1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2080-2234
First Published
06 Apr 2009
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Parameters of Foam Rolling, Self-Myofascial Release Treatment: A Review of the Literature

Published Online: 14 Feb 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2019) - Issue 1 (January 2019)
Page range: 36 - 46
Received: 29 Jun 2018
Accepted: 04 Feb 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2080-2234
First Published
06 Apr 2009
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Self-myofascial release (SMR) is a well-known and popular therapy. Its growing popularity is based on high effectiveness and availability. However, there is a lack of agreement about which parameters should be used to optimize the effects of the therapy. The purpose of this review is to critically select and assess current literature and ascertain the values of the follow­ing parameters: (1) therapy duration, (2) volume of applied pressure, (3) speed and (4) frequency of roll, (5) type of roller, (6) the number of treatment applications during one session, (7) the duration of intervals between applications that yield the best results in terms of soft tissue.

The authors launched their research in May 2018. The search strategy included the electronic databases EBSCOhost and PubMed. The following inclusion criteria were assessed:

- English language, high quality manuscripts (evaluation in PEDro scale)

- at least one of the groups using the foam roller, tennis ball or the stick to fascial release

- basic parameters of therapy described.A total 55 articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients can usually withstand a maximum tolerable pressure for 30-120 seconds, repeated 1-3 times, separated by 30 seconds of rest. The intensity of a single rolling movement should be moderate, and the movement should last about 3 seconds. Keeping the roller on particularly sensitive areas is recommended to release tension and enhance blood perfusion.Currently, there is no consensus on an optimal FR programme. However, there is a tendency to use SMR tools with a physiol­ogy-based method to enhance therapeutic efficiency.

Keywords

1. Aboodarda S.J., Greene R.M., Philpott D.T., Jaswal R.S., Millet G.Y., Behm D.G. (2017) The effect of rolling mas­sage on the excitability of the corticospinal pathway. Ap­pl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab., 43(4): 317-323. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0408.10.1139/apnm-2017-040829084391Search in Google Scholar

2. Aboodarda S.J., Spence A.J., Button D.C. (2015) Pain pres­sure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16(295). DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0729-5.10.1186/s12891-015-0729-5458767826416265Search in Google Scholar

3. Bishop C., Aune A.A.G., Turner A.N., Papadopulos K., Budd S., Richardson M., Maloney S.J. (2018) Acute and chronic effects of foam rolling vs eccentric exercise on ROM and force output of the plantar flexors. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1486000.10.1080/02640414.2018.148600029893193Search in Google Scholar

4. Bradbury-Squires D.J., Noftall J.C., Sullivan K.M., Be­hm D.G., Power K.E., Button D.C. (2015) Roller-mas­sager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J. Ath. Train, 50(2): 133-140.10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.03449543125415414Search in Google Scholar

5. Bushell J.E., Dawson S.M., Webster M.M. (2015) Clini­cal relevance of foam rolling on hip extension angle in a functional lunge position. J. Strength Cond. Res., 29(9): 2397-2403.10.1519/JSC.000000000000088825734777Search in Google Scholar

6. Cao T., Hicks M., Campbell D., Standley P. (2013) Dosed myofascial release in three-dimensional bioengineered tendons: effects on human fibroblast hyperplasia, hyper­trophy and cytokine secretion. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther., 36(8): 513-521.10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.07.00424047879Search in Google Scholar

7. Casanova N., Reis J.F., Vaz J.R., Machado R., Men­des B., Button D.C., Pezarat-Correia P., Freitas S.R. (2017) Effects of roller massager on muscle recovery af­ter exercise-induced muscle damage. J. Sports Sci., DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1280609.10.1080/02640414.2017.128060928095747Search in Google Scholar

8. Cheatham S.W., Baker R. (2017) Differences in pressure pain threshold among men and women after foam roll­ing. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies 21: 978-982. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.006.10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.00629037655Search in Google Scholar

9. Cheatham S.W., Kolber M., Cain M., Lee M. (2015) The effects of self myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recov­ery and performance: a systematic review. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 10(6): 827-838.Search in Google Scholar

