems. Several groups have demonstrated the presence of aerolysin (Chakraborty et al., 1986), hemolysin (Wang et al., 1996), extracellular lipase (Anguita et al., 1993), cytolytic enterotoxin (Chopra et al., 1993), haemolytic toxin genes (Khan et al., 1998), acetylcholinesterase (Nieto et al., 1991) and proteases (Leung and Stevenson, 1988). Genome level scans have identified virulence factors in potential open reading frames (ORFs) and few putative genes, like O-antigen and capsule, gene cluster in phage and type III secretion system have been associated with virulent aeromonads. Several genomic islands (GIs) with unusual G-C content, have also been identified that carry mobility-associated genes, such as integrases or transposes and other putative virulence genes (Yu et al., 2005). Aeromonas luxRI quorum sensing gene homologs and Ribonuclease R (Vac B) have also been implicated in modulation and expression of these virulence genes (Jangid et al., 2007; Erova et al., 2008). The NDM-1 gene (blaNDM-1) has been found in aeromonads of North India (New Delhi) (Walsh et al., 2011).

Aeromonads are found to inhabit a variety of niches including soil, aquatic habitats, aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, birds, insects, and human beings (Table I). A. hydrophila are found to inhabit a wide range of thermal and pH conditions, except in extremely polluted and saline water and hot water springs. Estuaries are ideal for Aeromonas, where they either exist freely or associated with crustaceans (Fiorentini et al., 1998). Most of the aeromonads come into human systems through ingestion of water or food contaminated with Aeromonas. In India, Aeromonas spp. have been detected in 13.4% of animal-origin food samples, the highest being in fish (Kumar et al., 2000). Aeomonads mostly infect the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract and blood of human beings. Three Aeromonas species viz., A. hydrophila, A. caviae and A. veronii bv. Sobria are known to infect human beings (Janda and Abbott, 1998). Some other species like A. jandaei, A. veronii bv. veronii, A. schubertii, A. popoffi are also known to infect human (Janda et al., 1994; Hua et al., 2004). Hua et al. (2004) isolated A. popoffi from the urine of a patient with urinary tract infection (Hua et al., 2004). A. salmonicida, generally known to infect cold blooded animals, has also been isolated from blood sample of a patient in India (Tewari et al., 2014). A. salmonicida was identified by Vitek 2 compact automated system. Non-culturable Aeromonas can be found in drinking water in various concentrations. The first report of Aeromonas from drinking water was confirmed by sequencing 16S rRNA (Figueras et al., 2005). Different concentrations of Aeromonas have been detected in consumable products from markets (Isonhood and Drake, 2002).

Genomospecies and phenospecies of the genus Aeromonas.

