[
Badgett, M. V. Lee, Folbre, Nancy. 1999. Assigning Care: Gender Norms and Economic Outcomes. International Labour Review 138(3): 311–326.10.1111/j.1564-913X.1999.tb00390.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bass, Bernard M., Avolio, Bruce J. 1994. Shatter the Glass Ceiling: Women May Make Better Managers. Human Resource Management 33(4): 549–560.10.1002/hrm.3930330405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, Penny Edgell, Moen, Phyllis 1999. Scaling Back: Dual-Earner Couples’ Work–Family Strategies. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(4): 995–1007.10.2307/354019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertrand, Marianne, Hallock, Kevin F. 2001. The Gender Gap in Top Corporate Jobs. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 55(1): 3–21.10.1177/001979390105500101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blair-Loy, Mary. 2005. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674021594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaskó, Zsuzsa. 2006. Nők és férfiak. Keresőmunka, házimunka. A „Család” tematikájú ISSP 2002-es adatfelvétel elemzése. Budapest: KSH.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Budig, Michelle, England, Paula. 2001. The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–225.10.2307/2657415
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, Mariko Lin. 2000. The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 105(6): 1658–1701.10.1086/210469
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coltrane, Scott. 2004. Elite Careers and Family Commitment: It’s (Still) about Gender. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596(1): 214–220.10.1177/0002716204268776
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotter, David, Hermsen, Joan M., Vanneman, Reeve. 2011. The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology 117(1): 259–289.10.1086/658853
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cotter, David A., Hermsen, Joan M., Ovadia, Seth, Vanneman, Reeve. 2001. The Glass Ceiling Effect. Social Forces 80(2): 655–681.10.1353/sof.2001.0091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crompton, Rosemary, Lyonette. Clare. 2006. Work–Life “Balance” in Europe. Acta Sociologica 49(4): 379–393.10.1177/0001699306071680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csite, András, Kovách, Imre. 1999. The End of Post-Socialism: The Structure and Efficiency of the Ownership of Hungarian Large Companies in 1997. Acta Oeconomica 50(1/2): 57–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csurgó, Bernadett, Kristóf, Luca. 2018. Narrative Identities and the Egalitarian Norm Among Hungarian Elite Couples. Journal of Family Issues 39(7): 2107–2130.10.1177/0192513X17741175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csurgó, Bernadett, Megyesi, Boldizsár. 2006. Családi döntések, munkamegosztás és társadalomszerkezet. In: Kovách, I. (ed.), Társadalmi metszetek, Érdekek és hatalmi viszonyok, individualizáció és egyenlőtlenség a mai Magyarországon. Budapest: Napvilág. 293–310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csurgó, Bernadett, Megyesi, Boldizsár. 2011. Elit-meghatározások és elitcsoportok – a 2009-es magyarországi elitfelvételek fogalmi-mintavételi háttere. In: Kovách, I. (ed.), Elitek a válság korában. Magyarországi elitek, kisebbségi magyar elitek. Budapest: Argumentum. 143–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. Women, Quotas, and Politics. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dribe, Martin, Stanfors, Maria. 2010. Family Life in Power Couples: Continued Childbearing and Union Stability among the Educational Elite in Sweden, 1991–2005. Demographic Research 23(30): 847–878.10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.30
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dupcsik, Csaba, Tóth, Olga. 2014. Family Systems and Family Values in 21st-Century Hungary. In: Rajkai, Z. (ed.) Family and Social Change in Socialist and Post-Socialist Societies: Change and Continuity in East Europe and East Asia. Leiden–Boston: Brill. 210–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagly, Alice H., Carli, Linda H. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution. Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Esseveld, Johanna, Andersson, Gunnar. 2000. Career Life-Forms. In: Vianello, M., Moore, G. (eds.), Gendering Elites: Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialised Societies. London: Macmillan Press. 189–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Falussy, Béla. 2001. Társadalmi hatások és változások a férfiak és nők munkaidőfelhasználásában. In: Nagy, I., Pongrácz, T., Tóth, I. G. (eds.), Szerepváltozások: Jelentés a nők és férfiak helyzetéről 2001. Budapest: TÁRKI. 198–221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleche, Sarah, Lepinteur, Anthony, Powdthavee, Nattavudh. 2018. Gender Norms and Relative Working Hours: Why Do Women Suffer More than Men from Working Longer Hours Than Their Partners? AEA Papers and Proceedings 108:163–68.10.1257/pandp.20181098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, Éva. 2009. Women and Political Engagement in East-Central Europe. In: Goetz, A. M. (ed.), Governing Women: Women’s Political Effectiveness in Contexts of Democratization and Governance Reform. London: Routledge. 112–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, Erwing. 2000. Az én bemutatása a mindennapi életben. Budapest: Pólya.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gregor, Anikó. 2016. A nemi szerepekkel kapcsolatos attitűdök a 2000-es években Magyarországon. Socio.hu 6(1): 89–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajdu, Gábor, Hajdu, Tamás. 2018. Intra-Couple Income Distribution and Subjective Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Gender Norms. European Sociological Review 34(2): 138–156.10.1093/esr/jcy006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harré, Rom, van Langenhove, Luk (eds.). 1998. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hobson, Barbara, Fahlén, Susanne, Takács, Judit. 2014. A Sense of Entitlement? Agency and Capabilities in Sweden and Hungary. In: Hobson, B. (ed.), Work–Life Balance. The Agency and Capabilites Gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 57–92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hochschild, Arlie, Machung, Anne. 2012. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York: Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilonszki, Gabriella (ed.). 2004. Women in Decision-Making. CEE Experiences. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jansen, Lisanne, Weber, Tijmen, Kraaykamp, Gerbert, Verbakel, Ellen. 2016. Perceived Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: A Comparative Study in 29 Countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 57(1–2): 53–68.10.1177/0020715216642267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufman, Gayle, Bernhardt, Eva, Goldscheider, Frances. 2016. Enduring Egalitarianism? Family Transitions and Attitudes Toward Gender Equality in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues 38(13): 1878–1898.10.1177/0192513X16632266