10. Cheatham S.W., Kolber M.J., Cain M. (2017) Compari­son of video-guided, live instructed, and self-guided foam roll interventions on knee joint range of motion and pres­sure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 12(2): 242-249.Search in Google Scholar

11. Cheatham S.W., Stull K.R. (2018) Comparison of a foam rolling session with active joint motion and without joint motion: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Body­work & Movement Therapies, 22(3): 707-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.011.10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.01130100300Search in Google Scholar

12. Cheatham S.W, Stull K.R., Kolber M.J. (2018) Com­parison of a vibration roller and a nonvibration roller intervention on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0164.10.1123/jsr.2017-016428787233Search in Google Scholar

13. Cheatham S.W., Stull K.R. (2018) Comparison of three different density type foam rollers on knee range of mo­tion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 13(3): 474-482. DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20180474.10.26603/ijspt20180474Search in Google Scholar

14. Couture G., Karlik S., Glass S., Hatzel B. (2015) The ef­fect of foam rolling duration on hamstring range of mo­tion. Open Orthop. J., 9: 450-455.Search in Google Scholar

15. Curran P., Flore R., Crisco J. (2008) A comparison of the pressure exerted on soft tissue by 2 myofascial rollers. J. Sport Rehabil., 17: 432-442.Search in Google Scholar

16. D’Amico A., Paolone V. (2017) The effect of foam roll­ing on recovery between two eight hundred metre runs. J. Hum. Kinet., 57: 97-105.Search in Google Scholar

17. DeBruyne D.M., Dewhurst M.M., Fischer K.M., Wojtanowski M.S., Dural C. (2017) Self-mobilization us­ing a foam roller versus a roller massager: which is more effective for increasing hamstrings flexibility? J. Sport Rehabil., 26: 94-100.Search in Google Scholar

18. Deguzman L., Flanagan S.P., Stecyk S., Montgomery M.M. (2018) The Immediate Effects of Self-administered Dynamic Warm-up, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Fa­cilitation, and Foam Rolling on Hamstring Tightness. Athletic Training & Sports Health Care, 10(3): 108-116. DOI: 10.3928/19425864-20171101-07.10.3928/19425864-20171101-07Search in Google Scholar

19. Do K., Kim J., Yim J. (2018) Acute effect of self-myo­fascial release using a foam roller on the plantar fascia on hamstring and lumbar spine superficial back line flex­ibility. Phys. Ther. Rehabil. Sci., 7(1): 35-40.Search in Google Scholar

20. Fairall R., Cabell L., Boergers R.J. Battaflia F. (2017) Acute effects of self-myofascial release and stretching in overhead athletes with GIRD. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 21: 648-652.10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.04.00128750979Search in Google Scholar

21. Findley F., Shelzola M. (2013) Fascia research congress evidence from the 100y perspective of Andrew Taylor Still.10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.05.01523768282Search in Google Scholar

22. Fleckenstein J., Wilke J., Vogt L., Banzer W. (2017) Pre­ventive and regenerative foam rolling are equally effective in reducing fatigue-related impairments of muscle function following exercise. J. Sports Sci. Med., 16: 474-479.Search in Google Scholar

23. Grabow L., Young J.D., Byrne J.M., Granacher U., Be­hm D.G., (2017) Unilateral Rolling of the Foot did not Affect Non-Local Range of Motion or Balance. J. Sports Sci. Med., 16: 209-218.Search in Google Scholar

24. Griefahn A., Oehlmann J., Zalpour C., von Piekartz H. (2017) Do exercises with the foam roller have a short-term impact on the thoracolumbar fascia? - A random­ized controlled trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 21: 186-193.Search in Google Scholar

25. Grieve R., Clark J., Pearson E., Bullock S., Boyer C., Jar­rett A. (2011) The immediate effect of soleus trigger point pressure release on restricted ankle joint dorsiflexion: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 15(1): 42-49.10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.02.00521147417Search in Google Scholar

26. Hall M., Smith J.C. (2018) The effects of an acute bout of foam rolling on hip range of motion on different tissues. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 13(4): 652-660. DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20180652.10.26603/ijspt20180652Search in Google Scholar

