Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Scalpel Versus Electrosurgery for Skin Incisions in the Facial Regions

1. Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Segelcke D, Schug SA. Postoperative pain - from mechanisms to treatment. Pain Reports. 2017; 2(2): e588. doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588.10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588577017629392204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Diva Shrestha. Evaluation of pain following the use of scalpel versus diathermy for skin incisions in Ear, Nose, Throat and Head and Neck surgeries. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018 Jan-Mar; 16(38): 58–60.10.3126/jnhrc.v16i1.19367Search in Google Scholar

3. Petrovski M, Kaftandziev I, Petrovski D, Zhogovska E, Cvetanovski V, Todorovik L, et al. Surgical propaedeutics, practicum for exercises. 1 edition. Skopje: Makavej, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Scalpel in Wikipedia. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalpel.Search in Google Scholar

5. Пановски М. Електрохирургија. Скопје: Табернакул: 2013.Search in Google Scholar

6. Elbohoty AE, Gomaa MF, Abdelaleim M, Abd-El-Gawad M, Elmarakby M, Diathermy versus scalpel in transverse abdominal incisions in woman undergoing repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Oct;41(10): 1541-6.doi: 10.1111/jog.12776.10.1111/jog.1277626446416Search in Google Scholar

7. Mirza F, Beenish Bareeqa S, Alam JM, Husein SI, Ahmed SI. Pain scores of scalpel versus Diathermy Skin Incisions in Head and Neck Surgeries. Glob J Otolaryngol 2018, Issue 3, vol 16. doi: 10.19080/GJO.2018.16.55593610.19080/GJO.2018.16.555936Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG (1998) High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surgical endoscopy 12(6): 876–888.10.1007/s0046499007339602010Search in Google Scholar

9. Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, et al. (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 17(8): 1228–1230.10.1007/s00464-002-8833-7Search in Google Scholar

10. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, et al. (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. The Journal of urology. 169(2): 697–700.10.1097/00005392-200302000-00067Search in Google Scholar

11. Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y (2005) Comparative study ofelectrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 19(2): 226–228.10.1007/s00464-004-9072-x15573241Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective mid-line laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. PubMed PMID: 11136307.10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x11136307Search in Google Scholar

13. Ayandipo OO, Afuwape OO, Irabor D, Oluwatosin OM, Odigie V. Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Surgery: Official Publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. 2015; 21(1): 43–47. doi:10.4103/1117-6806.153193.10.4103/1117-6806.153193438264225838766Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Charoenkwan K, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Rerkasem K, Matovinovic E. Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD005987. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD005987.pub3.10.1002/14651858.CD005987.pub3648151428931203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Kumar V, Tewari M, Shukla HS. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. Indian J Cancer. 2011 Apr-Jun; 48(2): 216–9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.82904. PubMed PMID: 21768669.10.4103/0019-509X.82904.PubMedPMID:21768669Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mabula JB, Gilyoma JM. Diathermy versus Scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study. East and Central Afric J Surg. 2013; 18(1): 71–7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Talpur AA, Khaskheli AB, Kella N, Jamal A. Randomized, Clinical Trial on Diathermy and Scalpel Incisions in Elective General Surgery. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015; 17(2): e14078. doi:10.5812/ircmj.14078.10.5812/ircmj.14078Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017 May 3. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28467526.10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.[Epubaheadofprint]PubMedPMID:28467526Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Antonakakis S, Xynos E, Zoras O. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Am Surg. 2005 Apr;71(4): 326–9. PubMed PMID: 15943407.10.1177/00031348050710041015943407Search in Google Scholar

20. Ayandipo OO, Afuwape OO, Irabor D, Oluwatosin OM, Odigie V. Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Surgery: Official Publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. 2015; 21(1): 43–47. doi:10.4103/1117-6806.153193.10.4103/1117-6806.153193438264225838766Open DOISearch in Google Scholar