This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Andersen, N. (2003). Discursive Analytical Strategies. Bristol: Policy Press.AndersenN.2003BristolPolicy Press10.2307/j.ctt1t898ndSearch in Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (1999). Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 36(1), 59–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993736AtkinsonR.1999Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration3615972doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/004209899373610.1080/0042098993736Search in Google Scholar
Beilmann, M., Kalmus, V., Macek, J., Macková, A & Šerek. J. (2018). Youth in the Kaleidoscope: Civic Participation Types in Estonia and the Czech Republic. Sociální studia / Social Studies, 2. 11–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2018-2-11BeilmannM.KalmusV.MacekJ.MackováAŠerekJ.2018Youth in the Kaleidoscope: Civic Participation Types in Estonia and the Czech Republic21133doi: https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2018-2-1110.5817/SOC2018-2-11Search in Google Scholar
Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193BobbioL.2019Designing effective public participation381415710.1080/14494035.2018.1511193Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Browne, J., Coffey, B., Cook, K., Meiklejohn, S., & Palermo, C. (2018). A guide to policy analysis as a research method. Health Promotion International, 34(5), 1032–1044. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day052BrowneJ.CoffeyB.CookK.MeiklejohnS.PalermoC.2018A guide to policy analysis as a research method3451032104410.1093/heapro/day052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.DeanM.1999LondonSageSearch in Google Scholar
Durnová, A., Fischer, F. & Zittoun, Ph. (2016). Discursive Approaches to Public Policy: Politics, Argumentation, and Deliberation. In B.G. Peters & Ph. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy Theories, Controversies and Perspectives (pp. 35–56). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DurnováA.FischerF.ZittounPh.2016Discursive Approaches to Public Policy: Politics, Argumentation, and DeliberationInPetersB.G.ZittounPh.(Eds.),3556New YorkPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4_3Search in Google Scholar
Dodson, J. (2007). Government Discourse and Housing. Aldershot: Ashgate.DodsonJ.2007AldershotAshgateSearch in Google Scholar
Flint, J. (2004). Reconfiguring Agency and Responsibility in the Governance of Social Housing in Scotland. Urban Studies, 41(1), 151–172. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000155722FlintJ.2004Reconfiguring Agency and Responsibility in the Governance of Social Housing in Scotland41115117210.1080/0042098032000155722Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 1–52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.GordonC.1991Governmental rationality: An introductionInBurchellG.GordonC.MillerP.(Eds.),152Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Harris, P. (2001). From Relief to Mutual Obligation: Welfare Rationalities and Unemployment in 20th Century Australia. Australian Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 5–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/144078301128756175HarrisP.2001From Relief to Mutual Obligation: Welfare Rationalities and Unemployment in 20th Century Australia371526doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14407830112875617510.1177/144078301128756175Search in Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and Governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating Governance (pp. 13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.HirstP.2000Democracy and GovernanceInPierreJ.(Ed.),1335OxfordOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Housing2030 Programme (2018). Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Mieszkania2030_Program_01.10.2018.pdf2018Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Mieszkania2030_Program_01.10.2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Huff, R. (2020). Governmentality, Political science. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/governmentalityHuffR.2020Governmentality, Political scienceRetrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/governmentalitySearch in Google Scholar
Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research, 24(1), 39–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817JacobsK.2006Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research2413952doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0811114060059081710.1080/08111140600590817Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, K. (2019). Discourse analysis. In Walters, M. (Ed), Social Research Method (pp. 316–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.JacobsK.2019Discourse analysisInWaltersM.(Ed),316340OxfordOxford University Press10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_9Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., Manzi, T. (2000). Performance indicators and social constructivism: conflict and control in housing management. Critical Social Policy, 20(1), 85–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830002000104JacobsK.ManziT.2000Performance indicators and social constructivism: conflict and control in housing management20185103doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183000200010410.1177/026101830002000104Search in Google Scholar