27. Halperin I., Aboodarda S.J., Button D.C., Andersen L.L., Behm D.G. (2014) Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent de­creases in force parameters. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 9(1): 92-102.Search in Google Scholar

28. Hansen A., Beltz N.M., Janot J., Martenson A., Sieg­mann A., Jagielo A., Erdmann A., Wiggins, M. (2016) A dose response relationship between myofascial release and anaerobic power output in active college-aged males. Journal of Fitness Research, 5(2): 10-17.Search in Google Scholar

29. Healey K.C., Hatfield D.L., Blanpied D., Dorfman L.R., Riebe D. (2014) The effects of myofascial release with foam rolling on performance. J. Strength Cond. Res., 28(1): 61-68.10.1519/JSC.0b013e318295656923588488Search in Google Scholar

30. Hinz B., Celetta G., Tomasek J.J., Gabbiani G., Chapon­nier C.H. (2001) Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. Mol. Biol. Cell., 12: 2730-2741.Search in Google Scholar

31. Hodgson D., Lima C., Low J., Behm D. (2018) Four weeks of roller massage training did not impact range of motion, pain pressure threshold, voluntary contractile properties or jump performance. Inter. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 13(5): 835-845. DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20180835.10.26603/ijspt20180835Search in Google Scholar

32. Hong C.Z., Simons D. (1998) Pathophysiologic and elec­trophysiologic mechanisms of myofascial trigger points. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 79: 863-872.Search in Google Scholar

33. Jung J., Choi W., Lee Y., Kim J., Kim H., Lee K., Lee J., Lee S. (2017) Immediate effect of self-myofascial release on hamstring flexibility. Phys. Ther. Rehabil. Sci., 6(1): 45-51.10.14474/ptrs.2017.6.1.45Search in Google Scholar

34. Kelly S., Beardsley C. (2016) Specific and cross-over ef­fects of foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of mo­tion. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 11(4): 544-550.Search in Google Scholar

35. Lee C.L., Chu I.H., Lyu B.J., Chang W.D., Chang N.J. (2018) Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and bal­ance in young adults. J. Sports Sci.,10.1080/02640414.2018.146984829697023Search in Google Scholar

36.(22): 2575-2582. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1469848.36. MacDonald G.Z., Button D.C., Drinkwater E.J., Be­hm D.G. (2014) Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 131-42.10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a123db24343353Search in Google Scholar

37. MacDonald G.Z., Penney M.D.H., Mullaley M.E., Cu­conato A.L., Drake C.D.J., Behm D.G., Button D.C. (2013) An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in mus­cle activation or force. J. Strength Cond. Res., 27(3): 812-821.10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c2bc122580977Search in Google Scholar

38. Macgregor L.J., Fairweather M.M., Benett R.M., Hunt­er A.M. (2018) The effect of Foam Rolling for three con­secutive days on muscular efficiency and range of motion. Sports Med., 4(26), DOI: 10.1186/s40798-018-0141-4.10.1186/s40798-018-0141-4599369229884972Search in Google Scholar

39. Madoni S.N., Costa P.B., Coburn J.W., Galpin A.J. (2018) Effects of foam rolling on range of motion, peak torque, muscle activation, and the hamstrings-to-quad­riceps strength ratios. J. Strength Cond. Res., 32(7): 1821-1830.10.1519/JSC.000000000000246829401195Search in Google Scholar

40. Maher C.G., Sherrington C., Herbert R.D., Moseley A.M., Elkins M. (2003) Reliability of the PEDro Scale for rat­ing quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys. Ther., 83: 713-21.Search in Google Scholar

41. Markovic G. (2015) Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization vs. foam rolling on knee and hip range of motion in soccer players. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.04.01010.1016/j.jbmt.2015.04.01026592226Search in Google Scholar

42. Mauntel T.C., Clark M.A., Padua D.A. (2014) Effective­ness of myofascial release therapies on physical per­formance measurements: A systematic review. Athletic Training & Sports Health Care, 6(4): 189-96.10.3928/19425864-20140717-02Search in Google Scholar