DNA Hybridization groupType Strain/ReferenceGenospeciesPhenospeciesRemarksReference
 1ATCC 7966A. hydrophilaA. hydrophilaIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 1BCCM/LMG 19562A. hydrophila subsp. dhakensisA. hydrophila subsp. dhakensisIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 1BCCM/LMG 19707A. hydrophila subsp. ranaeA. hydrophila subsp. ranaePathogenic for frogsMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 2ATCC 14715A. bestiarumA. hydrophila-likeIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 3ATCC 33658A. salmonicidaA. salmonicida subsp. SalmonicidaNonmotile fish pathogenMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 3ATCC 33659A. salmonicidaA. salmonicida subsp. AchromogenesNonmotile fish pathogenMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 3ATCC 27013A. salmonicidaA. salmonicida subsp. MasoucidaNonmotile fish pathogenMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 3ATCC 49393A. salmonicidaA. salmonicida subsp. SmithiaNonmotile fish pathogenMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 3CDC 0434-84, Popoff C316UnnamedA. hydrophila-likeIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 4ATCC 15468A. caviaeA. caviaeIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 5ACDC 0862-83A. mediaA. caviae-likeIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 5BCDC 0435-84A. mediaA. mediaMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 6ATCC 23309A. eucrenophilaA. eucrenophilaMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 7CIP 7433, NCMB 12065A. sobriaA. sobriaMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 8XCDC 0437-84A. veroniiA. sobriaMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 8YATCC 9071A. veroniiA. veronii biovar sobriaIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
 9ATCC 49568A.jandaeiA.jandaeiIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
10ATCC 35624A. veronii biovar veroniiA. veronii biovar veroniiIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
11ATCC 35941UnnamedAeromonas spp. (ornithine PositiveMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
12ATCC 43700A. schubertiiA. schubertiiIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
13ATCC 43946Aeromonas Group 501A. schubertii-likeIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
14ATCC 49657A. trotaA. trotaIsolated from clinical specimensMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
15ATCC 51208, CECT 4199A. allosaccharophilaA. allosaccharophilaMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
16ATCC 51020A. encheleiaA. encheleiaPathogenic for eelsMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
17BCCM/LMG 1754A. popoffiiA. popoffiiMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
UAMTCC 3249, NCIM 5147A. culicicolaA. culicicolaIsolated from mosquitoesMartin-Carnahan and Joseph, 2005
UAA. eucrenophilaA. tectaIsolated from clinical and environmental sourcesDemarta et al., 2008
UAA. trotaA. aquariorumIsolated from monkey faecesHarf-Monteil et al., 2004
UAA. popoffiiA. bivalviumIsolated from aquaria of ornamental fishMartinez-Murcia et al., 2008
UAUnnamedA. sharmanaIsolated from bivalve molluscsMinana-Galbis et al., 2004
UA868ET (= CECT 7113T = LMG 23376T)A. bivalvium sp. nov.Isolated from bivalve molluscsMinana-Galbis et al., 2007
UAA. schubertiiA. simiaeIsolated from midgut of MosquitoesPidiyar et al., 2002
UAA. sharmana sp. nov.A. sobriaIsolated from a warm springSaha and Chakrabarti, 2006
UA266T (5CECT 8023T 5LMG 26707T)Aeromonas australiensis sp. nov.Aeromonas fluvialis, Aeromonas veronii and Aeromonas allosaccharophilaIsolated from irrigation water systemAravena-Roman et al., 2013
UAA.11/6T (= DSMZ 24095T, = CECT 7828T)Aeromonas lusitana sp. nov.Isolated frm untreated water and vegetables (lettuce/celery)Martinez-Murcia et al., 2016
UAATCC 49803Aeromonas enteropelogenesAeromonas trotaIsolated from human stoolSchubert et al., 1990
UACECT 4254TAeromonas diversaAeromonas schubertiiIsolated from leg wound of a patientFarfan et al., 2013
UA717T (= CECT 7401T = LMG 24681T)Aeromonas fluvialisAeromonas veroniiIsolated from river waterAlperi et al., 2010b
UA848TT (= CECT 5864T = LMG 22214T)Aeromonas molluscorum sp. nov.Isolated from Wedge-shellsMinana-Galbis et al., 2004
UAWB4.1-19T (CECT 7518T DSM 22539T MDC 2511T)Aeromonas rivuli sp. nov.Isolated from a karst hard water creekFigueras et al., 2011
UAS1.2T (= CECT 7443T = LMG 24783T)Aeromonas piscicola sp. nov.Isolated from wild diseased SalmonBeaz-Hidalgo et al., 2009
UAA2-50T (= CECT 7403T = LMG 24683T)Aeromonas taiwanensis sp. nov.Isolated from wound infection of a patientAlperi et al., 2010a
UAA2-67T (= CECT 7402T = LMG 24682T)Aeromonas sanarellii sp. nov.Isolated from a wound culture from a patientAlperi and Figueras, 2010
UAA. hydrophilaIsolated from wild birdsGlunder and Seigmann, 1989

