[1. Ashton, H. and D.W. Watson: Puffing frequency and nicotine intake in cigarette smokers; Brit. Med. J. 3 (1970) 679–681.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Forbes, W.F., J.C. Robinson, J.A. Hanley, and H.N. Colburn: Studies on the nicotine exposure of individual smokers. I. Changes in mouth level exposure to nicotine on switching to lower nicotine cigarettes; Int. J. Addict. 11 (1976) 933–950.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Schulz, W. and F. Seehofer: Smoking behaviour in Germany – The analysis of cigarette butts (KIPA); in: Smoking Behaviour; edited by R.E. Thornton, Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York, 1978, pp. 259–276.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Green, C.R., F.W. Conrad, Jr., K.A. Bridle, and M.F. Borgerding: A liquid chromatography procedure for analysis of nicotine on cellulose acetate filters, a) Bates Number 512314519/4531, Legacy Database, http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/sjv33d00/pdf accessed on October 2, 2008. Paper presented at the CORESTA symposium in Winston-Salem, NC, October 31-November 4, 1982; b) Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 11–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Overton, J.R.: Filtration of cigarette smoke: Relative contributions of inertial impaction, diffusional depo-sition, and direct interception; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 117–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dwyer, R.W. and SG. Abel: The efficiencies of celluose acetate filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 243–253.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Norman, V., A.M. Ihrig, R.A. Shoffner, and M.S. Ireland: The effect of tip dilution on the filtration efficiency of upstream and downstream segments of cigarette filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 178–185.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Baker R.R., M. Dixon, and C. Hill: The incidence and consequences of filter vent blocking amongst British smokers; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 71–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. St. Charles, F.K.: A robust method for determining consumer smoked cigarette yields from filter analytical data; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol.55, Paper 92, 2001, pp.73–74.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Shepperd, C.J., F.K. St. Charles, M. Lien, and M. Dixon: Validation of methods for determining con-sumer smoked cigarette yields from cigarette filter ana-lysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2006) 176–184.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. St. Charles, F.K., G.R. Krautter, M. Dixon, and D.C. Mariner: A comparison of nicotine dose estimates in smokers between filter analysis, salivary cotinine, and urinary excretion of nicotine metabolites; Psycho-pharmacology (Berl.) 189 (2006) 345–354.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. St. Charles, F.K., A.A. Kabbani, and MF Borgerding: Estimating tar and nicotine exposure: Human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. (2009) doi:10.1016/j-yrthp.2009.08.011.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. St. Charles, F.K. and M. Lien: Consumer smoked ciga-rette yields of reduced toxin lights cigarettes compared to other lights brands; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol.58, Paper 39, 2004, pp.44.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Moldoveanu, S.C. and F.K. St. Charles: Differences in the chemical composition of the particulate phase of inhaled and exhaled cigarette mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 290–302.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Moldoveanu, S.C., W.M. Coleman, III, and J. Wilkins: Determination of carbonyl compound in exhaled ciga-rette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 346–357.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Sloan, C.H. and J.G. Curran: Spectrophotometric deter-mination of filtration of cigarette filters; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 57–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. ISO 3308: Routine analytical cigarette smoking machine – Definition and standard conditions; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. ISO 4387: Cigarettes – Determination of total and nico-tine free dry particulate matter using a routine analy-tical smoking machine; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. ISO 10362-1: Cigarettes – Determination of water in smoke condensates, Part 1: Gas-chromatographic method; International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. ISO 10315: Methods for chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco products. Determination of nicotine in smoke condensate of cigarettes (gas-chromatographic method); International Organization for Standardi-zation, Geneva, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. CORESTA Recommended Method No. 9. Determi-nation of nicotine in cigarette filters by gas chromato-graphy analysis; 1989 www.coresta.org/ Recom-mendedMethods/CRM_09.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Federal Trade Commission: Cigarettes: Testing for tar and nicotine content; Fed Regist. 1967, 32, 11178.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Nelson, P.R., A. Campbell, B. Brown, and D. Brown: Storage stability of filters for yield-in-use measure-ments; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol.59, Paper 78, 2005, pp.61.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Minutes of the CORESTA Task Force: “Routine Analytical Chemistry” 3rd meeting in Stockholm; 15th June 198, Copy available from the corresponding author.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ohnishi, A., Y Akinaga, K. Kobayashi, M. Ishii, K. Maeda, and M. Uehara: Studies on the gas chromato-graphic determination of nicotine removal of cigarette filters (I). Determination of nicotine in mainstream smoke and butt filter tips; Nippon Sembai Kosha Chuo Kenkyusho Kenkya Hokoku 114 (1972) 97–104.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. St. Charles, F.K., A.A. Kabbani and M.W. Ogden: Smoking behavior: How close to the tipping do con-sumers actually smoke?; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 435–440.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. CORESTA Recommended Method No. 23. Determi-nation of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine-determination of total particulate matter and pre-paration for water and nicotine measurements; 1991. www.coresta.org/Recommended_Methods/CRM_23. pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. NIST: Chemical Webbook; http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi/91-22-5-UVVis.jdx?JCAMP=C91225&Index=0&Type=UVVis. Accessed April 19, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Life Sciences Research Office: Exposure assessment in the evaluation of potential reduced-risk tobacco products; Lewis, K.D. (Ed.), Life Science Research Office, Bethesda, MD, 2007, pp. 90–91.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Feng, S., S.E. Plunkett, K. Lam, S. Kapur, R. Muhammad, Y. Jin, M. Zimmermann, P. Mendes, R. Kinser, and H.J. Roethig: A new method for estimating the retention of selected smoke constituents in the respiratory tract of smokers during cigarette smoking; Inhal. Toxicol. 19 (2007) 169–179.]Search in Google Scholar