43. McKenney K., Sinclair A., Elder C., Hutchins A. (2013) Myofascial release as a treatment for orthopaedic con­ditions: a systematic review. J. Athl. Train., 48(4): 522-527.10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.17371835523725488Search in Google Scholar

44. Mohr A., Long B., Goad C. (2014) Effect of foam rolling and static stretching on passive hip-flexion range of mo­tion. J. Sport Rehabil., 23: 296-299.Search in Google Scholar

45. Monteiro E.R., Cavanaugh M.T., Frost D.M., Novaes J.S. (2017) Is self-massage an effective joint range-of-motion strategy? A pilot study. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 21: 223-226.Search in Google Scholar

46. Monteiro E.R., Skarabot J., Vigotsky A.D., Brown A.F., Gomes T.M., Novaes J.S. (2017) Acute effects of different self-massage volumes on the FMS overhead deep squad performance. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 12(1): 94-104.Search in Google Scholar

47. Monteiro E.R., Skarabot J., Vigotsky A.D., Brown A.F., Gomes T.M., Novaes J.S. (2017) Maximum repeti­tion performance after different antagonist foam rolling volumes in the inter-set rest period. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 12(1): 76-84.Search in Google Scholar

48. Monteiro E.R., Vigotsky A.D., Novaes J.S., Skarabot J. (2018) Acute effects of different anterior thigh self-massage on hip range of motion in trained men. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 13(1): 104-113. DOI: 10.26603/ij­spt20180104.Search in Google Scholar

49. Monteiro E.R., Vigotsky A.D., Skarabot J., Brown A.F., de Melo Fiuza A.G.F., Gomes T.M., Halperin I., da Silva Novaes J. (2017) Acute effects of different foam rolling volumes in the interset rest period on maximum repeti­tion performance. Honk Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 36: 57-62.10.1016/j.hkpj.2017.03.001638509230931039Search in Google Scholar

50. Morton N.A. (2009) The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demo­graphic study. Aust. J. Physiother., 55: 129-133.Search in Google Scholar

51. Morton R.W., Oikawa S.Y., Phillips S.M., Devries M.C., Mitchell C.J. (2016) Self-myofascial release: no improve­ment of functional outcomes in ,,tight” hamstrings. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform., 11: 658-664.Search in Google Scholar

52. Moseley A.M., Herbert R.D., Sherrington C., Maher C.G. (2002) Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust. J. Physiother., 48: 43-49.Search in Google Scholar

53. Murray A.M., Jones T.W., Horobenau C., Turner A.P., Sproule J. (2016) Sixty seconds of foam rolling does not affect functional flexibility or change muscle temperature in adolescent athletes. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 11(5): 765-776.Search in Google Scholar

54. Ozsu I., Gurol B., Kurt C. (2018) Comparison of the Ef­fect of Passive and Active Recovery, and Self-Myofascial Release Exercises on Lactate Removal and Total Quality of Recovery. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6 (9a): 33-42. DOI: 10.11114/jets.v6i9a.3511.10.11114/jets.v6i9a.3511Search in Google Scholar

55. Patel D.G., Vyas N.J., Sheth M.S. (2016) Immediate ef­fect of application of bilateral self myofascial release on the plantar surface of the foot on hamstring and lumbar spine: a quasi experimental study. IJTA, 32: 94-99.10.20530/IJTA_32_94-99Search in Google Scholar

56. Peacock C.A., Krein D.D., Silver T.A., Sanders G.J., Von Karlovitz K.P. (2014) An acute bout of self - myofascial release in the form of foam rolling improves performance testing. Int. J. Exerc. Sci., 7(3): 202-211.Search in Google Scholar

57. Pearcey G.E.P., Bradbury-Squires D.J., Kawamoto J.E., Drinkwater E.J., Behm D.G., Button D.C. (2015) Foam roll­ing for delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dy­namic performance measures. J. Athl. Train, 50(1): 5-13.10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.01429973525415413Search in Google Scholar