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristóf, Luca. 2012. What Happened Afterwards? Change and Continuity in the Hungarian Elite between 1988 and 2009. Historical Social Research 37(2): 108–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leuze, Kathrin, Rusconi, Alessandra. 2009. Should I Stay or Should I Go? Gender Differences in Professional Employment. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 1413695. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.10.2139/ssrn.1413695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcus, Rachel, Harper, Caroline. 2014. Gender Justice and Social Norms – Processes of Change for Adolescent Girls. ODI Report (https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/8831.pdf).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayrhofer, Wolfgang, Meyer, Michael, Schiffinger, Michael, Schmidt, Angelika. 2008. The Influence of Family Responsibilities, Career Fields and Gender on Career Success: An Empirical Study. Journal of Managerial Psychology 23(3): 292–323.10.1108/02683940810861392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milkie, Melissa A., Peltola, Pia. 1999. Playing All the Roles: Gender and the Work–Family Balancing Act. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(2): 476–490.10.2307/353763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murinkó, Lívia. 2014. A nemi szerepekkel és a családdal kapcsolatos attitűdök európai kitekintésben. Értékek és gyermekgondozás. Szociológiai Szemle 24(1): 67–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Beáta. 2001. Női menedzserek. Budapest: Aula.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Beáta. 2007. A társadalmi nem szerepe a vezetésben Magyarországon. In: Nagy, B. (ed.), Szervezet, menedzsment és nemek. Budapest: Aula. 110–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Beáta. 2009. Női vezetők. In: Nagy, I., Pongrácz, T. (eds.), Szerepváltozások 2009. Budapest: Tárki–SzMM. 52–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagy, Beáta. 2016. Ki áll a sikeres nő mögött? Socio.hu 6(2): 117–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norris, Pippa. 2006. The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation. Acta Politica 41(2): 197–213.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oakley, Judith G. 2000. Gender-Based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics 27(4): 321–334.10.1023/A:1006226129868
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palasik, Mária, Sípos, Balázs (eds.). 2005. Házastárs? Vetélytárs? Munkatárs? Budapest: Napvilág.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powell, Gary N., Graves, Laura M. 2003. Women and Men in Management. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reis, Harry T., Judd, Charles M. 2000. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reissman. 2013. Analysis of Personal Narratives. In: Fortune, A. E., Reid, W. J., Miller, R. (eds.), Qualitative Research in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press. 168–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1999. The Gender System and Interaction. Annual Review of Sociology 25(1): 191–216.10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sayer, Liana C. 2005. Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time. Social Forces 84(1): 285–303.10.1353/sof.2005.0126
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shelton, Beth Anne, John, Daphne. 1996. The Division of Household Labor. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 299–322.10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sík, Endre, Szép, Katalin. 2001. A háztartási termelés pénzértéke és a háztartások munkaidő-gazdálkodása. In: Nagy, I., Pongrácz, R., Tóth, I. G. (eds.), Szerepváltozások. Jelentés a nők és férfiak helyzetéről 2001. Budapest: TÁRKI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, Val, Vinnicombe, Susan. 2004. Why So Few Women Directors in Top UK Boardrooms? Evidence and Theoretical Explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(4): 479–488.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00388.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Nina, Smith, Valdemar, Verner, Mette. 2013. Why Are So Few Females Promoted into CEO and Vice President Positions? Danish Empirical Evidence, 1997–2007. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 66(2): 380–408.10.1177/001979391306600204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solera, Cristina. 2008. Combining Marriage and Children with Paid Work: Changes across Cohorts in Italy and Great Britain. 2008–22. ISER Working Paper Series.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szelényi, Szonja, Szelényi, Iván, Kovách, Imre. 1995. The Making of the Hungarian Postcommunist Elite. Theory and Society 24(5): 615–638.10.1007/BF00993400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thébaud, Sarah, Kornrich, Sabino, Ruppanner, Leah. 2019. Good Housekeeping, Great Expectations: Gender and Housework Norms. Sociological Methods & Research 50(3): 1186–1214.10.1177/0049124119852395
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Usdansky, Margaret L. 2011. The Gender-Equality Paradox: Class and Incongruity between Work–Family Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Family Theory & Review 3(3): 163–178.10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00094.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Várnagy, Réka, Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2012. Üvegplafonok. Pártok lent és fent. Politikatudományi Szemle 21(4): 7–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vianello, Mino, Moore, Gwen. 2000. Gendering Elites: Economic and Political Leadership in 27 Industrialised Societies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-62882-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, Candace, Zimmerman, Don H. 1987. Doing Gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125–151.10.1177/0891243287001002002
]Search in Google Scholar