UA-Unassigned; – Un Named

Epidemiology

Mesophilic bacteria grow well at higher temperatures and therefore an increase in bacterial load may be attributed to their increase in concentration in both freshwater environments and drinking water sources with the increase of ambient temperature (Moyer, 1987; Edberg et al., 2007; Khardori and Fainstein, 1988). The seasonality is also seen in extra-intestinal infections such as septicemia, where 42% to 67% of bacteremic diseases appear during the summer season (Tsai et al., 2006). The elevated levels of these bacteria in aquatic environments during the summer season increases the opportunities of human or aquatic organisms of getting exposed to them and thus the risk of getting infected by these bacteria also gets higher. Infections caused by aeromonads seem to be rather more prevalent in developing countries like India, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Libya, Nigeria, Venezuala and Vietnam (Ghenghesh et al., 2008). Prevalence of Aeromonas related disease is more during rainy seasons when the water salinity is low than at high salinity during dry season (Marcel et al., 2002).

Infections and Symptoms

Gastrointestinal tract is the most common site of Aeromonas infection. Evidences show that Aeromonasassociated diarrhoea or cholera-like disease occurs in some patients, whereas no symptom may appear in cases of low-level infections (Gurwith et al., 1977; Holmberg et al., 1984). Kelly et al. (1993) isolated Aeromonas from non-fecal samples from 58 patients, suffering from gangrene, septicemia, osteomyelitis and peritonitis. Aeromonas-related diarrhoea may be watery and self-limiting. In other cases, fever, abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea may develop along with dehydration (Ghenghesh et al., 1999). Hematologic cancer patients, patients with tumours in their gastrointestinal tract or having alimentary canal diseases are more likely to be infected by Aeromonas. In rare cases of segmental colitis Aeromonas segmental colitis may occur that seem to be ischemic colitis or Crohn’s disease (Bayerdorffer et al., 1986). Although any portion of the colon may be affected, it mostly affects the ascending or transverse sections. Iileal ulceration has also been linked to Aeromonas enteritis (Yamamoto et al., 2004). It may also cause intra-mural intestinal hemorrhage including small bowel obstruction (Block et al., 1994), and refractory inflammatory bowel disease (Doman et al., 1989). Gastrointestinal tract infection symptoms may mimic cholera (Mohan et al., 2017).

The second most common area of Aeromonas- related infection in our body is the skin and the soft tissues underlying the skin. Aeromonads may cause several types of skin and soft tissue infections, ranging from mild problems like pustular lesions to dangerous conditions that can cause morbidity in infected person. Some of these conditions include cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, myonecrosis, septic arthritis and septic shock (Lai et al., 2007). Some medical treatment procedures like medicinal leech therapy, appendectomies, colectomy, cholecystectomy and elective surgery enhance the chances of Aeromonas-associated wound infections (Moawad and Zelderman, 2002; Tena et al., 2009). A. hydrophila and A. caviae were isolated from five burn patients admitted in Royal Brisbane hospital, where the patients had been immersed in water immediately after getting burnt, putatively contaminated with Aeromonas (Kienzle et al., 2000).

A. hydroplila sensu stricto, A. caviae and A. veronii bv. Sobria have been implicated in blood borne infections. Less frequently, three other species namely, A. jandaei, A. veronii bv. veronii and A. schubertii are known to cause sepsis (Janda et al., 1994). Aeromonassepticemia is more prevalent in immunocompromised conditions viz. myeloproliferative disorders, chronic liver disease, neoplasia, biliary disease, AML, myeloplastic syndromes, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and acute lymphocytic leukemia (Ko et al., 2000; Tsai et al., 2006). Aeromonas septicemia is also related to diseases like diabetes mellitus, renal and cardiac problems, thallasemia, multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia and Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (Janda and Abbott, 1996; Padmaja et al., 2013). Aeromonad-contaminated catheters and dialysis chambers may serve as points of entry into human blood. Aeromonas cause peritonitis and cholangitis as intra-abdominal disease. Aeromonasassociated cholangitis may result in pancreatic carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, cholelithiasis patients or patients with non-malignant biliary disease by the invasion of the bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the biliary tract via surgery or endoscopy (Chan et al., 2000). A. hydrophila, A. veronii bv. Sobria, A. popoffi and A. caviae infections have been implicated in UTI, aspiration pneumonia, keratitis, endophthalmitis, corneal ulceration and blood stream infections through biofilm formation (Ender et al., 1996; Hsueh et al., 1998; Miyake et al., 2000; Hua et al., 2004; Pinna et al., 2004; Hondur et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2014). First case of neonatal meningitis in a premature baby has been reported recently caused by A. hydrophila (Kali et al., 2016).