Jurlina Alibegović, D. & Slijepčević, S. (2015). Attitudes towards Citizen Participation in the Local Decision-Making Process: A Comparative Analysis.Jurlina AlibegovićD.SlijepčevićS.2015Search in Google Scholar
Karpieszuk, W. (2017). Ostry spór o miejski program „Mieszkania 2030”. Agata Nosal-Ikonowicz kontra Joanna Erbel, Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,21355002,a-moze-cel-zero-pustostanow-w-warszawie.htmlKarpieszukW.2017Ostry spór o miejski program „Mieszkania 2030”Gazeta WyborczaRetrieved from https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,21355002,a-moze-cel-zero-pustostanow-w-warszawie.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Lemke, T. (2006). Governance and Governmentality. In A. Harrington, B. L. Marshall & H.-P. Müller (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 232–234). Abingdon: Routledge.LemkeT.2006Governance and GovernmentalityInHarringtonA.MarshallB. L.MüllerH.-P.(Eds.),232234AbingdonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Lévy-Vroelant, C. (2014). Contradictory Narratives on French Social Housing: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Housing Studies, 29(4), 485–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.882498Lévy-VroelantC.2014Contradictory Narratives on French Social Housing: Looking Back and Looking Forward294485500doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.88249810.1080/02673037.2014.882498Search in Google Scholar
Manzi, T. (2015). The Big Society and the Conjunction of Crises: Justifying Welfare Reform and Undermining Social Housing. Housing, Theory & Society, 32(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2014ManziT.2015The Big Society and the Conjunction of Crises: Justifying Welfare Reform and Undermining Social Housing32192410.1080/14036096.2014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Marston, G. & McDonald, C. (2006). Analysing Social Policy: A Governmental Approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.MarstonG.McDonaldC.2006Edward ElgarCheltenhamSearch in Google Scholar
McIntyre, J. & Knight, R. (2016). Revealing the Community Within: Valuing the Role of Local Community Structures Within Evidence-Based School Intervention Programmes. The Urban Review, 48, 647–667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0372-yMcIntyreJ.KnightR.2016Revealing the Community Within: Valuing the Role of Local Community Structures Within Evidence-Based School Intervention Programmes48647667doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0372-y10.1007/s11256-016-0372-ySearch in Google Scholar
McKee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465–486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180McKeeK.2009Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?293465486doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830910518010.1177/0261018309105180Search in Google Scholar
McKee, K. (2011). Sceptical, disorderly and paradoxical subjects: Problematizing the “will to empower” in social housing governance. Housing, Theory and Society, 28 (1), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036091003788120McKeeK.2011Sceptical, disorderly and paradoxical subjects: Problematizing the “will to empower” in social housing governance281118doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1403609100378812010.1080/14036091003788120Search in Google Scholar
Murray Svidroňová, M., Mikušová Meričková, B., Nemec, J. & Kuvíková, H. (2017). Social Housing Provided by the Third Sector: The Slovak Experience. Critical Housing Analysis, 4(2), 67–75. doi: 10.13060/23362839.2017.4.2.387Murray SvidroňováM.Mikušová MeričkováB.NemecJ.KuvíkováH.2017Social Housing Provided by the Third Sector: The Slovak Experience42677510.13060/23362839.2017.4.2.387Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Perlikowski, Ł. (2016). Polityczność i deliberacja – Jürgena Habermasa teoria demokracji [Politics and deliberation – Jürgen Habermas’ theory of democracy]. Dialogi Polityczne/Political Dialogues, 20, 39–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/DP.2016.026PerlikowskiŁ.2016Polityczność i deliberacja – Jürgena Habermasa teoria demokracji [Politics and deliberation – Jürgen Habermas’ theory of democracy]203968doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/DP.2016.02610.12775/DP.2016.026Search in Google Scholar
Polko, A. (2005). Miejski rynek mieszkaniowy i efekty sąsiedztwa. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.PolkoA.2005KatowiceWydawnictwo Akademii EkonomicznejSearch in Google Scholar
Preece, J. (2019). Understanding approaches to tenant participation in social housing. An evidence review, provision. Welsh Government Social Research, Merthyr Tydfil.PreeceJ.2019Welsh Government Social ResearchMerthyr TydfilSearch in Google Scholar