58. Renan-Ordine R., Alburquerque-Sendin F., de Souza D.P.R., Cleland J.A., De-Las-Penas C.F. (2011) Effec­tiveness of myofascial trigger point manual therapy com­bined with a self-stretching protocol for the management of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J. Or­thop. Sports Phys. Ther., 41(2): 43-50.10.2519/jospt.2011.350421285525Search in Google Scholar

59. Phillips J., Diggin D., King D.L., Sforzo G.A. (2018) Ef­fect of varying self-myofascial release duration on sub­sequent athletic performance. J. Strength Cond. Res., Ahead of Print, DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002751.10.1519/JSC.000000000000275130024480Search in Google Scholar

60. Romero-Moraleda B., La Touche R., Lerma-Lara S., Fer­rer-Pena R., Paredes V., Peinado A.B., Munoz-Garcia D. (2017) Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling im­proved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled trial. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3908.10.7717/peerj.3908564224429043110Search in Google Scholar

61. Schroeder A.N., Best T.M. (2015) Is self myofascial re­lease an effective preexercise and recovery strategy? A lit­erature review. Curr. Sports Med. Rep., 4(3): 200-208.10.1249/JSR.000000000000014825968853Search in Google Scholar

62. Schroeder J., Renk V, Braumann K-M., Hollander K. (2017) Acute Foam Rolling effects on contractile proper­ties of the m. biceps femoris. A randomized cross - over pilot study. Ger. J. Exerc. Sport Res., 47: 294-300. DOI: 10.1007/s12662-017-0467-y.10.1007/s12662-017-0467-ySearch in Google Scholar

63. Simmonds N., Miller P., Gemmel H. (2012) A Theoreti­cal Framework for the Role of Fascia in Manual Therapy. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 16: 83-93.Search in Google Scholar

64. Simons D.G. (2002) Understanding effective treatments of myofascial trigger points. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 6(2): 81-88.10.1054/jbmt.2002.0271Search in Google Scholar

65. Skarabot J., Beardsley C., Stirn I. (2015) Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 10(2): 203-212.Search in Google Scholar

66. Stevens D. (2013) Foam rolling as a recovery aid for ath­letes. J. Aust. Strength Cond., 21(2): 43-51.Search in Google Scholar

67. Stull K. (2016) Why should foam rolling be used in group training. American fitness, (4).Search in Google Scholar

68. Sullivan K.M., Silvey D.B.J., Button D.C., Behm D.G. (2013) Roller-massage application to the hamstrings in­creases sit and reach ROM within 5 to 10 seconds with­out performance impairements. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 8(3): 228-36.Search in Google Scholar

69. Tatham J., Robergs R., Cameron M. (2016) The influence of self-myofascial release on countermovement jump force-time variables in pre-elite Academy Rubgy Union Players. J. Athl. Enhanc., 5(5), DOI: 10.4172/2324-9080.1000239.10.4172/2324-9080.1000239Search in Google Scholar

70. Van den Berg F. (2012) Macierz pozakomórkowa. In: Powięź. Badanie, profilaktyka i terapia dysfunkcji sieci powięziowej, red. Saulicz E., Wrocław, Elsevier Urban & Partner, 197-203.Search in Google Scholar

71. Vigotsky A.D., Lehman G.J., Contreras B., Beardsley C., Chung B., Feser E.H. (2015) Acute effects of anterior thigh foam rolling on hip angle, knee angle and rectus femoris length in the modified Thomas test. PeerJ, DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1281.10.7717/peerj.1281458680526421244Search in Google Scholar

72. Weerapong P., Hume P.A., Kolt G.S. (2005) The mecha­nisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med., 35(3): 235-256.10.2165/00007256-200535030-0000415730338Search in Google Scholar

73. Wilke J., Vogt L. (2018) Immediate effects of self - myo­fascial release on latent trigger point sensitivity: a ran­domized, placebo - controlled trial. Biol. Sport, 35(4): 349-354.10.5114/biolsport.2018.78055635852930765920Search in Google Scholar

74. Wines M.J. (2006) A complete meta analysis of myofas­cial release: application and efficacy for strength athletes. University of Carolina, EXSC 499.Search in Google Scholar

75. Wiseman G. (2017) Effect of static stretching or foam rolling on hamstrings range of motion and strength.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo