[
1. García-Mollá R, Linares R, Ayala R. Study of DQE dependence with beam quality on GE essential mammography flat panel. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;12(1):3176. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i1.317610.1120/jacmp.v12i1.3176571858821330969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(14):4201-4220. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/00210.1088/0031-9155/56/14/00221701051
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Gershan V, Ristova MM, Ivanovski Z. Evaluation of the Hologic Selenia FFDMsystem with tungsten tube. In: The First International Conference on Radiation and Dosimetry in Various Field of research, RAD 2012 Proceedings. 2012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Monnin P, Bosmans H, Verdun FR, Marshall N. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:2083-2108. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/208310.1088/0031-9155/61/5/208326895467
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Oberhofer N, Fracchetti A, Springeth M, Ehrenfried M. Digital mammography--DQE versus optimized image quality in clinical environment: an on site study. Proceedings Volume 7622, Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.84415010.1117/12.844150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Ghetti C, Borrini A, Ortenzia O, Rossi R, Ordóñez, PL. Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors. Med Phys. 2008:35:456-463. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.282818510.1118/1.282818518383665
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical evaluation of GE Healthcare Senographe Pristina digital breast tomosynthesis system. 2019. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-ge-senographe-pristina-dbt-system-evaluation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical evaluation of Siemens Mammomat Inspiration digital breast tomosynthesis system − modified detector and software (VB60). 2018. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-siemens-mammomat-inspiration-vb60
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report. Technical Evaluation of Hologic 3Dimensions digital mammography system in 2D mode. 2019. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-hologic-3d-digital-mammography-system-in-2d-mode
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Technical evaluation of Siemens Inspiration PRIME with VB30L software NHS Breast Screening Programme Equipment Report 1503. 2016. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-evaluation-of-siemens-inspiration-prime
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Marshall NW. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:2441-63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/00610.1088/0031-9155/51/10/00616675862
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Fourth edition, supplements, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment - Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices - Part 1-2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in mammography. IEC 62220-1-2:2007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ayala R, Linares R, García-Mollá R. MIQuaELa, software for DQE measuring in digital radiography/mammography. In: Dössel O., Schlegel W.C. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 25/2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_23010.1007/978-3-642-03879-2_230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3225-40. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30810.1088/0031-9155/45/11/30811098900
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Chevalier M, Morán P, Ten JI, et al. Patient dose in digital mammography. Med Phys. 2004;31:2471-2479. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.178459110.1118/1.178459115487727
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: Measurement and comparison against established metrics. Med Phys. 2013;40:101916. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.482036210.1118/1.482036224089918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall N. Effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ) for system optimization purposes in digital mammography. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 8313. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.91119310.1117/12.911193
]Search in Google Scholar