Aeromonas affects both cold and warm-blooded non-human animals. Mass deaths in fishes occur every year due to Aeromonas-associated diseases resulting in huge economic loss to the fish industry (Monette et al., 2006). Furunculosis in the salmonids, caused by A. salmonicida sensu stricto is characterized by symptoms like heamorrhages at fin bases, muscles and internal organs; loss of appetite, disordered melanin production, loss of energy and exopthalmia (Austin, 1997). Secondly, septicemia in carps, tilapia, catfishes, salmons, cods, bass and freshwater prawns is caused by A. hydrophila and A. veronii (Joseph and Carnahan, 1994). A. hydrophila has been detected in tissues like kidney, liver and blood of carps in farms (Mohanty et al., 2008). Incidences of A. hydrophila seem to be more prevalent than A. caviae and A. sobria, which indicates that A. hydrophila, is more virulent than the other (Daood, 2012). In a very recent study it was shown that A. caviae infection causes thrombocytopenia which contributes to elongation of clotting time which leads to hamorrhages in internal organs, muscles and bases of fins (Baldissera et al., 2018). Diseases in other ectothermic animals include ulcers (Lizards and snakes), “red leg” disease (frogs), septicemia (dogs), septic arthritis (calves), vesiculitis (bulls) (Gosling, 1996).

Pathogenicity

The identified virulence factors in Aeromonas are haemolysins, cytotoxins, enterotoxins, proteases [serine protease (AspA), elastase (AhpB)], lipases (Pla and Plc, Sat), DNAses, adhesins [type IV pili, polar flagella (FlaA and FlaB)] (Agarwal et al., 1998; Cascon et al., 2000; Rabaan et al., 2001), capsule and T3SS (Grim et al., 2013). Genome sequencing and annotation can be used to detect these virulence factors in Aeromonas (Grim et al., 2013). Enterotoxins, Act and Ast (Sha et al., 2002), elastase (Cascon et al., 2000), flagellin (Rabaan et al., 2001), and Stx1 and Stx2 (Alperi and Figueras, 2010) are directly involved in the pathogenesis. In a study Aeromonas isolates from well, tap and bottled water samples were found to have aer and ast genes, which poses a serious health concern for the human society (Didugu et al., 2015).

Aeromonas inections are mostly polymicrobial (Figueras and Beaz-Hidalgo, 2015), in which there is competition and cooperation between the bacterial cells (Armbruster et al., 2016). Virulence when checked in C. elegans was found to be higher in paired Aeromonas infections than in single strain (Mosser et al., 2015). The dual strain A. hydrophila infection showed synergistic effect by local tissue damage and antagonistic effect by elimination (Ponnusamy et al., 2016). The pathogenic potential of A. veronii isolates from clinical samples when tested were found to be like the drinking water and environmental isolates (Lye, 2011). The protein secretion systems of Aeromonas play important roles in pathogenesis caused by them. The type II secretion system is associated with the extracellular release of proteases, amylases, DNases and aerolysin (Pang et al., 2015). Type III secretion system, which is found in greater frequency in clinical isolates than environmental ones (Pang et al., 2015) functions by inserting effective toxins inside the host cells (Sierra et al., 2010). The type VI secretion system allows insertion of virulence factors into host cells through valine-glycine repeat protein and hemolysin-coregulated proteins. These proteins when secreted show antimicrobial pore-forming properties or remain as structural proteins (Bingle et al., 2008).

Gastroenteritis. Aeromonads enter the human gut via oral cavity, escape the effects of gastric acidity and produce bacteriocin-like compounds, which facilitate colonization of the intestine. They attach themselves to gastrointestinal epithelium, form biofilm, colonize and elaborate virulence factors to cause infection. Bacterial flagella and pili play important roles in gastric pathogenicity (Kirov et al., 2000).

Wound infections. Virulence caused by Aeromonas and the virulence factors possessed by them are similar to those of Gram-negative P. aeruginosa. The first step is settlement of the bacteria in wound site with the help of adhesion factors such as OmpA protein (Namba et al., 2008). The second step involves production of proteases (metalloproteases, serine proteases and aminopeptidases) and the breakdown of proteinaceous material of the host cells to gain energy, for multiplication of bacilli (Janda, 2001). The third step includes the entry of aeromonads into deeper tissues via chemotactic motility (Janda, 1985).

Septicemia. Most cases of primary Aeromonas septicaemia apparently arise through transfer of bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract into the blood circulatory system. They may also travel to the bloodstream from infected wounds, peritonitis, or biliary disease. Most of the Aeromonas septicemias are caused by a small number of species. Specific strains having certain markers are only responsible for most of the blood-borne diseases. Aeromonads of sergroups O:11, O:16, O:18, and O:34 are responsible for most cases of septicemia, which shows that lipo-polysaccharide (LPS) antigens are important in causing systemic diseases. The presence of LPS or the S layers makes most Aeromonas isolates resistant to the lytic effects of the host’s classical complement pathway (Janda et al., 1994).

Genes involved in virulence

Cytotoxic enterotoxin (act), haemolysin (hlyA)/aerolysin (aerA). The act gene of A. hydrophila encodes cytotoxic enterotoxin, which has many functions viz., cytotoxic, haemolytic and enterotoxic activities (Chopra and Houston, 1999). Other aeromonads have haemolytic activities due to the presence of other genes, namely hlyA and aerA, and these strains may have one or more of these genes (Heuzenroeder et al., 1999). The mature aerolysin binds to host cells, aggregates there and forms holes in their cell membrane destroying the permeability barrier of the membrane, which ultimately leads to osmotic lysis of the cells (Howard and Buckley, 1982). The haemolysin induces accumulation of fluids in intestinal loops (Asao et al., 1986), release of certain inflammation promoting factors from the granulocytes (Scheffer et al., 1988) and apoptosis of the host cells (Nelson et al., 1999). A study showed that about 50% of the marine fish samples were positive for the haemolysin gene hyl in India (Reshma et al., 2015). In another study, both environmental and clinical isolates from Kolkata (erstwhile Calcutta) in India were found to be positive for act and the enteropathogenic potential of these isolates were found to be comparable to V. cholerae (Bhowmik et al., 2009).

Cytotonic enterotoxins (ast, alt). The cytotonic enterotoxins do not degenerate the small intestine. The clones of E. coli having cytotonic enterotoxin genes have been showed to cause elongation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, which also produces cyclic AMP, and these are enterotoxic responses. The Alt enterotoxin is heat labile, whereas Ast is heat stable at 56°C (Chopra and Houston, 1999). These genes have strong roles in causing diarrhoea (Sha et al., 2002).

Elastase (ahpB). The knocking out of the ahpB gene in A. hydrophila causes a high rise in the LD50 value of A. hydrophila in fishes, which indicates that elastase, a zinc metalloprotease, is an important virulence factor to cause disease in organisms (Cascon et al., 2000). The ahpB gene in A. hydrophila encodes protease with both elastolytic and caseinolytic activities (Cascon et al., 2000).