Strengthening Local Communities Programme 2015–2020 (2015). Program Wzmacniania Wspólnoty Lokalnej 2015–2020. Warszawa: Zespół Wzmacniania Wspólnoty Lokalnej.2015WarszawaZespół Wzmacniania Wspólnoty LokalnejSearch in Google Scholar
Rein, M. (2009). The welfare Crisis. In L. Rainwater (Ed.), Social Policy and Public Policy: Inequality and Justice (pp. 89–102). New Brinswick: AldineTransaction.ReinM.2009The welfare CrisisInRainwaterL.(Ed.),89102New BrinswickAldineTransaction10.4324/9781315129686-12Search in Google Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P. & Valverde, M. (2009). Governmentality. Legal Studies Research Paper (09/94), 1–32.RoseN.O’MalleyP.ValverdeM.2009Governmentality09/9413210.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900Search in Google Scholar
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L., J. (2004). Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 512–556. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259197RoweG.FrewerL. J.2004Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda29451255610.1177/0162243903259197Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sabatier, P.A. & Weible, Ch.M. (Eds.) (2014). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.SabatierP.A.WeibleCh.M.(Eds.)2014Boulder, COWestview PressSearch in Google Scholar
Sarvašová, Z., Dobšinská, Z. & Šálka, J. (2014). Public participation in sustainable forestry: the case of forest planning in Slovakia. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7(6), 414–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1174-007SarvašováZ.DobšinskáZ.ŠálkaJ.2014Public participation in sustainable forestry: the case of forest planning in Slovakia76414422doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1174-00710.3832/ifor1174-007Search in Google Scholar
Shupulis, E. (2002). The Dimensions of Public Participation in Housing Policy. In I. Marana & S. Tsenkova (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities in Housing: New Concepts, Policies and Initiatives (pp. 139–144). CIB Working Commission 69 Housing Sociology Proceedings, Riga: The City of Riga.ShupulisE.2002The Dimensions of Public Participation in Housing PolicyInMaranaI.TsenkovaS.(Eds.),139144CIB Working Commission 69 Housing Sociology Proceedings,RigaThe City of RigaSearch in Google Scholar
Strussová, M. & Petríková, D. (2009). Opportunities and Preconditions of Public Participation in Sustainable Settlement Development. Sociológia, 41(4), 354–379.StrussováM.PetríkováD.2009Opportunities and Preconditions of Public Participation in Sustainable Settlement Development414354379Search in Google Scholar
Swisher, R. R. (2016). Neighbourhood. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/neighborhood-sociologySwisherR. R.2016NeighbourhoodRetrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/neighborhood-sociologySearch in Google Scholar
The Housing Policy – Housing2030 (2017). Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Polityka-mieszkaniowa-Mieszkania2030.pdf2017Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Polityka-mieszkaniowa-Mieszkania2030.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Theiss, M. (2009). Governance i instytucje dialogu obywatelskiego – remedium na kryzys czy dowód kryzysu w polityce społecznej? [Governance and institutions of civic dialogue – a remedy for crisis or evidence of crisis in social policy?]. In M. Księżopolski, B. Rysz-Kowalczyk & C. Żołędowski (Eds.), Polityka społeczna w kryzysie [Social policy in crisis] (pp. 309–319). Warsaw: Aspra-Jr.TheissM.2009Governance i instytucje dialogu obywatelskiego – remedium na kryzys czy dowód kryzysu w polityce społecznej? [Governance and institutions of civic dialogue – a remedy for crisis or evidence of crisis in social policy?]InKsiężopolskiM.Rysz-KowalczykB.ŻołędowskiC.(Eds.),309319WarsawAspra-JrSearch in Google Scholar
Vári, A. (2009). Hungarian Experiences with Public Participation in Water Management. Water International, 29(3), 329–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060408691787VáriA.2009Hungarian Experiences with Public Participation in Water Management293329337doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0250806040869178710.1080/02508060408691787Search in Google Scholar
Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: critical encounters. Abingdon: Routledge.WaltersW.2012AbingdonRoutledge10.4324/9780203116937Search in Google Scholar
Warsaw Housing Standard (2018). Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Za%C5%82.-1_Mieszkania2030_Warszawski-Standard-Mieszkaniowy.pdf2018Retrieved from http://2030.um.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Za%C5%82.-1_Mieszkania2030_Warszawski-Standard-Mieszkaniowy.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Warsaw my way (2018). Warszawa po mojemu. Jak działać w mieście i realizować swoje pomysły (2018). Warszawa: Centrum Komunikacji Społecznej Urzędu m.st. Warszawy.Warsaw my way2018WarszawaCentrum Komunikacji Społecznej Urzędu m.st. WarszawySearch in Google Scholar
Zubrzycka-Czarnecka, A. (2019). Social actors in the housing policy process. A constructivist perspective. Warsaw: Elipsa.Zubrzycka-CzarneckaA.2019WarsawElipsa10.33896/978-83-8017-232-6Search in Google Scholar