Open Access

Aqueous Extracts of Organic Mulch Materials Have Nematicide and Repellent Effect on Meloidogyne incognita Infective Juveniles: A Laboratory Study


Cite

Figure 1:

Representation of the sectors identified during the reading of the area choice test.
Representation of the sectors identified during the reading of the area choice test.

Figure 2:

Mortality rates (mean ± CI 95%) of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles of different concen-trations (0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5%) of various leaf litter, straw and compost extracts. (CI 95%: 95% of confidence interval) (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's pairwise comparisons (in the case of compost), Mann–Whitney U test; different letters in the same row indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 level).
Mortality rates (mean ± CI 95%) of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles of different concen-trations (0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5%) of various leaf litter, straw and compost extracts. (CI 95%: 95% of confidence interval) (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's pairwise comparisons (in the case of compost), Mann–Whitney U test; different letters in the same row indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 level).

Figure 3:

Area choice of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles with various leaf litter, straw and compost extracts (treated) and MQ-water (control). (Welch-test, p ≤ 0.05, p-value means that the number of M. incognita juveniles counted on the treated side is significantly different from that on the control side).
Area choice of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles with various leaf litter, straw and compost extracts (treated) and MQ-water (control). (Welch-test, p ≤ 0.05, p-value means that the number of M. incognita juveniles counted on the treated side is significantly different from that on the control side).

Tannic acid content of different concentrations of various leaf litter, straw, and compost extracts.

Tannic acid content (%)

Concentrations (%) 0 0.1 0.5 1 5

Extracts
Maple leaf litter n.d. 0.00521 0.02605 0.0521 0.2605
Oak leaf litter n.d. 0.00241 0.01205 0.0241 0.1205
Sycamore leaf litter n.d. 0.00209 0.01045 0.0209 0.1045
Walnut leaf litter n.d. 0.0008 0.004 0.008 0.04
Straw n.d. 0.00002 0.0001 0.0002 0.001
Compost n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

Values (mean ± CI 95%) of pH of different concentrations of various leaf litter, straw, and compost extracts. (CI 95%: 95% of confidence interval).

pH value

Concentrations (%) 0 0.1 0.5 1 5

Extracts
Maple leaf litter 7.02 ± 0.04 5.33 ± 0.01 4.81 ± 0.02 4.78 ± 0.03 4.43 ± 0.03
Oak leaf litter 7.02 ± 0.04 5.95 ± 0.01 5.42 ± 0.02 5.23 ± 0.03 4.99 ± 0.03
Sycamore leaf litter 7.02 ± 0.04 6.42 ± 0.01 6.09 ± 0.03 5.36 ± 0.03 5.12 ± 0.02
Walnut leaf litter 7.02 ± 0.04 6.30 ± 0.01 6.63 ± 0.03 6.68 ± 0.03 6.21 ± 0.04
Straw 7.02 ± 0.04 6.37 ± 0.02 6.41 ± 0.04 6.44 ± 0.01 6.46 ± 0.03
Compost 7.02 ± 0.04 6.90 ± 0.01 7.29 ± 0.03 7.57 ± 0.03 7.79 ± 0.06

Correlation between the concentration, the tannic acid content, the pH of mulch-derived extracts and the percentage mortality of the juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita.

Extracts Concentration/Mortality Tannic acid/Mortality pH/Mortality
Maple leaf litter 0.732 0.732 0.785
Oak leaf litter 0.710 0.710 0.854
Sycamore leaf litter 0.919 0.919 0.766
Walnut leaf litter 0.718 0.718 0.495
Straw 0.982 0.982 0.267
Compost 0.522 0.108 0.495
eISSN:
2640-396X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other