Flagella. Most of the Aeromonas species and all of the species responsible for human pathogenesis are motile having polar flagella. The polar flagellum has five flagellin subunits Fla A, Fla B, Fla G, Fla H and Fla J. The flaA and flaB genes have been cloned and sequenced from A. salmonicida (Umelo and Trust, 1997). All the five genes (flaA, flaB, flaG, flaH and flaJ) were identified in polar flagellin locus of A. caviae. Motility is known as an important virulence factor in the aeromonads. Mutation in either flaA or flaB did not affect development of flagellum but did reduce adherence and motility by approximately 50%. Mutations in flaH, flaJ or both cause complete loss of motility, development of flagellum and ability to get attached to HEp-2 cells. Thus, the ability to get attached to Hep-2 cells depends on motility and presence of flagella of aeromonads (Rabaan et al., 2001).

Lipase. Lipases change the plasma membrane of the host, increasing the severity of disease (Nawaz et al., 2010). Lipase gene has been recovered from multidrug-resistant virulent aeromonads capable of forming biofilms isolated from cattle feaces (Igbinosa et al., 2015).

Shiga toxins (Stx1 and Stx2). Shiga toxins are protein toxins, which have two parts A and B. One part has enzymatic property and the other binds to the surface of the host cells. These toxins inhibit protein synthesis of the host cells (Sandvig, 2001) and also induce apoptosis (Jones et al., 2000).

Enolase. Enolase is a glycolytic enzyme expressed in cell surfaces, which binds to human plasminogen leading to the production of plasmin which degrade plasma proteins. Enolase is also a heat-shock protein, which regulated transcription and is also necessary for cell viability (Sha et al., 2009).

Others. Other virulence factors include adhesins (Huang et al., 2015), nucleases (Ji et al., 2015), pore forming toxins (Saurez et al., 2012) and catalysts.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

All species of Aeromonas show similar antibiotic susceptibility profiles, which are also independent of the origin of the isolates (Kampfer et al., 1999). Most of the aeromonads have inducible chromosomal lactamases, which are their main resistance mechanisms. Among these, metallo-β-lactamases, which work against carbapenems, are of major concern (Janda, 2001; Zhiyong et al., 2002). The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) have published consensus guideline for testing Aeromonas (Jorgensen and Hindler, 2007). The susceptibility status of Aeromonas isolates for therapeutically active drugs also seem to be species independent with one exception of Aeromonas trota, which is susceptible to ampicillin (Carnahan et al., 1991). In a study antibiotic resistance status of Aeromonas isolates from diseased fishes were found to be similar to those isolated from the freshwater fish farm (Daood, 2012). In another study Aeromonas strains resistant to mercury and arsenite were found and these got transferred to E. coli when conjugation experiments were performed (Huddleston et al., 2006).

Resistance Mechanisms. Three major classes of β-lactamases are present in Aeromonas species, viz, C cephalosporinase, D penicillinase, and a class B metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) (Libisch et al., 2008). Fosse et al. (2003) classified strains expressing these β-lactamases into five groups as A. hydrophila: class B, C, and D β-lactamases, A. caviae: class C and D β-lactamases, A. veronii: class B and D lactamases, A. schubertii: class D lactamases and A. trota: class C β-lactamases. Many A. veronii bv. Sobria isolates also express a class C cephalosporinase. In few cases, infecting Aeromonas strains expressed a class A β-lactamase of the TEM family of ESBLs (Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases), a character similar to the Enterobacteriaceae (Marchandin et al., 2003). The β-lactamases are involved in detoxification of antibiotics, changes in the drug binding site of the target and inhibiting the entry of the drug into the bacterial cells by causing changes in structure and function of the cytoplasmic and cell membranes (Benveniste and Davies, 1973). Each strain can produce a maximum of three β-lactamases, which work in a coordinated manner (Walsh et al., 1997). Class C cephalosporinases of the AmpC family are resistant to cephamycins, extended spectrum cephalosporins and β-lactamase inhibitor compounds, like clavulanic acid, tazobactam, and sulbactam, which hydrolyse the CO-NH bond in the lactum ring of cephalosporin to inactivate it (Fosse et al., 2003).

“CphA”, is the most common MBL produced by Aeromonas species, which is largely found in A. hydrophila and A. veronii isolates (Walsh et al., 1997). Two other MBLs (VIM and IMP) are also found in A. hydrophila and A. caviae strains, which encode an integron and a plasmid, respectively (Libisch et al., 2008). These MBL-producing strains are resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam; both strains are found to be susceptible to aztreonam in vitro. MBLs work in a two-step process: firstly, the C-N bond of the beta-lactam antibiotic is cleaved and then the binding nitrogen is protonated (Crowder et al., 2006).

Recently, NDM-1 (blaNDM-1) gene has been detected in this group of bacteria (Walsh et al., 2011). The spread of mobile NDM-1, also known as carbapenemase, is of great concern, not only because these enzymes confer resistance to carbapenems and other β-lactam antibiotics, but also because such pathogens typically are resistant to multiple antibiotic classes, making treatment difficult. Plasmids having the sequence encoding this carbapenemase can have up to 14 other antibiotic-resistance determinants and can make other bacteria also resistant, resulting in multi-drug resistant or extreme drug-resistant phenotypes. Resistance of this scale could have serious public health implications because modern medicine is dependent on the ability to treat infection (Livermore, 2009).

Quinolone resistance in Aeromonas strains isolated from two European rivers is a matter of rising concern because quinolone was previously known to be effective in combating Aeromonas infections (Goni-Urriza et al., 2000). Several A. caviae strains showed resistance to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and norfloxacin (Sinha et al., 2004). Aeromonads pathogenic to fish are found to be resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin-sulbactum and streptomycin (Abu-Elala et al., 2015). These antibiotic resistant bacteria come into the environment through improper septic systems, agriculture and wastewater treatment plants (Rosenblatt-Farrell, 2009). River sediments adsorb antibiotics (Zhou et al., 2011) some of which may remain there for months (Lai et al., 2011). These impart antibiotic resistance to bacterial populations at that location. Biofilm formation increases resistance to antimicrobial substances (Acker et al., 2014), disinfectants (Jahid and Ha, 2014). Biofilm formation in Aeromonas is affected differently in different strains under several food related stresses. However, low temperature and pH conditions were found to facilitate biofilm formation in a recent study, which is the first study of this kind regarding Aeromonas (Nagar et al., 2017).

Role of plamids, integron systems and transposons in disease transmission

In Aeromonas, gene transfer mainly occurs through conjugation and transformation, in which type IV pili play a vital role (Huddleston et al., 2013). In a study, seven ESBL and two AmpCBL-producing Aeromonas strains were able to transfer their antibiotic resistance genes to E. coli (Bhaskar et al., 2015). Bacterial conjugative plasmids, transposable elements and integron systems are the panoply on which bacteria depend for their resistance to anti-bacterial compounds. Plasmids in particular serve as a platform on which useful resistance genes are assembled and subsequently disseminated (Bennett, 2008). Plasmid profiling and molecular characterization of aeromonad plasmids were undertaken by several research groups to address to the problems of generation and transmission of antibiotic resistance genes (Toranzo et al., 1983; Rhodes et al., 2000). Studies in eastern India focussed on the characterization of Aeromonas spp. isolated from cyprinid and silurid fishes affected with ulcerative disease (EUS) and the involvement of a low molecular weight plasmid has been implicated in the etiology of this disease in fishes (Pradhan and Pal, 1990; Majumdar et al., 2006; Majumdar et al., 2007). Subsequent investigations have also proved that, the degree of antibiotic resistance in these bacterial isolates is gradually increasing through the years (Pradhan and Pal, 1993; Saha and Pal, 2002; Das et al., 2009; Pal and Bhattacharjee, 2011).

Our laboratory tested antibiotic resistance status in few environmental Aeromonas isolates and the results showed an increase in antibiotic resistance in case of some antibiotics, while decrease in resistance in others (Dey Bhowmick and Bhattacharjee, 2017). Since antibiotic resistance is increasing in Aeromonas, aquaculture should resort to alternate means such as probiotics, essential oils and phage therapy to combat this problem.

In contrast to bacterial conjugative plasmids, which tend to be larger, mobilizable resistance plasmids tend to be relatively smaller (~10 to 20 kb) and encode only a handful of genes including the resistance gene(s) (Bennet, 2008). Therefore, resistance to multi-drugs and presence of small-sized plasmids in environmental isolates of this medically important bacteria group may indicate potential threat to human and culture fisheries (Pal and Bhattacharjee, 2011). Through horizontal gene transfer R-plasmids are spread between different species of Aeromonas, which spread multi-drug resistance (Indra et al., 2015). Transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from Aeromonas to other environmental and clinical bacteria makes treatment of both fish and humans difficult. Presence of multidrug resistance genes on mobile genetic elements is therefore a serious threat to society (Piotrowska and Popowska, 2015).

Conclusion

Phenotypically and genotypically a heterogenous group, aeromonads have been detected, isolated and characterized from varied sources such as brackish, fresh, estuarine, marine waters, chlorinated and unchlorinated water supplies, heavily polluted waters, cold and warm-blooded animals and humans alike. In contrast to the traditional morphological and biochemical differentiation, identification of aeromonads from clinical and environmental sources are presently based on PCR-based genotyping approach such as ribotyping and analysis of gyrB.

In the post World War II period, extensive use (or abuse) of antibiotics have given rise to drug-resistant varieties of bacteria, owing to the success and speed of bacterial adaptation. Bacteria apply many mechanisms to show antibiotic resistance. These resistance genes get accumulated in plasmids and are thought to spread among other bacteria through them. In order to find solution to this problem many researchers have undertaken plasmid profiling and molecular characterization of aeromonad plasmids (Toranzo et al., 1983). Therefore, assessment of anti-microbial drug resistance and possible involvement of bacterial plasmids in this resistance, in the locally isolated clinically and agriculturally important aeromonads, may be rewarding. To understand fully the virulence potential of any pathogen, it is imperative to understand pathogenic factors and/or mechanisms that are involved in their virulence. This is crucial since the expression of different virulence genes could contribute to infection depending upon the anatomical niche where the pathogenic organisms colonize and the microenvironment that dictates the differential expression of genes.

So far, many virulence factors have been discovered and characterized from Aeromonas group, especially from A. hydrophila, the causative organism of septicemia, wound infections and diarrhoea in humans and in animals. Novel putative virulence factors and/or virulence transfer systems, such as the NDM-1 gene, are being discovered on a regular basis in this diverse and ubiquitous group of bacteria. Although its emergence and distribution is controversial, the detection of NDM-1 gene in this clinically and agriculturally important bacteria group calls for a detailed surveillance of antibiotic resistance and also mode of transferability of NDM-1 gene in this bacteria group.

Plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer and acquisitions are thought to be one of the many adaptive ways by which bacteria acquire genes that may be useful periodically in combating environmental stresses, e.g., confronting potentially hazardous anti-bacterial agents, such as antibiotics (Bennett, 2008). Useful genes are thought to be selected and persist that ultimately confer better adaptability to microorganisms. Plasmid profiling in pathogenic isolates of A. hydrophila from fishes with ulcers, had been done to investigate plasmid-mediated virulence potential of the bacterium. Plasmid profiling, plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance and pathogenesis in aeromonads have been investigated by several groups but further works are necessary to investigate the mode of transmission of virulence and drug-resistance genes in this bacterial group. This is imperative in heavily populated tropical countries like India, especially where sanitary requirements are not upto the standard.

Moreover, knowledge on how antibiotic resistance develops and is spread by mobile genetic elements is necessary for designing and developing prevention strategies intended to minimize the threat of bacterial infections. Considering the great adaptive ability of these bacteria vis-a-vis the environmental stresses and increasing use of anti-bacterial agents in combating Aeromonas-associated pathogenesis, newer virulence genes may be acquired by these organisms. Therefore, a search and mapping for putative virulence genes of Aeromonas should be undertaken.

eISSN:
2544-4646
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology